Also See: Samādhi of the Treasury of Luminosity
Last Updated 16/06/2025
Introduction: The Three-Fold Path of Light
The Kōmyōzō Zanmai is one of the most luminous and
direct transmissions in the Zen tradition. Authored by Koun Ejō, the direct
Dharma successor of Eihei Dōgen, this text is not a mere philosophical
argument. It is a direct pointing to the nature of reality. In this reflection,
we will explore the meticulous path it lays out for the practitioner, a path
that can be understood in three major phases:
- The
Foundational Realization of Pure Presence ("I AM"): The
initial breakthrough of dis-identifying from the contents of mind
(thoughts, feelings) and recognizing the timeless, formless, ever-present
awareness that is the ground of all experience. This is the discovery of
the "numinous awareness" (靈知, líng zhī).
- The
Initial Non-Dual Insight (Substantialist Nonduality / Non-Dual Radiance):
The realization that all phenomena are not merely inseparable from
but ARE the luminous, radiant display of a single Mind. The
subject-object divide collapses into a unified, radiant field. This is a
profound insight, but as we will see, it can lead to the subtle
reification of Mind as an ultimate, existing ground or Self, where all
things are seen as expressions of this one Self—a deviation from the
Buddhist path.
- The
Profound Insight into Anātman (Insubstantialist Nonduality): A crucial
and liberating realization that paves the way for even deeper insights.
Here, even the single, radiant Mind is seen to be empty of any inherent,
independent self-nature (svabhāva). It is not a substance, but the
crystal clear knowingness not found anywhere apart from the dynamic,
selfless, agentless, and radiantly impermanent process.
Reality is understood not as nouns (a Seer seeing a scene), but as pure,
spontaneous, sentient verbs (seeing-happening). This is the direct
experience of impermanence itself as Buddha-Nature.
In this reflection, we will explore not only Ejō's pointing
but also practical methods of self-enquiry. While we do not know the exact
pedagogical tools Ejō used with his students, the methods discussed here, drawn
from the broader Dharma tradition, can serve as potent tools to directly
realize the profound truths to which he points.
The Prefaces: A Lineage of Reverence
The historical prefaces by Mitsuun and Menpō frame the text
not as a mere book, but as a sacred relic—a direct conduit to the mind of the
enlightened ancestors. Their palpable joy at its rediscovery underscores its
importance. For them, these words were not just teachings about the
light; they were the living transmission of the light. They establish an
unbroken lineage from the ancient Buddhas to Ejō, asserting that what follows
is the authentic, undiluted heart of the Dharma.
Part 1: Defining the Treasury of Light - The Luminous,
Sentient Heart of Reality
Ejō begins by defining his central metaphor: the Treasury
of Light (光明藏, kōmyōzō).
Critically, this is not a cold, empty void. This is a universe that "has a
Heart." Ejō’s light is not the lifeless photon of physics; it is a
vibrant, intelligent, and numinous luminosity (靈光, líng guāng). This
"radiance" is the very texture of reality itself, synonymous with
what other traditions might call pristine consciousness or pure knowingness.
It is the intrinsic clarity and wakefulness of Mind. When Zen masters speak of numinous
awareness (靈知, líng
zhī), they are pointing to this very same principle—an intelligent
light that is not seen with the eyes, but is the very aware,
noetic capacity behind seeing, hearing, and knowing. It is the sentient, aware
quality that makes experience possible.
Realizing the Source: The 'I AM' Before All Things: Ejō
establishes that this Light is the "source of all Buddhas, the inherent
nature of all beings, the total body of all things." This is a direct
pointing towards the first crucial breakthrough on the path: the realization of
the formless Source or Ground of Being. This is the insight into the "I
AM" that was present before Abraham, the "Original Face before your
parents were born." It is the direct, non-conceptual realization of the
Mind that is prior to all sensory and conceptual experience—prior to seeing,
hearing, smelling, tasting, touching and thinking.
The purpose of self-enquiry, as taught in Zen and other
direct paths, is to guide the mind back to this very Source. Questions like, "Without
thoughts, tell me what is your very mind right now?" are not seeking a
conceptual answer like "void" or "hollow." Such answers are
products of the thinking mind. The question is a tool to exhaust the intellect
and create an opening for direct recognition. As Ramana Maharshi explained, the
enquiry "Who am I?" is like the stick used to stir a funeral pyre—it
destroys all other thoughts and is finally destroyed itself, revealing the
doubtless Self that remains.
This realization is not necessarily achieved by entering
deep meditative states where the senses shut down, though such states can
intensify the absorption. As many masters have pointed out, it is a matter of
realizing what is already, undeniably present. You exist, and you are aware
that you exist. This is not just a vague or mental noticing of “Oh, I exist”
but a unshakeable, doubtless realization of the Truth of Being. This dawning of
a direct certainty of your own Beingness, this objectless Presence-Awareness,
is the foundational realization. It is the simple, direct taste of your own
essence before it is clothed in the five senses or labeled by the thinking
mind.
The "All is Mind-Only" Insight (As a
Subsequent, Pedagogic Tool): After the foundational realization of the
formless Source, the path often leads to a distinct, further insight that
directly corresponds to the Yogācāra (Cittamātra) teaching that "the three
realms are mind-only" (三界唯心).
This is the realization that all external objects are nothing but luminous
manifestations of one's own mind, collapsing the naive dualism of an inner self
and an outer world into a single, unified field of Mind.
However, it is absolutely essential to understand the true
intent of this teaching. As explained by Jamgön Mipham Rinpoche, the great
Mādhyamika masters refute the Cittamātra system only when it is misunderstood.
The error lies in reifying the mind as a truly existing substance. As Mipham
says:
"self-styled proponents of the Cittamātra tenets, when
speaking of mind-only, say that there are no external objects but that the mind
exists substantially—like a rope that is devoid of snakeness, but not devoid of
ropeness... they believe the nondual consciousness to be truly existent on the
ultimate level. It is this tenet that the Mādhyamikas repudiate."
Cittamātra, correctly understood, is not a metaphysical
assertion of a transcendental, ultimate Mind (like Brahman). Rather, it is an expedient
pedagogic tool designed to break our attachment to the reality of external
objects. The progressive path, as outlined by Asaṅga
and echoed by Brunnhölzl, is as follows:
- One
first understands that all phenomena are simply the mind.
- Subsequently,
one has the experience that there is no object to be apprehended in the
mind.
- Then,
one realizes that because there is no object, neither is there a subject
(a mind cognizing them).
- Immediately
after, one attains the direct realization of ultimate reality, devoid of
the duality of subject and object.
Jamgön Mipham Rinpoche clarifies this subtle point
perfectly. He explains that while Mādhyamika masters refute a substantially
existing mind, they do not refute the valid, conventional realization of a
non-dual "self-illuminating gnosis." Mipham states:
"If, on the other hand, that consciousness is
understood to be unborn from the very beginning (i.e. empty), to be directly
experienced by reflexive awareness, and to be self-illuminating gnosis without
subject or object, it is something to be established."
This "self-illuminating gnosis" is the profound
ground of non-dual radiance—a direct, valid experience on the path. The
critical point Mipham makes is that this gnosis is established conventionally
as a valid realization while being understood as ultimately empty and
unborn from the very beginning. The substantialist error, which Dōgen and all
Buddhist masters refute, is to mistake this valid realization for a final truth
by granting it its own independent essence, separate from the vivid, selfless
self-knowing/self-luminous appearances cognized. The deeper insight into anātman
deconstructs even this luminous ground, revealing that it has no inherent
existence apart from its own manifestations.
The Realization of "No-Attainment" (Mushotoku):
Ejō’s emphasis on "no-attainment" (无所得, mushotoku) is the key
that unlocks the entire path. This principle is supported by classic Zen
dialectics, such as his reference to the Way being unobtainable by either 'a
mind of existence' or a 'mind of non-existence' (无心, mushin), pointing directly
to the ungraspable, unfindable, and empty nature of Mind itself. The anātman
insight reveals that there is no static, background consciousness or
"Source" to be attained, only the dynamic, radiant foreground of
appearances — everything is no less “I AM” (Mind) than “I AM” when the illusion
of a background substrate is seen through. As John Tan explains, this
"background" is an illusion fabricated by a dualistic mind seeking
something to hold on to, for in truth, even the “I AM” Presence awakened to
initially is not some underlying background behind everything else but merely
another foreground manifestation that is simply one of the ten thousand faces
of nondual Presence, and nondual Presence has no (inherently existing) face of
its own besides these ten thousand faces. The realization of mushotoku
is the direct seeing-through of this illusion. It is not just that Mind is
already here; it is that there is no "Mind" as a separate, attainable
entity apart from the transient phenomena themselves. Realization, therefore,
is not an act of acquisition but the cessation of all seeking, which dawns when
the fundamentally unobtainable, empty nature of reality is directly and
irrefutably seen.
Part 2: The Foundational Realization - Discovering the
Ground of "I AM"
This initial breakthrough is the shift from identifying with
the contents of experience to identifying with the context in
which they appear—the silent, ever-present space of awareness itself. This is
the numinous awareness (靈知,
líng zhī). Ejō uses "Class 1 Kōans" to trigger this
insight by turning attention away from the object of perception and back
towards the perceiver itself.
Linji's Pointing: "Now tell me, what is it
that knows how to preach the Dharma and listen to the Dharma?" The
Enjoyer of Life: "Now tell me: when you piss and shit right now...
whose enjoyment is this, ultimately?"
It is crucial here to distinguish between a mere glimpse or
recognition of this "I AM" Presence, and its full, abiding
realization. Many practitioners may experience fleeting moments of recognizing
the formless witness. This is a vital first step. However, Self-Realization
proper is the direct, unshakeable certainty of this Beingness, a Eureka!
realization beyond all doubt of what one’s Essence or Ground of Being is. The
purpose of sustained self-enquiry is to deepen these initial recognitions until
they mature into an abiding, unshakable Reality.
Expanded Practical Enquiry: Finding the Listener ("I
AM") These are not questions for the intellect, but tools for direct
investigation designed to transform glimpses into certainty.
Method 1: Koan and Direct Pointing (The Zen Method)
- Settle
and Ask: Sit quietly in a comfortable posture. Allow your body and
mind to settle. Become aware of the ambient sounds in the room.
- Turn
the Question Inward: Now, with genuine curiosity, turn your attention
inward and ask Linji's question: "What is it that is hearing
these sounds right now?"
- Investigate
Directly and Relentlessly: Your conceptual mind will immediately try
to answer with labels. Discard them. The instruction is to find out who
is the listener, or what is listening to the sound.
- The
Realization of Objectless Presence: As you search with sustained,
non-conceptual diligence, a profound recognition will dawn: you cannot
find the listener as an object, however, It is undeniably present—clearly,
something is aware of that sound, that awareness and presence is
undeniable—but it is formless, boundless, and objectless. It has no center
and no edge—it is an all-pervading pure Presence. This is not a
realization of nothingness, but a direct certainty of Beingness
that is simply without object. This direct, non-conceptual recognition
of the formless, ever-present knower is the initial insight. Rest
in this open, knowing space of Being.
Method 2: Self-Enquiry and Neti-Neti (The Vedantic Method)
- Systematic
Negation: Ask, "Am I this body?" Feel the sensations
of the body. You are the awareness of them. Conclude firmly:
"Not this." Observe a thought. Ask, "Am I this thought?"
You are the witness of it. "Not this."
- What
Remains? After you have negated everything perceivable, what is left
is the irreducible, undeniable, subjective sense of presence, of knowing,
of being—the "I AM."
Part 3: The Profound Insight into Anātman: From
Non-Dual Radiance to Selfless Impermanence
The realization of "I AM" is a profound and stable
ground, but it is not the end of the Buddhist path. It can become a subtle
trap—a reified "True Self" or Universal Consciousness, a view Dōgen
directly refuted as the Senika heresy. The Buddhist insight into anātman
goes deeper. It involves turning the light of enquiry onto Awareness and
phenomena themselves, revealing them as empty of any permanent, independent, or
substantial self-nature. This progression from a substantialist to an
insubstantialist non-dual view is absolutely critical.
Stage 3a: The Initial Non-Dual Insight: Realizing
Non-Dual Radiance This first non-dual breakthrough is pointed to by "Class
2 Kōans" like Changsha's:
"Zen Master Changsha said to the assembly, 'The
entire ten-direction world is the eye of a monk... the entire ten-direction
world is one's own light.'"
This kōan directs the practitioner to the realization that
the entire world is a seamless, luminous display of Mind. It is the insight
that all appearances ARE the radiance of consciousness (心相一如). This is a profound experience
of non-duality. However, as John Tan clarifies, this initial insight is often
characterized by a "hyperreal" vividness. The world appears
with a magical, stark clarity, but it may not yet be seen as "unreal"
or empty. One can realize that "all is Mind's radiance" and still
subtly cling to "Mind" or "Radiance" as a real, underlying
substance—a substantialist view.
Stage 3b: The Deeper Anātman Insight: Realizing
Insubstantiality and Agentlessness The full insight into anātman
requires a further step: penetrating the empty, selfless, and transient nature
of all phenomena, including the radiant Mind itself. This requires a unified
practice that deconstructs both the agent, self-view, view of inherent
self-nature, and reveals the nondual radiance as appearances simultaneously.
The Bahiya Sutta provides the ultimate instruction for this, and the two
stanzas of contemplation are a direct, practical application of its wisdom.
Expanded Practical Enquiry: A Unified Practice for Anātman
based on the Bahiya Sutta
The Synergy: The Bahiya Sutta's core
instruction—"In the seeing, just the seen"—encapsulates both stanzas.
"Just the seen" means there is no "seer" (Stanza
1) and that the "seen" itself is not a solid object but is merely the
phenomenal display (Stanza 2). As John Tan emphasized, these two aspects must
be realized together for a complete insight.
The Practice:
- Begin
with a Single Perception: Settle your mind and focus on one continuous
sensory experience. For example, look at a cup on a table.
- Apply
the Bahiya Sutta's Instruction to Deconstruct the Experience:
- Strip
Away the Label: Look at the cup. The word "cup" is a
learned concept. Before that label, what is your direct, empirical
experience? It is a collection of colors, shapes, shadows, and
reflections. That is all. Return to this raw, pre-conceptual data.
- Contemplate
the First Stanza (Agentlessness): Now, bring in the first stanza:
"There is seeing, no seer." As you look at these colors
and shapes, search for the independent "seer" who is doing the
looking. Can you find it? You will only find the impersonal process of
seeing itself. There is no agent.
- Contemplate
the Second Stanza (Non-Dual Radiance): Now, bring in the second
stanza, framed by the Bahiya Sutta's radical directness: "In the
seeing, just the seen." The word "just" is the
key. It means there is nothing else there. The practice is to see through
the illusion that there are two separate parts to vision: 1) the seer,
and the act of seeing and 2) the object seen.
- Investigate
deeply: See that the “seeing” and "awareness" do not exist
as something inherent or with its own essence apart from the colors; the
colors ARE the knowing radiance, and that all phenomena are not inert
objects but are the self-luminous, self-knowing radiance of Mind itself.
Likewise, the "seen" (the raw colors and shapes) is not a
separate object "out there" being perceived by a
"seeing" "in here." The visual objects ARE the
colors and shapes, and these colors and shapes ARE the seeing. You
never experience an "unseen color"; they are one single,
indivisible process. The entire visual field is not an object to
your mind; it IS the active, knowing radiance of Mind
itself.
The Liberating Insight of "Not Being 'With
That'": The Bahiya Sutta's instruction culminates in liberation: "Then,
Bahiya, as you are not thereby, you will not be therein. As you are not
therein, it will be clear to you that there is no here or there or in between.
This, just this, is the end of suffering." This points to the final
fruit of the Hinayana path, Arhatship. The crucial, irreversible step on this
path is the direct insight into anātman. When it is directly realized
that the colors ARE the seeing, and that there is no seer, the entire
foundation for a self-view (sakkāya-diṭṭhi)
collapses. This direct seeing-through of the illusion of a self/Self marks the
attainment of Stream-entry (Sotāpanna), after which the final cessation
of suffering described by the Buddha is certain when the practice of sila,
samadhi, prajna is perfected and comes to complete fruition.
The Ultimate Collapse: As Thusness/John Tan points
out, the final deconstruction goes even further. "In hearing, only
sound. No hearing." Ultimately, even the verb "hearing" or
"seeing" is a subtle conceptual overlay. The final insight collapses
the entire structure. There is not even "seeing happening." There is
simply (self-seen/self-aware/self-knowing) radiant color. There is simply
sound. The raw phenomenal datum arises agentlessly as the luminosity of Mind
that is No-Mind.
The Merged, Unified Insight of Anātman: When
this practice matures, the insights from the two stanzas merge into a single,
direct perception of reality. This is the Pellucid No-Self, which has
two key facets, corresponding to the two stanzas:
- Agentless
Unfolding (The Fruit of the First Stanza): Through contemplating
"no seer," "no hearer," you directly realize that
experience unfolds without a central coordinating agent or
"doer." Actions happen, thoughts think, and senses sense, but no
one is authoring them.
- Non-Dual
Radiance (The Fruit of the Second Stanza): Through contemplating
"in seeing just the seen," "in hearing just the
heard," you realize that there is no "awareness", "seeing", or "hearing" apart from the colors; the colors ARE the knowing radiance, and that all
phenomena are not inert objects but are the self-luminous, self-knowing
radiance of Mind itself.
When unified, this insight reveals reality as a seamless,
agentless, and dynamic process. It is a world of verbs, not nouns.
There is no "Seer" seeing a "scene," only seeing-happening,
which ultimately resolves into just scenery. Everything is at zero
distance, gaplessly intimate, self-seen and self-heard without duality, as the
radiant knowingness of Mind that is No-Mind.
The Nature of This Realization (Dōgen's View): This
agentless, selfless process is not a cold, mechanical, or dead unfolding. It is
the very Buddha-Nature itself in dynamic expression. This view is
central to the Sōtō lineage to which Ejō was the direct successor. As Dōgen,
his master, taught:
Dōgen: "Therefore, ahe very impermanency of grass
and tree, thicket and forest is the Buddha nature... Supreme and complete
enlightenment, because it is impermanent, is the Buddha nature."
The "light" of the Kōmyōzō Zanmai is not
the light of a permanent, unchanging ground. It is the brilliant, radiant light
of moment-to-moment arising and ceasing. The final view is not a static abiding
in a peaceful Awareness; it is the dynamic, effortless, and compassionate
living as this transient, radiant reality.
Part 4: Shattering the Obstacles on the Path
With this three-phase model of realization in mind, Ejō’s
warnings about the pitfalls of practice become even clearer. They are precisely
the errors that prevent this progression.
- Seeking
an External Light: One of the most common pitfalls, which Ejō warns
against repeatedly, is to conceptualize "light" as a sensory
object or a phenomenon with specific characteristics. He states that this
luminosity "is not blue, yellow, red, white, or black." He then
describes how "foolish people," upon hearing the word
"light," immediately begin to search for something akin to
"the glow of a firefly, like lamplight, like the luminosity of the
sun, moon, gold, or jade." This act of objectifying the light is a
fundamental error. It keeps the practitioner trapped as a
"seeker" looking for a "sought" object, reinforcing
the very subject-object duality they are trying to transcend. By looking
for a radiance "out there" to be perceived, one misses the
crucial point: the true light is the formless, ever-present knower
itself. Therefore, seeing through this trap is the essential first step,
requiring one to abandon the search for any special appearance and instead
turn the faculty of awareness back upon itself to realize the "I
AM" presence directly.
- The
Trap of Stillness (The "State" vs. "Principle" Error):
Mistaking a quiet mental state for realization is a common pitfall. This
is often confusing a dull, non-conceptual state for the vibrant, clear
light of pristine awareness. The "I AM" is not a dull blankness;
it is bright, luminous knowingness and pure Presence.
- The
Reification of Consciousness: This often arises after the initial
non-dual insight (realizing non-dual radiance). The practitioner feels
they have found the "True Mind" or Universal Consciousness and
reifies it into a subtle new identity. This is why the deeper anātman
enquiry is necessary—to deconstruct this final, subtle "Self.",
not the egoic self but the Great Self with capital ‘S’.
Part 5: The Flame Sermon - Reality as Non-Dual, Total
Radiance
The metaphor of the "great mass of fire" (大火聚, daikaju), which Ejō
invokes, is a powerful and direct pointer to the nature of non-dual radiance as
appearance.
- A
Total, Immersive Field: A great fire is an all-encompassing reality.
It is not an object that one can stand apart from and observe. To approach
it is to be enveloped by its heat and light. This illustrates that there
is no standpoint from which one can observe reality. The deeper truth of anātman
is that there is no "one" to be apart, nor an "it" to
be apart from.
- The
Directness of Appearance: This provides the perfect context for
Yunmen's famous answer. When asked, "What is this luminosity of
yours?", he doesn't point to a mystical source or offer a
philosophical concept. He points directly at the "great mass of
fire" that is the raw, vivid, phenomenal world right in front of
everyone: "The monks' hall, the Buddha hall. The kitchen, the
storehouse, the temple gate."
The kitchen is the fire. The temple gate is
the fire. The luminosity is not hidden behind these appearances; the
appearances themselves, in their direct and undeniable presence, ARE the
luminosity. The "great mass of fire" is not a symbol for anything
else; it is a direct pointer to the totality and immediacy of the radiant
phenomenal field itself. It is the inescapable, all-encompassing Treasury of
Light.
Part 6: The Life of Realization - "The Person of
Old"
The "person of old" (旧时人, kyūjinin) is the one
who lives from this integrated, anātman understanding. The distinction
between a substantial Mind and the world has vanished.
- Effortless
Functioning (无为,
wúwéi): This person is "like a great dead man"
because the separate, striving ego-agent is dead. Yet they are fully alive
and responsive. Their actions are not decided upon; they flow
spontaneously from the totality of the situation. This is the effortless
action that arises when there is no "one" standing apart to
calculate or contrive.
- The
World as Selfless, Radiant Process: For this person, the world is no
longer an external object being perceived by an internal subject. The
colors on the mountains, the changing of seasons, the feeling of the
breath—all are direct, immediate, and selfless expressions of the one,
dynamic, radiant reality. There is no longer a "me" seeing a
"flower." There is only the sentient, selfless verb of
flowering-seeing.
Part 7: The Path After Anātman -
Practice-Enlightenment and the Two Wings
The profound insight into anātman is not a final
endpoint, but a crucial gateway. It marks the end of the seeker and the
path of deliberate "how-to" practice in one sense, but it is the
beginning of a different, deeper mode of practice in another. It is a grave
error to conclude that because there is no-self, there is nothing to do. The
correct understanding is the opposite: because there is no fixed self, there
is only the ongoing flow of ignorance and afflicted activities that need to be
addressed. The insight into anātman becomes the very motivation for
continued, correctly-oriented practice.
Practice-Enlightenment (修証一如, shushō-ittō): This is
where Dōgen's core teaching becomes the living reality of the practitioner. The
insight into anātman reveals that there was never a separation between
practice and enlightenment to begin with. Practice is not a means to an end (a
future enlightenment). Rather, every moment of rightly-oriented practice, such
as shikantaza (just sitting), IS the direct expression and
actualization of awakening and Buddha-nature. This is what Dōgen's teacher
Rujing meant by "dropping off body and mind"—it is not a goal
to be achieved, but the very act of zazen itself, free from the coverings of
desire and delusion.
The Two Wings of Wisdom (Prajñā) and Compassion (Karuṇā): The post-anātman
path is often described as the cultivation of the two wings of a bird, which
must be in balance for flight.
The Maturation of Wisdom: The focus of practice after
the initial anātman insight shifts from acquiring a realization
to the natural functioning and maturation of wisdom (prajñā). This is
not a passive process but an ongoing, dynamic authentication of the truth in
every moment, which deepens the understanding of dependent origination. A
critical aspect of this maturation involves seeing through a subtle layer of
reality that can initially be mistaken for the final truth. It is the
progression from experiencing the "realness" or vividness of
phenomena to simultaneously realizing their empty, dream-like nature.
As John Tan clarifies, there is a crucial distinction
between two intertwined insights:
"Tasting the 'realness' of what appears and what
appears is nothing real are two different insights... It is not only
realizing mere appearances are just one's radiance clarity but that
empty clarity is like a rainbow. Beautiful and clearly appears, but nothing
'there' at all. These two aspects are very important: 1. Very 'vivid',
pellucid, and 2. Nothing real. Tasting either one will not trigger the 'aha'
realization."
The initial non-dual insight is often characterized by this
first aspect: a "hyperreal" vividness and stark clarity. However, the
maturation of wisdom requires the integration of the second aspect: directly
seeing the dream-like, empty, non-arisen, and insubstantial nature of these
very vivid phenomena.
This is precisely what Dōgen, Ejō's master, pointed to when
describing the dream-like relativity of all things. In his Mountains and
Waters Sutra, he illustrates that there is no absolute, independently
existing reality:
Dōgen: "Not all beings see mountains and waters in
the same way... Hungry ghosts see water as raging fire... Dragons and fish see
water as a palace... Human beings see water as water... There is no original
water."
There is no objectively "real" water, only the
contextual, dependently arisen experience of "water-seeing." This
vivid yet empty presence is like a dream. As Dōgen further clarifies, this
dream is not a dull or sleepy state:
“The entire world, crystal-clear everywhere, is a dream; and
a dream is all grasses [things] clear and bright. To doubt the dream state is
itself to dream; all perplexity is a dream as well... Even as we study this,
the very roots and stalks, leaves and branches, flowers and fruits, lights and
hues [of our perception] are all a great dream. Never mistake this, however,
for a dreamy state.”
This entire process of maturation corresponds to the
Mahayana path of purifying the "obstruction of knowledge" (jñeya-āvaraṇa), which, as the
Lankavatara Sutra explains, is distinct from the arhat's liberation from the
"obstruction of passion" (kleśa-āvaraṇa). It is the difference
between realizing the emptiness of the person (pudgala-nairātmya) and
realizing the emptiness of all dharmas (dharma-nairātmya).
The Arising of Great Compassion: This deepening of
wisdom is what gives rise to true, great compassion (mahākaruṇā). As Rujing clarified to
Dōgen, the zazen of a Buddha is different from that of an arhat because it is
grounded in great compassion and the vow to save all beings. This
compassion is not a moralistic choice or a sentimental feeling, but the
spontaneous, unobstructed, and natural expression of wisdom in action. When the
boundary between self and other is truly seen as illusory, the well-being of
another is no longer separate from one's own. This active compassion is the
antidote to the pitfall of a dry, sterile "emptiness sickness,"
allowing one to live out the implications of non-separation in the world.
This continued path is the inseparable union of these two
wings, a dynamic unfolding where practice becomes the effortless expression of
enlightenment itself.
Conclusion: The Living Light of Practice-Enlightenment
Koun Ejō's Kōmyōzō Zanmai provides more than a map to
a destination; it charts the entire territory of liberation. The path guides
the practitioner through a profound sequence of deconstruction: from
discovering the foundational ground of Presence, to seeing the world as Mind's radiant
display, and finally, to the crucial insight into anātman which
dissolves even that ground into a selfless, agentless, and radiantly
impermanent process.
Yet, as Ejō and his master Dōgen make clear, this ultimate
insight is not a sterile endpoint but a vital gateway. It is the end of the
seeker, but the true beginning of practice-enlightenment (shushō-ittō),
where every action becomes the living expression of awakening. The
"Treasury of Light" is fully realized not in a static abiding, but in
the dynamic flight of the two wings of wisdom and compassion. Wisdom matures to
see the dream-like emptiness within the vivid, pellucid display of reality,
while great compassion arises as the spontaneous, functional expression of
non-separation. Thus, the light is not merely realized; it is lived. To engage
with this text is to be invited not just to find the light, but to become its
ceaseless, compassionate, and wise unfolding in the world.