Soh
[10/3/23, 6:40:43 PM] John Tan: You and Andre are talking about philosophical concepts of permanence and impermanence.   Dogen is not talking about that.  What Dogen meant by "impermanence is buddha nature" is telling us to authenticate Buddha nature directly in the very transient phenomena -- the mountains, the trees, the sunshine, the drumbeats of footsteps, not some super awareness in wonderland.
[10/3/23, 6:41:40 PM] Soh Wei Yu: Oic..
[10/3/23, 6:43:15 PM] Soh Wei Yu: I didnt talk with andre lol
[10/3/23, 6:43:21 PM] Soh Wei Yu: Anna was talking with andre
[10/3/23, 6:44:24 PM] Soh Wei Yu: Actually what dogen said is pretty obvious imo even after initial anatta
[10/3/23, 6:44:32 PM] Soh Wei Yu: Wonder why mipham didnt emphasize that point
[10/3/23, 6:44:43 PM] Soh Wei Yu: Maybe he did with the rongzom appearances are divine
[10/3/23, 6:44:49 PM] John Tan: Different praxis
 
..........
 
p.s. some recent quotes I shared: 
- Soh Wei Yu- Dogen does not accept an unchanging Brahman. Being a Buddhist teacher he refutes an unchanging atman-brahman: 
- As
 my mentor Thusness/John Tan said in 2007 about Dogen, “Dogen is a great
 Zen master that has penetrated deeply into a very deep level of 
anatman.”, “Read about Dogen… he is truly a great Zen master… ...[Dogen 
is] one of the very few Zen Masters that truly knows.”, “Whenever we 
read the most basic teachings of Buddha, it is most profound. Don't ever
 say we understand it. Especially when it comes to Dependent 
Origination, which is the most profound truth in Buddhism*. Never say 
that we understand it or have experienced it. Even after a few years of 
experience in non-duality, we can't understand it. The one great Zen 
master that came closest to it is Dogen, that sees temporality as buddha
 nature, that see transients as living truth of dharma and the full 
manifestation of buddha nature.” 
- "When
 you ride in a boat and watch the shore, you might assume that the shore
 is moving. But when you keep your eyes closely on the boat, you can see
 that the boat moves. Similarly, if you examine many things with a 
confused mind, you might suppose that your mind and nature are 
permanent. But when you practice intimately and return to where you are,
 it will be clear that there is nothing that has unchanging self. 
- “Mind
 as mountains, rivers, and the earth is nothing other than mountains, 
rivers, and the earth. There are no additional waves or surf, no wind or
 smoke. Mind as the sun, the moon, and the stars is nothing other than 
the sun, the moon, and the stars.” 
- “For
 Dōgen, Buddha-nature or Busshō (佛性) is the nature of reality and all 
Being. In the Shōbōgenzō, Dōgen writes that “whole-being (Existence 
itself) is the Buddha-nature” and that even inanimate things (grass, 
trees, etc.) are an expression of Buddha-nature. He rejected any view 
that saw Buddha-nature as a permanent, substantial inner self or ground.
 Dōgen held that Buddha-nature was “vast emptiness”, “the world of 
becoming” and that “impermanence is in itself Buddha-nature”.[23] 
According to Dōgen: Therefore, the very impermanency of grass and tree, 
thicket and forest is the Buddha nature. The very impermanency of men 
and things, body and mind, is the Buddha nature. Nature and lands, 
mountains and rivers, are impermanent because they are the Buddha 
nature. Supreme and complete enlightenment, because it is impermanent, 
is the Buddha nature.[24]  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dōgen#Buddha-nature- “ 
- Continued in my next post 
 
 
Soh Wei YuFrom Bendowa, by Zen Master Dogen
Some
 have said: Do not concern yourself about birth-and-death. There is a 
way to promptly rid yourself of birth-and-death. It is by grasping the 
reason for the eternal immutability of the 'mind-nature.' The gist of it
 is this: although once the body is born it proceeds inevitably to 
death, the mind-nature never perishes. Once you can realize that the 
mind-nature, which does not transmigrate in birth-and-death, exists in 
your own body, you make it your fundamental nature. Hence the body, 
being only a temporary form, dies here and is reborn there without end, 
yet the mind is immutable, unchanging throughout past, present, and 
future. To know this is to be free from birth-and-death. By realizing 
this truth, you put a final end to the transmigratory cycle in which you
 have been turning. When your body dies, you enter the ocean of the 
original nature. When you return to your origin in this ocean, you 
become endowed with the wondrous virtue of the Buddha-patriarchs. But 
even if you are able to grasp this in your present life, because your 
present physical existence embodies erroneous karma from prior lives, 
you are not the same as the sages.
"Those
 who fail to grasp this truth are destined to turn forever in the cycle 
of birth-and-death. What is necessary, then, is simply to know without 
delay the meaning of the mind-nature's immutability. What can you expect
 to gain from idling your entire life away in purposeless sitting?"
What do you think of this statement? Is it essentially in accord with the Way of the Buddhas and patriarchs?
You have just expounded the view of the Senika heresy. It is certainly not the Buddha Dharma.
According
 to this heresy, there is in the body a spiritual intelligence. As 
occasions arise this intelligence readily discriminates likes and 
dislikes and pros and cons, feels pain and irritation, and experiences 
suffering and pleasure - it is all owing to this spiritual intelligence.
 But when the body perishes, this spiritual intelligence separates from 
the body and is reborn in another place. While it seems to perish here, 
it has life elsewhere, and thus is immutable and imperishable. Such is 
the standpoint of the Senika heresy.
But
 to learn this view and try to pass it off as the Buddha Dharma is more 
foolish than clutching a piece of broken roof tile supposing it to be a 
golden jewel. Nothing could compare with such a foolish, lamentable 
delusion. Hui-chung of the T'ang dynasty warned strongly against it. Is 
it not senseless to take this false view - that the mind abides and the 
form perishes - and equate it to the wondrous Dharma of the Buddhas; to 
think, while thus creating the fundamental cause of birth-and-death, 
that you are freed from birth-and-death? How deplorable! Just know it 
for a false, non-Buddhist view, and do not lend a ear to it.
I
 am compelled by the nature of the matter, and more by a sense of 
compassion, to try to deliver you from this false view. You must know 
that the Buddha Dharma preaches as a matter of course that body and mind
 are one and the same, that the essence and the form are not two. This 
is understood both in India and in China, so there can be no doubt about
 it. Need I add that the Buddhist doctrine of immutability teaches that 
all things are immutable, without any differentiation between body and 
mind. The Buddhist teaching of mutability states that all things are 
mutable, without any differentiation between essence and form. In view 
of this, how can anyone state that the body perishes and the mind 
abides? It would be contrary to the true Dharma.
Beyond
 this, you must also come to fully realize that birth-and-death is in 
and of itself nirvana. Buddhism never speaks of nirvana apart from 
birth-and-death. Indeed, when someone thinks that the mind, apart from 
the body, is immutable, not only does he mistake it for Buddha-wisdom, 
which is free from birth-and-death, but the very mind that makes such a 
discrimination is not immutable, is in fact even then turning in 
birth-and-death. A hopeless situation, is it not?
You
 should ponder this deeply: since the Buddha Dharma has always 
maintained the oneness of body and mind, why, if the body is born and 
perishes, would the mind alone, separated from the body, not be born and
 die as well? If at one time body and mind were one, and at another time
 not one, the preaching of the Buddha would be empty and untrue. 
Moreover, in thinking that birth-and-death is something we should turn 
from, you make the mistake of rejecting the Buddha Dharma itself. You 
must guard against such thinking.
Understand
 that what Buddhists call the Buddhist doctrine of the mind-nature, the 
great and universal aspect encompassing all phenomena, embraces the 
entire universe, without differentiating between essence and form, or 
concerning itself with birth or death. There is nothing - enlightenment 
and nirvana included - that is not the mind-nature. All dharmas, the 
"myriad forms dense and close" of the universe - are alike in being this
 one Mind. All are included without exception. All those dharmas, which 
serves as "gates" or entrances to the Way, are the same as one Mind. For
 a Buddhist to preach that there is no disparity between these 
dharma-gates indicates that he understands the mind-nature.
In
 this one Dharma [one Mind], how could there be any differentiate 
between body and mind, any separation of birth-and-death and nirvana? We
 are all originally children of the Buddha, we should not listen to 
madmen who spout non-Buddhist views.