Kyle Dixon:
If by “awareness” we mean the mind’s cognition, then what
we are aiming to recognize is that said cognition is not actually a substantial
substrate that is the foundation for a discrete entity in the way we assume it
is.
When we have the realization that our cognitive capacity,
consciousness or whatever, is unable to be located, we are recognizing that the
feeling of being an internal knower of external phenomena is a fallacious
assumption that is structured through habitual conditioning in our own delusion
regarding the actual nature of the phenomena we are experiencing.
When we really fail to locate the mind as a substantial
knower of what is known, we again, as many have pointed out for years in this
group and elsewhere, are experientially having an epiphany that there is no
seer, hearer, feeler, etc., as an established entity.
This insight occurs in various ways and can unfold
pertaining to (i) the mind, (ii) external appearances, (iii) in the individual
sense gates related to both internal and external dimensions respectively, and
so on.
On the other hand, a cognition that is locatable is
simply the deluded assumption that our consciousness is an established internal
substrate, and the mistaken notion of a discrete identity is based on that
misconception.
Which is to say no cognition is actually locatable. We
just feel that it is and suffer as a result.