Bartek Nowacki shared a link.
Hi guys, I was reading an interview with John Peacock and there is something interesting about Anatta, Alaya, Rigpa:"It’s about the radically contingent nature of everything that leaves us with nothing left to grasp onto. Dependent Origination, in its universal form and in its sense of human becoming, is unique to world thought and utterly undermining of every other system of thought. It is so challenging, in fact, that both in early India and in current Buddhist teaching, few are able—or willing—to get it totally.Can you say more about this?Some of the movements and trends we see in Western Buddhism actually are akin to what was going on in the ancient period—a reification of some element of thought or experience. First there was an attempt to treat the notion of a person, a puggala, as somehow privileged metaphysically, much like with the modern psychological self. Even after Nāgārjuna reiterated the absolute emptiness of any thing, very soon after we begin to hear that “everything is empty except for one thing,” the mind. A whole metaphysics of the mind springs up, first around a storehouse consciousness (alaya), and then around a primordial or perfected consciousness (rigpa). These ideas of course resonate easily with both Judeo-Christian, Romantic era, and New Age notions in the Western tradition and thus have great popular appeal in modern Dharma teaching.Even if these ideas came initially as a report on experience, which I believe many of them did, it shows a tendency of the human mind to grasp after something to hold onto and to solidify it. This is what is getting us today, “Just fall back on your awareness, just be aware of awareness itself.” When awareness is used as a noun like this, it ends up looking strangely like some Upanishadic Brahman.But the Buddha’s final words in the Mahāparinibbāna Sutta are “Everything is evanescent; strive on diligently.” He is encouraging us to be fearless in the face of radical contingency. He knows that we are going to go running away to the safest haven we can just as quickly as possible. In fact if we try to create a false haven for ourselves, we end up just dukkharing, creating more suffering for ourselves. I think that is the absolute radical nature of it—impermanence so profound and far reaching there cannot be any fixed notion of the self.".Full interview here:7 Comments
- Reply
 - 15h
 - Edited
 
- Reply
 - 15h
 
- Reply
 - Remove Preview
 - 11h
 
- Reply
 - 2h
 
André A. Pais
Admin
The
 nature of mind is supposed to be beyond affirmation and denial. Being 
stuck on affirming it is as bad as being stuck on denying it.
Impermanence
 is a relative teaching (ultimately, all are), because if there is no 
arising, abiding or ceasing, there can't be any "evanescence" either.
(Even if there is no Evanescence, they still dropped a few good albums back in the days! 
)
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
While many teachers and students may reify rigpa, rigpa is not reified in original dzogchen texts and teachings:

AWAKENINGTOREALITY.COM
A Letter to Almaas on Dzogchen and Longchenpa
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
The alaya of mahayana sutras is also not a reified entity.
Thrangu rinpoche explains in his book “pointing out the dharmakaya”:
“The Seventh and Eighth Consciousnesses
Previously,
 we looked at the first six consciousnesses: the eye consciousness, ear 
consciousness, nose consciousness, tongue consciousness, tactile con- 
sciousness, and mental consciousness. Five of these, the consciousnesses
 of the five gates or five senses, are obviously intimately connected 
with the physi- cal body, as they rely upon particular organic supports 
in order to function. These experiences of seeing, hearing, smelling, 
tasting, and feeling are gen- erated in dependence upon the physical 
body. Even the sixth consciousness, which is, in a sense, less 
physically oriented, is still intimately connected with
the body in the way we experience it.
It is the seventh and eighth consciousnesses that we might take to be fun-
damentally
 different from the body. The seventh consciousness is called the 
consciousness that is mental affliction; the eighth consciousness is 
called the alaya consciousness. The eighth consciousness, the alaya, is 
called that because it is itself the ground of consciousness. It is that
 mere cognitive lucid- ity which is the fundamental level of 
consciousness.
Earlier, 
the terms “unstable consciousnesses” and “stable consciousnesses” were 
mentioned. Unstable means a consciousness that is generated when var- 
ious causes and conditions come together and subsequently vanishes when 
those causes and conditions are no longer present together. The first 
six con- sciousnesses are like that. The seventh and eighth are stable, 
which does not mean permanent, but means they are continuous. They never
 stop func- tioning.
The
 eighth consciousness in particular, the alaya consciousness is subtle, 
not obvious; it never becomes more obvious, and it never simply 
disappears or ceases to function altogether. Nor is it permanent, 
because it is not the same consciousness that passes through time. For 
example, the alaya con- sciousness of last year, of last month, of 
yesterday, like the five conscious- nesses or six consciousnesses that 
were generated at those times, has ceased to exist. Nevertheless, the 
habits of those consciousnesses and the habits of the actions performed 
at those times have been retained in the continuity of the alaya; 
therefore, in each moment, the alaya consciousness retains those habits.
 Eventually the results of these karmas, these actions and habits, arise
 or emerge as form, much like the way that, at night, when we’re 
dreaming, the images and habits stored in the daytime emerge as dream 
images. What emerges from the alaya consciousness arises as both body 
and mind, the expe- rience of a body and the experience of a mind.
The
 alaya consciousness retains the particular habits that are implanted 
through one’s actions and habituation throughout time, as well as the 
begin- ningless habit of ignorance. All of these habits that are stored 
in the alaya con- sciousness re-emerge from it in the form of various 
appearances. That is how the eighth consciousness functions, how it 
projects appearances.
The
 seventh consciousness is called the consciousness which is mental 
affliction, or the afflicted consciousness; essentially, it is fixation 
on a self. The seventh consciousness is that faculty which fixates on 
the cognitive aspect of the alaya consciousness and mistakes it to be 
“I,” or a self. On the basis of mistakenly fixating upon that awareness 
aspect of the alaya consciousness as a “self,” it designates “others” as
 well. That’s why it’s called the consciousness which is mental 
affliction because this duality between self and other is the
root
 of all mental affliction, or klesha. This is not the same as when we 
con- sciously think “I.” That happens on the level of the sixth 
consciousness. The seventh consciousness is stable, which is to say, it 
is constant; it is always there. Whether you recollect yourself or not, 
whether you think of yourself or not, there is a fixation on this 
imputed self that is always there, whether you’re eating, talking, in 
the midst of activity, no matter what you’re doing; and it never stops.
The
 alaya consciousness arises as apprehended objects and an apprehend- ing
 subject. The seventh consciousness fixates on the appearance of the 
appre- hending subject as a self and, then, on the appearances of 
apprehended objects as other. In that way, through the action of these 
consciousnesses, the appearances of body and mind arise as distinct from
 one another, in the sense that the body appears as an apprehended 
object, while the mind appears as an apprehending subject. They’re 
distinct in appearing that way, but they’re not, in fact, different from
 one another, since they are merely two aspects of a single appearance 
that arises through the projection of the alaya conscious- ness. In that
 sense, as well, they are beyond being the same or different.”

