Existence must necessarily be embedded with consciousness. Not in a mystical, universal or transcendental way, but merely in a functional and operational manner. Without consciousness, no single phenomenon, no matter how "insentient", can ever interact with its context in a causal and coherent way.
Consciousness is, very naturally, of the nature of being conscious - of knowing or perceiving. A formless, "contentless" or pure consciousness - like the one envisioned in some mystical traditions - wouldn't be able to manifest its own nature of knowingness, due to the absence of known objects.
With the impossibility of any type of unmanifest or formless awareness - one devoid of known content -, we realize that consciousness is intrinsically of the nature of experiencing or perceiving. What would an unconscious consciousness amount to? Thus, there is no unobserved reality, for reality is always conscious of itself. Consciousness and experience arise simultaneously, in mutual dependency.
Again, there is no cosmic mind omnisciently perceiving all. This view is merely pointing to the intrinsic intelligence of life, requiring that every single particle is aware of what is happening in its immediate context.
So, we understand that existence is of the nature of consciousness (or information, intelligence, etc.); and consciousness is of the nature of experience (or manifested luminosity, perception, etc.) - no matter how subtle or insentient it may appear to be.
Existence = Consciousness = Experience. Therefore, beyond experience, there is nothing.
Of course, when I turn around, the table is still there, even if I'm not observing it. Why? Because something else is - even if that something is believed to be insentient, like the space, floor or any objects touching, or interacting with, the table.
However, every phenomenon is interpreted/observed/known differently, in accordance with its different perceiving subjects. A sheet of paper interprets fire one way (burning); a rock in another (heating up); water in yet another (extinguishing the fire). So no truly established thing exists objectively, only its many subjective interpretations.
There is no solipsism - since there is not only one mind. But there is no external reality either, since everything arises merely as an interpreted object of a perceiving awareness - no matter how subtle such aware entity is (it could be space itself or any subatomic particle). One last time, this awareness is not some aggrandized, transpersonal cosmic mind or entity, but the mere nature of phenomena.
Write a reply...