r
o
o
d
n
s
S
e
p
t
t
t
0
m
g
2
6
h
h
f
1
t
a
l
i
6
c
f
1
0
6
m
1
7
f
7
1
a
u
t
6
8
Shared with Your friends
How to be blissful and happy all the time without external stimulus: have a nondual awakening.
7 Comments
Soh Wei Yu 
How I came across this: 
Recently
 I had an exchange of sorts with a number of spiritual teachers, I sent 
them the AtR links and see what their responses are. Most teachers are 
appreciative, and usually they send me some of their own links and I 
read up on them to find out more. 
Gary Weber told me that there is much that is very similar to his work and that I might enjoy my talk
 "The End of Suffering and the Default Mode Network" ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oX1IFUDNtto&feature=youtu.be ) for a scientific approach to awakening with lots of citations and papers.
In
 it he mentioned something about his research and comparison between 
meditators, nondual and psychedelics, and how nondual people have an 
even better state than those on psychedelics. 
So I went to search up on that. Another link: http://happinessbeyondthought.blogspot.com/.../magic...

YOUTUBE.COM
The End of Suffering and the Default Mode Network
- Reply
 - Remove Preview
 - 1h
 
Soh Wei Yu
I wrote this years ago - This is not an exaggeration at all:
Why awakening is so worth it
From
 time to time, people ask me why should they seek awakening. I say, 
awakening will be the best thing that happen in your life, I guarantee 
it. It is worth whatever effort you put into it. You won't regret it. Or
 as Daniel M. Ingram said, "Would I trade this for anything? Maybe world
 peace, but I would have to think about it. Until then, this totally 
rocks, and missing out on it would be barking crazy from my point of 
view."
What is it like? I can only give a little preview, an excerpt of what I wrote taken from the AtR guide: 
"Personally,
 I can say from direct experience that direct realization is completely 
direct, immediate, and non-intellectual, it is the most direct and 
intimate taste of reality beyond the realm of imagination. It far 
exceeds one’s expectations and is far superior to anything the mind can 
ever imagine or dream of. It is utter freedom. Can you imagine living 
every moment in purity and perfection without effort, where grasping at 
identity does not take hold, where there is not a trace or sense of 'I' 
as a seer, feeler, thinker, doer, be-er/being, an agent, a 'self' entity
 residing inside the body somewhere relating to an outside world, and 
what shines forth and stands out in the absence of a 'self' is a very 
marvellous, wondrous, vivid, alive world that is full of intense 
vividness, joy, clarity, vitality, and an intelligence that is operating
 as every spontaneous action (there is no sense of being a doer), where 
any bodily actions, speech and thoughts are just as spontaneous as heart
 beating, fingernails growing, birds singing, air moving gently, breath 
flowing, sun shining - there is no distinction between ‘you are doing 
action’/’you are living’ and ‘action is being done to you’/’you are 
being lived’ (as there is simply no ‘you’ and ‘it’ - only total and 
boundless spontaneous presencing). 
This
 is a world where nothing can ever sully and touch that purity and 
perfection, where the whole of universe/whole of mind is always 
experienced vividly as that very purity and perfection devoid of any 
kind of sense of self or perceiver whatsoever that is experiencing the 
world at a distance from a vantagepoint -- life without ‘self’ is a 
living paradise free of afflictive/painful emotions, where every color, 
sound, smell, taste, touch and detail of the world stands out as the 
very boundless field of pristine awareness, sparkling 
brilliance/radiance, colorful, high-saturation, HD, luminous, heightened
 intensity and shining wonderment and magicality, where the surrounding 
sights, sounds, scents, sensations, smells, thoughts are seen and 
experienced so clearly down to the tiniest details, vividly and 
naturally, not just in one sense door but all six, where the world is a 
fairy-tale like wonderland, revealed anew every moment in its fullest 
depths as if you are a new-born baby experiencing life for the first 
time, afresh and never seen before, where life is abundant with peace, 
joy and fearlessness even amidst the apparent chaos and troubles of 
life, and everything experienced through all the senses far surpasses 
any beauty previously experienced, as if the universe is like heaven 
made of glittering gold and jewels, experienced in complete gapless 
directness without separation, where life and the universe is 
experienced in its intense lucidity, clarity, aliveness and vivifying 
presence not only without intermediary and separation but without center
 and boundaries - infinitude as vast as an endless night sky is 
actualized every moment, an infinitude that is simply the vast universe 
appearing as an empty, distanceless, dimensionless and powerful 
presencing, where the mountains and stars on the horizon stands out no 
more distant than one’s breath, and shines forth as intimately as one’s 
heartbeat, where the cosmic scale of infinitude is actualized even in 
ordinary activities as the entirety of the universe is always 
participating as every ordinary activity including walking and breathing
 and one’s very body (without a trace of an ‘I’ or ‘mine’) is as much 
the universe/dependent origination in action and there is nothing 
outside of this boundless exertion/universe, where the purity and 
infinitude of the marvellous world experienced through being cleansed in
 all doors of perception is constant. (If the doors of perception were 
cleansed every thing would appear to man as it is: Infinite. For man has
 closed himself up, till he sees all things thro' narrow chinks of his 
cavern. - William Blake) 
You
 know all the Mahayana Sutras (e.g. Vimalakirti Sutra), old Zen talks 
about seeing this very earth as pure land and all the Vajrayana talks 
about the point of tantra as the pure vision of seeing this very world, 
body, speech and mind in its primordial unfabricated purity as the 
Buddha field, palace, mandala, mantra and deity? Now you truly get it, 
you realise everything is really just like that when experienced in its 
primordial purity and perfection, and that the old sages have not been 
exaggerating at all. It is as much a literal and precise description of 
the state of consciousness as it is a metaphor. As I told John Tan 
before, Amitabha Sutra’s description of pure land resembles my living 
experience here and now. “To me it just means anatta. When what’s seen, 
tasted, touched, smelled are in clean purity, everywhere is pure land.” -
 John Tan, 2019. "If one is free from background self, all 
manifestations appear in clean purity in taste. Impurities from what I 
know come from mental constructions." – John Tan, 2020
This
 is a freedom that is free from any artificially constructed boundaries 
and limitations. And yet, this boundlessness does not in any way lead to
 the dissociation from one’s body, instead one feels more alive than 
ever as one’s very body, one grows ever more somatic, at home and 
intimate as one’s body. This is not a body normally conceived of, as the
 boundaries of an artificially solidified body that stands separated 
from the universe, dissolve into energetic streams of aliveness dancing 
and pulsating throughout the body in high energy and pleasure, as well 
as sensations of foot steps, movement, palm touching an object, where 
the body is no longer conflated with a constructed boundary of ‘inside’ 
and ‘outside’, ‘self’ or ‘other’, where no trace of an ‘inside’ and an 
‘outside’ can be found in one’s state of consciousness - there’s only 
one indivisible, boundless and measureless world/mind - only this 
infinitude of a dynamic and seamlessly interconnected dance that we call
 ‘the universe’. This is better than any passing peak experiences be 
they arisen spontaneously, in meditation or through the use of 
psychedelic substances. And yet, despite experiencing life to it fullest
 every moment without any veils, in complete openness and utter 
nakedness, nothing gains a foothold in consciousness, for as vivid as 
they are, they leave no trace just as a bird leaves no tracks in the 
sky, an empty and lucid display such as a gust of wind and the glittery 
reflections of moon on the ocean waves - appearing but nothing ‘there’ 
or anywhere. All these words and descriptions I just wrote came very 
easily and spontaneously in a very short time as I am simply describing 
my current state of experience that is experienced every moment. I am 
not being poetic here but simply being as direct and clear as possible 
about what is immediately experienced. And this is only a figment that I
 am describing. If I were to tell you more of what this is like, you 
would not believe it. But once you enter this gateless realm you shall 
see that words always pale in comparison."
Labels: Anatta |
- Reply
 - 1h
 - Edited
 
Yin Ling
Agree. Don’t need even bliss, just reduce suffering is already bliss. 
It’s Probably the only way or method that works to drop my suffering
- Reply
 - 49m
 - Edited
 
Yin Ling
Btw soh the link doesn’t work on my phone somehow
- Reply
 - 35m
 

HAPPINESSBEYONDTHOUGHT.BLOGSPOT.COM
Which is more pleasurable...psychedelics, the nondual state, or sex?
- Reply
 - Remove Preview
 - 31m
 - Edited
 
Soh Wei Yu
Yin Ling oh you are right. Cannot view from phone only pc.
- Reply
 - 10m
 

HAPPINESSBEYONDTHOUGHT.BLOGSPOT.COM
Which is more pleasurable...psychedelics, the nondual state, or sex?
Reply
Remove Preview
Mr. JP
I
 agree with Daniel Ingram that perpetual bliss models of awakening are 
unrealistic at best. Impermanence will always come and knock us back 
down to reality and suffering again at some point, even with the arising
 of non-dual wisdom. Much more realistic to hope for reduced mental 
suffering and anxiety than for total elimination of all negative or 
painful emotions forever imo.
I'd
 be very skeptical of anyone who claims to be in a bliss state 24/7 365 
days a year. I'd think they were trying to sell me something. Just not 
the way reality works unfortunately, even for enlightened people.
- Reply
 - 8h
 - Edited
 
AWAKENINGTOREALITY.COM
The Incredible Bliss of Anatta
- Reply
 - Remove Preview
 - 7h
 
Soh Wei Yu
Total removal of all suffering is also possible but you must reach arahant stage. Or eighth bhumi or buddha
- Reply
 - 7h
 
Mr. JP
Soh
 Wei Yu Oh I know that anatta, emptiness, the non-dual wisdom of 
suchness - those realizations bring unimaginable feelings of peace. I've
 had those experiences, levels of bliss I never thought possible. But no
 bliss state remains forever. Why? It just goes back to impermanence. 
The
 teachings are fundamentally built on impermanence. Understanding the 
fact of impermanence is part and parcel of understanding emptiness. From
 a metaphysical standpoint, no impermanence = no emptiness. So to throw 
that out at some point and just say "No, now permanence IS possible, 
because we can be happy and blissful 24/7" is a huge contradiction. This
 is also addressed well by Ingram in MCTB.
It's
 the same problem that he brings up when talking about the emotional 
perfection models. The false idea that somehow enlightenment will make 
one completely morally pure and perfect and never able to do anything 
bad again. Well we know that's not true just by looking at all the 
supposedly enlightened masters who have done horrible things to others 
in their personal lives. Perfection in any sense, emotionally, 
psychologically, morally, is imo a misguided goal.
- Reply
 - 7h
 - Edited
 
Mr. JP
Soh
 Wei Yu Eh, I don't buy that that's possible even if you reach that 
level. Again, look at all the masters who've had high realization who 
did terrible things from a moral standpoint. Some of them were 
definitely Arhats. Sogyal Rinpoche? Hurting others usually comes from 
one's one emotional pain in some sense. What about Trungpa? Reading his 
books, he certainly seems like he had high realization, probably an 
Arhat, but he wasn't exactly a model human being, and sure seems like he
 suffered a lot.
So do you then not believe Daniel Ingram when he says he's an Arhat?
- Reply
 - 7h
 - Edited
 
Soh Wei Yu
Mr. JP
 sogyal rinpoche is definitely Not an arahat, in fact not even a 
sotapanna in my books. I only saw him describe I Am and possible nondual
 experience but not anatta insight.
I
 have also expressed my skepticism about Trungpa, i doubt he even 
reached stream entry. He described no mind experience but not anatta 
realisation
- Reply
 - 5h
 - Edited
 
![[insight] [buddhism] A reconsideration of the meaning of "Stream-Entry" considering the data points of both pragmatic Dharma and traditional Buddhism](https://external.fsin5-1.fna.fbcdn.net/emg1/v/t13/497192918622639776?url=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-fhDka_KL-J8%2FT8sSVsC4ZSI%2FAAAAAAAAAFA%2FPTCxfF6kLnw%2Fs1600%2Fchansmallerjz1.png&fb_obo=1&utld=blogspot.com&stp=c0.5000x0.5000f_dst-emg0_p196x196_q75&ccb=13-1&oh=00_AT_dKaYOGOs5L3rAzGEQ-ZLqiZC1aMRJwmyeHzHQ_z2iPw&oe=62BA6023&_nc_sid=c504da)
AWAKENINGTOREALITY.COM
[insight]
 [buddhism] A reconsideration of the meaning of "Stream-Entry" 
considering the data points of both pragmatic Dharma and traditional 
Buddhism
- Reply
 - Remove Preview
 - 5h
 - Edited
 
Soh Wei Yu
Mr. JP john tan told me this year to make the above thread to the top of the reading list in our blog.
It clarifies much misunderstandings.
- Reply
 - 5h
 
Soh Wei Yu
It is rare even among masters to realise anatta
Even though to realise anatta is also not an end
“Though
 buddha nature is plainness and most direct, these are still the steps. 
If one does not know the process and said ‘yes this is it’… then it is 
extremely misleading. For 99 percent [of ‘realized’/’enlightened’ 
persons] what one is talking about is "I AMness", and has not gone 
beyond permanence, still thinking [of] permanence, formless… ...all and 
almost all will think of it along the line of "I AMness", all are like 
the grandchildren of "AMness", and that is the root cause of duality.” -
 John Tan, 2007
- Reply
 - 5h
 
Mr. JP
Soh
 Wei Yu My point is that having insight into the nature of reality does 
not change the fundamental fact that every experience, whether blissful 
or suffering, is temporary. Since even enlightened people still live on 
the level of the relative, all of their experiences, good or bad, will 
be transitory, as will the experiences of ordinary people. 
To
 believe that there is a possible permanent, unchanging state of being 
that can be attained in any sense is to go directly against the Buddha's
 foundational teaching of impermanence, which is at the very core of the
 dharma.
And
 my other point is that having insight into the nature of reality does 
*not* make one perfect in any way - morally, psychologically or 
otherwise. I know that because I have personally had deep insights and I
 am in no way perfect.
And
 it isn't just that if I had more insights I would be perfect, or if I 
trained or practiced and meditated more then I would be perfect at some 
point. None of us can ever achieve complete perfection because of the 
fact that life moves in cycles and, again, everything changes. 
We
 make mistakes, we fail, then we succeed, then we fail again. Just like 
Summer changes to fall and fall changes to Winter and Winter changes 
back to Spring. We don't control that process of cycling because we 
*are* the process. That's why mental suffering can never be completely 
removed. Whatever bliss we might be experiencing will cycle and 
transform back to suffering at some point.
Even
 enlightened people who have seen directly into dharmata, suchness, with
 the light of non-conceptual wisdom are still subject to this 
impermanence simply because they still live in the relative world where 
change is a brute, unavoidable fact.
- Reply
 - 4h
 - Edited
 
Soh Wei Yu
Realizations and attainments are permanent: they permanently put an end to fetters and tendencies.
For example, stream entry puts an end to the first three fetters permanently. This is why realization is not an experience.
- Reply
 - 4h
 
Soh Wei Yu
Do read this also:
SUTTACENTRAL.NET
suttacentral.net | 502: Bad gateway
- Reply
 - Remove Preview
 - 4h
 
Mr. JP
Soh
 Wei Yu Nope, you can't get away with saying that without denying 
impermanence, and thus undermining a core tenet of the teachings. You 
are trying to have your cake and eat it too. 
Even if you are talking about permanent realizations, that still d… 
See more
- Reply
 - 3h
 - Edited
 
Geovani Geo
Mr. JP,
 that is purely theoretical. I mean "theoretical" in an impersonal way. 
The thing is that you are imagining an enlightened dude and eventual 
events that could happen to him. These are all images in a mind.
- Reply
 - 3h
 
Soh Wei Yu
You fail to understand something: impermanence only applies to conditioned phenomena. 
Impermanence does not apply to cessation, which is an unconditioned phenomena (although also empty).
Nirvana (cessation) is not impermanent. It is however unreal and a mere designation. 
Also I wrote this on reddit two months ago:
Anatta,
 unlike the other two seals, covers both conditioned and unconditioned 
phenomena such as cessation or unbinding [nirvana]. (The three marks 
are: sabbe saṅkhārā aniccā — "all saṅkhāras (conditioned things) are 
impermanent" sabbe saṅkhārā dukkhā — "all saṅkhāras are unsatisfactory" 
sabbe dhammā anattā — "all dharmas (conditioned or unconditioned things)
 are not self" https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwji_JSwlMb3AhXCmuYKHdlvBUkQFnoECAwQAw&url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FThree_marks_of_existence&usg=AOvVaw0zJ_UvB957Jv1sHHe5M8-V )
EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG
Three marks of existence - Wikipedia
- Reply
 - Remove Preview
 - 3h
 
Mr. JP
Geovani
 Geo It's not really theoretical, the point is to show that realization 
is in no way permanent because there are things that could happen to 
reverse those realizations even if they did occur.
- Reply
 - 3h
 - Edited
 
Soh Wei Yu
Also
 Daniel agrees with me that awakening is about the permanent end of 
something (the illusion of self), not about an experience. I will see if
 I can find what he said when I get home.
- Reply
 - 3h
 - Edited
 
Mr. JP
Soh
 Wei Yu The absolute is always approached through the 
relative/conventional. You know this. Dharmadhatu is cognized through 
non-dual wisdom/rigpa, which is itself relative. It is the nature of an 
*appearance* which is known to be suchness (the "ultimate"). All this 
also implies an agent on the relative level who is doing the 
cognizing/abiding in non-dual wisdom. 
All
 of this - non dual wisdom, the appearance which is being cognized, and 
the agent which is doing the cognizing, are relative (and ultimately 
empty) phenomena. Being empty, all of them are impermanent and 
conditioned.
Nibbana
 may not be conditioned, but the relative agent who knows Nibbana is 
completely conditioned, impermanent, and transitory in every way. And 
since the agent only approaches or knows Nibbana through his or her 
Wisdom, and since that Wisdom is conditioned and impermanent, it cannot 
be so that that person can possibly remain permanently in an unchanging 
state of non-dual equipoise.
- Reply
 - 3h
 - Edited
 
Geovani Geo
Mr. JP, "realization" as a state must be impermanent. But, just as an exercise of imagination: can space be ended?
- Reply
 - 3h
 
Mr. JP
Geovani Geo Are you referring to the basic spaciousness of phenomena in their "real" nature beyond elaboration and concepts?
- Reply
 - 3h
 
Geovani Geo
Mr. JP, Yes. For space is just an analogy.
- Reply
 - 3h
 
Mr. JP
Geovani
 Geo Well I would say no then, as phenomena in their basic spaciousness,
 as Dharmadhatu, are beyond the four extremes of existence, 
non-existence, both or neither, so to talk about anything ending or not 
ending ultimately doesn't make sense.
- Reply
 - 3h
 - Edited
 
Geovani Geo
Mr. JP.
 Yes. Also, as I see it, the same with permanent and not permanent. And 
the "space" of the analogy is inert while the underlying meaning is not.
 What this "not" could mean? Lucid? Aware? Open and receptive like Lao 
Tzu's "spirit of the valley"?
- Reply
 - 2h
 
Geovani Geo
So,
 when we regard the meaning of "enlightened person" one must be careful 
to not conceptualize. Enlightenment and Dharmkaya are the same.
- Reply
 - 2h
 
Mr. JP
Geovani
 Geo We have to distinguish between the ultimate and the relative levels
 of things. As I see it, the relative world of appearances, or the world
 of impermanence, still retains it's validity even after one has seen 
the ultimate. 
If
 the entire path, which takes places on the relative level, were 
realized to be a cognitive error upon seeing the ultimate beyond 
fabrications, what incentive would the Buddha have had to teach after 
his awakening?
If
 the relative did not retain it's validity after one's seeing the 
ultimate, then to talk of only being able to approach the ultimate 
through the relative, as is asserted by Nagarjuna and many other 
masters, would be nonsensical.
- Reply
 - 2h
 - Edited
 
Geovani Geo
Mr. JP,
 of course the relative it maintains its validity. Nonetheless, its 
interesting how we visualize such "approaching the ultimate through the 
relative". We eventually see it as something getting closer to some 
other. But that is not the case at all - imo. As I see it, in fact, the 
relative stops making noises, stops claiming that it is other then the 
ultimate. It is the claims that stop, no? Also, not that the relative 
comes to see the ultimate, but there is the realization that the claims 
where conceptual clouds seemingly obstructing the seeing - not 
specifically a seeing of the relative. Such seeing is entity-less. I 
don't know.... maybe you (or others) see it otherwise.
- Reply
 - 2h
 - Edited
 
Yin Ling
Saw this on my newsfeed, just gonna say one or two words. 
U seem to be closing ur door to a place where complete liberation is possible. 
Realisation is a permanent shift in perception. It is not a myth for me. 
Suffering can drop. Massively. 
But no one can convince u, not even the buddha himself. 
It’s up to u to work hard and find out. 
 hope u don’t close ur doors too early. Just a light comment, I don’t want to debate. 
- Reply
 - 1h
 
Soh Wei Yu
Well said.
Also I was just reminded of an explanation by Kyle Dixon, I liked it including Tsele Natsok Rangdrol's analogy.
User avatar
level 1
krodha
·
3 yr. ago
·
edited 3 yr. ago
Nirvana
 is a species of cessation, and is defined as a total cessation of cause
 for rebirth in the three realms. Once the cause of affliction is 
exhausted there is no longer a means for it to re-arise, hence 
buddhahood is irreversible and permanent.
Nirvāṇa
 is the total exhaustion of one's ignorance regarding the nature of 
phenomena, and for that reason nirvāṇa is described as a cessation. What
 ceases is the cause for the further arising and proliferation of 
delusion regarding the nature of phenomena, which is precisely the 
cessation of cause for the arising of the cyclical round of rebirth in 
the three realms we call "saṃsāra."
For
 this reason, nirvāṇa is said to be 'permanent', because due to the 
exhaustion of cause for the further proliferation of saṃsāra, saṃsāra no
 longer has any way to arise.
Tsele Natsok Rangdrol:
You
 might ask, 'Why wouldn't confusion reoccur as before, after... 
[liberation has occured]?" This is because no basis [foundation] exists 
for its re-arising. Samantabhadra's liberation into the basis [wisdom] 
itself and the yogi liberated through practicing the path are both 
devoid of any basis [foundation] for reverting back to becoming a cause,
 just like a person who has recovered from a plague or the fruit of the 
se tree.
He
 then states that the se tree is a particular tree which is poisonous to
 touch, causing blisters and swelling. However once recovered, one is 
then immune.
Lopon Tenzin Namdak also explains this principle of immunity:
Anyone
 who follows the teachings of the Buddhas will most likely attain 
results and purify negative karmic causes. Then that person will be like
 a man who has caught smallpox in the past; he will never catch it again
 because he is immune. The sickness of samsara will never come back. And
 this is the purpose of following the teachings.
and from Lopon Kunga Namdrol:
Buddhahood
 is a subtractive process; it means removing, gradually, obscurations of
 affliction and obscurations of knowledge. Since wisdom burns these 
obscurations away, in the end they have no causes for returning; and 
further, the causes for buddhahood are permanent leading to a permanent 
result.
11
Give Award
Share
Report
Save
User avatar
level 2
unkeptzen
·
3 yr. ago
Nirvana is a species of cessation
I guess you could say that nirvana is the cessation of conditionality which reveals the unconditioned.
1
Give Award
Share
Report
Save
- Reply
 - 43m
 - Edited
 
Soh Wei Yu
User avatar
level 3
krodha
·
3 yr. ago
·
edited 3 yr. ago
"I guess you could say that nirvana is the cessation of conditionality which reveals the unconditioned."
Nirvana
 is defined as pratisaṃkhyā-nirodha or “analytical cessation.” Which is 
the total cessation of cause for rebirth in the three realms.
As
 for “unconditioned,” there is an unconditioned nature of so-called 
conditioned existents, specifically; that they are figments of ignorance
 and are therefore non-arisen and free from extremes. But there is no 
"the unconditioned" as a stand-alone separate capacity.
From Nāgārjuna:
Since
 arising, abiding and perishing are not established, the conditioned is 
not established; since the conditioned is never established, how can the
 unconditioned be established?
1
Give Award
Share
Report
Save
User avatar
level 4
unkeptzen
·
3 yr. ago
I
 would just add that in the Pali discourses the only dhamma that is 
unconditioned is nibbāna (nirvana). All other dhammas are conditioned.
Also to help you on your journey, Zen Ma-tsu says:
The conditioned is the function of the unconditioned; the unconditioned is the essence of the conditioned.
Both
 the Buddha and Jesus understood that the universe and everything in it,
 even our thoughts, are only the "shape of spirit" (shape being 
conditioned; spirit being unconditioned). But the shape hides the spirit
 if one is not, personally, awakened to the spirit. God too is spirit 
(Jhn 4:24). For those of us who have meditated in deep forests and in 
caves, setting the books aside, the unconditioned has to be personally 
witnessed. Peace to you pandita
1
Give Award
Share
Report
Save
User avatar
level 5
krodha
·
3 yr. ago
"I
 would just add that in the Pali discourses the only dhamma that is 
unconditioned is nibbāna (nirvana). All other dhammas are conditioned."
In
 Mahāyāna there are three unconditioned dharmas, which are space and two
 forms of cessation, nirvana is one of those cessations.
1
Give Award
Share
Report
Save
- Reply
 - 42m
 - Edited
 
Cheng Chen
I’ve known about Gary Weber’s work for a while, but didn’t know he was still active. Soh Wei Yu you’re in touch with him? Is he still putting out content?
- Reply
 - 1h
 
Soh Wei Yu
Cheng Chen Only just one e-mail. I spam the 7 stages and On Anatta, Emptiness article to all the spiritual teachers in the world 


- Reply
 - 1h
 
Soh Wei Yu
Even Eckhart Tolle thanked me too. 
- Reply
 - 1h
 
Soh Wei Yu
Gary's latest blog post seem to be in 2018 https://happinessbeyondthought.blogspot.com/

HAPPINESSBEYONDTHOUGHT.BLOGSPOT.COM
happinessbeyondthought
- Reply
 - Remove Preview
 - 1h
 - Edited
 
Soh Wei Yu
Cheng Chen But the e-mail reply is from today.
- Reply
 - 1h
 - Edited
 
Geovani Geo

Soh Wei Yu "I spam the 7 stages and On Anatta, Emptiness article..."
Reply



