- Reply
- 2d
- Reply
- 2d
- Reply
- 2d
- Reply
- 2d
- Reply
- 1d
- Reply
- 1d
- Reply
- 2d
- Reply
- 2d
- Reply
- 2d
- Reply
- 2d
- Reply
- 2d
- Reply
- 2d
- Reply
- 2d
- Reply
- 2d
- Reply
- 2d
- Reply
- 2d
- Edited
- Reply
- 1d
- Edited
- Reply
- 1d
- Reply
- 1d
- Reply
- 1d
- Edited
- Reply
- 1d
- Reply
- 1d
- Edited
- Reply
- 1d
- Edited
- Reply
- 1d
- Reply
- 1d
- Reply
- 1d
- Reply
- 1d
- Edited
- Reply
- 1d
- Edited
- Reply
- Remove Preview
- 1d
- Reply
- 1d
- Edited
- Reply
- 19h
- Reply
- Remove Preview
- 19h
- Reply
- Remove Preview
- 19h
- Reply
- Remove Preview
- 19h
- Reply
- 18h
- Edited
- Reply
- Remove Preview
- 8h
- Reply
- Remove Preview
- 8h
- Reply
- Remove Preview
- 8h
- Reply
- 3h
- Edited
- Reply
- 3h
- Reply
- Remove Preview
- 3h
- Reply
- Remove Preview
- 2h
- Reply
- 2h
- Edited
- Reply
- 2h
- Reply
- 2d
- Reply
- 1d
- Reply
- 1d
- Reply
- 1d
- Reply
- 1d
- Reply
- 1d
- Reply
- 1d
- Reply
- 1d
- Reply
- 14h
- Reply
- Remove Preview
- 9h
- Edited
- Reply
- 9h
- Edited
- Reply
- Remove Preview
- 9h
- Edited
- Reply
- 9h
- Reply
- 9h
- Reply
- 5h
- Reply
- 1d
- Reply
- 1d
- Edited
- Reply
- 11h
- Reply
- Remove Preview
- 8h
- Reply
- Remove Preview
- 8h
- Reply
- 8h
- Reply
- 2h
- Reply
- 20h
- Reply
- 13h
- Edited
- Reply
- 12h
- Reply
- 12h
- Edited
- Reply
- 11h
- Reply
- 8h
- Reply
- 8h
- Reply
- 8h
- Reply
- Remove Preview
- 8h
- Reply
- 44m
- Reply
- 5m
- Edited
- Reply
- 4m
- Reply
- Remove Preview
- 3m
- Reply
- 3m
- Edited
Chappell IsomSoh Wei Yu do you have any pointers for second path realization/dealing with the fetters of craving and aversion?Soh Wei YuAdminChappell Isom It's late here and I'm going to do some meditation and rest.But first of all, before speaking about the further paths which I can perhaps another day, John Tan, Yin Ling, myself, and most other members and admins I know, do not agree with either 1) Daniel Ingram's definition of stream entry and 4 paths, which defines stream entry as a fruitional blackout cessation, third path/anagami as nondual, fourth path/arahantship as anatta, nor, 2) kevin schanilec's teachings, which mixes fetter model with 'overcoming layers of duality and self', which goes like this: stream entry is impersonality, anagami is roughly nondual and arahantship is just anatta.In both models, their arahantship is simply AtR's anatta realization, aka Thusness Stage 5, etc. To us, impersonality and nondual does not even reach the sutta's stream entry (and I have read thousands of pages of the pali canon suttas so I am very clear that stream entry actually refers to the anatman realization and the end of self view includes all substantialist nondual views as well as being an eternal witness and so forth, therefore anything short of anatman realization will not meet the criteria of ending the self view which is achieved by a stream entrant).See my article: https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/.../different-degress... -- Different Degress of No-Self: Non-Doership, Non-dual, Anatta, Total Exertion and Dealing with PitfallsYou should read this to have a better understanding of what we understand here as 'stream entry': https://www.reddit.com/r/streamentry/comments/igored/insight_buddhism_a_reconsideration_of_the_meaning/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf%20 and https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/.../insight-buddhism...What some of those teachers I mentioned, that calls "arahantship" is simply what we here consider to be "stream entry", and I say this with certainty backed by the scriptures and what the realized Buddhist masters taught.I apologize if I have told you this before, as I speak to too many people and lose track of who and what I spoke to/spoke with and spoke on.Soh Wei YuAdminAlso, not going to write anything more as its late, but will paste some excerpts from Kyle Dixon because I can relate:"...The anatta definitely severed many emotional afflictions, for themost part I don't have negative emotions anymore. And either the anattaor the strict shamatha training has resulted in stable shamatha wherethoughts have little effect and are diminished by the force of clarity. I'm also able to control them, stopping them forany amount of desired time etc. But I understand that isn't what isimportant. Can I fully open to whatever arises I would say yes. Iunderstand that every instance of experience is fully appearing toitself as the radiance of clarity, yet timelessly disjointed andunsubstantiated.." - Kyle Dixon, 2013“The conditions for this subtle identification are not undone until anatta is realized.Anattarealization is like a massive release of prolonged tension, this is howJohn put it once at least. Like a tight fist, that has been tight forlifetimes, is suddenly relaxed. There is a great deal of power in theevent. The nature of this realization is not often described intraditional settings, I have seen Traga Rinpoche discuss it. Jñāna isvery bright and beautiful. That brightness is traditionally the “force”that “burns” the kleśas.Thereservoir of traces and karmic imprints is suddenly purged by thiswonderful, violent brightness. After this occurs negative emotions aresubdued and for the most part do not manifest anymore. Although this iscontingent upon the length of time one maintains that equipoise.” - KyleDixon, 2019“Prajñā “burns” karma, only when in awakened equipoise. Regular meditation does not.” - Kyle Dixon, 2021Soh Wei YuAdminKyle Dixon's writings are all worth reading, such as https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/.../advise-from-kyle... and https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/.../a-sun-that-never...Advice from Kyle DixonAWAKENINGTOREALITY.COMAdvice from Kyle DixonSoh Wei YuAdminCan you also tell us more about yourself, what are your progress and breakthroughs so far or insights etc.- Reply
- 11h
- Edited
- Reply
- 9h
- Reply
- 1h
- Edited
- Reply
- 9h
- Reply
- 6h
- Reply
- 2h
- Edited
- Reply
- 58m
- Reply
- 2h
- Reply
- 1h
- Reply
- 32m
- Reply
- Remove Preview
- 18m
- Reply
- 18m
- Reply
- 16m
- Reply
- 15m
- Edited
- Reply
- Remove Preview
- 8m
- Edited
Mr O's Post
Once you’ve realized maha and spontaneous perfection, what’s the point of formal practice of meditation anymore?
I’ve been doing vipassana and shikantaza for years, but lately, formal sitting practice seems entirely superfluous. All the inquiry into how self and objects work, all the focus on deconstructing perception, and other such fascinating and all-consuming questions, seem to have just run their course.
1) It’s entirely unimportant to practice and it can just be let go of.
2) One should keep practicing because it’s a good maintenance practice (i.e., for continual processing of mind-body patterns, for unwinding energetic blocks on a daily basis, or just as a relaxation or restorative practice). If so, then probably something like qigong or yoga would be even more beneficial than vipassana or shikantaza, wouldn’t it?
3) It’s not strictly necessary, but it is desirable to keep practicing because one can develop different types of knowledge, siddhis, or other powers or abilities that can be used to help others. Not to peruse any goal on my part, but just to be a more effective bodhisattva in the world. In that case, I don’t think it actually matters what kind of practice one engages in. For example, I never did tonglen, but maybe that would be helpful and I should take it up. Or any other practice that seems like it would have some benefit.
EDIT suggested by some of the comments made below:
4) Perhaps it's actually necessary to keep up intensively meditating in order to avoid "backsliding" out of awakening or to continue to maintain an awakened state?
I’d appreciate any thoughts from those of you who can relate. Thank you 

Comments
Albert Hong

Mr. O
there is a lot of value in walks in nature. doing what we truly enjoy.
and really if we hold view then all of that can be exactly the same as
formal practice. but we can also make believe that and totally destroy
our path.
lol no one but ourselves truly knows when we are actually practicing or not.
Mr. O
Author
Albert Hong
what do you mean by “hold view”? Sounds like you’re saying some kind of
efforting is still required to maintain the realization?
Albert Hong

Mr. O
oh most certainly. definitely a lot of effort on my end. I have a LOT
of bad habits. and definitely hav absolutely no realization.
Mr. O
Author
Albert Hong
I'm sure you don't want any advice about that, but I'll just share
that, for me, when the efforting seemed like it was becoming
counterproductive I found the Radiance Sutras quite helpful. It's not
Buddhist though, so make of it what you will....
Albert Hong

also
if one has no distinction between formal and informal then one has
elevated informal to the momentum of formal practice. not the other way
around. but that level of attainment or actualization of view in your
continumm would have to be continually tested.
i
personally go back and forth from retreat practice to living a very
demanding conventional life of working. i find practice when i can
control the conditions to be much easier aka retreat. but when dealing
with a lot of movement and action and people. then its much difficult to
practice, yet alone hold any profound views.
thus
for myself i need to do a lot of formal practice to have a momentum so
that daily life doesn't overwhelm me. and at times i fail and at times i
succeed.
and at rare instances performance and practice are unified. then to just live life in lots of action is exactly the view.
but that's rare. hahaja
Albert Hong

tbh
i think at the point where formal practice isn't necessary one would do
formal practice anyways out of the sheer habit cultivated from decades
of sitting. so i'm not really sure its a choice.
Mr. O
Author
Albert Hong yes I’ve been sitting out of habit, but considering the value of doing something more intentional.
Mr. O
Author
Albert Hong
I have never done retreats. Just living normal life. Not so busy
though, so I’ve had lots of time to devote to meditation, inquiry,
qigong, and other related things (3-4 hours per day).
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
What do you mean by maha and spontaneous perfection?
Are you suggesting you have realized it? If so, what is it experientially like for you?
Mr. O
Author
Soh Wei Yu
it’s a long story, and I may use different terminology since I’m not
coming at this from a Buddhist framework, but in a nutshell…
There’s
no longer any subject/perceiver behind perception, all
perceptions/objects are unfindable/unpindownable, everything appearing
is empty like a flow of fizzy champagne bubbles that pop before you can
see them, there’s no resistance to the bubbles arising and no
identification with them either, everything is seen to be the dance of
the great Goddess (who of course herself is also empty).
Also,
it’s clear that the flow of experience is completely intertwined with
the way of seeing it, so that the latter influences the former and vice
versa. (For example, I turn the whole universe into a heavenly realm or a
starry galaxy by perceiving it that way.)
Oh,
and also, I talk to devas and ancestors and nature spirits, which
started happening along the way…. although that may be beyond the scope
of your question.
All
that being said, the actual experience of all of that is quite
“normal.” After years of mystical experiences, big openings, and
disorienting perceptual and energetic shifts, it’s now just all become
super ordinary. It’s kind of like pre-awakening, minus all the
identification and resistance and trouble, and minus that gripping
feeling in my core that kept everything I used to do based in fear.
Everything is ordinary, but beautiful and flowing and perfectly ok just
as it is.
The
radiance of the Goddess shines like sun rays everywhere all the time,
even in the dark of night — both metaphorically and literally.
Does that help?
Yin Ling
Admin
A few more Q so I thjnk the rest can help answer you easier if u don’t mind.. ? (Ignore if u mind ok)
When you talk to devas, ancestors, and spirits, in what situation do you talk to them? Astral travel? Day to day? Dreams?
When you listen to a sound, how does the perceiving seems like to you?
As you walk in a garden, how does experience reflect back ? Who experiences ?
Mr. O
Author
Hi Yin Ling. Thanks for the questions. I don't mind.
I
talk to devas, ancestors, and spirits through a morning 30-45 min
ritual I have developed. I listen to shamanic drumming and do some
free-form movements, and they appear. I know that these things are not
the focus of this group, but I would say that these days, this is my
primary practice over and above meditation.
Mr. O
Author
Yin Ling
When I listen to a sound... So, first of all, there's no "I" doing any
listening. Just sound appearing. Further, what I used to think of as
"paying attention to a sound" is more like "inviting the sound
phenomenon to become more predominant." When I do that, the sound is
there, but also completely unlocateable. Each instant of sound appears
to be made out fizzy champagne bubbles that pop before I can actually
hear them. Then, if I sit still with that experience for a little bit,
the fizzy bubbles merge with fizzy bubbles of "vision" and "body
sensation." They merge into a whole synesthetic field of fizziness and
buzzing sensations that's neither here nor there but also everywhere.
This
same trajectory can happen from the starting point of vision or body
sensation as well. It always ends up in the buzzing undifferentiated
energy field.
Mr. O
Author
Yin Ling
I walk in nature every day for an hour. There's no "who" who is
experiencing. Just nature happening. Birds flying, dogs barking,
feelings of feet on the ground, thoughts bubbling up (lots of thoughts
usually). They're all together, everywhere, but also nowhere in
specific. If I invite any of those phenomena to become more predominant,
they're unfindable. But, usually I'm not trying to adjust the flow of
phenomena in any way. Things just bubble up, beautifully perfect, of
their own accord. Even the thoughts. It's all divinely glorious and
entirely ordinary. No need to attach to, change, or identify with any of
it.
Does that help?
Yin Ling
Admin
Mr. O yup

What was ur practice to trigger these insights??
For myself the most crucial insight is “non dual”.
It’s as though sound is hearing itself, sight seeing itself, touch feeling itself.
Knowingness all over.
Mind knowing itself all around 360 degrees without a subject
Is this clear for you ?
Then next step is clearing the object.. like u say.. fizzy champagne, for me it’s like a hologram.
When this matures, experience is hollow and unified without subject or object. Just mind seeing mind. Mind perceiving itself.
That takes alot of practice esp in difficult situations.
R u engaging with life much? Is your job a tough one? Challenging?
How has insight help in reducing ur struggles or suffering in life?
Mr. O
Author
Yin Ling
Yes, I recognize the steps of clearing the subject, then clearing the
object, then both are empty, but then also for me it's been really
important to re-engage, with both being empty but also full of love and
bliss and joy and a sense of divinity.
My
practice cannot be a model for anyone else, and if I describe it it
probably won't even make sense to anyone but me. I really don't have any
idea how or why it unfolded the way it did, and it hasn't been a
coherent particular method. I have had a series of mystical experiences
that just happened for unknown reasons. It would be completely
destabilizing at first, and I would have no idea what's going on. But
the mystical experience itself would show me what to practice. Like,
when the self dropped out, I investigated the lack of self. When the
body dissolved into energy, I investigated the flows of energy. When the
devas appeared, I investigated how to interact with them. And so forth,
just following, investigating, and engaging with whatever was
happening.
Along
the way, I would research spiritual stuff and practices that sounded
kind of like what was happening to me, maybe take a few practice tips
from that. At one point, I thought headless way was really useful, then
Peter Brown, Rob Burbea's Soulmaking Dharma, a bunch of shamanism stuff,
Reggie Ray, the Radiance Sutras, and ultimately also AtR. Each one was
helpful for a time but not a model I fully accepted, like a path made of
stepping stones and I jumped from one to the next without committing to
any. My main commitment was always following closely what was being
revealed in the present moment, and never settling for anything being a
final resting point.
I'm
not considering the current situation to be a final resting point
either, it's just that the focus seems no longer to be on investigating
how perception works and etc., but rather turning toward action in
society and especially helping others. In Buddhist terms, the goal of
arhatship or Buddhahood holds no interest to me, but the bodhisattva
ideal definitely does. I'm wondering if you all here agree that part of
the shift that happens at this point in the path is dropping intensive
meditation practice in favor of other kinds of practice that are more
skillful means, or if you see intensive investigative meditation as
continuing to be vitally important.
All
along, I have always been engaged in the world, with a family and a
career. But, it's not a super strenuous job, and it normally allows me
to spend a lot of time focusing on spiritual practice during the day.
In
terms of how all of this has helped with struggles, there is no more
struggle. Everything is ok just as it is, filled with joy even when
there's tension, filled with love even when there's pain. We had a super
traumatic medical situation with one of the kids, and even though it
was difficult and there was anxiety, all I could see in any of that was
love.
Yin Ling
Admin
Mr. O
sounds really good for you. No one path is completely similar. But I
believe opening up to reality has overlapping experiences.
I
can only speak for myself and yes I do still practice 3-4 hours formal
meditation a day even after having insights.. only because they allow
really rapid progression and I can feel the difference between practice
and lack of practice.
Off
cushion insights are actually the same as on cushion for me and they
gradually becomes more and more powerful and stable overtaking the whole
sense of self and sense of self drops as practice progresses. But this
is because I have the formal practice which allows clear recognition
post meditation.
I
supposed having a formal set of practice give me protected time to
contemplate as well as familiarise, so for myself I’m keeping that up
until I’m confident my whole sleep, wake, dream state is fully stable in
emptiness and complete non doing. Though I think, attempting to achieve
that in this lifetime is a tall order. Lol.
Hope you get some response from others!
Mr. O
Author
Yin Ling
Perhaps you can help me to better understand the goal you are
expressing here: "fully stable in emptiness and complete non doing."
I've heard other people in Buddhist orbits say things that are similar.
For me, there's nothing stable anywhere. It's all flux and flow, bubbles
and energies, a mirage-like dream. I'm not sure what's being referred
to when people say they want to be "stable" in this.
Sometimes
I think people are wanting to be permanently walking around in a state
of total presence. To me, that seemed like a desirable goal for a while,
but then I saw that "presence" turned out to be just another form of
self-consciousness or selfing.
Sometimes
I think people mean that they want to permanently be in a
non-conceptual state that lies beyond thoughts. But, for me, it has
never really been about stopping thoughts. Thoughts come and go as much
as any other perceptual phenomena. They're not a problem, just part of
the ever-changing scenery.
I'm wondering what you mean by this? Thanks for helping me to understand this point, as it's often confused me.
Yin Ling
Admin
Mr. O it just means literally that, once a practitioner attain direct seeing of emptiness, it is a different perception altogether.
It’s a completely non-dual sensing without a fraction of an observer in total translucent/illusory world.
Not even a movement of a “going towards thoughts”Will arise when emptiness view stabilise as thoughts arise empty.
Then
again also, thoughts drop a lot and becomes really quiet. Only when
intentionally need to think for work or necessity that we can use
thoughts. That’s how I feel.
Mr. O
Author
Yin Ling
Ok, I see. Buddhism is really concerned about the dangers of thoughts,
yes? I guess I don't worry so much about that. To me, thoughts are no
more or less of a worry than sounds. Some are loud, some are subtle,
they're always seemingly flowing, but they're never really there. They
are nothing to hold on to, but nothing to run away from either. Even if
they dance around in the mind for a little while, and we pay attention
to thoughts instead of other phenomena, that doesn't hurt us or harm us
in any way. To me, the dance of thoughts is part of the Goddess's
mysterious and beautiful dance — an outpouring of energy and love
bubbling up, to be celebrated and enjoyed. 

Mr. O
Author
(Sorry
if that doesn't make sense to Buddhist sensibilities. I'm curious about
the similarities as well as the differences between our experiences,
and appreciate your sharing.)
Mr. WA
Mr. O
Your descriptions seem profoundly healthy to me, and resonate with a
certain misgiving I always have around Buddhism. It may just be a
cultural difference or a subtle misunderstanding of intent, but to my
Western-raised brain there is always something "cold" about Buddhism
which seems to miss something I feel to be vitally important... The
heart must be at the center of it all. Love must stand with Truth on
equal footing, the radiance and the peace intertwined. I really get
that from the way you describe your experience, and admire the
non-dogmatic and almost "bouncy" way you have pursued your realization.
It reminds me a lot of Frank Yang and his approach. Keep trusting your
heart, it has not let you down so far 

Mr. O
Author
Mr. WA
Yes, I'm totally down with what you're saying about Love and Truth on
equal footing. For me, though, I've always thought of it in terms of
three....
Metaphorically
speaking — but perhaps energetically too — my head is immersed in the
emptiness and transiency of all phenomena. From here, I see and hear the
emptiness of all phenomena through the senses. My chest area, on the
other hand, is all about connection. That's the location from which I am
intimate with all phenomena (which I collectively call "the Goddess" so
that I can engage in a love affair with all of it). Then below that, in
the belly area, there's a portal to the dark depths, an underworld
teeming with power animals, spirits, ancestors, and other ghostly
figures. Here is where I was taught how to be fully human — I can't
really explain how, but it involved being completely dismantled and put
back together as a new being made of earth and sex and sunlight.
I
guess I'm saying for me it's not just about Truth and Love but also
about Soul. I mean that word not as synonymous with atman, but as
something deeply powerful, resonant, mysterious, beautiful, and
poignant. Sorry if I'm getting carried away in the poetry of it. Rob
Burbea knew about this too and talked about it frequently right before
his death. He tried to build a bridge over to the Soul from Buddhism.
Not sure if Buddhists will think he was successful, but I totally get
what he's on about. 

Soh Wei Yu
Admin
Mr. O
My sense of it is that you had some experience or insight on
non-doership, but it is not the same as anatta realization. Do check out
my article https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/.../different-degress...
And also this one: https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/.../pellucid-no-self...
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
The no-self you describe also may be related to impersonality, as in the first aspect in https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/.../four-aspects-of-i...
In impersonality you feel that everything is divine dance
The expression of cosmic intelligence and life

AWAKENINGTOREALITY.COM
Four Aspects of I AM
Mr. O
Author
Soh Wei Yu thanks for sharing these. From the first article, this passage summarizes my experience well:
“Anatta
is not merely a freeing of personality sort of experience; rather,
there is an insight into the complete lack of a self/agent, a doer, a
thinker, a watcher, etc, cannot be found apart from the moment to moment
flow of manifestation. Non-duality is thoroughly seen to be always
already so: here is effortlessness in the non-dual and one realizes that
in seeing there is always just scenery (no seer or even seeing besides
the colors) and in hearing, always just sounds (never a hearer or even a
hearing besides the sounds).”
The
second piece on impersonality does strike a chord. The difference in my
case is that it’s clear to me that the divine dance is completely
empty. For me, “divine dance” is a way of talking about and engaging
with the impermanent, empty, nonsubstantial world of phenomena in a way
that honors, loves, and takes joy in it without reifying or
essentializing it. There is no source; the Goddess is just the dance of
phenomena itself.
Soh Wei Yu 
Admin
Do you have the following experience and insight:
"What is experiential insight

Yin Ling:
When we say experiential insight in Buddhism,
It means..
A literal transformation of energetic orientation of the whole being, down to the marrow.
The sound MUST literally hears themselves.
No hearer.
Clean. Clear.
A bondage from the head here to there cut off overnight.
Then gradually the rest of the 5 senses.
Then one can talk about Anatta.
So if for you,
Does sound hear themselves?
If no, not yet. You have to keep going! Inquire and meditate.
You haven’t reach the basic insight requirement for the deeper insights like anatta and emptiness yet!
Yin Ling:
Yin Ling: “Realisation is when
This insight goes down to the marrow and you don’t need even a minute amount of effort for sound to hear themselves.
It is like how you live with dualistic perception now, very normal, no effort.
Ppl with Anatta realisation live in Anatta effortlessly, without using thinking to orient. It’s their life.
They cannot even go back to dualistic perception because that is an imputation, it js uprooted
At first you might need to purposely orient with some effort.
Then at one point there is no need.. further along, dreams will become Anatta too.
That’s experiential realisation.
There’s no realisation unless this benchmark is achieved!”
Labels: Anatta, Yin Ling | "
"Soh:
what is important is that there is experiential realisation that leads
to an energetic expansion outwards into all the forms, sounds, radiant
universe... such that it is not that you are in here, in the body,
looking outwards at the tree, listening the birds chirping from here
it is just the trees are vividly swaying in and of itself, luminously
without an observer
the trees sees themselves
the sounds hear itself
there is no location from which they are experienced, no vantage point
the energetic expansion outward into vivid manifestation, boundless, yet
it is not an expansion from a center, there is just no center
without such energetic shift it is not really the real experience of no
selfxabir Snoovatar" - https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/.../the-difference...

AWAKENINGTOREALITY.COM
What is experiential insight
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
Also I shared with someone today:
On the radiance as forms of anatta, i wrote years ago:
"Strong and vivid radiance..
Even now the smell of food is standing out in intensity
...[sights have a] HD hypervivid quality...
...Actually
more accurate description is magical and marvellous colors (as in the
vivid 'textures' of what's called trees, sky, houses, people, streets,
etc), sounds (as in the vivid 'textures' of a bird chirping, sound of
traffic, etc), scents (as in the aromas of food, and plants, etc), etc.
Complete perfection with a stark intensity...
Yet feels completely natural. Without slightest sense of distance or self/Self, even the tiniest details becomes starkly clear
This
sense of perfection and magical radiance of everything is still there
even when I'm physically tired and lack sleep on the previous night
By
magical what I mean is a sense that there’s something very magnificent,
almost like beauty but it is not beauty vs ugly and is not at all a
subjectively imposed or affective feeling of beauty, but a sense of
perfection.. like I look at the fly crawling on my skin, the fly is so
completely perfect, like part of the paradise (note: this is different
from Thusness's usage of the term 'magical')
Like
a ball of radiance, except radiance as none other than the boundless
world of forms, colors, textures and sounds, that is the very radiance,
for it is the world that is the radiance and nothing else. Not a
subjective radiance standing apart from forms.
There
is nothing subjectively imposed here.. when I say “sense of perfection”
that is already not quite accurate as it conveys some subjectively
imposed interpretation of perfection.. rather it is the world that is
the perfection and each moment carries the flavor of perfection
Perfection
being merely a qualitative description of the pristine state of
consciousness/radiant forms, not an affective feeling of "it is perfect"
but neither is it an objective characteristic of some inherently
existing object (there is neither subject nor object as subject and
object is conceptual)
But
this state of consciousness is not just heightened clarity... it’s like
even the trees swaying is marvelously and magically alive and life
reveals its significance and meaning all around. I think this is what
Richard calls “meaning of life”.
The emotional model of AF makes some sense"
...
Driving around Singapore, it feels like I am experiencing Singapore for the first time.
...
…But
the best thing in terms of affect so far is that the constant
apperception is such a joyful, clean, pristine state of appreciating the
boundless and radiant world that there isn't room for unpleasant
emotions like sadness, boredom, depression, etc. There is certainly no
more "Monday blues" or any kind of "blues" at all. It make sense now in
my experience when Richard says his days are one perfect day after
another. Even lying on bed, looking at the ceiling, the sound of the
humming and background noises is joyful. Any added entertainment on top
of that perfection is just another addition on top of perfection."
...
This
state of apperception is effortlessly and naturally present from the
very moment I wake up to the moment I sleep, for example when I wake up
sometimes a sound is heard and I do not even know where I am (the body
is lying on the bed but the mind hasn't cognized that on the very first
moment of waking up) in contrast to the bird chirping or the fan humming
as there is simply no 'I' to be located anywhere, there is only
everything everywhere... it is almost as if I am at the sound of the
bird chirping except there is no 'I' to 'be at' or 'be one with' the
sound, there is only sound. The reflection of the orange rising sun over
the window in the next building shines as vivid radiance with flawless
perfection... the radiant energies courses through the body, energising
and vitalising my day. All these informs me that it's going to be yet
another perfect day in paradise even before I open my eyes. When
driving, when walking, overlooking the long stretch of road over the
horizon, there is no center, no reference-point, no center-of-reference,
and no circumference... the whole universe is walking, is the walking,
is the driving, where the movement of legs is not done or perceived by
an 'I' (there is no doer, thinker, feeler, watcher, cognizer,
being/Being whatsoever, only action) and this body is walking
inseparably from the entire universe, it is not the case that there is a
body here and a separate universe out there in which the body moves
through.

AWAKENINGTOREALITY.COM
The Magical Fairytale-like Wonderland and Paradise of this Verdant Earth Free from Affective Emotions, Reactions and Sufferings
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
What you spoke is more on non doership https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/.../pellucid-no-self...

AWAKENINGTOREALITY.COM
Pellucid No-Self, Non-Doership
Mr. O
Author
Soh Wei Yu
Yes, there’s no “I” to be located anywhere, from waking till sleeping.
It’s that way naturally and without any effort. And there is no
inside/outside or here/there either. Birdsong, body sensations,
thoughts, all arise in the same flow. They’re just present. Sometimes
there’s a thought about “my body” or “my personality” that bubbles up,
but these thoughts are also just arising in the flow. Nothing to get
caught on or to identify with, and they’re not referring to anything
separate from the flow itself.
I
can also relate to terms like “wonderland” and “fairytale.” This is
what I meant when I said above that everything is shining with “the
radiance of the goddess.” Everything is lit from within with an aura of
beauty and poignancy. But also totally empty. (I like the metaphor of
fizzy champagne bubbles, which are both ephemeral and also sparkling.)
At
first it was so stunningly beautiful that I was literally overwhelmed
by it, however, seeing things this way has become routine and normalized
for me now. My terminology is different that AtR’s, more deistic, but I
believe we’re talking about the same thing.
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
Mr. O The 'flow' is more of the non-doership, spontaneous aspect.
Everything
is lit from within etc is the intensity of luminosity aspect. Do note
that one need not be in nondual or anatta to experience impersonality
and intensity of luminosity, those are all part of the 'four aspects of I
AM' that one practices even post I AM and pre-nondual: https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/.../four-aspects-of-i...
Had this conversation with John Tan before my anatta realization:
Session Start: Monday, 6 September, 2010
(9:01 PM) AEN: scott kiloby wrote an article on 'The Flow' http://www.kiloby.com/writings.php?offset=0&writingid=253
(9:13 PM) Thusness: kiloby's article is very good
(9:16 PM) Thusness: the article u posted in the blog by kiloby and together with this article, it fairly complete
(9:17 PM) Thusness: u must be able to integrate the 2 articles.
(9:17 PM) Thusness: currently u r looking at AF 'aliveness' that is only the luminosity aspect.
(9:19 PM) Thusness: now the article u showed me has two very important points, tell me the 2.
(9:23 PM) Thusness: many of the titles seem interesting
(9:35 PM) AEN: it's talking about self not as something solid but as the flow, ungraspable?
(9:36 PM) Thusness: no
(9:36 PM) Thusness: completely out
(9:37
PM) AEN: its saying that concepts are part of the flow, and concepts do
not actually refer to something solid, and therefore thoughts aren't a
problem?
(9:38 PM) Thusness: what is the different between all previous articles and this one?
(9:43 PM) AEN: the previous article seems to stress more on non conceptuality
this one seems to talk about concepts as not a problem?
im not so sure
(9:44 PM) Thusness: just read through the articles, they are very different
(9:44 PM) AEN: u're talking about which previous article
(9:44 PM) Thusness: the one u posted in our blog
(9:45 PM) AEN: oic..
(9:47 PM) AEN: im not so sure..
(9:48 PM) Thusness: so just rem this part
(9:49 PM) AEN: remember what?
(9:49 PM) Thusness: rem that there are differences between these 2 articles
very different in fact.
(9:51
PM) Thusness: and u r always looking for easy answers. Even if u were
to think, u still face the same issue that is mentioned in kiloby's
article.
the article that u pasted in this msn.
(9:51 PM) AEN: oic..
(10:29
PM) AEN: in the blog article, scott kiloby talks about objects as being
thoughts, emotions, sensations happening in awareness
in the article he talks about thoughts, emotions, sensations as seamless currents of an unknowable river

AWAKENINGTOREALITY.COM
Four Aspects of I AM
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
(10:30 PM) Thusness: totally out
(10:30 PM) AEN: oic..
(10:32 PM) Thusness: the analogy is the same as the dust and the mirror i told u.
(10:33 PM) Thusness: but he is unable to get over the idea of the mirror.
(10:33 PM) Thusness: yet in the article of the blog, he spoke of no mirror
(10:33 PM) AEN: ic..
(10:33 PM) Thusness: therefore there is no clarity of the view yet
(10:34 PM) Thusness: u can see he repeatedly talk about the current is the river
(10:35 PM) AEN: oic.. but wats the difference between the two articles?
(10:35 PM) Thusness: first go through all the points first
all are very important
(10:36
PM) Thusness: post it in the blog, i see whether i got time to go
through...there are some very important points that u have to know.
(10:37 PM) Thusness: it is also advisable to re-read these articles to have deepening insight.
(10:40 PM) AEN: posted
(10:41 PM) Thusness: will go through it these few days
(10:42 PM) AEN: ic..
(10:43 PM) Thusness: u posted twice
(10:43 PM) AEN: yea deleted the other one
(10:56 PM) Thusness: is AF more about the flow article, or you r left with the world?
(11:00 PM) AEN: you are left with the world
AF seldom mentions about the flow
(11:00 PM) AEN: i think
(11:02 PM) Thusness: yes
(11:02 PM) Thusness: what is AF emphasizing?
(11:02 PM) AEN: the universe, the physical, the actual, the intensity of luminosity
(11:02 PM) Thusness: yes
this experience peaks when?
(11:03 PM) AEN: hmm
when one experiences consciousness as just the flow?
(11:04 PM) Thusness: no
why u like to anyhow link hah
(11:05 PM) AEN:
the experience peaks when all sense of self/Self is being dissolved?

(11:05 PM) Thusness: closer
when u r left with the world
(11:05 PM) AEN: oic..
(11:06 PM) Thusness: like what richard herman said, the zen master slaps the floor... luminosity manifested in the actuality
(11:06 PM) AEN: ic..
(11:07 PM) Thusness: so u know why i say AF lacks of something?
(11:07 PM) Thusness: when no-self matures, what is lacking?
(11:08 PM) AEN: the intensity of luminosity as the actuality of the world?
(11:08 PM) Thusness: no
totally out
this is what AF is about
how is it that u r unable to see.
(11:09 PM) AEN: icic..
hmm its about the insight into awareness as the flow?
(11:09 PM) Thusness: are u seeing with ur heart or just going through motion.
how could the AF be lack of luminosity manifesting as actuality.
(11:10 PM) Thusness: it is expressed all over the place
(11:10 PM) AEN: ic.. ya
(11:10 PM) Thusness: if u truly want to know, then u have to be sincere in practice and at least have certain insight.
(11:11 PM) Thusness: yet 'the flow' has certain misconception
(11:12 PM) Thusness: it cannot integrate the article 'u r left with the world' with 'the river and the current'.
go contemplate
don't anyhow answer
(11:13 PM) AEN: oic..
(11:19 PM) AEN: btw u saw rar jungle's post? http://awakeningtoreality.blogspot.com/.../thusnesss-six...
in the comments section
(11:19 PM) Thusness: yeah
(11:20 PM) Thusness: such comment is not so appropriate in the blog
more appropriate to be in the sgforums
(11:21 PM) AEN: oic..
(12:38 AM) AEN: mikael says:
*i think I have a natural disposition toward the PCE
*i think i've had one before
*whenever
I "naturally" try to meditate.. I concentrate on the senses and try to
"become" the world, ignore feelings by just seeming them as impermanent
physical sensations. thoughts are usually non existent because i'm
concentrating
*i'm going to try to cultivate that
(12:44
AM) AEN: i think i know the difference between the first and second
article... the awareness is the world is like talking about the 2nd
stanza of anatta with the emphasis on luminosity as the universe, then
the flow is talking abuot the 1st stanza of anatta... the
insubstantiality of everything as
simply
mind moments arising and passing without anything graspable whatsoever.
like a thought is simply an arising bubble... but then the flow article
fails to integrate the insight of awareness as simply the 'current',
the universe, the sensations?
(1:58
AM) AEN: the new article still talks about river and current as if
river is something inherent even though the current is part of the
river... the previous article is talking about how there is no
mind/awareness, only the manifestation/current
Session Start: Tuesday, 7 September, 2010
(11:15
AM) Thusness: PCE is simply non-dual experience except the realization
is about manifestation (coming face to face with the actual stuff, i.e,
the other five entries and exits) instead of coming face to face with
"I AM".
ur answer is still no good
(11:15
AM) Thusness: although ur answer is quite near. You must also be aware
of the part on there is no way u can have any 'concepts' of the flow.
But the idea or 'right view' is still not there. Not having any 'fixed
idea' or 'fixed view' is still not good enough.

AWAKENINGTOREALITY.COM
Thusness/PasserBy's Seven Stages of Enlightenment
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
Mr. O Did you go through I AM before?
Also, do you relate with this:
August 2010:
“(11:07
PM) Thusness: for example you see AF description of insight and
experience are very similar to what i described in anatta article.
(11:11 PM) Thusness: there is no ending to this realization
(11:42 PM) Thusness: Allow the muddy waters of mental activity to clear;
Refrain from both positive and negative projection -
leave appearances alone:
The phenomenal world, without addition or subtraction, is Mahamudra/liberation.
-Tilopa
this is very good
(11:46 PM) AEN: oic..
(11:51
PM) Thusness: ask how will what he realize thus far can lead to the
insight that The phenomenal world, without addition or subtraction, is
Mahamudra/liberation.
ask luckystrikes
(11:52 PM) AEN: ok posted
(12:29
AM) AEN: Scott Kiloby: If you see that awareness is none other than
everything, and that none of those things are separate "things" at all,
why even use the word awareness anymore? All you are left with is the
world, your life, the diversity of experience itself.
(12:30 AM) Thusness: very good.
(12:31 AM) Thusness: This is anatta
(12:31 AM) AEN: oic..
(12:32 AM) Thusness: what’s left in is the intensity of practice.
(12:33 AM) Thusness: until there is completely without trace of awareness” (Scott Kiloby wrote more recently: https://www.kiloby.com/.../the-case-against-awareness-a...)

KILOBY.COM
The Case Against Awareness – A Little Blasphemy Goes a Long Way - Kiloby.com
Mr. O
Author
Soh Wei Yu
in John Tan’s seven stage model, I clearly can relate to having gone
through 1, 4, 5, 6, and 7. I didn’t spend any time in 2 or 3. I agree
with Kiloby that there is no such thing as awareness. I’d also add
there’s no such thing as consciousness, mind, ground, or other
reifications of what’s going on. I use field of perception, energy, flow
of phenomena as terms of convenience, knowing that these are also empty
not substantial essences. There actually isn’t a flow at all, since
there’s no time. Just what’s happening right now, and there aren’t even
really any phenomena since it is like a bubble that pops before you can
apprehend it.
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
Mr. O but anatta is also not just that. Do you relate to this convo between John Tan and AwakeningToReality-GPT:
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
Also:
“luminosity.
“Geovani
Geo to me, to be without dual is not to subsume into one and although
awareness is negated, it is not to say there is nothing.
Negating
the Awareness/Presence (Absolute) is not to let Awareness remain at the
abstract level. When such transpersonal Awareness that exists only in
wonderland is negated, the vivid radiance of presence are fully tasted
in the transient appearances; zero gap and zero distance between
presence and moment to moment of ordinary experiences and we realize
separation has always only been conventional.
Then
mundane activities -- hearing, sitting, standing, seeing and sensing,
become pristine and vibrant, natural and free.” – John Tan, 2020
“

AWAKENINGTOREALITY.COM
No Awareness Does Not Mean Non-Existence of Awareness

AWAKENINGTOREALITY.COM
Actual Freedom and the Immediate Radiance in the Transience
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
How
was your I AM realization like for you? Experientially? Does that
quality or dimension of presence in I AM remain or expand after anatta,
what and how did anatta transform it?
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
also john tan wrote last year:
André
A. Pais Similar to no-self of ATR, if the pointing does not result in
the direct recognition of suchness (pure appearances) free from
apprehender and apprehended or recognition of appearances as one's
radiance clarity, then it is not anatta proper. Which is what imo
Shentong Madhyamika is trying to emphasize with affirming-negation.
However
to me, for a path that is based on reasoning and analysis, negation
should be non-implicative because practitioners along the path are
always dealing with a dualistic and inherent mind. If there is no
dualistic and inherent mind, then there is no need for any path as there
is nothing to sever. Hence, affirming-negation imo is less skillful as
that would promote rather than sever the habitual tendency which is not
the import of the analytical path.
If
one wants to talk about the self-arising wisdom, it should not be by
way of reasoning and analysis, the padaegogy will have to be radically
different. It will probably have to be like dzogchen that takes the
result as path. Then emphasis should not be just non-referential ease
and space-like emptiness but includes all the magic of clarity's
radiance.
Mr. O
Author
Soh Wei Yu
I should also clarify that I’m not looking for “authorization” that
I’ve achieved what AtR calls maha or spontaneous perfection. Like I
said, I’m not really thinking in Buddhist terms myself, so my
descriptions may not fully match up and I’m ok with that. 

Mr. WA
Mr. O
This is wonderful. Thank for you sharing. Reminds me of Adyashanti
saying you must awaken in the head, heart, and gut, with the latter
being in some ways the most profound. I loved Seeing That Frees
tremendously, I could feel Burbea's connection to what you're talking
about. Maybe it's time I explore more of his talks. Thank you 

Mr. O
Author
Mr. WA big yes to what you said about the gut being the most profound.
But about Burbea...
What
I'm referring to isn't really in Seeing That Frees. That book is almost
totally written from the head space (i.e., emptiness). I'm referring to
his Soulmaking Dharma stuff. Are you familiar with it?
If you're interested, here's a webpage https://hermesamara.org/teachings/soulmaking-dharma Check out the audios in the right hand sidebar.
Michael Sinclair
It's good for the conventional body-mind, similar to going to the gym.
Mr. O
Author
Yikes,
I feel like I might be overstepping by recommending Burbea and Roche in
my comments. Really all I was after was what AtR says about ongoing
practice. Sorry if I'm breaking protocol!
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
Just posted this convo I had with someone else today on the AtR blog, may be relevant here:
Irreversibility of Nirvana
Mr.
J asked, “ I think I’m just wondering in regard to this then like… does
ignorance just happen dependent on conditions if it’s beginningless?
Meaning
“samsara” is something that the mind can sort of “fall into” depending
on conditions even if it was in “nirvana” at some point, and then
“samsara” before that too?”
Soh replied,
“ No, nirvana is not reversible. Nobody was in nirvana before samsara
Samsara had no beginning
See what kyle dixon wrote before:
“One
of the characteristics of nirvana (and all unconditioned dharmas) is
that it is "permanent" because it is defined as a total cessation of
cause for rebirth in the three realms. Since there is no possibility of
cause for "re-arising" nirvana is said to be "permanent".
As I wrote before on here:
Buddhahood
is irreversible and permanent. Nirvāṇa is the total exhaustion of one's
ignorance regarding the nature of phenomena, and for that reason
nirvāṇa is described as a cessation. What ceases is the cause for the
further arising and proliferation of delusion regarding the nature of
phenomena, which is precisely the cessation of cause for the arising of
the cyclical round of rebirth in the three realms we call "saṃsāra."
For
this reason, nirvāṇa is said to be 'permanent', because due to the
exhaustion of cause for the further proliferation of saṃsāra, saṃsāra no
longer has any way to arise.
Tsele Natsok Rangdrol:
You
might ask, 'Why wouldn't confusion reoccur as before, after...
[liberation has occured]?" This is because no basis [foundation] exists
for its re-arising. Samantabhadra's liberation into the basis [wisdom]
itself and the yogi liberated through practicing the path are both
devoid of any basis [foundation] for reverting back to becoming a cause,
just like a person who has recovered from a plague or the fruit of the
se tree.
He
then states that the se tree is a particular tree which is poisonous to
touch, causing blisters and swelling. However once recovered, one is
then immune.
Lopon Tenzin Namdak also explains this principle of immunity:
Anyone
who follows the teachings of the Buddhas will most likely attain
results and purify negative karmic causes. Then that person will be like
a man who has caught smallpox in the past; he will never catch it again
because he is immune. The sickness of samsara will never come back. And
this is the purpose of following the teachings.
and from Lopon Kunga Namdrol:
Buddhahood
is a subtractive process; it means removing, gradually, obscurations of
affliction and obscurations of knowledge. Since wisdom burns these
obscurations away, in the end they have no causes for returning; and
further, the causes for buddhahood are permanent leading to a permanent
result.”
………
Yes and you remove afflictions and ignorance that causes cyclic rebirth through wisdom
"The
process of eradicating avidyā (ignorance) is conceived… not as a mere
stopping of thought, but as the active realization of the opposite of
what ignorance misconceives. Avidyā is not a mere absence of knowledge,
but a specific misconception, and it must be removed by realization of
its opposite. In this vein, Tsongkhapa says that one cannot get rid of
the misconception of 'inherent existence' merely by stopping
conceptuality any more than one can get rid of the idea that there is a
demon in a darkened cave merely by trying not to think about it. Just as
one must hold a lamp and see that there is no demon there, so the
illumination of wisdom is needed to clear away the darkness of
ignorance."
Napper, Elizabeth, 2003, p. 103"
Nirvana is the permanent ending of ignorance and other mental afflictions that comes with it
…
Mr
J: “ And then it’s like keeping up with the wisdom and skillful means
like you’re at the gym or practicing guitar to maintain it, hence the
effort part”
Soh:
“
You practice the path of wisdom and meditation until all traces of the
two obscurations are absolutely exhausted. At which point you are a
Buddha, which none of us here are (we are still very much on the path
despite insights and all those I have witnessed that claims to be Buddha
are seriously deluded individuals) and you do not need to practice to
maintain or improve anything.
And
even the Buddha spends months in forest retreats practicing anapanasati
(mindfulness of breathing) meditation every year, he still meditates
everyday and so on because he explained it is a pleasant abiding and he
is compassionate for future generations (setting a good example for
them).
Until then, we need to continue practicing diligently to progress along the path to Buddhahood.
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
See Jamgon Mipham’s explanations:
"PATHS TO ENLIGHTENMENT
What
follows is a short explanation of the way Mipam presents the structure
of the Buddhist path to awakening. According to him, we can only go so
far in the Lesser Vehicle, realizing the lack of a personal self based
on its path, but without the Great Vehicle, we will not come to fully
realize the lack of self (that is, emptiness) with respect to all
phenomena. In other words, those in the Lesser Vehicle realize only part
of emptiness (the lack of a personal self) but do not realize the
entire scope of emptiness. They hang on to an ultimate foundation of
reality (the fundamental elements of reality, or dharmas), whereas there
is actually no such foundation. Therefore, according to Mipam, one
cannot become a buddha based solely on the Lesser Vehicle path; becoming
a buddha is the result of the Great Vehicle. Nevertheless, realizing
the lack of a personal self is enough to free us from samsara, because
in doing so, we relinquish the obscurations of the afflictive emotions.
The afflictive emotions can be included within the “three poisons” of
attachment, aversion, and delusion.
These
afflictive obscurations function to prevent liberation, and they are
tied in with the apprehension of a personal self. Based on the notion of
such a self, we become attached (to me and mine) and averse (to what is
other). This notion of self keeps the wheel of samsara rolling, because
it perpetuates the distorted framework through which we selfishly act
out attachment and aversion, thus sowing the seeds of suffering.
Afflictive obscurations have two aspects: a gross, imputed aspect and a
more subtle, innate aspect. According to Mipam, the imputed aspects are
relinquished on the first “ground” (Tib. sa, Skt. bhūmi) when you
directly perceive the suchness of reality. This experiential realization
is called “the path of seeing.”
The
imputed aspects of the afflictive obscurations are learned and not
inborn like the innate aspects. Imputed aspects involve distortions that
are explicitly conceptual, as opposed to the perceptual distortions
that comprise the innate aspects. The difference between the imputed and
innate aspects can be understood as something like the difference
between software and hardware: the innate aspects are embedded more
deeply in one’s mind-stream and are thus more difficult to eliminate.
Imputed ego-clinging refers to imputing qualities to the self that are
not there—namely, apprehending the self as a singular, permanent, and
independent entity. This is overcome on the first bodhisattva ground in a
direct, nonconceptual experience of reality that is the culminating
insight of analysis. Nevertheless, the more subtle, innate aspect of
ego-clinging hangs on.
The
innate ego-clinging, as the bare sense of self that is imputed on the
basis of the five aggregates, is more difficult to remove. Rather than
construing qualities to the self such as singularity or permanence, it
is a more subtle feeling of simply “I am” when, for instance, we wake up
in the morning. This innate sense of self is a deeply rooted,
instinctual habit. It thus involves more than just imputed identity; it
is a deeper experiential orientation of distorted subjectivity. Although
analysis into the nature of the self paves the way for it to be
overcome, it cannot fall away by analysis alone. Rather, it has to be
relinquished through cultivating the path of meditation. According to
Mipam, there are no innate aspects of the afflictive obscurations left
on the eighth ground. However, the afflictive emotions are only one of
two types of obscurations, the other being cognitive obscurations.
Cognitive
obscurations are nothing less than conceptuality: the threefold
conceptualization of agent, object, and action. Conceptuality is tied in
to apprehending a self of phenomena, which includes mistaking phenomena
as real, objectifying phenomena, and simply perceiving dualistically.
Such conceptualization serves to obstruct omniscience. Based on the
Great Vehicle, these cognitive obscurations can be completely
relinquished; thereby, the result of the Great Vehicle path culminates
in not merely escaping samsara, as in the Lesser Vehicle, but in
becoming an omniscient buddha. According to Mipam, up to the seventh
ground, the realization (of the twofold selflessness) and abandonment
(of the twofold obscurations) are the same in the Great and Lesser
Vehicles.
As
with the Great Vehicle, he maintains that accomplishing the path of the
Lesser Vehicle entails the realization of the selflessness of
phenomena, to see that phenomena are empty. Those who accomplish the
Lesser Vehicle path also realize the selflessness of phenomena, because
their realization of emptiness with respect to a person is one instance
of realizing the emptiness of phenomena. The final realization of the
Lesser Vehicle path, however, is incomplete. Mipam compares it to taking
a small gulp of the water of the ocean: we can say that those who
realize emptiness in the Lesser Vehicle have drunk the water of the
ocean, just not all of it.150 The final realization of the bodhisattva’s
path in the Great Vehicle, however, is the full realization of
emptiness, like drinking the entire ocean.
- Jamgon Mipam: His Life and Teachings"
Labels: Nirvana |
Anna Mukherjee
Soh Wei Yu Sorry , I've been peeking on this conversation. Could you please clarify something that seems contrary for me?
In the below quote
Thusness/John Tan seems to be reffering to post anatta practice:
"After this insight, one must also be clear of the way of anatta and the path of practice. (...)
It
does not mean because there is no-self, there is nothing to practice;
rather it is because there is no self, there is only ignorance and the
chain of afflicted activities. Practice therefore is about overcoming
ignorance and these chain of afflictive activities. There is no agent
but there is attention. Therefore practice is about wisdom, vipassana,
mindfulness and concentration. If there is no mastery over these
practices, there is no liberation. (...)
However
based on Jamgon Mipham’s explanations, it seems that it is enough to
realise anatta to cut off all ignorance and the chain of afflicted
activities?
"PATHS TO ENLIGHTENMENT
Nevertheless, realizing the lack of a personal self is enough to free
us from samsara, because in doing so, we relinquish the obscurations of
the afflictive emotions. The afflictive emotions can be included within
the “three poisons” of attachment, aversion, and delusion.
John Tan's quote makes much more sense to me, but perhaps I'm missing something from Mipham’s explanation 

Soh Wei Yu
Admin
Anna Mukherjee You misunderstood. Realizing anatta is only stream entry ( https://www.reddit.com/r/streamentry/comments/igored/insight_buddhism_a_reconsideration_of_the_meaning/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf%20 ) or 1st bhumi (Mahayana stream entry) instead. For 1st bhumi it is the realization of twofold emptiness.
John
Tan wrote the 7 stages back in 2006 (updated in 2009). He realised both
anatta and twofold emptiness for decades, two decades. But he made
tremendous progress since, and even last year had further breakthroughs
which he attributed to his 3-4 hours of meditation per day (or more).
This is consistent with what Jamgon Mipham (and all other Buddhist
masters starting from Buddha) have said, the deeper
obscurations/afflictions require the path of meditation to overcome.
![r/streamentry on Reddit: [insight] [buddhism] A reconsideration of the meaning of "Stream-Entry" considering the data points of both pragmatic Dharma and traditional Buddhism](https://external.fsin10-1.fna.fbcdn.net/emg1/v/t13/14630699014623794097?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Fo0h58lzmax6a1.png&fb_obo=1&utld=redd.it&stp=c0.5000x0.5000f_dst-emg0_p98x98_q75&ccb=13-1&oh=06_AbHaS-IGVYtlfYJB6qdhL2uUvUwNo4QTtqoRopeyIvU12A&oe=64222C60&_nc_sid=72c730)
REDDIT.COM
r/streamentry
on Reddit: [insight] [buddhism] A reconsideration of the meaning of
"Stream-Entry" considering the data points of both pragmatic Dharma and
traditional Buddhism
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
1st
bhumi (emptiness realization) is not the end. There are 10, or 13, or
16 bhumis (depending on which tradition and scheme) to Buddhahood. Many
stages.
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
"
Nevertheless, realizing the lack of a personal self is enough to free
us from samsara, because in doing so, we relinquish the obscurations of
the afflictive emotions. The afflictive emotions can be included within
the “three poisons” of attachment, aversion, and delusion." -- do read
carefully, although the realization of emptiness (twofold emptiness:
emptiness of self/Self and emptiness of all phenomena) is present in 1st
bhumi, the emptiness of a self is only fully actualized totally to
obliterate all afflictions at the 8th bhumi. This is explained in Jamgon
Mipham's text above but perhaps not elucidated very clearly.
At
this point of the 8th bhumi you are also similar to a sravaka arahat in
terms of overcoming all afflictions and cutting off cyclic rebirth
(there may be some other differences between them but I digress). But a
Bodhisattva proceeds on to put an end to the second obscuration through
the full actualization of the emptiness of all phenomena (as opposed to
merely emptiness of personal self), the cognitive/knowledge obscurations
that blocks the omniscience of Buddhahood. This is accomplished at the
point of Buddhahood.

RIGPAWIKI.ORG
Two obscurations - Rigpa Wiki
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
Anna Mukherjee 1st bhumi realization is this, according to Mipham:
"Then, at the time of the supreme quality on the path of joining,
one realizes that since the perceived does not exist, neither does the
perceiver. Right after this, the truth of suchness, which is free from
dualistic fixation, is directly realized. This is said to be the
attainment of the first ground."
Jamgom Mipham Rinpoche
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
At
which point, you put an end to the first three fetters (similar to
Sravaka stream enterer), view of a self, skeptical doubts, attachment to
rites and rituals. And you cut off the possibility of rebirth in the
lower realms and can henceforth only be reborn in human or deva realms.
Mipham:
"The Bodhisattvas on this ground have a direct realization of the
nonexistence of the self. This enables them to abandon the three
fetters: the view of the transitory composite, the belief in the
superiority of their ethical discipline, and doubt—together with all the
obscurations eliminated on the path of seeing..... ....Birth in the
lower realms is no longer possible It is said that when Bodhisattvas
reach the first ground, all paths whereby they might fall into the lower
realms are closed."
Anna Mukherjee
Soh Wei Yu Thank you !
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
John
Tan and Yin Ling still sits 3 to 4 hours or more everyday. Both
attributes great progress even after realization to their meditation
practice. If meditation were not important, Bodhidharma would not have
sat 9 years facing the wall even after being an awakened patriarch, and
so on as Dogen pointed out:
FUKANZAZENGI
by Eihei Dogen
The Way is basically perfect and all-pervading. How could it be contingent upon practice
and realization? The Dharma-vehicle is free and untrammelled. What need is there for
concentrated effort? Indeed, the whole body is far beyond the world's dust. Who could
believe in a means to brush it clean? It is never apart from one, right where one is. What
is the use of going off here and there to practice?
And yet, if there is the slightest discrepancy, the Way is as distant as heaven from earth.
If the least like or dislike arises, the Mind is lost in confusion. Suppose one gains pride of
understanding and inflates one's own enlightenment, glimpsing the wisdom that runs
through all things, attaining the Way and clarifying the Mind, raising an aspiration to
escalade the very sky. One is making the initial, partial excursions about the frontiers but
is still somewhat deficient in the vital Way of total emancipation.
Need I mention the Buddha, who was possessed of inborn knowledge? The influence of
his six years of upright sitting is noticeable still. Or Bodhidharma's transmission of the
mind-seal?--the fame of his nine years of wall-sitting is celebrated to this day. Since this
was the case with the saints of old, how can we today dispense with negotiation of the
Way?
You should therefore cease from practice based on intellectual understanding, pursuing
words and following after speech, and learn the backward step that turns your light
inwardly to illuminate your self. Body and mind of themselves will drop away, and your
original face will be manifest. If you want to attain suchness, you should practice
suchness without delay.
For sanzen (zazen), a quiet room is suitable. Eat and drink moderately. Cast aside all
involvements and cease all affairs. Do not think good or bad. Do not administer pros and
cons. Cease all the movements of the conscious mind, the gauging of all thoughts and
views. Have no designs on becoming a Buddha. Sanzen has nothing whatever to do with
sitting or lying down.
At the site of your regular sitting, spread out thick matting and place a cushion above it.
Sit either in the full-lotus or half-lotus position. In the full-lotus position, you first place
your right foot on your left thigh and your left foot on your right thigh. In the half-lotus,
you simply press your left foot against your right thigh. You should have your robes and
belt loosely bound and arranged in order. Then place your right hand on your left leg and
your left palm (facing upwards) on your right palm, thumb-tips touching. Thus sit upright
in correct bodily posture, neither inclining to the left nor to the right, neither leaning
forward nor backward. Be sure your ears are on a plane with your shoulders and your
nose in line with your navel. Place your tongue against the front roof of your mouth, with
teeth and lips both shut. Your eyes should always remain open, and you should breathe
gently through your nose.
Once you have adjusted your posture, take a deep breath, inhale and exhale, rock your
body right and left and settle into a steady, immobile sitting position. Think not-thinking.
How do you think not-thinking? Non-thinking. This in itself is the essential art of zazen.
The zazen I speak of is not learning meditation. It is simply the Dharma gate of repose
and bliss, the practice-realization of totally culminated enlightenment. It is the
manifestation of ultimate reality. Traps and snares can never reach it. Once its heart is
grasped, you are like the dragon when he gains the water, like the tiger when she enters
the mountain. For you must know that just there (in zazen) the right Dharma is
manifesting itself and that, from the first, dullness and distraction are struck aside.
When you arise from sitting, move slowly and quietly, calmly and deliberately. Do not
rise suddenly or abruptly. In surveying the past, we find that transcendence of both
unenlightenment and enlightenment, and dying while either sitting or standing, have all
depended entirely on the strength (of zazen).
In addition, the bringing about of enlightenment by the opportunity provided by a finger,
a banner, a needle, or a mallet, and the effecting of realization with the aid of a hossu, a
fist, a staff, or a shout, cannot be fully understood by discriminative thinking. Indeed, it
cannot be fully known by the practicing or realizing of supernatural powers, either. It
must be deportment beyond hearing and seeing--is it not a principle that is prior to
knowledge and perceptions?
This being the case, intelligence or lack of it does not matter: between the dull and the
sharp-witted there is no distinction. If you concentrate your effort single-mindedly, that in
itself is negotiating the Way. Practice-realization is naturally undefiled. Going forward
(in practice) is a matter of everydayness.
In general, this world, and other worlds as well, both in India and China, equally hold the
Buddha-seal, and over all prevails the character of this school, which is simply devotion
to sitting, total engagement in immobile sitting. Although it is said that there are as many
minds as there are persons, still they all negotiate the way solely in zazen. Why leave
behind the seat that exists in your home and go aimlessly off to the dusty realms of other
lands? If you make one misstep, you go astray from the Way directly before you.
You have gained the pivotal opportunity of human form. Do not use your time in vain.
You are maintaining the essential working of the Buddha-Way. Who would take wasteful
delight in the spark from the flintstone? Besides, form and substance are like the dew on
the grass, destiny like the dart of lightning--emptied in an instant, vanished in a flash.
Please, honored followers of Zen, long accustomed to groping for the elephant, do not be
suspicious of the true dragon. Devote your energies to a way that directly indicates the
absolute. Revere the person of complete attainment who is beyond all human agency.
Gain accord with the enlightenment of the buddhas; succeed to the legitimate lineage of
the ancestors' samadhi. Constantly perform in such a manner and you are assured of
being a person such as they. Your treasure-store will open of itself, and you will use it at
will.
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
Thusness/John Tan wrote many years ago:
"After
this insight, one must also be clear of the way of anatta and the path
of practice. Many wrongly conclude that because there is no-self, there
is nothing to do and nothing to practice. This is precisely using "self
view" to understand "anatta" despite having the insight.
It
does not mean because there is no-self, there is nothing to practice;
rather it is because there is no self, there is only ignorance and the
chain of afflicted activities. Practice therefore is about overcoming
ignorance and these chain of afflictive activities. There is no agent
but there is attention. Therefore practice is about wisdom, vipassana,
mindfulness and concentration. If there is no mastery over these
practices, there is no liberation. So one should not bullshit and psycho
ourselves into the wrong path of no-practice and waste the invaluable
insight of anatta. That said, there is the passive mode of practice of
choiceless awareness, but one should not misunderstand it as the
"default way" and such practice can hardly be considered "mastery" of
anything, much less liberation."
In
2013, Thusness said, "Anapanasati is good. After your insight [into
anatta], master a form of technique that can bring you to that the state
of anatta without going through a thought process." and on choiceless
awareness Thusness further commented, "Nothing wrong with choice. Only
problem is choice + awareness. It is that subtle thought, the thought
that misapprehend (Soh: falsely imputes/fabricates) the additional
"agent"."
“A
state of freedom is always a natural state, that is a state of mind
free from self/Self. You should familiarize yourself with the taste
first. Like doing breathing meditation until there is no-self and left
with the inhaling and exhaling... then understand what is meant by
releasing.”
Mr. O
Author
Soh Wei Yu
thanks for sharing. I’m a bit confused by these comments of John Tan’s.
It sounds like he’s saying that anatta is a special state of mind one
is trying to provoke or maintain through certain practices, but I know
from other writings that that’s not his position.
More
generally, when anatta is a “seal” (to borrow your terminology) that’s
seen everywhere, then what’s so special about seeing it with your eyes
closed sitting on a cushion? Why not just take a walk outdoors or wash
the dishes?
Also,
can you say more about his critique of choiceless awareness? Something
like that has been my primary sitting practice for years now.
Thank you for your time 

Soh Wei Yu
Admin
Mr. O
His critique is that just practicing 'choiceless awareness' you are not
in any way close to perfecting shamatha-vipashyana. For example, you
can have a lot of wandering thoughts, then you 'choicelessly aware' of
those wandering thoughts, but that doesn't mean you are closer to
improving on your shamatha, let alone mastering it, let alone joining
shamatha and vipashyana and so on.
Better
to practice a skillful means that helps you train your concentration,
one-pointedness, mindfulness, insight, tranquility, all the seven
factors of enlightenment and so on. For example, mindfulness of
breathing.
Many
people think mindfulness of breathing is just some basic/elementary
technique, 'not advanced', 'just for beginners', 'just basic shamatha'
and so on. They are wrong on all counts.
It
is only shamatha without vipashyana if one has not arisen the insights
of vipashyana, such as into anatta and twofold emptiness. Anapanasati
can become the shamatha-vipashyana conjoined, as expressed by Shunryu
Suzuki here:
“When
we practice zazen our mind always follows our breathing. When we
inhale, the air comes into the inner world. When we exhale, the air goes
out to the outer world. The inner world is limitless, and the outer
world is also limitless. We say “inner world” or “outer world,” but
actually there is just one whole world. In this limitless world, our
throat is like a swinging door. The air comes in and goes out like
someone passing through a swinging door. If you think, “I breathe,” the
“I” is extra. There is no you to say “I.” What we call “I” is just a
swinging door which moves when we inhale and when we exhale. It just
moves; that is all. When your mind is pure and calm enough to follow
this movement, there is nothing: no “I,” no world, no mind nor body;
just a swinging door.”
- excerpt from https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/.../when-we-practice...

AWAKENINGTOREALITY.COM
Quotes of Shunryu Suzuki
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
Mr. O anapanasati or mindfulness of breathing is the buddha’s practice everyday and on all retreats even after liberation:
Anapanasati.
Buddha said:
On
one occasion the Blessed One was dwelling at Icchānaṅgala in the
Icchānaṅgala Wood. There the Blessed One addressed the bhikkhus thus:
“Bhikkhus,
I wish to go into seclusion for three months. I should not be
approached by anyone except the one who brings me almsfood.”
“Yes, venerable sir,” those bhikkhus replied, and no one approached the Blessed One except the one who brought him almsfood.
Then, when those three months had passed, the Blessed One emerged from seclusion and addressed the bhikkhus thus:
“Bhikkhus,
if wanderers of other sects ask you: ‘In what dwelling, friends, did
the Blessed One generally dwell during the rains residence?’—being asked
thus, you should answer those wanderers thus: ‘During the rains
residence, friends, the Blessed One generally dwelt in the concentration
by mindfulness of breathing.’“
Here,
bhikkhus, mindful I breathe in, mindful I breathe out. When breathing
in long I know: ‘I breathe in long’; when breathing out long I know: ‘I
breathe out long.’ When breathing in short I know: ‘I breathe in short’;
when breathing out short I know: ‘I breathe out short.’ I know:
‘Experiencing the whole body I will breathe in.’… I know: ‘Contemplating
relinquishment, I will breathe out.’
“If
anyone, bhikkhus, speaking rightly could say of anything: ‘It is a
noble dwelling, a divine dwelling, the Tathāgata’s dwelling,’ it is of
concentration by mindfulness of breathing that one could rightly say
this.“
Bhikkhus,
those bhikkhus who are trainees, who have not attained their mind’s
ideal, who dwell aspiring for the unsurpassed security from bondage: for
them concentration by mindfulness of breathing, when developed and
cultivated, leads to the destruction of the taints. Those bhikkhus who
are arahants, whose taints are destroyed, who have lived the holy life,
done what had to be done, laid down the burden, reached their own goal,
utterly destroyed the fetters of existence, those completely liberated
through final knowledge: for them concentration by mindfulness of
breathing, when developed and cultivated, leads to a pleasant dwelling
in this very life and to mindfulness and clear comprehension.
“If
anyone, bhikkhus, speaking rightly could say of anything: ‘It is a
noble dwelling, a divine dwelling, the Tathāgata’s dwelling,’ it is of
concentration by mindfulness of breathing that one could rightly say
this.”

DHAMMATALKS.ORG
SN 54:11 Icchānaṅgala Sutta | At Icchānaṅgala
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
Mr. O As john tan said before,
“U need stability
When u sit, start from overcoming body then to stillness then to pervasiveness of radiance.
Master a skill, don't always think of "highest", non-meditation...in actually case, still far from it.”
“U
can meditate everywhere in all activities, meditation of non-dual is
not restricted to sitting post anatta, this should be a moment to moment
event for u. It is not about anatta insight, u need to complement what
u lack for sitting meditation, equanimity is what u need to improve,
don't waste too much time on FB activities. Also do exercises, don't
get energy imbalances.”
Mr. O
Author
Soh Wei Yu
this is great. I love the Suzuki quote. I’ve never seriously tried this
kind of meditation. But of course I’ve heard about it quite a bit. 

Dhruval Patel
I stopped practicing Vipassana years ago, I don’t see why you need to keep doing a practice that is no longer benefiting you.
Can replace it with a more beneficial practice.
With regards to Vipassana / insight there is no backsliding, one you see it, it more or less cannot be unseen afaik.
The other practices I cannot comment on.
Sim Pern Chong
Admin
When
you were meditating, can you uncontrively enter into a thoughtless
space.. that reveals a brightness even when there is no one?
Mr. O
Author
Sim Pern Chong
I don’t have any special skill at concentration, jhana, or samadhi.
Both on and off the cushion, thoughts and perceptions (sights, sounds,
body sensations, etc) bubble up constantly. There are always gaps
in-between the arisings that I might characterize as “thoughtless”
spaces, but it’s nothing that’s stable.
Frequently,
the thoughts and perceptions swirl together into an undifferentiated
static like snow on an old TV, and here thinking is impossible. Maybe
that’s a thoughtless space too?
Then,
occasionally it’s like a fog lifts and everything is crystal clear and
quiet for a little while, but that’s never something that I am
consciously trying to do. My main practice is open awareness, letting
whatever happens just happen, so I’m never trying to control my
experience.
Like
I said somewhere else in the thread, I’m not really worried about
thoughts or trying to get rid of them. They just spontaneously arise and
then pass through without leaving a trace, just like sounds or any
other sensations/perceptions.
Sim Pern Chong
Admin
Then you still need to do formal sitting meditation.
IMO,
the insight and the 'retraining' is what allow the unconcontriveness
leading to a no/few thought meditation.. and the 'space' through
non-grasping will reveal the Brightness.
Mr. O
Author
Sim Pern Chong
can you say a bit more about this? I’m not so steeped in Buddhism, so
these may be very basic questions, but what kind of meditation are you
referring to here? And also, why is non-thought so important to attain? I
would think that the most “uncontrived” practice would be just letting
everything be spontaneously perfect just as it is.
Thank you for entertaining these basic questions! 

Soh Wei Yu
Admin
Mr. O
"...The anatta definitely severed many emotional afflictions, for the
most part I don't have negative emotions anymore. And either the anatta
or the strict shamatha training has resulted in stable shamatha where
thoughts have little effect and are diminished by the force of clarity.
I'm also able to control them, stopping them for any amount of desired
time etc. But I understand that isn't what is important. Can I fully
open to whatever arises I would say yes. I understand that every
instance of experience is fully appearing to itself as the radiance of
clarity, yet timelessly disjointed and unsubstantiated.." - Kyle Dixon,
2013
“The conditions for this subtle identification are not undone until anatta is realized.
Anatta
realization is like a massive release of prolonged tension, this is how
John put it once at least. Like a tight fist, that has been tight for
lifetimes, is suddenly relaxed. There is a great deal of power in the
event. The nature of this realization is not often described in
traditional settings, I have seen Traga Rinpoche discuss it. Jñāna is
very bright and beautiful. That brightness is traditionally the “force”
that “burns” the kleśas.
The
reservoir of traces and karmic imprints is suddenly purged by this
wonderful, violent brightness. After this occurs negative emotions are
subdued and for the most part do not manifest anymore. Although this is
contingent upon the length of time one maintains that equipoise.” - Kyle
Dixon, 2019
“Prajñā “burns” karma, only when in awakened equipoise. Regular meditation does not.” - Kyle Dixon, 2021
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
On one occasion Ven. Ānanda was staying in Kosambī at Ghosita’s monastery. There he addressed the monks, “Friends!”
“Yes, friend,” the monks responded to him.
Ven.
Ānanda said: “Friends, whoever—monk or nun—declares the attainment of
arahantship in my presence, they all do it by means of one or another of
four paths. Which four?
“There
is the case where a monk has developed insight preceded by tranquility.
As he develops insight preceded by tranquility, the path is born. He
follows that path, develops it, pursues it. As he follows the path,
developing it & pursuing it—his fetters are abandoned, his
obsessions destroyed.
“Then
there is the case where a monk has developed tranquility preceded by
insight. As he develops tranquility preceded by insight, the path is
born. He follows that path, develops it, pursues it. As he follows the
path, developing it & pursuing it—his fetters are abandoned, his
obsessions destroyed.
“Then
there is the case where a monk has developed tranquility in tandem with
insight. As he develops tranquility in tandem with insight, the path is
born. He follows that path, develops it, pursues it. As he follows the
path, developing it & pursuing it—his fetters are abandoned, his
obsessions destroyed.
“Then
there is the case where a monk’s mind has its restlessness concerning
the Dhamma [Comm: the corruptions of insight] well under control. There
comes a time when his mind grows steady inwardly, settles down, and
becomes unified & concentrated. In him the path is born. He follows
that path, develops it, pursues it. As he follows the path, developing
it & pursuing it—his fetters are abandoned, his obsessions
destroyed.
“Whoever—monk
or nun—declares the attainment of arahantship in my presence, they all
do it by means of one or another of these four paths.”
See also: MN 149; SN 35:204; AN 2:29; AN 4:94; AN 10:71
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
As i shared with someone:
It is also important that one does not fall into the neo advaita confusion that meditation and samadhi is unimportant
It is important, just not contrived
As krodha/kyle dixon said:
"Nice explanation. Meido Moore, who is a Rinzai Zen master says the same, he writes:
'From
a practice standpoint, the crucial point is contained in the words,
"one should just constantly activate correct views in one’s own mind."
This has nothing to do with theoretical certainty that defilements are
empty and do not bind; it refers to the seamless, sustained upwelling of
the unity of samadhi/prajna. Departing from but then returning to this,
again and again, describes the post-awakening practice to dissolve
jikke.
If one
experiences departure from this samadhi, even for a moment, the path is
not completed at all. If one does not know what is actually meant by
that samadhi, then even with kensho the path is still barely begun in
terms of actualization.'
This process, dovetailing the “sudden” and “gradual” is identical for Dzogchen and Mahāmudrā as well." - Kyle Dixon, 2021
“Only
Buddhas rest in prajñā at all times, because they rest in “samati”
which is an unfragmented samādhi which directly cognizes the nature of
phenomena at all times.
The
rest of us do our best to cultivate concentration, dhyāna, which then
will lead to samādhi, and after time we will awaken to have the awakened
equipoise which comes about due to our samādhi being infused with
prajñā. However due to latent obscurations that awakened equipoise will
be unstable and our prajñā will be fragmented. The more we access
awakened equipoise however, the more karma in the form of kleśa and
vāsanā will be burned away, and as a result, the more obscurations will
be removed and diminished. The path is precisely eliminating those
obscurations, the afflictive obscuration that conceives of a self and
the cognitive obscuration that conceives of external objects. Buddhas
have completely eliminated these two obscurations and as a result their
samādhi is samati, a transcendent state of awakened equipoise beyond the
three times.” – Kyle Dixon, 2021
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
Dzogchen teacher Acarya Malcolm Smith on importance of meditation:
Excerpts from https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/.../dzogchen...
Malcolm (Loppon Namdrol) wrote:
Rongzom makes the point very clearly that Dzogchen practitioners
must develop the mental factors that characterize the first dhyana,
vitarka, vicara, pritvi, sukha and ekagraha, i.e. applied attention,
sustained attention, physical ease, mental ease and one-pointedness. If
you do not have a stable samatha practice, you can't really call
yourself a Dzogchen practitioner at all. At best, you can call yourself
someone who would like to be a Dzogchen practitioner a ma rdzogs chen
pa. People who think that Dzogchen frees one from the need to meditate
seriously are seriously deluded. The sgra thal 'gyur clearly says:
The faults of not meditating are:
the characteristics of samsara appear to one,
there is self and other, object and consciousness,
the view is verbal,
the field is perceptual,
one is bound by afflictions,
also one throws away the path of the buddhahood,
one does not understand the nature of the result,
a basis for the sameness of all phenomena does not exist,
one's vidya is bound by the three realms,
and one will fall into conceptuality
He also added:
Dhyanas are defined by the presence or absence of specific mental factors.
The Dhyanas were not the vehicle of Buddha's awakening, rather he
coursed through them in order to remove traces of rebirth associated
with the form and formless realms associated with the dhyanas.
...
Samadhi/dhyāna
is a natural mental factor, we all have it. The problem is that we
naturally allow this mental factor to rest on afflictive objects such as
HBO, books, video games, etc.
Śamatha
practice is the discipline of harnessing our natural predisposition for
concentration, and shifting it from afflictive conditioned phenomena to
nonafflictive conditioned phenomena, i.e., the phenomena of the path.
We do this in order to create a well tilled field for the growth of
vipaśyāna. Śamatha ultimately allows us to have mental stability and
suppresses afflictive mental factors so that we may eventually give rise
to authentic insight into the nature of reality. While it is possible
to have vipaśyāna without cultivating śamatha, it is typically quite
unstable and lacks the power to effectively eradicate afflictive
patterning from our minds. Therefore, the basis of all practice in
Buddhadharma, from Abhidharma to the Great Perfection, is the
cultivation of śamatha as a preliminary practice for germination of
vipaśyāna.
...
In
the early period of Budddhism, there were two yānas, śamatha yāna and
vipaśyāna yāna; beginners went to Śariputra to training in vipaśyāna for
stream entry; then they would go train in śamatha with Maudgalyana for
further progress.
Lance Cousins wrote a very interesting article about this.

AWAKENINGTOREALITY.COM
Dzogchen, Meditation and Jhana
Sim Pern Chong
Admin
Mr. O
the no thought is not the main point...as it can be achieved by
one-point concentration as well. The 'no /very few thought' here is an
indication of the stability of no-self insight.. As for the
brightness...it can only be experienced when there is no grasping.
If
you are asking these questions, it means the necessary insights are not
well established. Otherwise, how 'no thought' or very few thoughts and
subsequent brightness can be experienced will be understood. Which then,
in turn means you need to meditate .. many of us still meditate. At
least I do..on a daily basis. Even the Buddha after his Enlightenment.
Cheers
Indy Moo-Young

your posts seem quite performative. i think you're being self-deceptive of your level of realization.
Mr. O
Author
Indy Moo-Young entirely possible. And if I am, I trust that Soh will get to the bottom of it! 

Tommy McNally
If
you consider yourself to be a bodhisattva, then practice absolutely
must continue since our entire goal is the liberation of all sentient
beings. If you're only seeking personal liberation, then you're not a
bodhisattva. I understand that you're not especially well versed in
Buddhadharma, so I wanted to point this out as it's an important
distinction and there's an entire path (Bodhisattvayana) dedicated to
the training of a bodhisattva.
Even
if you're aiming for personal liberation, you're not there yet and so
stopping formal practice would be a dreadful mistake. You may feel that
you're 'there' to some extent, but your descriptions elsewhere in the
replies to this post suggest (to me and based on my own experience so
far) that you still have work to do, e.g. your emphasis on "the Goddess"
implies an asymmetry at a deep, extremely subtle level. It may seem
unimportant, and I actually do understand why you'd characterise the
creative energies in this way; but it suggests that you're still bound
up in duality and haven't truly experienced the nature of mind.
I
don't say any of this to be critical or to just be a dick. There's no
benefit in blowing smoke up your ass, and if there's more work to be
done then it's incumbent on other experienced practitioners to point
this out and suggest how to move forward.
If
you find that your current practice isn't working for you, then there
are myriad other practices to explore depending on your goals.
Personally, I would recommend tonglen and the Four Immeasurables as they
can bring about a profound shift in experience that changes everything,
and dissolves any sense of distinction between self and other. These
practices require absolute sincerity, otherwise it's just mental
masturbation.
If
you're serious about liberation and are interested in energetic work,
find a lineaged teacher who can teach you tummo. It's extremely powerful
and goes far beyond simply generating inner heat, but it requires an
experienced teacher as it can potentially fuck you up. You're
essentially taking conscious control over certain, normally unconscious
and automatic elements of your nervous system, and also disentangling
identification with deep primal drives that still dictate much of your
day to day life.
If
you feel more comfortable with open awareness sort of practices, and
especially if you find that Dzogchen teachings resonate with you, then
seek empowerment to practice trekchod and togal. These are also
extremely powerful, yet deceptively simple practices that can lead to
complete liberation in one lifetime. Basic sky gazing practices can give
you a hint of what's involved and start you off, but there's subtleties
and nuances that need to be explained by a teacher so as to avoid
delusion.
Sticking
with Dzogchen, the practices of Ati Guru Yoga and Song of the Vajra are
also simple but profound; but again, you need a teacher and certain
transmissions before they'll work properly.
I'm
not convinced by anyone claiming that vipassana doesn't work after a
certain point. I went through that phase too many years ago, but I was
wrong and probably wasted a lot of time on less effective practices.
Vipassana just means something like "clear seeing", which lies at the
heart of Buddhadharma. All we're ever doing is trying to see, with the
clarity of wisdom, how we fabricate experience due to our fundamental
ignorance. There are countless methods available, but in some way they
all involve a blend of one-pointedness and clear seeing.
As
a note of caution re. "Ancestors" and spirits, etc: My background
pre-Buddhadharma was primarily within the Western Mystery Traditions,
including Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, Thelema, Enochian magick,
Kabbalistic pathwork, astral projection and related practices. Unless
you know how to test these (seemingly separate) entities, and how to
bring them under control with fierce compassion, you're at risk of being
deceived by your own projections and reinforcing the habitual
patterning that brought you to samsara in the first place. Tread very
carefully and don't accept what you're told unless you can confirm it
with absolute certainty through study and practice.
Long story short: Keep practicing, no matter how advanced you think you are.
Mr. O
Author
Tommy McNally
thank you, this is great. Precisely the kind of response I was hoping
to receive. I think elsewhere the thread got kind of sidetracked into
people “testing” my level of realization according to Buddhist standards
that I don’t really connect with. I appreciate your directness, and how
you actually addressed my principal question.
(As
an aside, I realize this isn’t the right crowd for any goddess
talk—which would definitely be more suited for a Shaiva Tantra or even
Bön group, if I knew of any good ones—and I totally hear what you’re
saying about the self-deluding dangers of engaging with entities. In my
experience, that is resolved when you realize that they are *all*
actually empty externalizations/projections of different parts of your
own psyche.)
Anyway,
your response seems to focus primarily on advising me to get into a
lineage of Tibetan Buddhism. My understanding of that world is that you
have to engage with a whole cosmology, and a retinue of deities, and do
years of “preliminary practices” like prayers and mantras to just get in
the door. This probably sounds arrogant to someone steeped in that
tradition, but what is one to do if they are interested in learning the
techniques without all the religion? I have my own
imagination/archetypal cosmos and well-established practices for
navigating it, and have no interest in being required to buy into a
whole Tibetan worldview.
Is
there such a thing as a proper Ati Guru Yoga teacher (for example) that
allows you to do your own thing when it comes to the
entities/deities/mantras/rituals?
Tommy McNally
Mr. O
If you believe you've developed your own syncretic approach that truly
leads to complete liberation, then by all means have at it.
I
wasn't advising you to get into a lineage of Tibetan Buddhism. I was
offering a few suggestions for other practices that, in my experience,
are very powerful and may allow for considerable progress. Some of those
require empowerment and transmissions, otherwise they won't work
effectively.
And to answer your question re. A bastardised Ati Guru Yoga: No, that's just silly.
Bruce McCaskey

I'm not speaking from experience, just wondering: is accumulating joriki a good reason to continue formal practice ?
Mr. O
Author
Bruce McCaskey that seems to be what Soh and Sim are suggesting in some of their latest comments.
Mr. AG
Hey.
First up thanks for sharing yourself here, I enjoyed reading you. I
think people have been quite harsh on you here, I feel the group has a
slightly sectarian shadow sometimes, if you don't speak exactly the same
language as AtR, or Vajrayana, you meet a lot of questions. But anyway
not to dwell, I think the core of this question is basically about
doubts and preferences ....
so,
you do your deity hangout practice, like a formal practice. why ? I
imagine, because it's interesting, wholesome, beautiful, and you feel
it's expanding you. you know for sure, outside the level of rationality,
there are benefits. and, you are confident in co-creating and
navigating this practice, from scratch, without asking anyone if its ok,
right, wrong, etc.
but,
sitting practice. you didn't yet 'master' jhana / samadhi , total
disappearance. but it doesn't occur to you to practice it .... or more
accurately, you have doubts about "have I hit the limit of silent
sitting?" or is there more ? is it worth it ?
IMO
these doubts represent your inner knowing there is something
interesting, wholesome, a new area there. IMO people's beings generally
have a strong preference for life/gut - love/heart - head/silence.
and cultivation in one aspect comes so naturally, easily, like learning
to love , and in others aspects, it feels more like unimportant, or
something esoteric, or like 'why would I do that?' and, in this
uncertainty, a question of the form of "is something done or not done"
can arise, rather than an endless longing for more unknown beauty
to
some people, the question, why learn to sit in some
super-silent-samadhi for ages, is not even a question, it's as
ridiculous to ask as why love your children , or why stop the car to
look at a rainbow...
a
teacher of mine had a similar 'being-setup' to you, they never went on
retreats, had a family, had a lot of deistic contact, and only later
started to really get into being really really empty.
i
also don't think you necessarily need to get into any whole other
tradition, tho, of course you can if you want. but just looking honestly
at the source of your doubt. for the record I have not attained any
super samadhi or any other realisation. all the best to you
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
"I
feel the group has a slightly sectarian shadow sometimes, if you don't
speak exactly the same language as AtR, or Vajrayana, you meet a lot of
questions"
Not
really. But I think it is healthy to question claims. For example, it
is my experience that when people talk about no self, 99% they are
talking about non-doership rather than nondual, and even if nondual it
is not anatta. There are different gradations of insights and we have to
be careful about these. No self for others does not necessarily mean
AtR anatta. This is why I wrote this article to make it as clear as
possible: https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/.../different-degress...

AWAKENINGTOREALITY.COM
Different Degress of No-Self: Non-Doership, Non-dual, Anatta, Total Exertion and Dealing with Pitfalls
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
John
Tan, Yin Ling often shares the same skepticism with me when people make
claims about no self insight. Not speaking about this OP, but many
other instances.
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
Even anatta is just really the beginning. OP may or may not agree, but we have to make our stance clear about things.
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
This has nothing to do with sectarianism or semantics but the subtleties of actual experiential insights.
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
For
example if someone is a Buddhist, a Vajrayana Buddhist (and btw I
equally appreciate Zen and Theravada), even so, I have equal skepticism
for that person's claim of 'no self insight' as I have for a
non-Buddhist. Because actual anatta experiential insight is rare, even
for Buddhist practitioners and Buddhist teachers. Very rare. It is much
easier to get some breakthroughs in terms of I AM, non-doership,
impersonality, glimpses of nondual, or substantialist nondual sort of
realization. Anatta is really quite rare even for Buddhists. This is why
Daniel Ingram mistakens it as "4th path" or "arahantship", but to us in
AtR it is just stream entry https://www.reddit.com/r/streamentry/comments/igored/insight_buddhism_a_reconsideration_of_the_meaning/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf%20
Those
in my admin group will know I criticise some Buddhist teachers for
their lack of clarity of insight. My skepticism is not skewed towards
non-Buddhists. lol
![r/streamentry on Reddit: [insight] [buddhism] A reconsideration of the meaning of "Stream-Entry" considering the data points of both pragmatic Dharma and traditional Buddhism](https://external.fsin10-1.fna.fbcdn.net/emg1/v/t13/14630699014623794097?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Fo0h58lzmax6a1.png&fb_obo=1&utld=redd.it&stp=c0.5000x0.5000f_dst-emg0_p98x98_q75&ccb=13-1&oh=06_AbHaS-IGVYtlfYJB6qdhL2uUvUwNo4QTtqoRopeyIvU12A&oe=64222C60&_nc_sid=72c730)
REDDIT.COM
r/streamentry
on Reddit: [insight] [buddhism] A reconsideration of the meaning of
"Stream-Entry" considering the data points of both pragmatic Dharma and
traditional Buddhism
Soh Wei YuAdmin
DhO generally takes a non-interfering approach when people make claims.
Personally, I 'interfere' with all claims or challenge them, even the others like Wil Gau and so on -- I wrote many emails questioning him and etc. Also provided some feedback and advise.
I spammed AtR 7 stages links to thousands of people on reddit privately also, lol
But of course if they didn't like it (most people like the links) then I don't have time to waste on them either. Live and let live.
Many people seemed to benefit from my sharing and some had breakthroughs (even up to anatta and so on) after reading, so I continue to share.
Reply
20mEdited