- Reply
- 1d
- Edited
- Reply
- 1d
- Reply
- 1d
- Reply
- 1d
- Reply
- 1d
- Reply
- 1d
- Edited
- Reply
- 1d
- Reply
- 1d
- Reply
- 1d
- Reply
- 20h
- Reply
- 19h
- Reply
- 1h
- Reply
- 20m
- Reply
- 18m
- Reply
- 15m
- Reply
- 13m
- Reply
- 12m
- Reply
- 11m
- Reply
- 11m
- Reply
- 11m
- Reply
- 9m
- Reply
- 2m
- Reply
- 1m

Hi Nick. Glad you’re reading this book, I found it very helpful.
I Am as described here is equivalent to kensho.
As
far as the question about hearing the bell, the question that
immediately arose for me was, “Did you have an awakening?” This is what
matters. Was there an undeniable shift in the way that you experience
moment to moment reality? This is absolutely self-validating. For
instance Buddha himself could appear and tell you it wasn’t real and it
wouldn’t shake your certainty one bit. It won’t be surrounding a
singular event like hearing one thing, but will be pervasive in all of
your experience. There is usually an accompanying emotional release and
a feeling of vaporizing a heaviness wed been carrying as long as we can
remember. It usually comes with a honeymoon period that can last weeks
to months, somethings longer. Even when that wears off it’s clear that
something has shifted and never shifted back. This is in contrast to
tastes of awake nature which can last minutes to hours, sometimes a
couple days, but there is no shift in ones identity and you still feel
like the same person seeking that relief.
If
that hasn’t then I’d keep working at it and not analyze about specific
details. It often occurs that we analyze specific details trying to
“solve” something and use that activity as a life line to avoid going
into the abyss that no concept can touch.
Very
specifically, there are definitely degrees to which hearing/sensing
occurs. Before awakening it can appear as if we can sense directly but
the subject / object construct is completely intact. There is no way we
can imagine how that sense experience would be without it, literally. To
sense without separation operating is quite a different thing, it
usually comes with awakening to various degrees, and it’s not subtle.
I
told this story somewhere recently maybe in this group so sorry if
you’ve read it, but it’s illustrative here. A friend of mine years ago
was in a particularly difficult phase of her life and practice. She was
sitting one day and said to herself, “I just can’t get back to myself!”
Then she laughed at what a strange thought that was. She asked herself,
“Where the fuck did I go then?” And laughed some more. She continued to
sit and everything was quiet. It was so quiet and there were no
thoughts, that she didn’t notice anything was different bc there was no
noticer, but that wasn’t noticed
.
Then she got up to take a shower. As she ran her hand through her hair
under the shower she said she realized that in 37 years of being alive
she’d never ACTUALLY felt that before! She couldn’t believe it.
Everything was pure flow, clarity, infinite. All objects were pristine,
alive and radiant. She spent weeks examining random objects in tears at
their beauty and depth. She told me, “You know I always thought
enlightenment was something mystical or sone other worldly experience, I
was so surprised it was the sensation of water running through my hand
in my hair.”

If
you experience the bell, other sounds and visual field this way then
you have your answer. If not I’d keep chipping away at it.
Even
if you are experiencing things in a non dual way, that can still be
clarified as well as dissolving the tendency to form reference frames,
hold position, etc.
Good luck !
Angelo Gerangelo
Great post. I wonder how this realization you describe fits into the
many maps/levels that are mentioned in this thread, ie Buddhist, Wilber
or otherwise. 
Angelo
That's a fantastic story and immediately relatable to anyone who has
had that shift. I remember reading in a Jed Mckenna book where he's awed
by the beauty of the rust and grime on some old buildings while he's
waiting on a friend. I never got that until after my shift. For me, it
was sound. The symphony of construction noise, melody of the dogs
snoring, "terrible" pop music suddenly sounding beautiful for what it
was, etc.
Hi
Charlie. In my experience the initial shift (I usually just call
awakening or first awakening) but is referred to as I AM or kensho is
consistent among those going through this process in earnest. There are
differences in initial depths of awakening etc but those are subtleties
that would not be easy to sort out until far down the road so trying to
sort them out or map them before even going through the process will
probably not be very fruitful. Also based on experience, personality,
etc people will describe this shift in quite different ways. Many won’t
feel inclined to talk about it at all bc it’s clear it’s not something
you can put into words/maps and to do so without really knowing the
subtleties of how this all moves, can mislead people. As an illustrative
example, I was at an adyashanti retreat one and a woman got up and
described what sounded like an awakening in her recent past. Then in a
round about way she suggested she feels she now wants to help other
people go through it. She was clearly looking for an endorsement to
teach but didn’t say it out right. He just smiled and sat back looking
at her for an uncomfortably long time. Then he finally said in a pretty
stern tone, “I can’t tell you what to do... but if you’re going to go
out and teach this you’d better know it all the way down to the bottom.”
Without saying it literally he was effectively telling her “Go sit for
another 20 years, and come back and talk to me.” 

Anyways
what I find with people I’m working with who go through this initial
gate-less barrier is that this initial shift is consistent and has
certain aspects that are undeniable. Few people clarify ongoing non-dual
realization right after initial awakening but it can happen as well.
More likely it will take several months to several years. That period is
one of clarifying practice, dissolving fixations,
integrating/dissolving afflicting repressed emotions, investigating how
the most fundamental beliefs tied to self operate which leads naturally
to clarification etc.
Also
I find that right after awakening the person usually seems quite
enlightened for a period. They often touch into non-dual and even
no-self for a time but those are usually experiential/unstable and
followed by that not-so fun period of feeling quite un-enlightened. Then
with good guidance and willingness to let this process dissolve the
fixations more and more there can be those further refinements as
described in stage 4/5 here. No-self you is sort of a whole different
ballgame but it is where this leads if you’re crazy enough to keep going
after awakening :0
I’ll
post a link of a friend I interviewed about a week after initial
awakening. It took her five months of hard core practice/ Inquiry.

YOUTUBE.COM
Nothing Changed

TD Unmanifest
yeah when you can be enraptured staring at a wall not trying to meditate , you know something has changed 

Charlie Birns
here something else someone sent me right after awakening. You can see
that the ways of describing vary yet the shift is undeniable.____
The
body is tired but it doesn’t sleep much. It shakes. I wake up in the
middle of the night to cry. The tears keep coming. It actually isn’t me
crying, it’s the universe crying. It’s shedding all the tears that my
family had to hold back, all the tears that my friends innocently
swallowed.
What grace to be broken open like this.
Nobody
is doing anything. This has nothing to do with me. What is me? Is it
still here? Was it ever here? I don’t know. I can’t tell. ‘Me’ sounds
like a pet dog.
Something
is dying. But I am here. Alive. There is nothing more obvious. At times
thought is quiet. At times thought is loud. Thoughts come. The mind is
active. The mind is adorable. All I see are dreams. Mere whispers on the
stage. Desire and aversion come and go, but they belong to no one.
There
are hopes and wishes, fears and concerns. And here they all converge,
they meet and kiss and dissolve into each other. ____ is changing and
not changing. It’s a beautiful show. She’s still here, apparently. She
still loves to work her ass off and eat chocolate and exercise and laugh
and fall apart. She loves to fall apart. So what?
There is nothing to overcome. Suffering is perfection.
The
most mundane is the most sacred. Imagination is sacred. Delusion is
sacred. Pretense is sacred. In this play I meet myself again and again
and again. Hi there you.
I’m
on my death bed and outside the sun is rising. This is where the end
meets the beginning. I’ve never heard the birds sing so clearly. So
effortlessly.
I’m
exhausted and heavy and I’m vital and light. How can this be? There’s a
coexistence. Sameness. I’m moving so rapidly and yet unwaveringly still.
I’m naked and absolutely held. Held by the unknown. Kidnapped. Conquered by the unknown. Home.
Thank
YOU for lighting the way. Thank you for your willingness to take
everything away so gently and so radically. Thank you for feeling when I
couldn’t feel. Thank you for getting out of the way, for showing up
relentlessly, for the lack of filters, for everything you didn’t do. I
don’t know what the fuck you did, but I suspect you didn’t do anything.
Thank you for a selfless, agenda-less offering from no one to no one.
Angelo Gerangelo
Thanks so much for your replies. I really like how you write about
this. I find it difficult to locate my perceptual shifts in terms of
maps and stages, though it is compelling and in some ways productive to
do so. It seems like you are locating that initial, seismic nondual
realization as stages 4 and 5 on the AtR Seven stages of enlightenment
map. I found Adyashansti's book "The End of Your World" a helpful guide
navigating life after that initial breakthrough/breakdown. What have you
found to be the most helpful approaches or supports for continuing the
insane journey to no-self-land?
Charlie Birns
I think that’s a good book, he has one called emptiness dancing that is
good as well. As far as resources, it’s hard for me to say honestly. I
have only read a handful of books about realization. They seem to appear
when needed. A few things I think are important for life after that
initial awakening and up until no-self are these.1.
Important to find where intention (for awakening , living truth etc),
meets surrender to flow of life/non-dual nature of immediate experience.
Continue to find this sweet spot revealed in various activities, not
just on the mat. Continue to investigate the pristine and dimensionless
nature of sense phenomena / presence. If done correctly the sense of a
world will dissolve. This is not describable but it’s true experience,
nothing special and transient (just this). Like entering a non-world of
as this is-Maha-radiance . From here it’s exquisitely clear there is
nothing to do, yet alertness and willingness to see any and all fixation
tendencies, beliefs and avoidance patterns is key. From here there is
nowhere to go and spontaneity IS practice IS radiant empty nature IS
everything-not-in space-and-here IS nothing at all. Endless flux so
primary it can’t even know it self, just pure display . It’s radically
intimate but impossibly varied. It’s no where and never not here. This
carries itself forward naturally,
Author
Angelo Gerangelo
that's awesome. thank you! I definitely still have subject/object
despite no-thought when experiencing sensations. If I enquire "who am I"
attention centres on the energy channel running up the centre of the
body, then I enquire "who am I" (meaning I see that I am aware of what
initially seems like me then enquire of that). Is that how you would
practice?
Nick Wilson
for initial breakthrough it doesn’t involve the senses so much as it
does the relationship between thought and consciousness. I write
something recently may be helpful 
Self-Inquiry
We’ve
already touched on the question “Who am I?” a couple times. Now we’re
going to take that point of inquiry and supercharge it. We’ll use this
self-inquiry vehicle as a sort of depth charge. Its purpose is to plunge
you down through all those layers of belief and personal narrative,
right to the core of identity. If we do this the right way, it will
detonate when it reaches that core. This detonation will blow a hole
right through the bottom. “The bottom of what?” You might ask. The
bottom of everything. We are going to blow a hole right through the
bottom of reality. You didn’t come all this way for nothing right?
“Blowing
a hole through the bottom” is obviously a metaphor. The transformation
that we’re referring to is so radical that even dimension (bottom, top,
near, far) will be seen to be an illusion. Still, it’s a reasonably apt
description. After my own awakening, these were the exact words that
occurred to me. A couple of days into reality as I knew it dismantling
itself, I was talking to a friend about what had happened. I knew I
couldn’t adequately put into words what had taken place. I also knew it
was impossible to describe what had replaced the struggle and isolation I
had previously considered “normal life.” Yet my friend could sense that
something had dramatically changed in me, and asked what had happened.
The words came, “I was meditating and the bottom fell out.” It was
exactly like this. Oddly enough, when the bottom fell out, there was
nothing for everything to fall into. The framework of reality as I had
known it had completely deconstructed itself. What was left was
something like a deep and pervasive peace, and that’s how it remains.
It’s obvious that whatever I thought was real before was only a very
small “model” of reality, something like a shadow on a wall. I had
stumbled upon a possibility, a way of investigating perception, that
completely altered the way I experience reality.
Self
inquiry has the power to bring this about for anyone who is willing to
take the plunge. By imbibing it with the will to awaken to our true
nature, we give the self-inquiry vehicle power beyond the limits of what
we are capable of on our own. In this way, the inquiry becomes
something of a portal or a conduit through which we can come into
contact with forces altogether beyond the limits of the human dimension.
Once this happens, you can no longer know yourself in the limited and
definite way you had previously learned to perceive yourself. Your
identity will find a new equilibrium with unbound consciousness, which
is essentially limitless. The limitless experience of
consciousness-Being, while astounding, is but the staging area for the
more radical unfolding ahead. Yet it is a very important milestone in
the process of realization.
Like
any catalyst, this method of self inquiry functions best when the
environmental conditions are favorable. Let’s spend some time discussing
the optimal conditions to support this process before we will delve
into the mechanics of the inquiry itself. Here are the conditions:
Alert:
This inquiry works best if we are alert, without straining. You don’t
want to be slack with your attention, daydreaming, or mind-wandering. On
the other hand, it’s unnecessary to be hyper-vigilant or to strain your
attention into a hyper-focused state. You want to be alert enough to
assure that nothing escapes your attention, including any thought. A
relaxed and dilated (open) attention, engaged in the process of inquiry
is ideal. It is something like driving an automobile in a city you are
unfamiliar with. Unlike taking a long drive down the highway where you
might zone out or daydream a bit, driving in an unfamiliar city requires
you to keep your attention on the immediate environment. You won’t be
daydreaming or imagining events and places that aren’t in your current
experience. It can take a bit of practice to strike the right balance of
alertness and relaxation. Keep practicing and you will find that sweet
spot where you are neither daydreaming nor straining.
Curious:
Genuine curiosity is necessary for this approach to work. It’s my
responsibility to relate the mechanics of this inquiry in a way that
compels genuine curiosity. It’s up to you to be willing to acknowledge
that innocent curiosity and proceed from it. We often circumvent natural
curiosity by moving our attention to a familiar but artificial mental
construct when we find ourselves in the unknown. We do this to feel some
sense of certainty. This means that when faced with the unknown we
often cling to old habituated patterns of thinking to help us avoid
admitting to ourselves that we really don’t know. When this technique is
applied correctly you will find yourself in the unknown rather quickly.
The paradox here is that using thought to “cure” that sense of
unknowing will undermine the inquiry. A willingness to remain in
unguarded curiosity is the lamp that lights the way forward.
Empirical:
One definition of empirical is, “Verifiable by observation or
experience rather than theory or logic.” When conducting self-inquiry,
it’s best to forego comparing your experience to any idealized
experience or expectation. We’re here to discover. So any description
we’ve read or heard about what is supposed to happen when we
self-inquire is useless. We’re only interested in what we directly
discover. If you’re willing to take a strictly empirical approach, then
only immediate, obvious, and self-explanatory experience matters. When
you really get the spirit of this, it is quite a relief. How nice it is
to not to have to stress over whether your experience is the “right”
one. In a sense you’re putting realization in the hot seat. You’re
saying, “OK, I trust that you really can show me something that is
beyond my own capacity to construct as a mental image. I will keep my
slate clean and not compare my experience to any ideal, regardless of
where I acquired that ideal.”
Fresh:
- When you begin this inquiry just let go of everything you know. Let
go of past inquiries and results. Let go of any insights you might have
had, even the last time you meditated or engaged in inquiry. In fact,
let go of what happened five minutes ago. Just this one question. Just
this one experiential observation. Do this every time you return to
inquiry. Better yet, do this as you go about inquiry. It’s like writing
on a chalkboard and there is an eraser immediately following the chalk.
In this way every moment is fresh. Every time a question is asked, it’s
asked from complete innocence and unknowing. We carry no baggage in this
way. When we free ourselves up from the bondage of the past, we are
free to synchronize with the moment to moment flow of reality.
Consistent:
Initially, you might approach this inquiry during seated meditation, or
when you feel inclined to introspect. Over time, as the curiosity and
desire to wake up build, you will find that you can carry this inquiry
with you for longer periods of time. You might be surprised as it
becomes quite enjoyable to carry this throughout daily activities such
as cooking, working, exercising, and even talking with others. With
consistency a certain momentum builds. When I was close to awakening
(though I didn’t know it at the time), I would even carry inquiry off
into sleep. I would try to stay with the query even as my consciousness
seemed to disappear into nothingness. I would then pick it up just as
soon as I remembered upon waking. There’s no need to judge yourself if
you can’t stay with it constantly, but as your passion to penetrate the
barrier of illusion grows, you will find that it can be carried with you
a lot of the time. After all, if you’ve come this far you’ve realized
there is nothing more important than this right?

Basic Process
1.
Become receptive to thought: It’s so common for us to attempt suppress
or avoid thoughts when we want to relax and rest. We often conclude that
if all those thoughts weren’t there we’d be at peace. Well when it
comes to self-Inquiry we actually want the thoughts to come. We orient
toward thoughts, as if we can’t wait for the next thought to arrive.
This might sound counterintuitive but when you truly embrace the arrival
of thoughts (regardless of their content), it can relax you in a
different way than you might be used to. It’s not a checked-out sort of
relaxation, it’s a checked-in relaxation. To put it simply, a lot of
strain is involved in resisting thoughts, and we resist thoughts to
various degrees all day long. So the first step is to simply become
thought-receptive. Turn your attention to that inner movie screen. You
can even affirm inwardly, “I choose to be completely receptive to
thoughts, they have all of my attention right now. I welcome them.”
Another way of saying it is to make the awareness of thoughts as
thoughts, the most interesting thing to you in this moment. For
instance, the goal is not to daydream endlessly about a beach trip to
the Bahamas. Rather we become fascinated as the thought of the Bahamas
forms on that inner screen. “Oh, so this is a thought! It’s showing a
sort of inner movie of the Bahamas, and yet I can see it’s made out of
some sort of nebulous thought-stuff.” That’s what it means to become
fascinated with thought as thought.
2.
Take a neutral stance: As a thought arrives, don’t evaluate its
content. There’s no need to assign a value to it such as, “this is a
good thought or a bad thought.” For instance if a thought arrives that
says, “I’m confused,” we needn’t assign a negative connotation to it.
Just take it as a neutral experience. For example, consider the thought
to be like a pad of paper with the message “I’m confused” written on it.
We could say that the pad of paper is primary to the message, meaning
the pad of paper could be there with any message on it or no message at
all. In that sense it’s neutral. When we see a thought as a thought, we
have this opportunity to perceive its neutrality. It’s when we believe a
thought points to some reality “out there” that we begin to struggle
with polarity. As you practice with one thought at a time, you will get
better at perceiving this neutrality.
3.
Clarify the thought. This step can take a bit of practice because we
usually have a dynamic relationship with thought inside consciousness.
We tend to move past certain thoughts that are uncomfortable or
partially unconscious. This is even more marked when we are feeling
restless and our monkey-mind is swinging from branch to branch so
quickly that we’re not fully aware of what thought branches it’s
swinging from. So slow down. Take one thought at a time as it arrives.
Once you recognize a thought (whether conceptual, auditory, or visual
image), try to clarify it a bit. If it’s conceptual you can speak it in
your mind. If you think of this like watching a slide show of thoughts
on a movie screen, you want to slow down the slides. Then you want to
move closer to the screen and clarify exactly what that
thought/image/slide is. As you get better at holding a single thought in
your mind you might be surprised how simple and even relaxing it
becomes. You might also be surprised that the closer you look at a
thought the less substance it seems to have. This is analogous to
walking so close to the screen that all you see are soft forms, shapes,
and light.
4. Notice how
the thought feels like it’s about “Me.” The previous steps can become
somewhat passive once you get the hang of them. This step requires
active engagement with each thought, if only for a moment. This is
because this step addresses the precise moment when we become
unconscious, meaning the moment we become identified with thought. It’s a
subtle transition, so we must train ourselves to recognize it if we
ever want to finally be free of it. Here you may feel like you are doing
a bit of detective work, but it’s essential to do it every time.
Initially it can feel somewhat awkward, like you’re going against the
habit force of the thought stream. What you’re really doing here is
undermining a false perspective. The key is to observe the thought and
identify the sense that this thought is about “me.” Let’s look at an
example. Let’s say we become receptive to thought(step one). We turn our
attention inward, and within a short time we are starting to form a
visual memory of eating a sandwich 10 minutes ago. We remember thinking
about what a good sandwich it was at the time we were eating it. As we
become aware of this thought, we recognize, “Ok in this thought/memory
there is a visual replaying of eating a sandwich. There is also
self-dialogue saying it is a good sandwich eating experience. It is
clear that this self talk occurred ten minutes ago. At this moment it is
simply one thought in my mind, neither good nor bad.” This is step two.
Now we clarify the visual experience of that thought, somewhat like we
are squaring ourselves up to the internal movie screen and stepping
closer (step 3). We notice the colors and textures of the room, the
sandwich, and our hand holding it. We see the movement and recall the
chewing as well as the internal dialogue, “What a delicious sandwich
this is.” We see how peculiar it is that this is all made out of
thought-stuff and yet it is quite vivid. Now for step four. In this step
we recognize that this thought, this internal movie appears to be about
me. It seems that I was the one eating the sandwich doesn’t it? Of
course in the past I did eat a sandwich, but in this thought, it seems
that it is referring to “me.” It’s not Joe or Jessica eating that
sandwich. I understand this may seem so obvious as to be absurd, but
it’s key to recognize that this thought clearly appears to refer to
someone called “me.” In addition it seems and feels like this thought is
occurring to “me.” This means that the sense of me is not only implied
in the thought (the one eating the sandwich), but also it is implied by
there being a thought at all. Let me explain. Not only does the thought
appear to suggest it is about “me” as the star of the internal movie
eating a sandwich, but it also suggests that there is a “me” that is
interested in the thought at all. Can you see that distinction? More
importantly can you find that sense with your own thought, whatever that
is? It appears as if the thought is happening to a “me,” the thinker.
It suggests a “me” right here and now that is aware of and viewing the
thought. You could say it suggests a “me” in two different respects. One
is a remembered me (as a thought subject). The other is an immediate me
that is aware of that thought right in this moment. Can you feel into
both of those? Is your internal experience starting to feel a bit
different? Do you feel the edges of identity starting to soften or
distort? If you do, that’s totally normal. If you don’t yet, it’s ok.
Give this some practice and sooner or later those perceptual frameworks
will start to loosen and fragment. If you’ve gone through this step
along with me (using your own immediate thought experience) and you
understand and can experience directly that a thought implies both a
subject “me” which is the main character in the thought, as well as the
immediate “me” which is the viewer/thinker of the thought, then you’ve
completed step four. I know this can be confusing or disorienting at
first, but it’s imperative to go through this process for this type of
self-inquiry to really do its magic. It will get much simpler with a bit
of practice.

5.
Now, look for the “me.” All of the steps up until this one were
preparatory steps. They are all necessary and you shouldn’t skip over
them using this approach. However, they are merely a means to orient you
properly for this final step. This step is very simple. Now that you
have a sense that the thought you have become aware of is about “me,”
look for that me. That’s it. The thought says there’s a me there that
it’s about, right? Now look for it in your immediate experience. By that
I mean don’t think about who/where/what that sense of me is. You have
to look for evidence of it right in your experience. It helps to start
by looking in the place where it feels like you are right now. Look
right in the center of the one that feels like the “me” that thought was
about. Do you find something there? Is there something definite you can
identify and say, “There’s the ‘me,’ there’s exactly what I am?” If you
can then what is it you found there? If you don’t find anything
specific then just keep looking. Here are some common immediate results
and how to navigate them:
* You immediately start thinking again, “Well I know who I am, this
practice is silly it doesn’t work for me...” When this happens, great!
That is your next thought, start from step 2 with that thought and
proceed through the inquiry. It doesn’t matter what the next thought is.
If it is a thought it is obviously not you right? It can’t be you
because you were there before that thought and you will be there after
that thought, right? Also that thought says it’s about you so clearly it
isn’t actually you. Lastly you are aware of the thought so it can’t be
equivalent to what you are right? So just keep looking, and if a thought
sucks you in then just start at step 2 with the new thought.
* You totally forget what you’re doing. This is fine, it can be
confusing to put the mind on the rack in this way. It’s not used to it.
If at any point you’ve totally lost track of what you’re doing, find
yourself daydreaming, etc, just start again at number one.
* You go to look for the “me” that the thought says it’s about and
can’t find it. It’s important to make a distinction here between the
thought, “I can’t find it/I can’t find myself,” and a looking that just
keeps on going with no landing on anything solid or specific. In the
first case just start with that thought at step two again. If it’s the
second case, the looking goes on and there is genuine curiosity even
though nothing is found, then great! Just keeping doing that. You’ve
figured out the point of self inquiry. If you find yourself in that pure
looking but landing nowhere specific and there are no thoughts, you are
doing pure self-inquiry. Just keep at it. Stay in the gap. It might
happen for a few seconds at first. Then a thought will come. At that
point, start at step two again. Over time you might go from several
seconds to a few minutes or longer. The key is thoughtless looking.
Neither rejecting thoughts nor getting entangled in their content. A
pure movement of innocent curiosity. It might feel dynamic or it might
feel quite still. Either is fine, just keep that looking going.

Fine tuning
Once
you get the hang of these steps and can move through them in a short
time you will notice it’s not hard to get that thoughtless gap, even if
it is for a short time. The following suggestions can help fine tune to
that frequency of pure self-inquiry. It’s something like tuning a radio
between stations. You neither land at this thought nor at that thought,
yet you aren’t rejecting any thought. Perhaps it could be said that
attention moves toward a thought so quickly that it has no time to fully
form. Attention becomes the thought. Over time it will become far more
spontaneous and relaxing to remain in this thoughtless gap of pure
looking, pure knowing without thought, and pure being.
-
Recognize when another thought has emerged and has bound your
attention. Often the thought will be about the immediate inquiry
practice. This is often the moment we become re-identified with thought
and don’t realize it, simply because the content of the thought is about
the practice itself.
-
Reviewing the thought chapter may be helpful. Recognize that anything
you can put into words is a thought. Also any image, even vaguely
defined images, are thoughts.
- You may have to reinvigorate your curiosity periodically, you don’t want to practice this mechanically.
-
You can use the body as a gauge to assure you are doing this in a
non-straining (relaxed) manner. You can periodically put attention into
various parts of the body just to see if you’re holding tension anywhere
or straining. This is especially useful if the inquiry feels strained,
frustrating, or tense. Once you get the hang of doing self-inquiry
without straining it may not be necessary to check in with the body in
this way.
-
Keep in mind that the pure looking in thoughtless gap doesn’t mean that
you are out of contact with the stuff thoughts are made of
(consciousness). It’s quite the opposite. It’s more like all of
experience gets replaced by thought-stuff, which is also you-stuff. It’s
all one endless continuum of pure conscious experience. The
looking/questioning, the sense of you, the gap, and the thought stuff,
are all the same substance.
-
Even though we’re using a question as a launch vehicle, we’re not
looking for a specific arrival place, a conceptual understanding, or a
certain pre-defined experience. We’re more interested in “settling in”
to pure experience itself which is not apart from the experiencer. The
pure experience is infused with curiosity and fascination. However it’s a
satisfied curiosity, so it doesn’t require resolution like a typical
question would.

Potential Pitfalls:
-
Asking “Who Am I?” or “Where am I?” and then looking around for a
conceptual answer. This simply leads to more inner dialogue, thinking,
and frustration.
-
Concluding “Oh there is no I/me/self.” This will lead to a dull inquiry
with little interest in actually looking for the sense of “me.” The
reason this happens is because we’ve become identified with the thought
“There is no I/me/self.” When we are identified with that thought we
don’t recognize it as just another thought. Another way of saying this
is that when we adopt the belief, “There is no me/self,” the view from
which that belief is held remains completely intact. The unseen (and
assumed) sense of subjective self holds the view that there is no self.
The self we are investigating is not a mere thought or belief. It’s a
sense, frame of reference, or a feeling-assumption. So if you find
yourself concluding this, you can recognize that conclusion as a mere
thought. Then you can start at step two again using that thought.
-
We get frustrated. It doesn’t feel like anything is happening so we
feel frustration, impatience, or even anger. If this occurs it doesn’t
mean you’re doing anything wrong. In fact when we start digging into our
identity, it’s common for emotions to come to the surface. If this
occurs. Just take a breath and relax for a minute. Then acknowledge the
emotion. Feel it in your body. See if you can relax any tension in the
body associated with the emotion. Then look for the thought or belief
associated with the experience. It might be something like, “I’m feeling
frustration.” Then proceed with the inquiry starting with step two.
-
Staring at the thought/question “who am I?” endlessly without realizing
that the one who feels like you doing this practice, and having a
history, and a spiritual path etc, is what you are supposed to try to
investigate. Whenever that dawns on you, look there!
-
Concluding that because you haven’t found an I or a self, there is no
value in continuing to look. The non-conceptual looking is the point.
-
Being uncomfortable with the thoughtless state, then reengaging
thoughts. This happens very frequently. When it occurs, we rarely
realize that the mind re-engaged thought to avoid the fear response that
can arise with thoughtless gaps. If we keep at self-inquiry, returning
to the thoughtless gap again and again, we will often realize there is a
certain fear associated with letting go of the addiction to thoughts.
We are so used to clinging to the next thought, and then the next, that
we often don’t recognize an underlying uneasiness that we are habitually
using thoughts to avoid. If we persist in spite of any uneasiness or
fear, then these emotions will settle with time and experience. If we
just keep returning to this gap and remain there beyond the fear and
physical responses, then things will start to change experientially.
This is where magic can happen, but you have to stay in that gap.

Examples
1.
Above I used the example of a thought about eating a sandwich. I
started with a visual thought because they are the simple to describe.
Let’s look at another example with a thought that is a bit more obscure.
Let’s assume we start the self-inquiry process. We begin by becoming
receptive to thought. We become aware of our inner thought-space and
wait. After a short time we think, “Inquiry never works for me.” This is
where the rubber meets the road. Many people will get exactly this far
and give up. They give up by not recognizing that the thought “Inquiry
never works for me” was their entry point. If you don’t catch it, and
you believe that you were the thinker of that thought, you will give in
to the stream of thoughts that follow. How do I know this happens so
frequently? Well because people tell me. It’s common for someone to
attempt self-inquiry and then report, “Every time I do inquiry it starts
out well, but then I can’t get past...” Then they proceed to tell me
the rest of the thought that bound them. I don’t blame them, the
hypnotic pull of thought is far more powerful than most of us realize.
When this happens I try as nicely as possible to point out that the
thought that came up during self-inquiry saying “Every time I do inquiry
it starts out well, but then I can’t get past...” was just a thought
like any other. However at the moment they failed to recognize it as a
thought, they hypnotized themself back into the thought stream and
abandoned the inquiry process. So now that you have that background
information let’s look at the thought, “Inquiry never works for me.”
Step two is to take a neutral stance. If we believe this thought is a
statement of truth, we might feel frustrated and might judge it as
undesirable. However now that we’re out of the business of judging
thoughts, we can regard it as neutral, because it is. It’s a thought
like any other, in that it’s made of the same thought-stuff that every
thought is made of. That thought-stuff is neutral in quality. The next
step is to clarify it. Just repeat it once in your mind and annunciate
the inner dialogue. “Self inquiry never works for me.” Can you see how
it’s just like some mysterious substance of mind that can seemingly form
internal sounds (dialogue) where there are none? That internal dialogue
is clear somehow, but also not there at all. It’s also the same stuff
that made up the sandwich thought isn’t it? Step four, notice this
thought appears to be about “me.” In this case I think it’s more clear
why this is important. It has to do with the story I told about how
people commonly get this far and then end up getting dragged down the
thought stream. If you don’t slow down enough and go through these steps
then when a thought like this comes, it can really hooks you and take
you for a ride. There is a certain momentum to our relationship with
thoughts. The stepwise approach slows this momentum down enough to truly
disentangle ourselves from thoughts. So when a thought like this
catches us and drags us into the thought stream, such that we abandon
the entire process of self-Inquiry, it is because that momentum has
caused us to take that thought as a statement of fact. We experience
that thought as if it’s defining reality. Moreover, we take it as if
it’s defining reality for “me.” The “me” becomes assumed and solidified
when this momentum is ongoing. This is the step where we have an
opportunity to truth-test the “me” that this thought claims to be about.
So now let’s perform step 4. The thought was, “Self-Inquiry never works
for me.” Now we recognize that the thought seems to be referring to
“me.” In fact it states it directly doesn’t it? That’s the assumed me
that is the subject of the thought. More importantly there is an
assumed, felt “me,” that seems to be aware of that thought. This is the
sense of the one that feels disappointed or frustrated if that thought
is believed. Now we proceed to step five. Look for that “me.”You’ll
notice that it isn’t in the thought. Why? Because clearly you don’t
disappear when that thought subsides. Furthermore you were clearly here
before that thought arose. So where else can you look? You can look
where it feels like you are. What’s there? Well you might notice a
sensation, such as a pressure in the head or a subtle feeling in some
other part of the body. Is that you? Well the sense of you can be there
when you aren’t noticing that specific sensation right? So just keep
looking. Stay in that curiosity. Stay in the feeling of that place that
seems to be aware of thoughts, seems to form thoughts, and yet is still
there even when there are no thoughts for a moment. Stay here and you’ll
be physically experiencing where the sense of you the thinker, the
sense of the thoughts on the inner movie screen, and the gap between
thoughts are all seamlessly one. Just stay there. It might feel dynamic
and it might feel very still. It might feel both simultaneously. Once
you “get” the feel of this you need do nothing more than stay right
there. Stay there during meditation. Stay there as you get up from
meditation. Stay with it through activities to the degree possible. Stay
there any time you remember to return to that gap. See if you can
carry it off into sleep and pick it up right as you awaken.

That’s
about as detailed as I can muster for how that initial shift into
unbound consciousness occurs. Just don’t share it outside of this
group, it’s going into a book that hopefully will be published soon.
Author
Angelo Gerangelo
Ah, got it. Forget my other comment I saw this after 