Soh

Welcome to Awakening to Reality

Hello! Welcome to the Awakening to Reality site.

Must-Read Articles

You’re welcome to join our archived Facebook group: facebook.com/groups/AwakeningToReality.

Update: The group is closed to new posts, but you can still join to access past discussions.

1) The Awakening to Reality Practice Guide — by Nafis Rahman

(Note: If you have opened this file recently, your browser may show an older version. Please press Ctrl+F5 (Windows) or Cmd+Shift+R (Mac) to force a refresh.)
  • AudioBook on SoundCloud
  • Feedback: "The shortened AtR guide is very good. It should lead one to anatta (the experiential realization of no-self) if they really go and read. Concise and direct." – Yin Ling
  • Download links: PDF  · EPUB (Note: If you experience formatting issues with Apple Books, we recommend using a third-party reader like eBoox to open this EPUB file.)
  • Update: Portuguese translation now available here
  • Update: Simplified Chinese translation (简体中文译本) now available: PDF · EPUB
  • Update: Traditional Chinese translation (繁體中文译本) now available: PDF · EPUB
ATR Practice Guide cover
The Awakening to Reality Practice Guide — cover

2) The Awakening to Reality Guide — Web Abridged Version

3) The Awakening to Reality Guide — Original Version (compiled by Soh)

  • Latest update: 26 January 2026
  • PDF · EPUB

(Note: If you have opened this file recently, your browser may show an older version. Please press Ctrl+F5 (Windows) or Cmd+Shift+R (Mac) to force a refresh.)
  • This is the original 1300+ page document on which the practice and abridged guides are based.
"I also want to say, actually the main ATR document >1200 pages helped me the most with insight... ...I did [read] it twice 😂 it was so helpful and these Mahamudra books supported ATR insights. Just thought to share." – Yin Ling

 

"To be honest, the document is ok [in length], because it’s by insight level. Each insight is like 100 plus pages except anatta [was] exceptionally long [if] I remember lol. If someone read and contemplate at the same time it’s good because the same point will repeat again and again like in the nikayas [traditional Buddhist scriptures in the Pali canon] and insight should arise by the end of it imo.", "A 1000 plus pages ebook written by a serious practitioner Soh Wei Yu that took me a month to read each time and I am so grateful for it. It’s a huge undertaking and I have benefitted from it more that I can ever imagine. Please read patiently." – Yin Ling
ATR Guide preview
ATR Guide preview

Listening to PDFs on Various Devices

How to download PDFs and listen with text-to-speech (TTS).

iPhone (iOS 18+)

  1. Download & unzip: In Safari, download the ZIP. Open Files → Downloads and tap the .zip to extract.
  2. Add to Books: In Files, select the PDFs → ShareBooks (may appear as “Save to Books”).
  3. Listen with Speak Screen: Settings → Accessibility → Read & Speak → Speak Screen → turn on Speak Screen (and optionally Show Controller / Highlighting). Open the PDF in Books, then two-finger swipe down from the top, press Play on the floating controller, or say “Siri, speak screen.” Adjust Voices & Speaking Rate there.

Android

  1. Download & unzip: In Chrome, download the ZIP and extract in the Files app.
  2. Open a PDF: Use Drive PDF Viewer, Acrobat, etc.
  3. TTS options: Turn on Select to Speak in Settings → Accessibility (voices/speed under Text-to-speech output), or use an app like @Voice Aloud Reader.

Windows

  1. Open the PDF in Microsoft Edge.
  2. Click Read aloud (or press Ctrl+Shift+U).
  3. Use Voice options to change voice and speed.
Adobe Acrobat Reader: View → Read Out Loud → Activate → choose a mode; voices in Preferences → Reading.

Mac

  1. Books / Preview: Select text → Edit → Speech → Start Speaking. System-wide: Accessibility → Spoken Content → Speak selection (shortcut Option+Esc).
  2. VoiceOver: Toggle with Command+F5.
  3. Acrobat Reader: View → Read Out Loud → Activate; adjust in Preferences → Reading.
Tip: If a PDF is only scanned images, run OCR (e.g., Acrobat “Recognize Text”) so TTS can read it.
Soh

英文原文: https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2011/03/realization-experience-and-right-view_13.html


2011年 John Tan 写道:

Judith Blackstone,《同理心的基础》(The Empathic Ground):

“虽然在亚洲灵性传承中,非二元证悟被认为是一种高阶的灵性成就,但我发现对许多人来说,它其实是容易契入的。

重要的是要理解,非二元证悟是一个过程。

彻底的非二元证悟据说是极其罕见的,如果这种可能性存在的话。

但初步的证悟需要一到三年的持续修行的意愿。”

我在你的论坛帖子《尚在人世的开悟大师?》中看到了这段引文。我好奇你为何引用它,这似乎并不相关。尽管如此,随着最近对无我(anatta)的洞见,我相信你不再赞同 Judith Blackstone 所说的“彻底的非二元证悟据说是极其罕见的,如果这种可能性存在的话”。事实上,彻底的非二元不仅是可能的,它仅仅是个开始。在无心(no-mind)的领域里,所有的体验皆隐含着非二元与不费力。这对现在的你来说应该已不再是个谜。

提出 Judith Blackstone 的引文并不是为了吹嘘个人的成就,而是为了传达修行中的另一点。那就是除了体验与证量之外,你还必须拥抱“正见”。我曾在文章《从不同角度看证量、体验与非二元体验》中对你提过,我将在此重申:

为了使这种证悟成熟,即便是对“无主宰者”(absence of an agent)的直接体验也是不够的;在知见(view)方面也必须有一个全新的范式转移;

我们必须将自己从一种观念、需求、冲动和倾向中解放出来,不再从一个源头、一个体(essence)、一个中心、一个位置、一个主宰者(agent)或一个控制者去分析、看待和理解我们念念迁流的体验性实相,而是完全安住在无我与缘起之上。

因此,尽管有清晰的证量与正确的体验,若无“正见”,非二元体验的无缝性(seamlessness)与无功用(effortlessness)将难以顺畅地展现。理由虽显而易见却常被忽略;如果在一个修行者的内心深处,他仍然持有二元与实有见(inherent view),他如何在“见时只是景”、“听时只是声”中拥有无缝且不费力的体验?一个修行者如何能毫无保留、敞开且无缝地将“自我”(self)完全超越并融入无常(transience)之中?因此,让自己具备一个能与证量和体验相结合的知见,将有助于修行者更顺畅地进步。理解知见对修行的影响,是我觉得你许多帖子中所欠缺的。你或许想要深入研究一下。

关于对知见的执着,这并不适用于已经通过某些洞见阶段的修行者。在通过某些洞见阶段后的修行者,会不断地废除立足点,并清楚任何窍诀和知见都仅是权设。有告诫修行者的大师,也有鹦鹉学舌般复述大师建议的学生,所以不要盲目跟随。事实上,如果理解正确,知见的每一次深化都是一种舍弃。就无我而言,它是对“自我”(Self)的彻底消除。

“比丘们,即便此知见是如此清净明亮,如果你们贪以此为实、珍爱它、以此为宝、以此为傲,你们是否理解此法如筏喻,是为了舍弃 [即渡过] 而说,而非为了执取?”

“不,世尊。”

“比丘们,即便此知见是如此清净明亮,如果你们不贪以此为实、不珍爱它、不以此为宝、不以此为傲,你们是否便知此法如筏喻,是为了舍弃 [即渡过] 而说,而非为了执取?”

“是的,世尊。”

来源:MN 38 《大爱尽经》 (Mahātāṇhāsaṅkhaya Sutta)

回到你的修行,有三种体验你应该要熟悉:

  1. 在六根出入的感官体验中,频繁出现微细的定境(mini absorption states)。
  2. 扎根于“当下”(here and now)。
  3. 偶尔短暂地体验到自己被超越而进入无休止的活动(根据你的佛法祖师,这是摩诃(Maha)相互连结的开始,亦即一合相)。

我想听听你对以下问题的看法:

  1. 1、2 和 3 是如何关联的?
  2. 以你自己的看法,你下一个自然的进展是什么?
    在你台湾老师的回复中,他向你指出了见诸法与诸相平等。这是你下一个自然的进展吗?如果在灵光一闪的瞬间,你能直觉到你台湾老师所指出的,那么所有的缝隙都将被填满,并获得超越语言局限的传心;否则,体验与证悟是急不来的。心尚未舍弃得足够彻底以去除人为造作,从而直觉到那是平白单纯、无间隙且直接的。

凡缘生者,皆属缘起。
生亦如是,死亦如是。
此亦如是,彼亦如是。
此处如是,当下如是。
故无生、无死、无此、无彼、无此处、无当下。
无“自我”来建立层级使事态复杂。
奇妙单纯,本初清净。
虽万殊而平等!

  1. 扎根于“当下”是值得追求的吗?将此与 Ted 的文章以及关于《无垢》(Stainless)的文章联系起来。你曾写过一篇关于舍弃对“当下”之执着的帖子。这种进步表明了对无我的理解与表达在提升。
  2. “一合相”(相互连结的体验)的体验是如何且为何生起的?为何它不像你的非二元体验那样只是偶尔出现?
  3. 你台湾老师的回复与 Ted 的文章有何关联?

最后,我想评论在 Ted 的文章《“A”即“非A”,“非A”即“A”》中发现的以下三点。它们与上述问题相关,并且对目前的你来说稍显超前。在部队里慢慢去细化你的理解与体验。我会沿途更新。

  1. 万法前来印证自我(The myriad things advance and confirm the self)
  2. 海印三昧(Kaiin Zammai / Ocean-Seal Samadhi)
  3. 不相待,不相对(Do not anticipate, Do not oppose)

1. 万法前来印证自我

只管打坐是“竭尽整个身心(包括‘A’与‘非A’的整个有时[existence-time])去看色、去听声,”道元将其描述为“亲证”(direct experience)。

这种“亲证”不仅是听、看等;它是一个‘我’的生起。”

如《正法眼藏・现成公案》所云:“万法前来印证自我。

如果没有上述粗体引用的文字,整篇文章会很美。这种强调与需要在“当下”寻找立足点并无不同。博客中你发布的另一篇文章《现成公案:实现根本点》,依我之见提供了更准确的翻译:

驱使自己以修证万法,是为迷。
万法前来进行修证自己,是为悟。
….
….
学佛道者,即学自己也。
学自己,即忘自己。
忘自己者,为万法所证也。
为万法所证者,即令自己之身心及他人之身心脱落也。
悟迹不留,此无迹延续无尽。

如果“万法前来印证自我”,那么修行者将留有悟迹。这也让我想起了我在 dharmaoverground 与 Gozen(一位曹洞宗禅师)的对话:

24. 回复:心与观者
2009年4月7日,下午5:46 EDT | 帖子编辑于:2009年4月7日,下午5:57 EDT

“I AM:悖论的是,一个人同时感觉到自己在本质上未被一切现象所触及,却又与它们亲密地合而为一。正如奥义书所言‘汝即是彼’(Thou are That)。”

1.a. 身与心作为构建:另一种看待此点的方式是观察所有因缘和合之物——包括自己的身与心——皆是觉知的对象。也就是说,从本初觉知(primordial awareness)或真我(True Self)的‘根本’观点来看,即使身心也非我(not self)。”

哈 Gozen,我重读了帖子并看到了非我,我以为你指的是无我(anatta),若是那样我就必须得不同意了……:-)。然而,我同意你从吠檀多(真我)立场​​所说的。但深入这点可能会让它显得不必要的复杂。

总而言之,我看待无我的方式是:通过了悟没有独立于所观之外的观察者,从而将无常理解为觉知(Awareness)。实际上,它指的是在看时只有景,无见者。在听时只有声,无闻者。这种体验与“汝即是彼”颇为相似,除了不需要退回至一个源头,因为这被认为是不必要的。完全安住于无常之中,甚至没有丝毫回溯源头的需求,即能找到完全的舒适。因为源头由于其空性(emptiness nature),一直以来就是显现(manifestation)本身。

一直以来都没有尘埃落在镜子上;尘埃从来就是镜子。当我们执着于某一粒特定的尘埃并称其为“镜子”时,我们就无法认出尘埃即是镜子;当某一粒特定的尘埃变得特殊时,所有其他本自照映的本初发生就会突然显得布满尘埃。

任何进一步的讨论,我们得再次私下进行。 :-)
来源:《空性作为无见之见与拥抱无常》

因此,看到所有尘埃从无始以来即是本初清净,是成熟无我洞见的全部目的。以下文字简洁地表达了这一洞见:

……根据道元,此“海印身”(oceanic-body)并不包含万象,也不由万象组成——它就是万象本身。同样的教导也出现在《正法眼藏・画饼》的开头,他在那里断言,“正如诸佛即证(或本证)”,同样“诸法即证”,他说这并不意味着它们仅仅是“一”体或“一”心。

任何未达此证悟者皆不能称为佛教的开悟,这也是你台湾的陈老师在谈到“诸法平等”时希望你清楚的,因为仅有无我的初步瞥见,并不会导致修行者看到现象本身即是本初清净。


2. 海印三昧(Kaiin Zammai / Ocean-Seal Samadhi)

利比亚战争、日本地震、海啸和核危机给世界及其经济造成了许多动荡。过去几周(在生意上)是一段难以应对的时期。对于那些生意与利比亚和日本紧密相关的商人来说,这是一段非常艰难的时期,我能理解他们的恐惧、愤怒和沮丧。我有朋友受到了严重影响,但在这一困难时期,让我们也不要忘记成千上万的生命已经逝去,还有成千上万的人正在受苦……

我真诚希望在这场危机中的所有众生都能免于危险、身心之苦……
_/\_

“海印三昧”一词似乎源自《华严经》。我不熟悉《华严经》,因此对海印三昧知之甚少。当 Amitayus48 最初在你的论坛上发布宣化老和尚关于海印三昧的文章时,我在网上搜索了“海印三昧”(中文字符),但我收集到的许多大师的解释(中文)都是从非二元实体论者(non-dual substantialists)的角度出发的。这颇为令人失望。

重新点燃我对海印三昧兴趣的是以下描述:

佛言:“但有法集,以成此身。起唯法起,灭唯法灭。此法起时,[菩萨]不言‘我起’;此法灭时,不言‘我灭’。”

“前念后念,念念不相待;前法后法,法法不相对。
是名海印三昧。”

我好奇道元从何处得来这段表达如此精妙的引文,但我无法在《华严经》中找到它(Soh 更新:此处整段文字出自《马祖语录》。第一段引文代表马祖(略微缩减)引用的《维摩诘经》,其中维摩诘在教导文殊师利,生病的菩萨应如何看待他的身体。第二段引文是马祖的评论,他接着说此三昧摄入万法,如海纳百川。“Thought moment”(念)这个尴尬的翻译试图保留“nen”(念)一词的歧义,它既指时间瞬间,也指个别的心理事件。该词将在下文中以这两种含义再次出现。 - https://global.sotozen-net.or.jp/pdf/dharma-eye/de14/de14_10.htm)。这段引文似乎是将两部不同的经——《维摩诘经》和(禅宗六祖)慧能的经——拼凑而成的。如果是这样,Ted 说得没错,道元确实创造性地为海印三昧的深刻含义注入了新的光芒。

依我之见,这段引文并非是在表达一种完美透明和清澈的心灵状态——即能所消融成为反映万象的无差别合一(undifferentiated oneness)。这仅仅是一种非二元状态;相反,它是对“在当下的如是瞬间真正发生着什么”这一洞见的圆满。万象以平白的单纯呈现着自己,而万象一直以来就是我们所谓的“心”。质地、织物、形状、鲜艳的色彩,这些处于本初清净中的万象一直以来就是“心”本身!但不要误以为“心”是构成万象的单一实体(substance),因为这是一种扭曲的实有见。它仅仅是一个标签,指代这个包含了宇宙之全体作用(total exertion)的鲜活生起的瞬间。这种“全体作用”并非通过“努力”,任何数量的“努力”都不会导致“全体作用”;这种“全体作用”是通过了悟任何生起之物的二重空性本质。

因此,学心即是学万法。学万法即是学在此瞬间之缘起显现。学此瞬间即是理解“相互连结之宇宙”的全体作用,而此全体作用毫无保留地表达为这个鲜活生起的瞬间——声音……这个呼吸……这个逝去的念头……这明显清晰的景色……

以及
刹那即逝!


3. 不相待,不相对(Do not anticipate, Do not oppose)

上一节本质上是了悟“海”(Ocean)是多余的东西,实际上它并不存在。然而,“无主宰者”洞见的生起并不会自然导致以下的了悟:

“前念后念,不相顾系;前法后法,不相待对。”
(注:此处保留原文翻译的连贯性,或可统一为“念念不相待;法法不相对”)

你曾写过一篇与此相关的帖子,你在其中谈到了第一节与第二节的区别。我认为这比 Ted 所提出的将其视为瞬间中的全体作用更为切题。万象生起的瞬间是过去、现在和未来“全体作用”的完整体现,因此“有时”(existence-time)是一个宝贵的洞见,但它更多是与摩诃(Maha)的体验相关。

为了你修行的目的,在深入“全体作用”之前,建议先通过了悟念“不相顾系,法不相待对”来直接体验“从(生死)链锁中解脱”。依我之见,若无这种对念之链锁的解开(de-linking),并看到显现是不二、非局域且无支撑地持续涌现,海印“三昧”将无法被充分理解。

此外,在“视大海为多余”与直接体验“这持续活动之无休止性中的全体作用”之间,一个成熟无我洞见的过程是必要的。我所说的成熟,指的是终结对心之对象(mind-objects)的任何实有化(reification),无论是“大我/小我”(Self/self)、“此处/当下”、“心”、“身体”、“天气”……——没有“大我/小我”,只有变化的蕴;没有“身体”,只有变化的觉受;除了变化的现象,没有“此处和当下”;除了变化的云、雨和阳光,没有“天气”。如果这一洞见能彻底扩展到任何生起之物,那么这一刻的相互连结与全体作用将变得清晰且明显。以至于当吃苹果时,宇宙在尝它!——苹果、手、味道、喉咙、胃以及一切的一切之全体作用,皆完全被超越进入这单纯的如是(suchness)行动中,无一物被排除在外。此处再次注意,这种“全体作用”并非全神贯注的结果;当修行者充分拥抱了二重空性的“知见”时,它是自然的结果。

总之,我认为这是一篇写自深刻体验性洞见的优秀文章。然而,这篇文章似乎更多强调“A”而非“非A”。虽然提到了“身心脱落”,但它很快被对“全体作用”、扎根于“当下”以及在生灭中肯定“自我”的强调所掩盖。

“此处”与“当下”仅仅是由感官形成的印象。根本上,没有什么是真正的“此处”,没有什么是真正的“当下”,也没有什么是真正的“自我”。虽然宇宙(连同所有因缘条件)正全力运作以使这一刻成为可能,但它是无实(nothing real)的。依我之见,Pegembara 最近在你论坛上发布的帖子,为 Ted 的“全体作用”之洞见提供了一个很好的平衡。

仅是我的一点浅见。 :)

标签:无我、缘起、空性、John Tan、摩诃、Ted Biringer、道元禅师 |

Soh

John Tan shared:



Soh


大家好,

非常高兴地宣布,《觉醒于现实修行指南》(Awakening to Reality Practice Guide)的中文翻译版现已正式发布!

此指南由 Nafis Rahman 汇编与编辑,其内容主要由 John Tan 和 Soh 撰写 。这份指南汇编了我们原版《觉醒于现实:心性指南》(Awakening to Reality: A Guide to the Nature of Mind)中的核心指引与观修练习 。

由于原版指南篇幅浩繁(超过1000页),对于许多读者来说可能稍显沉重且难以消化 。因此,这份经过 Nafis Rahman 精心汇编的修行指南应运而生,旨在为寻求灵性觉醒的同道们提供一份更通俗易懂、更直接的实修手册 。

本指南详细涵盖了从第一阶段“我是”(I AM)的证悟 、到第四阶段“一心” 、第五阶段“无我”(Anatta) ,以及第六阶段“空性”(Emptiness)和“一法具尽”等关键阶段的深刻洞见与具体修法 。

特别感谢 Nafis Rahman 为汇编此指南所付出的巨大努力 。

最后更新:2026年2月9日

简体中文版 (Simplified Chinese):

点击此处下载 PDF: [https://files.awakeningtoreality.com/ChineseAtRPracticeGuide.pdf]
点击此处下载 EPUB: [https://files.awakeningtoreality.com/ChineseAtRPracticeGuide.epub]

繁體中文版 (Traditional Chinese):

点击此处下载 PDF: [ChineseAtRPracticeGuide_TraditionalChinese.pdf]
点击此处下载 EPUB: [ChineseAtRPracticeGuide TraditionalChinese.epub]


[New Release] Chinese Translation of the "Awakening to Reality Practice Guide" Now Available

Hi everyone,

I am very happy to announce that the Chinese translation of the "Awakening to Reality Practice Guide" is now officially released!

This guide was compiled and edited by Nafis Rahman, featuring contents primarily written by John Tan and Soh. It compiles key instructions and contemplative practices from our original "Awakening to Reality: A Guide to the Nature of Mind".

Since the original guide is quite massive (over 1000 pages), it can be somewhat daunting for many readers. Therefore, this condensed practice guide was compiled by Nafis Rahman to serve as a more accessible and direct manual for fellow spiritual seekers.

The guide covers in detail the profound insights and specific practices ranging from Stage 1 "I AM" realization , to Stage 4 "One Mind" , Stage 5 "No-Self" (Anatta) , and Stage 6 "Emptiness" and "Total Exertion".

Special thanks to Nafis Rahman for his tremendous effort in compiling and editing this guide.

Last Updated: 9 February 2026

Simplified Chinese Version:

Download PDF Here: [https://files.awakeningtoreality.com/ChineseAtRPracticeGuide.pdf]
Download EPUB Here: [https://files.awakeningtoreality.com/ChineseAtRPracticeGuide.epub]

Traditional Chinese Version:

Download PDF Here: [ChineseAtRPracticeGuide_TraditionalChinese.pdf]
Download EPUB Here: [ChineseAtRPracticeGuide TraditionalChinese.epub]

Soh

Just a quick note to let everyone know that both the ATR Practice Guide and the Original ATR Guide have been updated.

Please check out the link below to access the latest versions.


The Awakening to Reality Practice Guide and The Original Awakening to Reality Guide

Soh

I recently had a chat with someone who is a devout Roman Catholic. Although he holds deep faith and devotion to Jesus Christ and his religion, he shared a fascinating experience with me: he has been meditating spontaneously, untaught and uninfluenced by anyone.

He told me that when he feels stressed, he simply sits and tries to calm his mind into total silence. His initial motivation wasn't spiritual seeking per se—he wasn't following any specific instructions—but simply a desire to stop his racing mind and alleviate stress. However, in that silence, something profound happened. More than once, he saw or felt a "great bright light." Later on, he began to feel this great light spontaneously even before sleep.

When I asked him to describe it—specifically if the light had a color—he said it is a "colorless brilliance." It wasn't so much something visually seen with the eyes, but rather a felt-sense of brilliance.

He intuited that the deeper essence of his being is that light, a knowing derived from these glimpses, though he hasn't yet reached a total realization.

I affirmed his intuition. I encouraged him to let that light reveal more of itself and suggested he inquire, "Who am I?" I explained that this inner light emanating from within is, in fact, the deeper essence of one's Being. Our fundamental brightness is akin to a brilliance a million times brighter than the sun. It has never been lost, not even for a moment; it is merely obscured by clouds. The sun never leaves; it is only the clouds—our ego, our ignorance, our grasping thoughts—that hide it.

I mentioned that although I am not Catholic, I have read the Bible (including the four Gospels and the Gospel of Thomas), and Jesus himself spoke about that inner light on many occasions. (For more on this, see: All Religions on Light).

I explained that through the millennia, many mystics in Christianity and Catholicism have discovered the essence of this inner light and the essence of God. To bridge our understanding, I told him about the Roman Catholic priest Father Laurence Freeman, who taught meditation to Lee Kuan Yew, the founding father and first prime minister of Singapore.

Father Laurence Freeman and Lee Kuan Yew

Lee Kuan Yew realized his true self through meditation guided by Father Freeman. Freeman guided him to discover his "True Self"—or the "Light of Self-Nature"—through the practice of Christian Meditation. You can watch a discussion regarding this here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RoSGUuAj1o


I told him that this method is elaborated in Father Freeman’s first book, The Light Within: Meditation as Pure Prayer. Freeman defines this practice as "pure prayer" because it strips away the intervention of the "ego." Unlike "head prayer," which involves talking to God or asking for things, this is "prayer of the heart"—placing oneself in the presence of God without the "safety barrier" of one's own thoughts or concepts.

Interestingly, although the main practice of Father Laurence Freeman is contemplative prayer and reciting the mantra 'Maranatha,' he also incorporated self-enquiry into the practices he taught.


The core theological concept here is the "Indwelling Light." Freeman teaches that the Light of Christ is already present within everyone; this is an ontological fact, not a reward we earn through holy behavior. He often uses the metaphor of a stream: the living water of God's love is constantly flowing. We do not need to pump the water; we only need to clear the silt and the residue of the "ego" that blocks the flow.

Freeman further expounds on this by addressing the problem of duality. He explains that typically, our consciousness is divided: "I" am looking at "you," or "I" am thinking about "God." This is duality.

However, the "Indwelling Light" is a state of unified, non-dual awareness. When you enter the silence of the mantra, you are no longer "looking at" the light; you become the light, or rather, realize that your true self is that light. You are participating in the consciousness of Christ himself. As Father Freeman quoted a teacher saying, "The self is the inner light. It is self-evident and it does not become an object of perception."

To enter this state requires what Freeman calls "Poverty of Spirit." He emphasizes that the only cost to obtain this light is the "loss of self." We usually hide behind a "safety barrier" made of our own thoughts and imaginations about God because we prefer a concept of God (which we can control) over the reality of God (which is an irresistible, overwhelming light). To contact this "Indwelling Light," you must be willing to become "poor"—to sit in silence without a single clever thought, theological insight, or holy feeling. It is in this absolute stillness that the shadow of the "ego" dissolves, and the light is revealed.

Crucially, Freeman points out that this light does not stay in the meditation room. Once the impurities are cleared, this light permeates the daily mind. It changes the way you see: you stop projecting your own shadow onto others. You begin to recognize the same "Indwelling Light" in the people you meet—even those you dislike. In his view, this is the foundation of true Christian compassion: seeing the radiance of the same Light refracted through different personalities.



Christ: The Reality of Your Divine Presence

Following this, I shared with him a passage from The Power of Now by Eckhart Tolle, which speaks directly to this realization:

Christ: The Reality of Your Divine Presence

Don’t get attached to any one word. You can substitute “Christ” for presence, if that is more meaningful to you. Christ is your God-essence or the Self, as it is sometimes called in the East. The only difference between Christ and presence is that Christ refers to your indwelling divinity regardless of whether you are conscious of it or not, whereas presence means your awakened divinity or God-essence.

Many misunderstandings and false beliefs about Christ will clear if you realize that there is no past or future in Christ. To say that Christ was or will be is a contradiction in terms. Jesus was. He was a man who lived two thousand years ago and realized divine presence, his true nature. And so he said, “Before Abraham was, I am.” He did not say: “I already existed before Abraham was born.” That would have meant that he was still within the dimension of time and form identity.

The words I am used in a sentence that starts in the past tense indicate a radical shift, a discontinuity in the temporal dimension. It is a Zen-like statement of great profundity. Jesus attempted to convey directly, not through discursive thought, the meaning of presence, of self-realization. He had gone beyond the conscious dimension governed by time, into the realm of the timeless. The dimension of eternity had come into this world. Eternity, of course, does not mean endless time, but no time. Thus, the man, Jesus, became Christ, a vehicle for pure consciousness.

And what is God’s self-definition in the Bible? Did God say, “I have always been, and I always will be?” Of course not. That would have given reality to past and future. God said: “I AM THAT I AM.” No time here, just presence.

The “second coming” of Christ is a transformation of human consciousness, a shift from time to presence, from thinking to pure consciousness, not the arrival of some man or woman. If “Christ” were to return tomorrow in some externalized form, what could he or she possibly say to you other than this: “I am the Truth. I am divine presence. I am eternal life. I am within you. I am here. I am Now.”

Never personalize Christ. Don’t make Christ into a form identity. Avatars, divine mothers, enlightened masters, the very few that are real, are not special as persons. Without a false self to uphold, defend, and feed, they are more simple, more ordinary than the ordinary man or woman. Anyone with a strong ego would regard them as insignificant or, more likely, not see them at all.

If you are drawn to an enlightened teacher, it is because there is already enough presence in you to recognize presence in another. There were many people who did not recognize Jesus or the Buddha, as there are and always have been many people who are drawn to false teachers. Egos are drawn to bigger egos. Darkness cannot recognize light. Only light can recognize light. So don’t believe that the light is outside you or that it can only come through one particular form. If only your master is an incarnation of God, then who are you? Any kind of exclusivity is identification with form, and identification with form means ego, no matter how well disguised.

Use the master’s presence to reflect your own identity beyond name and form back to you and to become more intensely present yourself. You will soon realize that there is no “mine” or “yours” in presence. Presence is one.

Group work can also be helpful for intensifying the light of your presence. A group of people coming together in a state of presence generates a collective energy field of great intensity. It not only raises the degree of presence of each member of the group but also helps to free the collective human consciousness from its current state of mind dominance. This will make the state of presence increasingly more accessible to individuals.

However, unless at least one member of the group is already firmly established in it and thus can hold the energy frequency of that state, the egoic mind can easily reassert itself and sabotage the group’s endeavors. Although group work is invaluable, it is not enough, and you must not come to depend on it. Nor must you come to depend on a teacher or a master, except during the transition period, when you are learning the meaning and practice of presence.

A Note on Kundalini

During our chat, he also asked me about Kundalini. I told him that I am not a practitioner of Kundalini yoga, but I shared my only direct experience with it, which occurred through a dream many years ago:

Sleep Kundalini

An awakened teacher appeared in my sleep in the form of a doctor yesterday and guided me into clear nondual presence. He seemed to telepathically direct me on how to bring my energy up through the spine into my higher (crown?) chakras. As I went into it, I felt this presence and state of absorption grow more and more intense until the bliss was so incredible that I woke up.

Even a while after I woke up, I still felt the bliss energy and vibrations going up from bottom to top through the base of my spine up to my nape through my sushumna nadi (central channel). This was slightly different from previous instances where it was more related to something like the heart chakra.

Then something somewhat miraculous happened—keep in mind my mind was super awake and blissful after I woke up, and although it was 4 a.m., I was not in a dreamlike state. I saw my hands glowing with light. At first, I thought it was coming from my watch, but I checked, and I was not wearing one. I sent a description to John Tan and went back to sleep.

Just wanted to share this interesting experience. Today my state of consciousness felt clearer and cleaner.

Incidentally, years later, I found that Chögyal Namkhai Norbu described something similar regarding Kundalini in his book, The Crystal and the Way of Light, acknowledging it as a valid path to enlightenment within the Dzogchen context.

Further Reflections from Eckhart Tolle

To round off these thoughts, I came across another passage by Eckhart Tolle today that addresses the friction between different levels of religious understanding. It serves as a great reminder of how we can view these differences with wisdom rather than conflict.

Question to Eckhart Tolle:

"My Christian friend thinks I am going to hell because I have not accepted Jesus Christ as my personal savior. I disagree with my Christian (or Catholic) friend. I think my friend is stuck in an ego-based belief system. Who is right, Eckhart?"

Eckhart Tolle answers:

Well, I'm sure your friend thinks he is right. And I'm sure you think you are right. And now you want me to confirm that you are right.

There are certain levels of evolution and there are also certain levels of spirituality. And what works on one level for certain people may not work on another level for others...

At a certain level of consciousness, you regard Jesus as your personal savior. There are other levels of consciousness where you may regard Jesus as a representation of Christ consciousness. And Christians can go that way. You can go very deeply and still be a Christian. You can transcend the lower level belief systems that are associated with not only with Christianity, with any religion...

You can go to a deeper, deeper level of realization and can still have Jesus or Christ as the representation of transcendent consciousness. And then that may still work for you. So there are teachings that are quite profound. For example, A Course in Miracles that use Christian terminology, but take it to a deeper level. Other teachings, Joel Goldsmith... He also took Christianity to a deeper level.

There were medieval Christian mystics like Meister Eckhart, perhaps the most profound, who took Christianity, even medieval Christianity, which was extremely absurdly limited and totally intolerant... and Meister Eckhart took that and he revealed, he interpreted in such a way that it suddenly had enormous depth...

So let your friend be saved and allow him to believe that you are not saved and that you are going to hell. And perhaps one day you can talk to him about, not about presence, but about Christ consciousness. You might even select certain passages in the New Testament where I believe St. Paul, for example, says somewhere, "I must diminish and Christ in me must grow." ... Really, that means Christ, the consciousness, the mind of Christ, as it's called sometimes by St. Paul, the mind of Christ, as opposed to the little me.

One thing about the archetype of suffering that is embodied in the figure of Jesus, because the person who is suffering on the cross is an archetype of human suffering... And over the centuries, it has, I believe, to some extent helped many people to enter the state of surrender when suffering arose for them, because they felt that they relived or reflected the suffering of Jesus on the cross. And by feeling that they went through the same suffering as Jesus on the cross, they were able to surrender to their suffering. And if you surrender, then something else arises, inner peace arises...

The cross is, amazingly, it's a torture instrument and a symbol for the divine in the Christian religion... How can a torture instrument symbolize God or the divine? But there is a deeper meaning behind that. Suffering, which is symbolized by the cross, can become the doorway into the divine. And then the very thing, the worst thing in your life that created the suffering, when you surrender, becomes the doorway into presence... The torture instrument becomes a symbol. The cross is now suddenly a symbol for the divine because it becomes a doorway.

— Eckhart Tolle (Source: "Anna's archive -- Eckhart Tolle Magnum Opus")