Soh Wei Yu shared a link.Awakening to Reality



Rick Indie
This might seem like a mundane question, but i've been wondering Soh Wei Yu ; ever since your awakening, how has your emotional relationships with people changed?
View insights
530 post reach
9Sam Balali, Joel Rosenblum and 7 others
46 Comments
Like
Comment
Send
46 Comments
All comments
Active
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
People have commented that I am chill and cheerful/happy, that I don’t have a temper and they don’t see me angry and so on.
Basically I am happier and more peaceful. While normally people may often get frustrated, angry, not calm, when facing more challenging situations.
Also I don’t want to comment about my private life but I like how this Actualist describe his relationship with others after breaking through self. You become happier because you genuinely are happy throughout the day. How you relate therefore doesn’t come from a dark place.
“RESPONDENT: Dear Vineeto and Richard,
I have just posted up a report on Slack [actualist discussion group] and Yahoo Groups. I have been actually free since Nov 3rd 2018 and wanted to write you both and thank you for did for ‘me’ over the years that eventually allowed me to escape my fate and fulfil my destiny. Or perhaps I should say appreciate all you have done since there is no feeling of indebtedness anymore 🙂 […]
It is so deliciously amazing being here now. It is totally unimaginable and unbelievable as Richard has correctly said. It is quite freaky sometimes how giganormously vast this universe is such that it takes my breath away. I get intimations of infinitude and I am sure the definitive experience of it is on the horizon. I feel like my brain has been ‘uncapped’ and the magnificent universe – as oppose to ‘self’ and ‘other’ is my preoccupation. My body and mind are sometimes suffused with pleasure and expansiveness such that it is too much and I have to back away! I’ve been having a whale of a time just living my life for the last month or so. I’ve been having a fantastic time also comparing notes with Geoffrey and No 9(AF). The relationship with my girlfriend is like night and day. I’m like this big happy kid, that wants for her happiness. There is a delicious intimacy. Prior to this I was a grudging boyfriend, who often tolerated her and occasionally felt guilty enough to try and make a romantic gesture.
I would love to hear more about being fully free. But for now I am content to just enjoy and enjoy some more. The utter safety, spaciousness and stillness I am experiencing is truly something remarkable.
Yours actually 😉”
12
Like
Reply2d
Rick Indie
Author
this is beautiful
Like
Reply2d
Active
Reply to Soh Wei Yu…
Active
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
But why focus on me? You should ask others here. Lots of people realised anatta here
Like
Reply2d
Rick Indie
Author
Soh Wei Yu im not usually on fakebook often, so i havent had a chance to really see who else realized anatta. youre the main one i know & i see whenever im on, but i definitely dont deny there are other people here who have
2
Like
Reply2d
Active
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
Rick Indie
I hope others can comment more 🙂 from their insights and experience
Like
Reply2d
Mr. JW
Rick Indie if I may chime in, as Soh said.. 🙂 My wife has remarked that I seem much more open, loving, cheerful, and optimistic. I no longer see the behavior of "others" as something that can upset me, as the web of interconnection removes the illusion that "I" am at the mercy of "them." Basically, more unified, grounded, and always at rest with reality as it unfolds.
3
Like
Reply2d
Rick Indie
Author
Mr. JW thats amazing. so i see you mentioned your wife, how has your love for her changed? has it amplified at all? if you dont mind me asking
Like
Reply2dEdited
Mr. JW
Rick Indie Hi Rick, sorry, just saw this - when I first was dating my wife and going through the earlier stages, I was very conflicted and not sure what to do with sexual desire or attraction on a romantic level. I thought I had to choose spirituality or love. Nowadays they've blended into a relative expression of the Absolute - romantic love is just one optional part of a much larger context of socializing, being helpful to others, and co-creating a reality that is better for all sentient beings 🙂 If you have specifics, please ask or message me, I don't mind!
4
Like
Reply2d
Mr. RB
Rick Indie The earlier phases of awakening were characterized by disembodiment due to witnessing and self-enquiry… the sense of not feeling human because of the collapse of the identification processes. It was actually Anatta that brought the emotional centers back online. I didn’t feel much for a very long time, but after Anatta there’s the sense of being more human than ever before but without the sense of a me attached to it. Quite interesting and very impactful. Emotions are ornaments of the natural state and there’s certainly much more now than in years past.
7
Like
Reply2dEdited
Rick Indie
Author
Mr. RB interesting, i guess because the earlier phases still have obscurations, so there mightve been attachment to feeling "dull"/disassociated/separate from everything, but im guessing anatta is the collapse of that separation, so you didnt feel a need to separate yourself from any feeling after anatta. does that sound about right?
Like
Reply2dEdited
Mr. RB
Rick Indie didn’t feel the need to separate even before Anatta, but the difference was that afterwards I couldn’t experience duality even when I tried. Couldn’t undo the collapse.
2
Like
Reply2d
Mr. RB
Rick Indie the dissociation always happened after the non-dual openings. So after “I Am” realization there was this oscillation between the experience of “I am Everything” and the sense of being a “me.”
It was always on the contraction phase of that cycle when the sense of “me” would return that the dissociation would arise.
2
Like
Reply2d
Mr. RB
Rick Indie Sometimes those openings would last days and the contraction would follow for days or weeks and then another opening. This expansion-contraction cycle lasted 3 years or so. In the contraction phase of each cycle— difficulties would come to the forefront like feeling dissociated, apathy, negligent etc.
2
Like
Reply2d
Rick Indie
Author
Mr. RB also, you mentioned disembodiment. did you stop feeling bodily sensations? or did you "ascend" past the sensations while they were still there in space?
Like
Reply2dEdited
Mr. RB
Rick Indie body sensations would only vanish in meditation but that didn’t happen very often. Not sure what you mean by ascend past them? Could you clarify that?
Like
Reply2d
Rick Indie
Author
Mr. RB i prob couldve worded that better, but its like this: so you know how the average person(pre-anatta & pre-"I Am") feels like they're "trapped" in a body? as if the body is the ultimate boundary for them? so for you, when i say ascend past it, i mean did your mind "extend" past feeling like your body was the ultimate boundary? could you feel sensations, but did those sensations feel like they were only a drop inside a bigger ocean?
Like
Reply2d
Rick Indie
Author
Soh Wei Yu Mr. JW Mr. RB the reason i keep asking about love is because im subconsciously afraid of losing emotion if i do reach a certain level of [de]realization. i dont want to lose compassion, and i dont want to be stuck in a state of emotionlessness for even a day. what was the most helpful realization that allowed emotions to flourish in anatta? whats the main realization that cut away depersonalization? i really appreciate the help
3
Like
Reply2d
Active
Yin Ling
Admin
Rick Indie
U won’t.
If u really have proper Anatta realization, not just at intellect level. the sense of self will be released, it is palpable, and then U will have a sense like things and ppl around u “feels u”, not literally, but u will find out. The strong sense that you feel “I am me here” now, will miraculously be subdued so much that it’s hard to pretend I’m just this body.
The contraction in the middle here will subdued over time, and each time they become less, the “I am this body” feeling drops even more. It’s slightly strange to “not feel much here” at first but not uncomfortable, it feels spacious, like a relief.
U won’t lose compassion at all. U will probably have more. Now u lost the boundaries between u and others, and the compassion will sometimes feels almost too powerful, it brings u out to help beings. U can ignore being compassionate and still do harm .. I’m not sure but for me i think the guilt will be nerve wrecking. I have a Buddhist background, I don’t think I can stand my own judgement against myself if I do stupid stuff to others.
Imo, a practitioner will have gone through quite abit of studying, willingly being selfless, metta, generosity to see that insight.
It is quite hard for a very self centered person to want to release this energy in the middle because it is counterintuitive at first until it becomes natural after a lot a lot of practise. In some degree the compassion helps the insight to deepen.
4
Like
Reply2d
Rick Indie
Author
Yin Ling wow...this was the confirmation i needed. my vipashyana was being held back by my fear, but now, i feel i wont hold back anymore. (& as far as compassion, i'll never ignore it. i naturally always had compassion for people. and after seeing what buddhas can do, its almost like i was "born" for buddhism, specifically vajrayana. my whole mission for becoming a buddha is to help people)
Like
Reply2d
Active
Yin Ling
Admin
Rick Indie yeah u will be a perfect fit for the boddhisatva path becusse the whole path is to buddhahood which is to help sentient beings, nothing else
Like
Reply2d
Rick Indie
Author
Yin Ling also, in reference to feeling spacious, would you say the primordial nature of mind feels like infinite space?
Like
Reply2d
Active
Yin Ling
Admin
Rick Indie yup, one don’t feel like “living in the body” anymore, which is a small space.
U live spaciously, as the “beingness” is limitless and every where 🙂
It’s wonderful, really. Like being let out of a mri machine , phew
Like
Reply2d
Rick Indie
Author
Yin Ling wow, this is really motivating. so, if my view is right, then our intrinsic awareness is always infinitely spacious like that, however, the skandhas flare up when we fixate too strongly on feeling like a "small self". and this gets worse when we fixate on identifying with the skandhas as our "self". basically, its like a matter of mind latching onto the closest thing it can relate to, despite already having an infinite nature. does that sound about right?
Like
Reply2d
Active
Yin Ling
Admin
Rick Indie yes absolutely right.
There’s two levels to it.
First it’s to know “who am I”( aka to know what is our “mind”) truly.
Then next step is to see this “minds” nature.
Just keep it at the back of your mind that this “awareness” is not apart from the skandhas, the phenomenas, and everything in the world. It’s in it. As it. The awareness is itself the skandhas.
Or else what u are worried about- the “derealization” and emotionless ness would be the problem if one separate out awareness as a separate thing. Coz now we would become “awareness”, “standing away” and looking at the world, and not the world, not participating, isolating ourselves and that is often the biggest worry along the path , ppl get stuck and think emotionless ness is the outcome.
In true Anatta, you become the world. You will notice soh will post a huge amount of stuff about this on his profile and also here, which is crucial for a wholesome realization 🙂
All the best on ur path. U r very sincere, I’m sure ur compassion will guide u always. Buddha be with you 🙂
3
Like
Reply2d
Active
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
Rick Indie
I spammed the 7 stages link and on anatta article to thousands of spiritual teachers and practitioners online and by email
Take me as an example of foolish compassion 😂 not to follow my example
4
Like
Reply2d
Active
Yin Ling
Admin
Soh Wei Yu I’m not sure though. Some ppl might be ready and it will resonate.
I heard once someone said actually the dhamma is self-concealed when asked why do some teachings are secret?
Bc if one is not ready to hear them they won’t.
One who is ready they will find it. I’m not sure haha
Like
Reply2d
Active
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
Yin Ling
Yes indeed some people resonate and some people already broke through to anatta from previous stage after talking to me
Thats why i continued spamming 😂
Like
Reply2d
Active
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
Yin Ling
https://www.integrateddaniel.info/the-eleventh-army-of-mara
The Eleventh Army of Mara — Integrated Daniel
INTEGRATEDDANIEL.INFO
The Eleventh Army of Mara — Integrated Daniel
The Eleventh Army of Mara — Integrated Daniel
Like
ReplyRemove Preview2d
Active
Yin Ling
Admin
Soh Wei Yu agree with this article. Even worse when I want to explain my understanding but I don’t know how do I actually come to this understanding because somehow it just all clicks and come tgt…
And how do one even explain?
Like
Reply2d
Active
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
Yin Ling need patience, not a one day thing especially for someone dull like myself
Im so fortunate john tan had the patience to talk and talk for years with me and repeat the same stuff from many different angles
He is truly a bodhisattva with mastery of patience paramita
2
Like
Reply1dEdited
Active
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
Yin Ling unfortunately i cant do that for others
Not as skillful nor have i the time
Like
Reply1d
Active
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
Yin Ling so i try to compile something, the books and journal for those interested
Like
Reply1d
Active
Yin Ling
Admin
Soh Wei Yu yes I agree. He also write long passages befitting my conditions to allow me to intuit. It is hard.
U too did a lot of work for others, don’t belittle urself !
Sometimes just doing our practice sincerely will help others. For years I never talk to my partner about the dhamma, coz for me it’s a personal thing and I don’t want to impose on others what I believe. I only answer when asked.
But I read and meditate around him and suddenly few weeks back he told me he started a meditation practice and read a Steve Hagen book.. 🥹
2
Like
Reply1d
Active
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
Yin Ling
Yes i read on reddit just a day or two ago
Someone with a similar story
Non believer partner suddenly after many years got interested in meditation due to seeing changes in the partner
Like
Reply1d
Sam Balali
Yin Ling When I see someone is deeply transformed I feel ego backlash-usually anger or fear. It's as if the ego senses that this intense truth is the death of itself and so it protects itself with these reactions.
Like
Reply1d
Active
Reply to Yin Ling…
Mr. JW
Rick Indie Here is my experience as one guy who went from being a selfish early 20s kid to someone who now feels "stable" on the path - you never lose anything. You give up selfishness, deception, anger, lust, etc, and in return, you gain a sense of connection, ease, joy, honesty, basic goodness, and integrity. The fear around anatta and anicca is really born from the delusion of selfhood, which is constantly trying to scare you away from opening your heart to your own nature - the peaceful, open dharmadatu will always embrace you and lend strength for improving the lives of other beings in every possible domain, from the occupational to the social to the psychological ❤️ In short, you become what the world needs, and you share in its love and creativity.
2
Like
Reply2d
Mr. JW
Rick Indie btw, if you are interested in bodhisattva topics, you can click my name and find the post I made recently on integration - it may soothe your mind 🙂
Like
Reply2d
Joel Rosenblum
Rick Indie why so scared of losing emotions? When you're dead, would you also like to be born again to have more emotions?
Like
Reply2d
Rick Indie
Author
Soh Wei Yu haha you & me are the same, I always spam helpful articles. But atleast you're not like Virupa where Avalokitshvara Buddha literally had to come down & tell Virupa "hey, it's good you're converting people to dharma...but please stop freaking people out with your magic powers."
2
Like
Reply1dEdited
Active
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
Rick Indie
Tara once told me my wishes will be fulfilled (and it did) and that i should “focus on helping people”
I had a strong connection to avalokitesvara and tara and had many visions and miraculous encounters, unworldly fragrance etc
2
Like
Reply1dEdited
Active
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
Rick Indie avalokitesvara told me to be compassionate
2
Like
Reply1d
Rick Indie
Author
Soh Wei Yu oh wow that's amazing. I want to meet them. But they probably only appear after someone achieves 1st bhumi, right? (or atleast until you achieve an exceptionally high level of metta if you're not awakened yet)
Like
Reply1dEdited
Active
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
Rick Indie idk lol
I think people even before awakening can have visions of them
It does not necessarily indicate your level of enlightenment
But i think what john tan said here indicates his high degree of enlightenment:
“…It can be realized, known and experienced including the supramadane abilities of buddha and bodhisattvas, the sambhogakaya body and buddhafields to those that r serious in practice. They maybe myth to some but not myth to me, at least it can be verified by first person experiences (imo) regardless how science think and that are already enough for me to cope…”
Like
Reply1d
Active
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
Sambhogakaya only appears to those from 8th bhumi onwards from what I read
Like
Reply1dEdited
Rick Indie
Author
Soh Wei Yu yes, I agree! Me & my family have predisposition to clairvoyance, I'm looking to perfect it after anatta (BTW, tell John thank you for recommending "Finding Rest in Illusion." That book is amazing)
Like
Reply1d
Active
Reply to Rick Indie…
Active
Yin Ling
Admin
Joyful, spacious, light, very simple.
But I still get annoyed when ppl bullshit me lol but it doesn’t go deep.
7
Like
Reply2d
Translations: (Vietnamese) Không cần danh từ để bắt đầu động từ - No nouns are necessary to initiate verbs
Everything isn’t made of awareness, it quite literally is awareness itself. In your direct experience there isn’t anything inside looking out at something. the very thing that you presently think is the “seen” is the ongoing activity of the “seer” or awareness.
I like your answer. Also, I would like to add, awareness is none other than the ongoing activity. It is not the case that awareness is an unchanging substance modulating as everything. 'Awareness' is just like a word like 'weather', a mere name denoting the ongoing dynamic activities of raining wetting sun shining wind blowing lightning strike and so on and on. 'Awareness' has no intrinsic existence of its own than moment to moment manifestation, even if at that moment it is just a mere sense of formless Existence, that too is another 'foreground' non-dual manifestation and not an unchanging background.
Just like there is no lightning besides flash (lightning is flashing -- lightning is just another name for flash and is not the agent behind flash), no wind besides blowing, no water besides flowing, no nouns or agents are needed to initiate verbs. There never was an agent, a seer, or even a seeing, besides colors, never an agent, a hearer, or even a hearing, besides sound. Everything is just radiant and pellucid without a knower, sound hears and scenery sees. Anatta.
Some excerpts from the 2nd most famous Buddhist masters (right after the Dalai Lama) of our time, the Zen Master Thich Nhat Hanh :
Excerpts from http://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2008/10/sun-of-awareness-and-river-of.html
some
other quotations which Thusness/PasserBy liked from the book --"When we
say I know the wind is blowing, we don't think that there is something
blowing something else. "Wind' goes with 'blowing'. If there is no
blowing, there is no wind. It is the same with knowing. Mind is the
knower; the knower is mind. We are talking about knowing in relation to
the wind. 'To know' is to know something. Knowing is inseparable from
the wind. Wind and knowing are one. We can say, 'Wind,' and that is
enough. The presence of wind indicates the presence of knowing, and the
presence of the action of blowing'.""..The most universal verb is the
verb 'to be'': I am, you are, the mountain is, a river is. The verb 'to
be' does not express the dynamic living state of the universe. To
express that we must say 'become.' These two verbs can also be used as
nouns: 'being", "becoming". But being what? Becoming what? 'Becoming'
means 'evolving ceaselessly', and is as universal as the verb "to be."
It is not possible to express the "being" of a phenomenon and its
"becoming" as if the two were independent. In the case of wind, blowing
is the being and the becoming....""In any phenomena, whether
psychological, physiological, or physical, there is dynamic movement,
life. We can say that this movement, this life, is the universal
manifestation, the most commonly recognized action of knowing. We must
not regard 'knowing' as something from the outside which comes to
breathe life into the universe. It is the life of the universe itself.
The dance and the dancer are one."
----------------
Comments
by Thusness/PasserBy: "...as a verb, as action, there can be no
concept, only experience. Non-dual anatta (no-self) is the experience of
subject/Object as verb, as action. There is no mind, only mental
activities... ...Source as the passing phenomena... and how non-dual
appearance is understood from Dependent Origination perspective."
.............
Zen
Master Thich Nhat Hanh:"When we say it's raining, we mean that raining
is taking place. You don't need someone up above to perform the raining.
It's not that there is the rain, and there is the one who causes the
rain to fall. In fact, when you say the rain is falling, it's very
funny, because if it weren't falling, it wouldn't be rain. In our way of
speaking, we're used to having a subject and a verb. That's why we need
the word "it" when we say, "it rains." "It" is the subject, the one who
makes the rain possible. But, looking deeply, we don't need a "rainer,"
we just need the rain. Raining and the rain are the same. The
formations of birds and the birds are the same -- there's no "self," no
boss involved. There's a mental formation called vitarka, "initial
thought."
When we use the verb "to think" in English, we need a subject of the verb: I think, you think, he thinks. But, really, you don't need a subject for a thought to be produced. Thinking without a thinker -- it's absolutely possible. To think is to think about something. To perceive is to perceive something. The perceiver and the perceived object that is perceived are one.When Descartes said, "I think, therefore I am," his point was that if I think, there must be an "I" for thinking to be possible. When he made the declaration "I think," he believed that he could demonstrate that the "I" exists. We have the strong habit or believing in a self. But, observing very deeply, we can see that a thought does not need a thinker to be possible. There is no thinker behind the thinking -- there is just the thinking; that's enough. Now, if Mr. Descartes were here, we might ask him, "Monsieur Descartes, you say, 'You think, therefore you are.' But what are you? You are your thinking. Thinking -- that's enough. Thinking manifests without the need of a self behind it."Thinking without a thinker. Feeling without a feeler. What is our anger without our 'self'? This is the object of our meditation. All the fifty-one mental formations take place and manifest without a self behind them arranging for this to appear, and then for that to appear. Our mind consciousness is in the habit of basing itself on the idea of self, on manas.
But we can meditate to be more aware of our store consciousness, where we keep the seeds of all those mental formations that are not currently manifesting in our mind. When we meditate, we practice looking deeply in order to bring light and clarity into our way of seeing things. When the vision of no-self is obtained, our delusion is removed. This is what we call transformation. In the Buddhist tradition, transformation is possible with deep understanding. The moment the vision of no-self is there, manas, the elusive notion of 'I am,' disintegrates, and we find ourselves enjoying, in this very moment, freedom and happiness."
Session Start: Sunday, August 31, 2008
(2:08 PM) Thusness: wah u wrote so much about one taste. :P
(2:08 PM) Thusness: kok ur head!
(2:10 PM) AEN: huh where
(2:10 PM) AEN: lol
(2:10 PM) AEN: i just updated my post
(2:10 PM) AEN: removed some part and added some part
(2:10 PM) Thusness: every place. :P
(2:11 PM) Thusness: next time must do a constant check on the url awakeningtoreality. :P
(2:11 PM) Thusness: One Taste here and there...kok ur head
(2:11 PM) AEN: orh u mean google haha
(2:11 PM) AEN: i tot u mean sgforums
(2:11 PM) Thusness: yeah. Although ken wilber experience is non-dual, it is not exactly One Taste yet.
(2:11 PM) AEN: oic y
(2:11 PM) AEN: one taste include emptiness?
(2:12 PM) Thusness: yes din i tell u?
(2:12 PM) AEN: icic..
(2:13 PM) Thusness: The non-duality of advaita sort of understanding is different from buddhism.
(2:13 PM) Thusness: how could one reaches the phase of One Taste without understanding the emptiness nature?
(2:14 PM) Thusness: The One Taste realisation is of 2 parts: No object/subject split and both object/subject are empty of any inherent existence.
(2:15 PM) AEN: oic..
(2:15 PM) Thusness: Penetrating these 2 aspects, insight arises of the One Taste.
(2:15 PM) Thusness: Since when did i tell u about Advaita sort of understanding is non-dual of Buddhism?
(2:15 PM) AEN: icic..
(2:16 PM) Thusness: So many times I told u it is the empty nature that Buddha came to teach us, not only the luminosity aspect.
(2:16 PM) Thusness: The non-dual luminous nature is described all over the Vedas
(2:17 PM) AEN: oic..
(2:17 PM) Thusness: kok ur head!
(2:18 PM) Thusness: Anyone not talking about the 3 seals, understanding the anatta sort of non-duality is not talking about Buddhism.
(2:19 PM) Thusness: anyone that lead to the understanding of Brahman is deluded in Buddhist perspective. The One Mind, the One Reality is the non-inherent in nature.
(2:19 PM) Thusness: it should not be understood from a dualistic and inherent perspective.
(2:19 PM) AEN: oic but ken wilber talk about brahman meh :P
(2:20 PM) Thusness: Yes.
(2:20 PM) AEN: oic
(2:21 PM) Thusness: Therefore the experience is non-dual but the insight isn't.
(2:21 PM) AEN: icic..
(2:23 PM) AEN: so next time i shld show them the charlie singer article instead :P
(2:23 PM) Thusness: Charlie still need further refinement but it is already very good.
(2:24 PM) Thusness: There are not many good articles.
(2:24 PM) AEN: oic..
(2:24 PM) Thusness: Many do not have the clarity of the differences
(2:25 PM) Thusness: They are unable to discern correctly the difference. In terms of experience and insight.
(2:25 PM) AEN: icic..
(2:25 PM) Thusness: U have to be careful when telling ppl.
(2:25 PM) Thusness: Fortunately u always quoted the bahiya sutta...haahah
(2:26 PM) AEN: oic.. haha
(2:26 PM) Thusness: it is both. :)
(2:26 PM) AEN: wat u mean both
(2:26 PM) Thusness: both non-dual in terms of experience and insight
(2:26 PM) AEN: oic..
(2:28 PM) AEN: the insight means theres insight into emptiness
(2:28 PM) AEN: ?
(2:28 PM) Thusness: yes
(2:28 PM) Thusness: so far the best to me is still Ajahn Amaro. In terms of practical insight and experience.
(2:29 PM) Thusness: Clear and precise.
(2:29 PM) AEN: oic
(2:29 PM) AEN: but u said his e book not so gd?
(2:29 PM) Thusness: But that 'source' must be fully replaced with DO.
(2:29 PM) AEN: oic
(2:29 PM) Thusness: yes.
(2:29 PM) Thusness: That is the only problem.
(2:29 PM) Thusness: But he is still not wrong.
(2:29 PM) AEN: why not wrong
(2:29 PM) Thusness: The "I" is just a luminous clarity.
(2:30 PM) Thusness: In his mind, there is no sense of independence but still not thorough.
(2:30 PM) AEN: oic..
(2:31 PM) Thusness: Means he knows what Awareness is exactly. Therefore when he said "I AM", u should not mistake him as referring to that stage 1.
(2:31 PM) Thusness: Though to him it is the same.
(2:32 PM) Thusness: But he is using it as if a practitioner has understood the full insight of emptiness and non-duality
(2:32 PM) Thusness: It is not the same.
(2:32 PM) AEN: icic..
(2:32 PM) Thusness: But to him, he is not aware of that point.
(2:32 PM) Thusness: It is not obvious to him.
(2:32 PM) Thusness: That is my opinion.
(2:33 PM) AEN: he is not aware of what
(2:33 PM) Thusness: That the experience of "I AM" is different.
(2:33 PM) AEN: but u said in the ebook is still quite dualistic rite
(2:33 PM) Thusness: yes
(2:33 PM) AEN: i tink he said something like oil and water
(2:33 PM) AEN: are separate
(2:33 PM) Thusness: yes
(2:33 PM) Thusness: i will talk about that later.
(2:34 PM) Thusness: means he cannot rest in the phenomena...
(2:34 PM) Thusness: the arising and ceasing
(2:34 PM) Thusness: why so?
(2:34 PM) Thusness: because of certain 'block' still.
(2:34 PM) Thusness: that 'block' must be completely gone.
(2:34 PM) AEN: oic..
(2:35 PM) Thusness: sames goes to Charlie Singer
(2:35 PM) Thusness: Seems almost there but not there. :P
(2:35 PM) AEN: why not
(2:35 PM) Thusness: Don't go everywhere say that i say hah...
(2:35 PM) AEN: oic
(2:35 PM) Thusness: The mirror is still there. :)
(2:36 PM) AEN: icic..
(2:36 PM) Thusness: what is appearance to him?
(2:36 PM) Thusness: seems like awareness yet not.
(2:36 PM) Thusness: seems like merely a reflection
(2:36 PM) Thusness: apparition
(2:36 PM) Thusness: of a mirror
(2:37 PM) AEN: oic..
(2:37 PM) AEN: but we can use that analogy for its emptiness?
(2:37 PM) Thusness: yes but unfortunately in terms of experience, it is not
(2:38 PM) Thusness: means the nature of an arising is not thoroughly experienced.
(2:38 PM) Thusness: and he is right.
(2:38 PM) Thusness: one needs to go through until this nature is fully and completely understood.
(2:38 PM) AEN: oic..
(2:40 PM) Thusness: What are the 2 truths of egolessness about?
(2:40 PM) AEN: emptiness of self and phenomena?
(2:40 PM) Thusness: yes
(2:40 PM) Thusness: subject and object
(2:40 PM) Thusness: if there is no background, no "ITness" to be found as 'Self/self'
(2:41 PM) Thusness: and there is no 'ITness' to be found in object or attributes
(2:41 PM) Thusness: 'What is' is mere Appearances
(2:42 PM) Thusness: there is no 'redness' in flower or any 'ITness' found anywhere
(2:42 PM) Thusness: both as 'Self' and 'Object' of identification
(2:42 PM) Thusness: So what is there?
(2:43 PM) AEN: awareness as appearances?
(2:43 PM) Thusness: Yes.
(2:43 PM) Thusness: There is only appearances
(2:43 PM) Thusness: and we do not know that this Appearance is our Buddha Nature in real time.
(2:44 PM) Thusness: There is a 'block' because the direct experience is not strong and thorough enough.
(2:44 PM) Thusness: There will come a time when total clarity dawn, there is no more doubt.
(2:45 PM) Thusness: Because of this 'Block', there is still traces of an independent 'I'.
(2:45 PM) Thusness: And there is no One Taste. :)
(2:45 PM) AEN: oic..
(2:47 PM) Thusness: Think I will write my opinion about it.
(2:47 PM) AEN: okie
(2:48 PM) Thusness: Actually I do not like to comment on these articles because it often leads to disputes and arguments.
(2:48 PM) Thusness: :P
(2:48 PM) AEN: no la
(2:48 PM) AEN: dun tink it will
(2:48 PM) AEN: our forum like v quiet
(2:48 PM) AEN: haha
(2:48 PM) Thusness: ahaha...
(2:49 PM) Thusness: it is for practice sake
(2:49 PM) Thusness: for experience sake
(2:49 PM) Thusness: not to create noise in ur forum
(2:49 PM) AEN: icic..
(2:51 PM) Thusness: have u finished reading 'The Sun, My Heart'?
(2:53 PM) AEN: nope
(2:53 PM) AEN: i read slowly one leh
(2:53 PM) AEN: maybe one chapter or less a day
(2:53 PM) AEN: haha
(2:53 PM) AEN: thats why i always take a long time to finish a bk
(2:53 PM) AEN: u wan to get from me isit
(2:55 PM) Thusness: yeah
(2:55 PM) Thusness: how is it?
(2:55 PM) Thusness: have u read it?
(2:57 PM) AEN: not a lot yet
(2:57 PM) AEN: i think shld be quite gd
(3:03 PM) AEN: namdrol also recommend clarifying the natural state for mahamudra :P "
Must reads are Clarifying the Natural State and Moonlight, Quintessence of Mind and Meditation. As for Buddhist magazines, I can't really say any of them are particularly bad or good-- they are for the most part lineage marketing material; and in the case of Tricycle, it is aimed at Barnes and Nobles Buddhists i.e. the authors you find at B&N are the authors you see in its pages."
(3:04 PM) Thusness: ic
(3:04 PM) AEN: no no
(3:04 PM) AEN: the orange book u had
(3:05 PM) AEN: last time we discussed b4 mah
(3:05 PM) AEN: that one is another one.. is not dzogchen, is mahamudra
(3:05 PM) Thusness: oh...yeah
(3:05 PM) Thusness: that one is good.
(3:05 PM) AEN: ic ya
(3:05 PM) Thusness: yeah...remembered.
(3:06 PM) AEN: theres another book, a thicker one... by dakpo tashi namgyal, i think more thorough. called Moonlight, Quintessence of Mind and Meditation
(3:06 PM) Thusness: ic
(3:06 PM) AEN: oh btw
(3:06 PM) AEN: wat u tink about this article http://www.iol.ie/~taeger/mahamud/mahamud.html
(3:16 PM) Thusness: not bad.
(3:16 PM) AEN: icic..
(3:17 PM) Thusness: but u know vajrayana got recognition by certain authority is important.
(3:17 PM) Thusness: lol
(3:17 PM) Thusness: I do not like to comment about that. I am only interested in practical experience.
(3:17 PM) AEN: wat u mean got recognition by certain authority is important.
(3:18 PM) Thusness: means lineage is important lah
(3:18 PM) Thusness: for me, i have no interest in this sort of stuff.
(3:18 PM) Thusness: as long as the practitioner shows direct experience of our luminous and empty nature, he is a true practitioner
(3:19 PM) Thusness: at my current stage, i am vividly clear of that Buddha's teaching is the way towards liberation.
(3:19 PM) Thusness: There is no doubt in my experience and practice and Buddha's teaching.
(3:20 PM) Thusness: I am not particularly concerned about authority. :)
(3:20 PM) AEN: oic..
(3:22 PM) Thusness: where u get this url from?
(3:22 PM) AEN: dunnu leh
(3:22 PM) AEN: found somewhere then i save it in my browser
(3:22 PM) Thusness: seach from the web?
(3:22 PM) AEN: think so
https://www.reddit.com/r/Buddhism/comments/vgra29/for_my_vajrayana_people_how_do_we_view_intrinsic/
Subreddit Icon
r/Buddhism
•Posted by
u/truuseeker
12 days ago
For my Vajrayana people: How do we view "intrinsic awareness" without a self?
Vajrayana
Hey all, So recently I've been trying to break out of thinking that awareness "needs" a "self" behind it. But it's been hard to conceive of pure, intrinsic awareness(not the alayavijnana) as a phenomena that doesn't automatically involve a living self. We're so used to thinking: "well, if awareness is present, there has to be somebody/a soul that's making that awareness alive.'
What's a good way to see intrinsic awareness as a phenomena that doesn't need a self behind it? How can pure awareness "be" without a dualistic self behind it?
0
1
10
Comments
Award
Share
Save
Comment as xabir
Comment
Markdown Mode
Sort By: Top
User avatar
level 1
Type_DXL
·
12 days ago
Not from a Vajrayana source in particular, but from the Bahiya Sutta:
"Then, Bāhiya, you should train yourself thus: In reference to the seen, there will be only the seen. In reference to the heard, only the heard. In reference to the sensed, only the sensed. In reference to the cognized, only the cognized. That is how you should train yourself. When for you there will be only the seen in reference to the seen, only the heard in reference to the heard, only the sensed in reference to the sensed, only the cognized in reference to the cognized, then, Bāhiya, there is no you in connection with that. When there is no you in connection with that, there is no you there. When there is no you there, you are neither here nor yonder nor between the two. This, just this, is the end of stress."
Note that the Buddha here is playing on an Upanishad that Bahiya is believed to have followed, where it says, "In reference to the seen, it is the atman that sees. In reference to the heard, it is the atman that hears. Etc."
6
Reply
Give Award
Share
Report
Save
Follow
User avatar
level 2
nyanasagara
·
12 days ago
mahayana
In reference to the seen, it is the atman that sees. In reference to the heard, it is the atman that hears. Etc."
Kena Upaniṣad?
"That which is not seen by the eye, but by which the eye is able to see: know that alone to be the Brahman, not this which people worship here."
Etc.
3
Reply
Give Award
Share
Report
Save
Follow
User avatar
level 3
Type_DXL
·
12 days ago
For some reason I thought it may have been from the Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upanishad, but you may be right.
4
Reply
Give Award
Share
Report
Save
Follow
User avatar
level 1
krodha
·
12 days ago
When your awareness is deluded, it takes on the expression of being an internal observer of observed external phenomena. This predicament creates many misconceptions and misperceptions, even the small inclination that there could feasibly be a self behind awareness or that awareness is a reference point that could have anything behind it at all.
All of these spatial distinctions, temporal occurrences, these all emerge as a result of ignorance. The self is just a delusional aggregation of various causal conditions that manifest what seems like a monolithic entity, including assumptions of distance and the seeming flow of consecutive thoughts that appear to reference one another. The self is a truly incredible illusion, and it creates many issues. Luckily the mindstream can be purified of these limitations. And the buddhadharma is the means to accomplish this.
6
Reply
Give Award
Share
Report
Save
Follow
Welcome to Awakening to Reality Hello! Welcome to the Awakening to Reality site. For anyone new to the blog, I highly recommend...