Dieter Vollmuth runs a spiritual blog in German https://dieter-vollmuth.de/

Conversation from https://www.facebook.com/groups/AwakeningToReality
    • I have a Question to this text from here:
      http://awakeningtoreality.blogspot.com/…/presence-and-natur…
      "If we observe thought and ask where does thought arise, how does it arise, what is ‘thought’ like. 'Thought' will reveal its nature is empty -- vividly present yet completely un-locatable. It is very important not to infer, think or conceptualise but feel with our entire being this ‘ungraspability’ and 'unlocatability'. It seems to reside 'somewhere' but there is no way to locate it. It is just an impression of somewhere "there" but never "there". Similarly “here-ness” and “now-ness” are merely impressions formed by sensations, aggregates of causes and conditions, nothing inherently ‘there’; equally empty like ‘selfness’."
      -------------------
      In the above Text is stated, that thought is unlocatable.
      But when I watch thoughts and other perceptions, I have a very clear and sharp impression of where they come from. They arise in the body consciousness in or near the Hara.
      I can clearly feel how they penetrate from "outside" to "inside" - or from "inside" the hara to "outside" the hara - and then bubbles to the head, where they show their content.
      The content can also be seen through very sharp concentration - it is like catching it and looking directly into it.
      I also feel that the penetration of the perceptual bubbles into the hara is taking place JUST BEFORE a sound is heard or a picture is seen or thought is experienced. It seems that the hara is the producer of all appearances - like a film projector.
      This is not a delusion - it is as clear as feeling the left arm. If the feeling-concentration is very sharp, then it is much clearer than the feeling of the left arm.
      Does anyone have similar experiences?
      Comments
      • Hale OHerren Where are thoughts before they are in the hara?

        What’s it like, the creation of a thought? Is the thought slowly created or does it appear fully formed?

        What is it that links the sensation in the hara to the thought appearing? Or is there just more story about time and space? Does the sensation in your abdomen know the sound of a bird chirping? Does the thought “I know this sound” hear the sounds? Do your eyes create visual appearances? Does your tongue create taste? Or is the sound of bird chirping exactly as it is, where it is? What links all this together?

        Where is the line that divides inside the head versus outside the head? Check each sense field.

        Where is the mind? Is it inside the head? Where does thinking occur? Can you visualize a something simple in front of you? Can you imagine the sound of traffic far away?

        Where is a thought when it is here? Is it something solid and fixed or is it hollow and ephemeral like a dream. Where do thoughts go? What is it that knows this? Can a thought perceive something else, another thought perhaps? Do you have thoughts that are not dependent on other circumstances, events and perceptions for their appearances or is the hara the sole creator?

        Does the body experience or is the body just another experience? In your experience, is the sight of your hand made out of atoms and molecules or is it color? What is seeing other than color appearing? Is there congruency in the body or is there just a thought which links up various sounds, smells, sensations and so forth and labels them “body”?

        I don’t doubt what you experience, just bringing doubt into the conclusions that you draw from that 😊
        7


      • Dieter Vollmuth - I read your questions and after that the field seem to expand
        I wrote, what i felt and saw:

        - The whole field is sound, vision
        - All sounds and visions all sense-data are like hollow/empty bubbles with virtual-data-content
        - There is no one seeing and hearing - only vision and sound
        - Bubbles seems to bubble up from the hara-center but also from the whole field
        - The whole body is nothing else as hollow bubbles with feelings and other perceptions
        - the whole field is perveiving or better: perceptions
        - the divine sound (nada) is heard through all perceptions
        - There are no real objects -> form is foam
        1
    • Hale OHerren What is the field? Is it something tangible? A container perhaps? Where are the limits and boundaries to this field? Or is “field” just another label for seeing, hearing, touching etc?

      Does hearing take place inside of this field? Are sounds inside the field? What’s the difference between hearing and sound? What’s the difference between the field and sound? Is there even a field at all?

      Why the need to label something “divine”? Is it ok for it to be just as it is? Or do we need to give it a name?
      4
    • Dieter Vollmuth There is no inside and no outside, so there are no boundaries. So, sound can not be inside and not be outside.

      The expression "field" seems to be pure conformity - because if there are no borders and no inside and outside, then there is no field, because for something to be a field, there must also be a "no field".

      I unconsciously saw the "field" as a background. But if there is no field, just the perceptions - wherever they are - then it is unnecessary to use the word "field" and also to assume a background. There is just "that". Amazing.

      The nada is called the "divine sound" - but it is not necessary to give it a name because it is simply there.

      The "I am" had been pretty deconstructed because since month it began to flicker and become inconsistent. It "kicked" me out of the honeymoon, so to speak. But somehow I always assumed it as a "background" without realizing it. Only your questions brought some movement in there. Thank you!
      2
    • Soh Wei Yu Dieter Vollmuth Good insights. There is indeed a borderless, boundless (as well as centerless, nondual, luminous, transient, ephemeral, empty, etc) quality to awareness/experience in its purity. This will become more and more apparent as your experience matures and as insight matures and becomes effortless. It is an intense, out-of-body (more like mind-body-drop than a literal dissociative OBE experience, it is completely nondual and not dissociative in any way) experience of limitless expanse of luminosity, but as manifestation. However the boundless quality is often reified into a larger container and then all perceptions may seem to merely arise 'within' the field so to speak, this becomes one mind. But it need not be reified into one mind, reification happens due to lack of clarity of deep insight. But as you have rightly seen, the field is not a background, it is just manifestation. There is nothing containing anything -- no container.

      Good work. Anyway I was just just reminded of this: https://awakeningtoreality.blogspot.com/.../the-unbound...
    • The Unbounded Field of Awareness
      awakeningtoreality.blogspot.com
      The Unbounded Field of Awareness
      The Unbounded Field of Awareness









  • The Unbounded Field of Awareness
    awakeningtoreality.blogspot.com
    The Unbounded Field of Awareness
    The Unbounded Field of Awareness
  • Soh Wei Yu Thusness, 2013:

    "there is a very intense and much deeper state i assure u...but there is clear understanding that the manifestation is it....however awareness is like an unbounded and limitless expanse field

    the luminosity is intensely clear

    the experience is like Non-Dual Awareness broke lose and exist as a unbounded FIELD

    there is a difference in seeing sound and a hearer and realizing sound as awareness itself

    u cannot focus and there cannot be any sense of effort
    there cannot be any sense of boundaries

    just itself

    u must be very very stable and mature in the anatta state

    and u cannot be in an enclosed room...

    it is the effortlessness and crystal clear transparency and intensity of luminosity...

    but duality must no more trouble the practitioner, phenomena is clearly understood as the radiance...so nothing is obscuring then in total effortless and emanation arises and the expanse just continues"

    On how this differs from one mind:

    "one mind is subsuming

    therefore there is a sense of dual

    in this case there isn't

    it is like a drop of water landed on the surface of a clear ocean. the nature of water and ocean are one and the same...nothing containing anything

    when sounds and music arise...they are like water and waves in ocean...everything is it"
  • Soh Wei Yu Dieter Vollmuth http://awakeningtoreality.blogspot.com/.../rigpa-and...

    Rigpa and Aggregates
    (Also see: Dzogchen, Rigpa and Dependent Origination)

    From Dharma Overground, Dharma Dan (Daniel M. Ingram):

    Dear Mark,

    Thanks for your descriptions and analysis. They are interesting and relevant.

    I think of it this way, from a very high but still vipassana point of view, as you are framing this question in a vipassana context:

    First, the breath is nice, but at that level of manifesting sensations, some other points of view are helpful:

    Assume something really simple about sensations and awareness: they are exactly the same. In fact, make it more simple: there are sensations, and this includes all sensations that make up space, thought, image, body, anything you can imagine being mind, and all qualities that are experienced, meaning the sum total of the world.

    In this very simple framework, rigpa is all sensations, but there can be this subtle attachment and lack of investigation when high terms are used that we want there to be this super-rigpa, this awareness that is other. You mention that you feel there is a larger awareness, an awareness that is not just there the limits of your senses. I would claim otherwise: that the whole sensate universe by definition can't arise without the quality of awareness by definition, and so some very subtle sensations are tricking you into thinking they are bigger than the rest of the sensate field and are actually the awareness that is aware of other sensations.

    Awareness is simply manifestation. All sensations are simply present.

    Thus, be wary of anything that wants to be a super-awareness, a rigpa that is larger than everything else, as it can't be, by definition. Investigate at the level of bare sensate experience just what arises and see that it can't possibly be different from awareness, as this is actually an extraneous concept and there are actually just sensations as the first and final basis of reality.

    As you like the Tibetan stuff, and to quote Padmasambhava in the root text of the book The Light of Wisdom:

    "The mind that observes is also devoid of an ego or self-entity.
    It is neither seen as something different from the aggregates
    Nor as identical with these five aggregates.
    If the first were true, there would exist some other substance.

    This is not the case, so were the second true,
    That would contradict a permanent self, since the aggregates are impermanent.
    Therefore, based on the five aggregates,
    The self is a mere imputation based on the power of the ego-clinging.

    As to that which imputes, the past thought has vanished and is nonexistent.
    The future thought has not occurred, and the present thought does not withstand scrutiny."

    I really found this little block of tight philosophy helpful. It is also very vipassana at its core, but it is no surprise the wisdom traditions converge.

    Thus, if you want to crack the nut, notice that everything is 5 aggregates, including everything you think is super-awareness, and be less concerned with what every little type of consciousness is than with just perceiving them directly and noticing the gaps that section off this from that, such as rigpa from thought stream, or awareness from sensations, as these are golden chains.
  • Rigpa and Aggregates
    awakeningtoreality.blogspot.com
    Rigpa and Aggregates
    Rigpa and Aggregates
  • Dieter Vollmuth Thank you, Soh, for your Answers!

    Since last night, the body has much more "holes", than "points of reference". It seems to be transparent with some "points of fog" flying around there.

    Oddly enough, the vibration does not become faster, but much slower. it seems like the vibration is seen in slow motion. But it's probably the other way around - the resolution has increased drastically.

    There are no thoughts - this is pure experiential. The "points of reference" are flying around and flicker and are interwoved. It is a "bunch of flickering points" without knowing what that is really. Only that. "That" fills the whole "field of experience" - or better "that" IS the whole "field of experience".

    The experience is very stable because the mind feels like stone. Five years ago, there was a series of experiences in quick succession. The first was a fusion with a "radiant black mass" in "a womb in the body". The black mass was recognized as "I AM" - and in melting into it "I" was lost.

    A few days later there was a jump from a cliff to nowhere. Then the experience of consciousness, massive like a mountain. This was followed by an experience of being the entire "world-spanning" consciousness, so fine that it was almost not noticable.

    The feeling that is now here is both the "consciousness as a massive mountain" AND the "expansive fine 'no-thingness' of consciousness" together.

    stone=stable
    no-thingness=expansive wide-ness
    "matter" = "flying points of reference" = "radiance"
  • Soh Wei Yu Dieter Vollmuth

    By being the entire world spanning consciousness, do you mean the world is embraced by consciousness or the world itself is the radiance?
  • Dieter Vollmuth Soh Wei Yu The latter. I can see nothing, that radiates - only points as radiance
    1
  • Soh Wei Yu Yes good. The former is one mind and the latter is no mind.

    No mind is made effortless as anatta insight arises, matures and becomes very clear to be “always already so”
    1
  • Dieter Vollmuth Soh and Hale: Thank you again - that was here all the time - but I have not seen it because of the misleading net of words and concepts. 😘
    1
  • Dieter Vollmuth So, each "thing" or "point" is nothing other as a "piece of consciousness" or in other words: consciousness IS the substance of things.

    Or better: consciousness appears as a unending stream of appearing and ceasing "points of reference"

    Much better: Consiousness is the mechanics of arising and ceasing of appearances. Because that is an action, not a "substance".
  • Soh Wei Yu Yes you can say so, but I would be careful of the term “substance” as it implies some changeless essence, a view of inherency.

    Reading this article by Alan Watts might clear things up:

    http://awakeningtoreality.blogspot.com/.../alan-watts...

  • Alan Watts: Agent and Action
    awakeningtoreality.blogspot.com
    Alan Watts: Agent and Action
    Alan Watts: Agent and Action
    • Dieter Vollmuth Darkness is not a metaphor - because exactly with this darkness or "radiating blackness" "I" was melted into and therefore disappeared.

      And consciousness is also not a substance of something but more the "mechanics" of arising and ceasing of appearances. "Substance" is really not a good word for consciousness, because it has a notion of "permanence" or "realness". It is more a fluctuating happening, action.

      Oh man - the things are quickly becoming clear by itself - without any effort.

      There is only looking - and knowing in the same instant. Its absolutely breathtaking...
      1
    • The Wind is Blowing, Blowing is the Wind
      awakeningtoreality.blogspot.com
      The Wind is Blowing, Blowing is the Wind
      The Wind is Blowing, Blowing is the Wind
    • Dieter Vollmuth there is blowing (action, verb) but not "wind" (noun, concept)

      "Wind is blowing" is a concept - because I can only feel the "blowing" on the skin, not "Wind".

      hahaha - in the article is the same: verbs, not nouns.

      If the "body is going" there is no body going, there is only alternating feeling of "foot-pressure", "arm-swinging" and "eye-seeing" etc.

      There is no person lifes its live - there is only living and in that it seems, that sometimes arise a feeling like "I am that, which is living" or "that is my live". But there is only life living itself at this point and at all points.

      It is simply an ongoing stream of actions, without an actor - and nothing else. It is so clear, like seeing the left arm.
      1
    • Dieter Vollmuth Last night I felt that I was kidding myself all the time.
      Before falling asleep, there was an absolutely desperate feeling: "Either I finally see what's really there or I'll die." That seems to have unlocked something...
      1
    • Dieter Vollmuth Ahh - now I know, what "suchness" really is: the direct feeling, like "foot on the ground", without an intermediate. The verbing or acting without an actor - or the feeling without a feeler. A direct knowing without knower.
      1
    • Soh Wei Yu Well said.

      “I am telling the first and second stanza must go hand in hand to have real insight of anatta even for a start. You must have these 2 aspects of insight in anatta. So what is anatta? means when you penetrate no-agent, you are effectively developing your direct insight. That is not reifying anything extra. That is direct insight into suchness. So that when you see 'Self', there is nothing but aggregates. When you see 'weather', there is nothing but the changing clouds, rain… when you see 'body', you see changing sensation. When you hear sound, you see the DO [dependent origination], then you see how the 2 fold emptiness are simply one insight and why that leads to 一合相 (yi4 he2 xiang4; one totality/composite of appearance). If there is no insight but cling to words then you missed the essence. That is, the gaining of insight on the 2 stanzas is not to think only of 'Self'” - John Tan, 2011
      1



      ...

      Dieter Vollmuth Soh Wei Yu When there are dreams, it is more a "half-dream-state" or "half-wake-state". Consciousness is here but the body lie there like a corpse. And then there are visions of mechanics of the universe for example.

      My actual state is:
      - Day-dreams: absolutely not here
      - Imagination: Zero, no pictures, impossible to "make" them
      - Night-dreams: could real be forgotten

      - Memory: really bad. Eg: If i leave home or simply don't look at my wife and she is not talking - in the same instant she is totally forgotten. If she don't call me by phone - she is forgotten until i come back home and see her again.

      - Consciousness: The normal state of consciousness here is >90% simply awake, clear, present, nearly thought-free, silent, empty, free floating.

      - Percveiving: On the surface "interpretative without thoughts" and at the same time the underlying vibrations, nada, pressure surges, colors etc. It is more direct than before: "not I hear sound" or "hearing sound" - but more "only sound".

      - Feeling: Most of the time here is simply freedom and silence. Nothing special. Sometimes there is bliss but no clinging to it.

      I don't know, what that means, because i have no data of other people. Its simply that, what is present here.
      1


    Google translated article from Dieter Vollmuth's German blog:

    Awareness is not a container
    December 14, 2019 divo
    At the moment it looks like this: consciousness is not a field or container, but the things as they appear. Consciousness is also not the substance of things, but rather the mechanics of popping up and disappearing from unsubstantial phenomena. Firmness and permanence is part of the data of virtual reality, which appears as the “world out there with bodies”.

    The background field (I AM), which was fragmentary until yesterday, was deconstructed tonight and has disappeared. Now there are only networked points with gaps in between.

    On the surface, the body appears firm, solid and permanent - but a closer look immediately shows that it consists of strongly fluctuating, networked points. The deep, glowing blackness shines through the gaps, which has only been experienced as an “inner experience” for years and is now everywhere.

    There is nothing more to say about the conventional world, except that it is just the way it is. It cannot be denied as unreal, nor can it be confirmed as real. It is there in terms of experience - but only in the total view that all of these are just appearances (cinema film) and there is no one who sees them or can even change anything in the data content of the appearances can deep peace appear.

    The most amazing thing is that this view has been there all the time - but the intricate web of words and concepts has hidden the direct view of the real facts. Therefore, the view cannot be obtained - the obstacles must disappear, then it is there.

    What are the obstacles? Words, thoughts, concepts, ideas - which claim: "That the world is solid and permanent and that there are people who act in it and have to distinguish between good and bad". From a conventional point of view, this is correct - from the current point of view, the children's stuff!

    It's actually like watching a child playing in the sandpit and claiming that the sandcastle is a real house. But it's just sand, water and imagination ...

    The playing child, who pretends that his sand figures are real, shows the watching adults how they themselves mistakenly see the world. But the adults only see the mistake of the child who imitates them - but not their own mistake, because "of course the world is real, everyone sees that!" Yes, every superficial ignoramus sees it that way!

    As long as people hold on to this view and are content to see the world in this way, they are forced to suffer from it. This cannot be denied, because everyone experiences it firsthand. Not life is suffering, but to be seen wrong.

    This entry was posted in Findings. Bookmark the permanent link.
      GG wrote:
      Soh, I also like Bodhidarma . Coincidentally I was reading him and I separated these two passages that somehow sounded strange to me. I am curious about how this is written in Chines. Both passages, indeed, reminds one of Advaita based ideas. From the Wake-Up Sermon:
      Here Bodhidarma is quoting (not criticizing): "And the Nirvana Sutra says, "All mortals have the buddha-nature. But it’s covered by darkness from which they can’t escape.Our buddha-nature is awareness: to be aware and to make others aware. To realize awareness is liberation," Everything good has awareness for its root. And from this root of awareness grow the tree of all virtues and the fruit of nirvana. Beholding the mind like this is understanding"
      and...
      "Worship means reverence and humility it means revering your real self and humbling delusions."
      Comments
      • Soh Wei Yu 又《涅槃经》云:“一切众生悉有佛性,无明覆故,不得解脱。”佛性者,即觉性也。但自觉觉他,觉知明了,则名解脱。故知一切诸善,以觉为根;因其觉根,遂能显现诸功德树。涅槃之果德,因此而成。如是观心,可名为了。

        And The Mahāyāna Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra says: "All sentient beings have buddha-nature, but due to being obscured by ignorance, they are unable to be liberated." What is termed Buddha-nature is the nature of
        awake-awareness,. Simply to be self-awakened and awaken others, to clearly comprehend awake-knowing, is named liberation. One should know that all virtues have awake-awareness, as its root; from this root of awake-awareness, thereupon it is able to manifest various trees of merits. The merit of nirvana is thus accomplished. By contemplating mind as such is understanding/knowing

        (My comments: It should be noted that the 'awareness' here is actually more like the sanskrit term 'vidya' or the Tibetan term 'rigpa', which means more precisely - the knowledge of one's nature, although often incorrectly or inadequately translated as 'awareness'. Rather than simply the plain clarity aspect of our nature, the full understanding of our nature, the full maturation and ripening of vidya/awakening/rigpa includes the understanding of the *empty* and lucid nature of mind (see 
        The Doctrine of No Mind by Bodhidharma (无心论)). Thus translating this as 'awareness' is a rather misleading way of translation that lends it towards Advaitic misinterpretations, and a better term would be 'knowledge' or 'awakeness' or something of that manner.

        Buddhi (Sanskrit: बुद्धि) is derived from the Vedic Sanskrit root Budh (बुध् ), which literally means "to wake, be awake, observe, heed, attend, learn, become aware of, to know, be conscious again".)

        ...

        Buddhi is a feminine Sanskrit noun derived from *budh, to be awake, to understand, to know. The same root is the basis for the more familiar masculine form Buddha and the abstract noun bodhi.)

        夫礼者敬也,拜者伏也,所谓恭敬真性,屈伏无明,名为礼拜。

        礼 (courteous) is respect, 拜 is to submit/surrender (礼拜 is usually meant bow in veneration). What is known as respecting true nature, giving up/submitting/surrendering ignorance, is called "bowing in veneration".
    • Soh Wei Yu The term real self (真我) does not occur in Bodhidharma's text


      Also, months ago:
      • Soh Wei Yu Geovani Geo: I am unable to find these quotes in any books:

        "(...) the empty expanse of the ground of all phenomena"

        "As the final stage of the gradual way, the practitioner unites with the Way by seeing the emptiness of Self and all phenomena and by recognizing the empty expanse of the ground of all phenomena."

        Seems to be from Wayofbodhi site. Can you provide the book reference and which quote you are referring to?
      • Geovani Geo Soh, I cant find the source from where I copied that quote either(???)

        But I found this one:

        "A Tathagata’s forms are endless. And so is his awareness." The endless variety of forms is due to the mind. Its ability to distinguish things, whatever their movement or state, is the mind’s awareness. But the mind has no form and its awareness no limit. Hence it’s said, "A Tathagata’s forms are endless. And so is his awareness." A material body of the four elements" is trouble. A material body is subject to birth and death. But the real body exists without existing, because a Tathagata’s real body never changes. (Bloodstream Sermon - translated by red pine)

        "(...)because a Tathagata’s real body never changes"
      • Soh Wei Yu 故云如来色无尽,智慧亦复然。色无尽是自心,心识善能分别一切,乃至施为运用,皆是智慧。心无形相,智慧亦无尽。故云如来色无尽,智慧亦复然。四大色身,即是烦恼,色身即有生灭,法身常住无所住,如来法身常不变异故。

        Most English translations are not precise.

        Here's my translation, as precise and word-for-word as possible:

        "The sutras say, Tathagata's forms are limitless, wisdom is likewise. The limitless forms are one's mind, mind-consciousness is able to distinguish everything, and even actions and functions are all wisdom. Mind is without form, wisdom is limitless, [and hence] the sutras say that that Tathagata's forms are limitless, wisdom is likewise. The form-body of the four great elements are suffering, form-body has birth and death, dharma-body [dharmakaya] eternally abides without abiding anywhere, as the Tathagata's dharmakaya never alters."

        It is misleading to translate dharmakaya (the body of phenomena) as 'real body'. For in truth dharmakaya refers to the nature of phenomena, empty and having never arisen. The nature of phenomena being non-arisen, how can there be abiding, change, and cessation? In direct taste it's just lucid appearance, but nothing there, nothing undergoing birth, abiding/change nor cessation, all phenomena are complete quiescence and illusory yet simultaneously a vivid brilliant luminosity. But the word 'real' often connotes something like substantial reality, so it is misleading. I do not like translations that change words at the whims and fancies of the translator.

        Even to speak of the nature of phenomena is also conventional. Dharmakaya is also unreal (the emptiness aspect), the sambhogakaya is also unreal (the luminous clarity aspect), the nirmanakaya is also unreal (the energetic manifestation aspect), and the three bodies are inseparable or three aspects of our experiential 'reality'.

        Thusness wrote in 2013:

        John Tan Haha Jackson, u never give up.

        This heart is the "space" of where, the "time" of when and the "I" of who.

        In hearing, it's that "sound".

        In seeing, it's that "scenery".

        In thinking, it is that "eureka"!

        In snapping a finger, it is seizing the whole entire moment of that instantaneous "snapping".

        Just marvelous such as it is on the fly.

        So no "it" but thoroughly empty.

        To u this "heart" is most real, to dzogchen it is illusory. Though illusory, it is fully vivid and brilliance. Since it is illusory, it nvr really truly arise. There is genuine "treasure" in the illusory.

        I think Kyle has a lot points to share. Do unblock him.

        Nice chat And happy journey jax!

        Gone!
        December 12, 2013 at 8:24am · Unlike · 10

        ....

        Also Thusness wrote way back:

        John Tan Hi Kyle, Actually I am saying instead of attempting to deconstruct endlessly, why not resolved that that pure experience itself is empty and non-arising. In hearing, there is only sound. This clear clean and pure sound, treat and see it as the X (treat and see it like an imputation/conventional designation as u explained), empty and non-arising. In seeing, just scenery, just this clear clean and lurid scenery. Where is this scenery? Inside, outside, other’s mind or our mind? Unfindable but nonetheless appears vibrantly. This arising thought, this dancing sensation, this passing scent, all share the same taste. All experiences are like that -- like mirages and rainbows, illusory and non-arising, they are free from the 4 extremes. Resolved that all experiences are non-arising then pure sensory experiences and conventional constructs will be of equal taste. Realize this to be the nature of experience and illusory appearances will taste magic and vajra (indestructible)! Groundless and naturally releasing! Just my 2 cents of blah blah blah in new year. Happy New Year Kyle. 2 minutes ago • Unlike • 1 February 6 at 1:50am · Edited · Like"
    [1:59 PM, 12/6/2019] Soh Wei Yu: Kyle Dixon in Nonsectarian Dzogchen Atiyoga & Mahamudra:
    "The real difference is that in Dzogchen, appearances are 'non-existent clear appearances' [med par gsal snang].

    Not mind because they are ultimately unfindable, and then distinct on the level of convention."
    [5:44 PM, 12/6/2019] John Tan: Meaning?
    [7:15 PM, 12/6/2019] Soh Wei Yu: To dzogchen, mind and appearance are ultimately unfindable, but distinct conventionally
    [7:15 PM, 12/6/2019] Soh Wei Yu: Therefore they are not same in dzogchen
    [7:55 PM, 12/6/2019] John Tan: That is correct and accurate
    [7:57 PM, 12/6/2019] John Tan: Actually when we say appearance is mind, it is an experiential taste.  Conventionally it should treated as distinct and DO [dependently originating].
    [7:58 PM, 12/6/2019] John Tan: However even saying they r different is incorrect.
    [7:59 PM, 12/6/2019] John Tan: Language cannot define this relationship appropriately ...
    [7:59 PM, 12/6/2019] John Tan: Therefore 2 truth
    [8:00 PM, 12/6/2019] John Tan: Also it is true to talk abt emptiness
    [8:00 PM, 12/6/2019] John Tan: Appear and not-found
    [8:01 PM, 12/6/2019] John Tan: Rather than to talk about it as if we r talking about One Mind.
    Someone asked me if Toni Packer described Maha.

    I said,

    "This is maha

    Toni Packer, The Wonder of Presence:

    “When I talk about listening, I don’t mean just listening with the ear. Listening here includes the totality of perception—all senses open and alive, and still much more than that. The eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body and mind are receptive, open, not controlled. A Zen saying describes it as “hearing with one’s eyes and seeing with one’s ears.” It refers to this wholeness of perception. The wholeness of being!
    Another Zen saying demands: “Hear the bell before it rings!” Ah, it doesn’t make any sense rationally, does it? But there is a moment when that bell is ringing before you know it! You may never know it! Your entire being is ringing! There’s no division in that—everything is ringing.”"


    Excerpt from Finding a New Way to Listen
    Din posted:
    “There is that sphere, monks, where there is no earth, no water, no fire, no air, no sphere of infinite space, no sphere of infinite consciousness, no sphere of nothingness, no sphere of neither perception nor non-perception, no this world, no world beyond, neither Moon nor Sun. There, monks, I say there is surely no coming, no going, no persisting, no passing away, no rebirth. It is quite without support, unmoving, without an object,—just this is the end of suffering.”
    ~Nibbana Sutta - The first Discourse.

    I replied:
    Actually what the Buddha taught here is easily misunderstood as formless awareness but that is not what he meant.
    Buddha:
    “‘He has been stilled where the currents of supposition do not flow. And when the currents of supposition do not flow, he is said to be a sage at peace.’ Thus it was said. With reference to what was it said? ‘I am’ is a supposition. ‘I am this’ is a supposition. ‘I shall be’ is a supposition. ‘I shall not be’ … ‘I shall be possessed of form’ … ‘I shall not be possessed of form’ … ‘I shall be percipient’ … ‘I shall not be percipient’ … ‘I shall be neither percipient nor non-percipient’ is a supposition. Supposition is a disease, supposition is a cancer, supposition is an arrow. By going beyond all supposition, he is called a sage at peace.
    “And further, a sage at peace is not born, does not age, does not die, is unagitated, and is free from longing. He has nothing whereby he would be born. Not being born, will he age? Not aging, will he die? Not dying, will he be agitated? Not being agitated, for what will he long? It was in reference to this that it was said, ‘He has been stilled where the currents of supposition do not flow. And when the currents of supposition do not flow, he is said to be a sage at peace.’ Now, monk, you should remember this, my brief analysis of the six properties.”
    ...
    ““Then, Bāhiya, you should train yourself thus: In reference to the seen, there will be only the seen. In reference to the heard, only the heard. In reference to the sensed, only the sensed. In reference to the cognized, only the cognized. That is how you should train yourself. When for you there will be only the seen in reference to the seen, only the heard in reference to the heard, only the sensed in reference to the sensed, only the cognized in reference to the cognized, then, Bāhiya, there is no you in connection with that. When there is no you in connection with that, there is no you there. When there is no you there, you are neither here nor yonder nor between the two. This, just this, is the end of stress.”2
    Through hearing this brief explanation of the Dhamma from the Blessed One, the mind of Bāhiya of the Bark-cloth right then and there was released from effluents through lack of clinging/sustenance. Having exhorted Bāhiya of the Bark-cloth with this brief explanation of the Dhamma, the Blessed One left.
    Now, not long after the Blessed One’s departure, Bāhiya was attacked & killed by a cow with a young calf. Then the Blessed One, having gone for alms in Sāvatthī, after the meal, returning from his alms round with a large number of monks, saw that Bāhiya had died. On seeing him, he said to the monks, “Take Bāhiya’s body, monks, and, placing it on a litter and carrying it away, cremate it and build him a memorial. Your companion in the holy life has died.”
    Responding, “As you say, lord,” to the Blessed One, the monks–placing Bāhiya’s body on a litter, carrying it away, cremating it, and building him a memorial–went to the Blessed One. On arrival, having bowed down to him, sat to one side. As they were sitting there, they said to him, “Bāhiya’s body has been cremated, lord, and his memorial has been built. What is his destination? What is his future state?”
    “Monks, Bāhiya of the Bark-cloth was wise. He practiced the Dhamma in accordance with the Dhamma and did not pester me with issues related to the Dhamma. Bāhiya of the Bark-cloth, monks, is totally unbound.”
    Then, on realizing the significance of that, the Blessed One on that occasion exclaimed:
    Where water, earth,
    fire, & wind
    have no footing:
    There the stars don’t shine,
    the sun isn’t visible.
    There the moon doesn’t appear.
    There darkness is not found.
    And when a sage,
    a brahman through sagacity,
    has realized [this] for himself,
    then from form & formless,
    from bliss & pain,
    he is freed.”
    .......
    John tan/thusness, 2013:
    To Jax:
    The place where there is no earth, fire, wind, space, water…
    is the place where the earth, fire, wind, space and water kills “You” and fully shines as its own radiance, a complete taste of itself and fully itself.
    Lastly, it is interesting to get know something about Dzogchen however the jargons and tenets are far beyond me.
    Just wrote due to a sudden spurt of interest, nothing intense.
    Thanks for all the sharing and exchanges.
    Gone!
    .......
    A monk asked Tozan, “When cold and heat come, how can we avoid them?”
    Tozan said, “Why don’t you go to the place where there is no cold or heat?”
    The monk said, “What is the place where there is no cold or heat?”
    Tozan said, “When it’s cold, the cold kills you; when it’s hot, the heat kills you.”
    This is not advice to “accept” your situation, as some commentators have suggested, but a direct expression of authentic practice and enlightenment. Master Tozan is not saying, “When cold, shiver; when hot, sweat,” nor is he saying, “When cold, put on a sweater; when hot, use a fan.” In the state of authentic practice and enlightenment, the cold kills you, and there is only cold in the whole universe. The heat kills you, and there is only heat in the whole universe. The fragrance of incense kills you, and there is only the fragrance of incense in the whole universe. The sound of the bell kills you, and there is only “boooong” in the whole universe…
    ~The Flatbed Sutra of Louie Wing, Ted Biringer
    ....
    “In our bustling daily life we may feel that we have neither the time nor place to listen quietly, to look freshly. But if we are truly interested in a place and time to listen, an opportunity will present itself. It is one of the amazing graces of being alive that when there is a small flame of yearning to find out, we unexpectedly come upon a bench to sit on out in the open and realize that there is more space in this universe than the tight cocoon we have lived in all our life.

    With renewed questioning comes new wondering and listening. Heaven and earth are open in simply being here as we are, breathing in and out with an airplane humming in the sky—the miracle of this moment! Nothing is separate. Everything is here as it is, utterly simple. No one is here to lay any claim to it.

    ...

    Open listening embraces all the senses as one whole perception. There is no division between looking, listening, smelling, touching, or tasting—just undivided openness of all senses perceiving as one whole without a separate me at work. There is no doer and no recipient here—just spontaneous presence without fragmentation.

    ...

    Is it our task to find out whether or not there is total and complete enlightenment like the Buddha proclaimed? I always liked the Buddha’s saying: “I truly attained nothing from complete, unexcelled enlightenment, and that is why it is called complete, unexcelled enlightenment.” No-thing, no one to attain it, spaceless space, no one there to occupy it. Just alive presence with the evening star in the sky. Dying to all the stuff imagined and clung to about oneself—what I am, what I was, what I will be, what I could be, should be . . . Can we see all concepts as concepts with deepening clarity and wisdom? Not immediately lurching toward something promised in the future that has its sole existence in thought? Can we clearly discern what constitutes thinking and what is actually present right here without needing to think it? Can we discern it effortlessly? The open windows, fresh air touching the skin, bright sunshine everywhere, all kinds of twittering sounds, crows calling and breathing, pulsating life! Caw, caw, caw, caw . . . Sensations throughout the body, breathing, beholding it, not the words, but the aliveness of it all. Can we realize now that “complete unexcelled enlightenment” is a concept?”

    ~ Toni Packer, The Wonder of Presence


    ... 
    Do you see now that Buddha is not speaking about formless awareness but the insight into the absence of self/Self thus putting an end to the deluded sense of Being that drives craving and rebirth in samsara?
    The place where the five elements do not land is simply the place where the earth, fire, wind, space and water kills “You” and fully shines as its own radiance, a complete taste of itself and fully itself.
    ....

    • Din Robinson is this also called "The Great Cessation"?
    • Soh Wei Yu Din Robinson

      Yes

      http://measurelessmind.ca/nirodhasanna.html

      The Recognition of Cessation (Nirodhasaññā)

      For whom there is neither a far shore,
      Nor a near shore, nor both,
      Who is free from distress, without ties,
      Him I call a brāhmaṇa.

      — Dhammapada 385
      When the recognition of dispassion is fully developed and realized, and with no self to be found, nothing to be identified with, one realizes the gnosis and vision of liberation (vimuttiñāṇadassana). This is non-referential inner peace (ajjhattasanti). This is the full recognition of cessation. AN 10.60 Girimānanda Sutta:
      Now what, Ānanda, is the recognition of cessation? Here, Ānanda, a monk, gone to the wilderness, to the root of a tree, or to an empty place, discriminates thus: ‘This is peace, this is excellent, that is: the calming of all fabrications, the release of all acquisitions, the elimination of craving, cessation, nibbāna.’ This, Ānanda, is called the recognition of cessation.
      This is the complete absence of agitation (calita natthi). Ud 8.4 Nibbāna Sutta:
      There being no agitation, there is tranquility. There being tranquility, there is no inclination. There being no inclination, there is no coming or going. There being no coming or going, there is no passing away or arising. There being no passing away or arising, there is neither a here nor a beyond nor a between-the-two. Just this is the end of unsatisfactoriness.
      This is the calming of all specific fabrication and volitional intention. MN 140 Dhātuvibhaṅga Sutta:
      One does not form any specific fabrication or volitional intention towards either existence or non-existence. Not forming any specific fabrication or volitional intention towards either existence or non-existence, he does not cling to anything in this world. Not clinging, he is not excited. Unexcited, he personally attains complete nibbāna. He discerns that, ‘Birth is ended, the holy life fulfilled, done is what had to be done, there is nothing further here.’
      This is the freedom of absence which is revealed through the complete recognition of selflessness. Ud 1.10 Bāhiya Sutta:
      ‘The seen will be merely the seen, the heard will be merely the heard, the sensed will be merely the sensed, the known will be merely the known.’ This is how you should train, Bāhiya.

      When, Bāhiya, for you the seen will be merely the seen, the heard will be merely the heard, the sensed will be merely the sensed, the known will be merely the known, then Bāhiya, you will not be that. When, Bāhiya, you are not that, then Bāhiya, you will not be there. When, Bāhiya, you are not there, then Bāhiya, you will be neither here nor beyond nor between-the-two. Just this is the end of unsatisfactoriness.
      This is noble liberation which is the elimination of craving and clinging. MN 106 Āneñjasappāya Sutta:
      This is death-free, namely, the liberation of mind through not clinging.
      This is the effortless clarity of consciousness which is non-abiding and not established (appatiṭṭha viññāṇa). SN 22.53 Upaya Sutta:
      When that consciousness is not established, not increasing, not concocting, it is liberated. Being liberated, it is steady. Being steady, it is content. Being content, he is not excited. Unexcited, he personally attains complete nibbāna. He discerns that, ‘Birth is ended, the holy life fulfilled, done is what had to be done, there is nothing further here.’
      There is no more seeking of any kind. There is no more personal agenda. There is no identifying with any phenomena or turning anything into a fixed reference point. There is no “here” nor “beyond” nor “between-the-two.”
      The awakened mind is measureless (appamāṇacetasa), free from any sort of measuring (pamāṇa). In evocative terms, an awakened one is deep (gambhīra), boundless (appameyya), and fathomless (duppariyogāḷha). Utterly free from any reference to specifically fabricated consciousness (viññāṇasaṅkhayavimutta). “Gone” (atthaṅgata), the measureless mind is untraceable (ananuvejja) even here and now. It doesn’t abide in the head, or in the body, or anywhere else for that matter. It doesn’t have size or shape. It’s not an object or a subject.
      Just as the sky is formless and non-illustrative, the measureless mind is non-illustrative and non-indicative (anidassana). This effortless clarity is unmediated by any specific fabrication or volitional intention. It is unaffected knowing: The seen is merely the seen (diṭṭhamatta). The heard is merely the heard (sutamatta). The sensed is merely the sensed (mutamatta). The known is merely the known (viññātamatta). But there is no you there. Of course, this liberating gnosis and vision can’t adequately be pointed out or indicated by words alone. It is to be individually experienced (paccatta veditabba).

      The Recognition of Cessation and the Seven Factors of Awakening (Satta Bojjhaṅgā)

      Sustained, dedicated practice of the recognition of cessation will gradually create the optimal conditions for the arising of all seven factors of awakening. SN 46.76 Nirodha Sutta (abridged):
      Here monks, a monk develops the awakening factor of mindfulness accompanied by the recognition of cessation, dependent upon seclusion, dispassion, and cessation, resulting in letting go. He develops the awakening factor of dhamma-investigation accompanied by the recognition of cessation, dependent upon seclusion, dispassion, and cessation, resulting in letting go. He develops the awakening factor of energy accompanied by the recognition of cessation, dependent upon seclusion, dispassion, and cessation, resulting in letting go. He develops the awakening factor of joy accompanied by the recognition of cessation, dependent upon seclusion, dispassion, and cessation, resulting in letting go. He develops the awakening factor of tranquility accompanied by the recognition of cessation, dependent upon seclusion, dispassion, and cessation, resulting in letting go. He develops the awakening factor of meditative composure accompanied by the recognition of cessation, dependent upon seclusion, dispassion, and cessation, resulting in letting go. He develops the awakening factor of equanimity accompanied by the recognition of cessation, dependent upon seclusion, dispassion, and cessation, resulting in letting go.

      It is in this way that the recognition of cessation is developed and cultivated so that it is of great fruit and benefit. It is in this way that the recognition of cessation is developed and cultivated so that one of two fruits is to be expected: either final gnosis in this very life or, if there is a residue of clinging, the state of nonreturning. It is in this way that the recognition of cessation is developed and cultivated so that it leads to great good. It is in this way that the recognition of cessation is developed and cultivated so that it leads to great security from bondage. It is in this way that the recognition of cessation is developed and cultivated so that it leads to a great sense of urgency. It is in this way that the recognition of cessation is developed and cultivated so that it leads to dwelling in great comfort.
    • measurelessmind.ca
      The Recognition of Cessation | Nirodhasaññā
      The Recognition of Cessation | Nirodhasaññā
    • Great Resource of Buddha's Teachings
      awakeningtoreality.blogspot.com
      Great Resource of Buddha's Teachings
      Great Resource of Buddha's Teachings
    • Din Robinson Soh Wei Yu I actually asked the same question of Jackson Peterson and he told me no, said there was never anything there to begin with that could "cease"
    • Soh Wei Yu Din Robinson

      In the early tradition of Buddhism as taught by Buddha, the emphasis is on 'Cessation'. But this cessation is not about ceasing sense perception, rather Nirvana is precisely defined by Buddha as having these characteristics: 1) Cessation of all clinging 2) Cessation of all identity - I Am, I shall be, I have been, I am the Witness, etc - the Buddha listed all possible ways of identification and refuted them all 3) Cessation of passion (craving), aggression (anger), delusion 4) With the cessation of the three poisons in number 3., comes the cessation of rebirth in samsara, as rebirth in samsara is predicated upon the three poisons. The cessation of these delusions occur even while one is fully aware in waking state - therefore 'in the seen only the seen' -- in fact there is only seeing, no seer, and also no seeing as seeing is just colors. No you.

      All these characteristics of Nirvana are interlinked.

      Then about 500 years after the passing of Buddha, the Mahayana teachings developed and emphasized Bodhicitta - the compassionate aspiration for not only one's personal liberation but the attainment of full awakening of Buddhahood for the benefit of all sentient beings. In this tradition, the emphasis is that samsara - the world of experience - is fundamentally non-arisen, quiescent and equal to cessation, fundamentally no different from nirvana as it is non-arising, non-abiding and unceasing. This is because whatever originates in dependence is fundamentally non-arisen, an example would be a reflection of moon on water or a rainbow. Due to various conditions a reflection appears but we cannot say that a moon has truly arisen or been created in the water. Whatever originates in dependence are free of the extremes of existence or non-existence, arising and ceasing. The nature of appearance is merely empty clarity, free of extremes. The nature of conventions is such that they are dependently designated and fundamentally empty of essence/substance and unfindable when sought, just like the analogy of chariot and parts.

      So there are three parts to emptiness 1) conventions are empty of essence and substance, entities and mental constructs are empty and unfindable when sought, non-arisen, 2) the nature of all appearance are empty-clarity free from the extremes of existence and non-existence, 3) whatever originates in dependence are fundamentally non-arising and non-ceasing.

      Now, the early and later traditions do not contradict each other. I would say they are complementary. The Mahayana tradition simply expands upon the insight of emptiness that the Buddha already taught in the Pali canon (like Phena Sutta, Kaccayanagotta Sutta, Dhammapada, etc) with greater emphasis and clarification because it tends to be misunderstood and misinterpreted by some 'Hinayana' commentators.
    • Soh Wei Yu In the Mahayana tradition ala Lankavatara Sutra, it is taught that the Arahat of the early tradition is equivalent to the 8th bhumi stage of the Mahayana Bodhisattva in terms of eliminating all emotional obscurations (passion, aggression, delusion) through realizing and actualizing the emptiness of person (subjective self), while the end of the 10th bhumi culminates in the end of not only emotional obscurations but also all cognitive obscurations that misapprehends that there is true existence of phenomena by clearly realizing the right view of emptiness of all subject-action-object and the empty nature of phenomena. Then one attains Buddhahood, when all emotional + cognitive obscurations are eliminated through the eye of omniscience that apprehends the nature of all phenomena completely without hindrance. Emptiness of subjective person/self clears away emotional obscuration, while emptiness of phenomena clears away cognitive obscuration.


      Soh Wei Yu Din Robinson to clarify further, all traditions of Buddhism including even Dzogchen teaches cessation/nirvana, cessation here does not contradict the “non arising, non abiding and non ceasing” nature of all dharmas that dependently originate, rather it simply means the cessation of afflictions and cognitive obscurations/delusions.

      For example in Dzogchen it is taught:

      “There are three traditional methods of dealing with emotions: abandoning them, transforming them, and recognizing their nature. All three levels of Buddhist teaching, all three yanas, describe how to deal with disturbing emotions. It is never taught, on any level, that one can be an enlightened buddha while remaining involved in disturbing emotions - never. Each level deals with emotions differently.



      Just like darkness cannot remain when the sun rises, none of the disturbing emotions can endure within the recognition of mind nature. That is the moment of realizing original wakefulness, and it is the same for each of the five poisons.



      In any of the five disturbing emotions, we do not have to transmute the emotion into empty cognizance. The nature of the emotion already is this indivisible empty cognizance.” - Vajra Speech, Tulku Urgyen Rinpoche

      The Dzogchen master Śrī Siṃha also said the following:

      “A so called ‘primordial buddhahood’ is not asserted. Full awakening is not possible without being free of the five afflictions... It is not possible for wisdom to increase without giving up afflictions. Wisdom will not arise without purifying afflictions.”
    • Soh Wei Yu Buddha: "And what, monks, is the not-fabricated (asaṅkhata)? The elimination of passion, the elimination of aggression, the elimination of delusion: this is called the not-fabricated. " .... "And what, monks, is the death-free (amata)? The elimination of passion, the elimination of aggression, the elimination of delusion: this is called the death-free." - SN 43 Asaṅkhata Saṃyutta