- Reply
- 1h
John Tan sent Yin Ling months ago before her insight into emptiness (at that time she realised anatta but not yet twofold emptiness):
Yin Ling Not bad however not exactly "natural state" yet but it is the beginning of the direct insight into "natural state". To be fully "natural" and "spontnaeous", both self and phenomena, arising and ceasing must all be de-constructed thoroughly.
When sitting, there is no "body" and "no one" sitting. Only the sensation dancing. The "butt" that touches the "floor" forms the sensation of "hardness and firmness" -- the earth element.
Now, don't think but feel the sensation of "hardness and firmness", feel the earth element in anatta; so vividly and solidly present, now ask: where r all these sensations? So solidly and undeniably "appears" but "where"?
Happy anatta during CNY!👍
also paste her the 2 fold emptiness when I talk to u about Daniel Ingram...I forgot where is the link...lol
...
(regarding the post on daniel by john tan:
http://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2013/04/daniel-post-on-anattaemptiness.html
excerpt:
Thusness's comments to AEN:
Hi AEN,
Those were just some very casual sharing written on the spur of a moment, they were not well thought. Emptiness to me has another dimension if you wish to look into it.
When there is not even a single trace of Self/self nor is there any sense of inner/outer division, experiencer and what experienced collapsed...
At this moment there is just this vivid beautiful scenery, this bright brilliant world…all self arises
At this point…
Close your eyes....
Voidness....
Relax and rest in this all-consuming awaring void, this clear non-dual Awareness standing alone as itself and of itself…
Then shift the focus to the breath…
Just the sensations of the breath…
Then the transparent dancing sensations…absolutely no mind, no body, no experiencer/experienced, no inner/outer division… borderless and boundless
Every moment is great and miraculous…
This must become natural to you first.
Then at this moment of appreciating maha suchness of the breath, the sensations, the entire scenery, the entire world…
Understand that they are Empty!
Experience the magnificence then deeply understand that they are empty but this Emptiness has nothing to do with deconstruction nor reification nor do I mean they are simply impermanent. So what is this Emptiness I am referring to?
)
Krodha = Kyle Dixon
https://www.reddit.com/r/Buddhism/comments/vn3hma/brahman_capital_b_in_buddhism_is_nirvana_a_state/
Subreddit Icon
r/Buddhism
•Posted by
u/LavaBoy5890
4 days ago
Brahman (Capital B) in Buddhism? Is Nirvana a state of mind or an unconditioned reality?
Question
Did Buddha comment on the idea of Brahman specifically? Or did the idea of Brahman in the more modern sense come after Buddha? Can Brahman be compared to Nirvana? For instance Nirvana is called the Unconditioned, Unborn, Uncreated in the suttas. Does Buddha mean this in the sense of the universe or the sense of the mind? If the former, is Nirvana similar to or the same thing as Brahman? This is coming from someone who likes the idea of Brahman but is more drawn to Buddhism overall.
8
1
18
Comments
Award
Share
Save
Comment as xabir
Comment
Markdown Mode
Sort By: Top
level 1
xabir
·
just now
Do read this:
What buddha meant by death-free (amata): http://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2018/01/the-deathless-in-buddhadharma.html
In short, no, it is not the same as Brahman. You can compare Buddhist and Hindu insights from an experiential perspective here: http://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2007/03/thusnesss-six-stages-of-experience.html
1
Reply
Share
Save
Edit
Follow
User avatar
level 1
Cave-Bunny
·
4 days ago
·
edited 3 days ago
theravada
Whenever I ask a monk a question that is about Buddhist metaphysics, like your question, they always advice me to focus more on 4 noble truths and 8 fold for path.
Be diligent in the basics of the Buddhist practice and let the more metaphysical parts fall into place as you slowly deepen your understanding over time.
Edit: typo
26
Reply
Give Award
Share
Report
Save
Follow
User avatar
level 2
krodha
·
4 days ago
·
edited 4 days ago
Whenever I ask a monk a question that is about Buddhist metaphysics, like your question, they always advice me to focus more on 4 noble truths and 8 food for path.
Not every bhikṣu may be fully aware of the depths of Buddhist metaphysics (meaning a Theravāda bhikṣu will most likely not be classically trained in something like Śāntarakṣita‘s refutation of Advaita Vedanta in his Tattvasaṃgraha), it is important to bear in mind what system or tradition they belong to. Clearly metaphysics are discussed in depth in the abhidhamma, and these specific issues regarding differences between buddhadharma and sanatanadharma are elaborated upon heavily in Mahāyāna and Vajrayāna expositions.
I can see the logic behind a bhikṣu advising that you focus on fundamentals, but Buddhist scriptures are also very dense with metaphysical topics and comparisons, because it is important to understand such things, especially if it helps the practitioner to remove doubts... which is the sole purpose of such writings.
12
Reply
Give Award
Share
Report
Save
Follow
User avatar
level 2
StarBlissLover
·
4 days ago
Yes. There is no interest in Brahman. There is interest in Ariya-Magga (Noble-Path).
Do you want to be proficient with the best weapon we have available to us in this experience? Practice/Study how to use the weapon, it is Ariya-Magga (Noble-Path).
6
Reply
Give Award
Share
Report
Save
Follow
User avatar
level 3
krodha
·
4 days ago
·
edited 3 days ago
There is no interest in Brahman. There is interest in Ariya-Magga (Noble-Path).
Yet it is important to understand precisely what the ārya-marga (path of the āryas) is. If the aspirant does not comprehend the difference between (i) the sthāna-marga-phala or basis, path and result of the buddhadharma and (ii) the basis, path and result of relevant tīrthika systems, then this can cause issues. As Āryadeva said, realization is based on view. If the view is unclear, then this can potentially disrupt progress on the ārya marga, or even compromise entry to the ārya marga itself.
In any case, not trying to dominate the thread. Just trying to advocate for a healthy relationship with Buddhist metaphysics, because often there can be a trend to suppress such things, in an anti-intellectual way, which is a western invention. Traditional Buddhism has never shied away from study and even debate in post-equipoise activities, which is what reddit discussions qualify as.
6
Reply
Give Award
Share
Report
Save
Follow
User avatar
level 4
StarBlissLover
·
3 days ago
"If view is unclear, then this can potentially disrupt progress on the Ariya-Magga, or even compromise entry to the Ariya-Magga itself"
Ariya-Magga (Noble-Path) includes Right View (Samma-Ditti) which is equal to the Four Noble Truths (Cattari Ariya Saccani)
2
Reply
Give Award
Share
Report
Save
Follow
User avatar
level 2
B3and1
·
4 days ago
Personally, I love the 8 food path, especially the pizza path!
5
Reply
Give Award
Share
Report
Save
Follow
User avatar
level 1
krodha
·
4 days ago
·
edited 4 days ago
In comparing Buddhist principles such as nirvāna, or dharmakāya with something like the Brahman of Vedanta, there are distinct differences. Brahman on the one hand is a transpersonal, ontological, truly established ultimate. Whereas dharmakāya is a buddha’s realization of śūnyatā, emptiness, brought to its full measure at the time of buddhahood, which results from the cultivation of jñāna, or a direct non-conceptual, yogic perception of emptiness. Dharmakāya is the nature of a personal continuum of mind, is epistemic in nature, and is not a truly established ultimate nature.
The great Buddhist adept Bhāviveka, who lived during a time in India where there were many polemical debates and interactions between different traditions, addresses the distinctions in many of his expositions. This excerpt from his Tarkajvālā is especially pertinent:
If it is asked what is difference between this dharmakāya and the paramātma [bdag pa dam pa] (synonymous with Brahman) asserted in such ways as nonconceptual, permanent and unchanging, that [paramātma] they explain as subtle because it possesses the quality of subtlety, is explained as gross because it possesses the quality of grossness, as unique because it possess the quality of uniqueness and as pervading near and far because it goes everywhere. The dharmakāya on the other hand is neither subtle nor gross, is not unique, is not near and is not far because it is not a possessor of said qualities and because it does not exist in a place.
Thus we see that that dharmakāya is not an entity-like "possessor" of qualities. Conversely, brahman which is an ontological entity, does possess characteristics and qualities.
Dharmakāya is not an entity at all, but rather a generic characteristic [samanyalakṣana]. As the Buddha says in the Samdhinirmocana, the ultimate in Buddhism is the general characteristic of the relative. The dharmakāya, as emptiness, is the conventional, generic characteristic of the mind, as it is the mind’s dharmatā of emptiness, it’s actual nature that is to be recognized. Liberation results from the release of the fetters that result from an ignorance of the nature of phenomena, and this is how dharmakāya is a non-reductive and insubstantial nature.
The differentiation of brahman as an entity versus dharmakāya as a generic characteristic is enough to demonstrate the salient contrasting aspects of these principles. Dharmakāya is an epistemological discovery about the nature of phenomena, that phenomena lack an essential nature or svabhāva. Alternatively, brahman is an ultimate ontological nature unto itself. Dharmakāya means we realize that entities such as brahman are impossibilities, as Sthiramati explains, entities in general are untenable:
The Buddha is the dharmakāya. Since the dharmakāya is emptiness, because there are not only no imputable personal entities in emptiness, there are also no imputable phenomenal entities, there are therefore no entities at all.
Lastly, another succinct and pertinent excerpt from the Tarkajvālā, regarding the difference between the view of the buddhadharma and tīrthika (non-Buddhist) systems:
Since [the tīrthika position of] self, permanence, all pervasivness and oneness contradict their opposite, [the Buddhist position of] no-self, impermanence, non-pervasiveness and multiplicity, they are completely different.
17
Reply
Give Award
Share
Report
Save
Follow
Soh Wei Yu shared a link.
Someone asked me about generosity recently. I told him I frequently make offerings to sanghas and charities but I do not advertise about it. I find this to be a natural expression from anatta that you naturally will leap out of your circle of self-concerns into a more compassionate mode of caring about the welfare of other beings, it is not an intentional "I want to cultivate merits" (although there is no doubt this is a very meritorious practice). Most importantly, your heart must be open. Free from stinginess, compassionate, with loving kindness and always have the welfare of others in mind.
Also, if you have realisations, you should share them with others and encourage others to reach what you realised. Don't be stingy with your dharma. As the Buddha said, ‘The gift of Dhamma excels all other gifts – sabba danam dhamma danam jinati’. It doesn't cost a single cent to share it Even if you do not have realisations, you can still refer others to the right reliable books/teachers/sources.
p.s. I am not asking for personal offerings here, I have a full time job. I would always recommend practicing generosity. You can do that with a sangha or community near you or online, particularly monks/nuns and teachers that rely on such financial/food/lodging/etc support, or for other causes.
Although AtR emphasizes cultivation of wisdom, do not neglect merits. http://www.awakeningtoreality.com/.../on-importance-of...
It is important both for your own cultivation and path to liberation and buddhahood, and it even helps in worldly success and become more free from obstacles (this I learnt from John Tan and personal experience).
....
https://www.accesstoinsight.org/ptf/dhamma/dana/index.html
Generosity
- Craving (tanha)
- "The Economy of Gifts," by Thanissaro Bhikkhu
- "Dana" in the General Index
- Reply
- 3h
Yin LingAdminGreat sharing Soh, thanks.Generosity and compassion have been something on my mind recently.IMO I think it’s a really smart practice to undercut the self by directing the energy outwards.In my experience, focusing on others (animate or inanimate) while I’m out, generating compassion for things around me when I’m out and about or even when I’m meditating at home, thinking about what I can give to others, just drastically cut down the sense of self and “equalise” the energy inside and outside as we do still contract abit post anatta due to the worldly demands.In short, with compassion and generosity the energy opens up more and more. It reduces the remaining visceral sense of self bit by bit.I think it’s a powerful practice. Looking forward to hear from others