Soh

For the full translation of all Bodhidharma texts, see The High-Fidelity Transmission of Bodhidharma: A New Translation

Chinese Original: https://bookgb.bfnn.org/books/0848.htm

Note: The translator's commentary and notes (by Soh) are provided at the end of the text.


English Translation: 

Bloodstream Sermon of Grand Master Bodhidharma

Preface to the Bloodstream Sermon of Grand Master Bodhidharma

Written by Ren Zhe, Vice Prefect of Jianchang Military Prefecture, Court Gentleman for Instruction, Grantee of the Crimson Robe and Fish Pouch.


The Mind of the primordial person possesses the Buddha-nature in full. Broadly observing the Zen teachings of various schools and all scriptural texts, and tracing them to their most appropriate principle, none fail to state that the fundamental True Buddha is within one's own nature. Bodhidharma came from the West to point directly at the human mind, to See Nature and become Buddha; this implies that one's own True Buddha does not go beyond a single [instance of] nature.

People do not trust themselves, so they gallop outward to seek. They assume there is another special Buddha outside of the True Buddha of self-nature. Therefore, all Buddhas and Patriarchs expounded the Dharma essentials to make people awaken to their own fundamental True Buddha, not to rely on external seeking. Furthermore, because the various Dharma words are flooding and inconsistent, they conversely cause students to be confused about their fundamental nature, finding no place to enter realization.

Only this Bloodstream Sermon of Bodhidharma and the Essentials of Transmitting the Mind by Huangbo are the most ultimate discourses. They allow one to immediately verify one's own Buddha-nature, making it easy for people to understand. Compared to seeking teachers, visiting the Way, drilling into old papers, sitting in meditation (zazen), or traveling on foot, wildly wasting effort—[this text] is ten thousand times apart; this is no small assistance.

Preface by the Old Man Who Sees Solitude, Ren Zhe, in the Guiyou year of the Shaoxing era [1153 CE].

Bodhidharma’s Bloodstream Sermon

Edited and carved by Śramaṇa Shi Zongjing of Huayan Temple in Yuzhou.

The Three Realms arise in confusion, yet all return to One Mind. The former Buddhas and later Buddhas transmit Mind with Mind; they do not establish written words.

Question: If they do not establish written words, what do they take as Mind?

Answer: You asking me—that is precisely your Mind. I answering you—that is precisely my Mind. If I had no Mind, how could I answer you? If you had no Mind, how could you question me? Questioning me is precisely your Mind. From beginningless vast kalpas ago, up to all moments of current activity and movement, in all places, everything is your Fundamental Mind, everything is your Fundamental Buddha. "Mind itself is Buddha" is also just like this.

Apart from this Mind, there is ultimately no other Buddha to be obtained. Leaving this Mind to seek Bodhi (Awakening) or Nirvana is without basis. The true reality of self-nature is neither cause nor effect. The Dharma is the meaning of Mind; self-mind is Nirvana. If you say there is a Buddha or Bodhi obtainable outside of Mind, there is no such place. Where are Buddha and Bodhi located? For example, if someone tries to grab empty space with their hand, can they get it? Empty space has only a name; it has no characteristics or shape. It cannot be grasped, it cannot be abandoned; one simply cannot catch hold of emptiness. Apart from this Mind, one will ultimately never see Buddha.

The Buddha is made by one's own Mind; why seek Buddha apart from this Mind? Former Buddhas and later Buddhas only spoke of this Mind. Mind itself is Buddha, Buddha itself is Mind; outside of Mind there is no Buddha, outside of Buddha there is no Mind. If you say there is a Buddha outside of Mind, where is the Buddha? Since there is no Buddha outside of Mind, why generate a Buddha-view? Passing down deception and confusion to one another, unable to deeply understand the Fundamental Mind, being seized by insentient things, one has no freedom.

If you do not believe, deceiving yourself is of no benefit. The Buddha has no errors or faults; sentient beings are upside-down, unaware and unknowing that self-mind is Buddha. If you know self-mind is Buddha, you should not seek Buddha outside of Mind. Buddha does not liberate Buddha; using mind to seek Buddha is not knowing Buddha. However, those who seek Buddha externally all do not know that self-mind is Buddha.

You also must not use Buddha to bow to Buddha; you must not use mind to recite "Buddha". Buddha does not chant sutras; Buddha does not keep precepts; Buddha does not violate precepts; Buddha has no keeping or violating; nor does [Buddha] create good or evil. If you wish to seek Buddha, you must See Nature; Seeing Nature is precisely Buddha. If you do not See Nature, reciting Buddha's name, chanting sutras, holding fasts, and keeping precepts are all of no benefit.

Reciting Buddha's name results in cause and effect; chanting sutras results in intelligence; keeping precepts results in birth in the heavens; practicing charity results in blessed rewards; but seeking Buddha is ultimately not obtained [this way]. If you do not understand clearly for yourself, you must visit a spiritual friend (kalyāṇamitra) to completely understand the root of birth and death. If he does not See Nature, he is not named a spiritual friend. If not like this, even if one can explain the Twelve Divisions of Scripture, one cannot avoid the cycle of birth and death, suffering in the Three Realms without a time of exit.

In the past there was the Bhikshu Good Star (Sunakṣatra); he could recite the Twelve Divisions of Scripture, yet he did not avoid the cycle of rebirth, because he did not See Nature. Since Good Star was like this, people today who lecture on three or five books of sutras and treatises considering it to be the Buddha-dharma are foolish people. If you do not recognize your own Mind, reciting idle texts is entirely useless. If you want to seek Buddha, you must directly See Nature. Nature is Buddha; the Buddha is a person of ease, a person of no-concerns and no-creation.

If you do not See Nature, all day long you remain confused, galloping outward to seek; seeking Buddha is fundamentally unobtainable. Although there is not a single thing to be obtained, if you seek to understand, you must also visit a spiritual friend; you must painstakingly seek to make your mind understand and resolve. The matter of birth and death is great; you must not pass it in vain; deceiving yourself is of no benefit. Even if you have piles of rare delicacies like mountains and family members like the sands of the Ganges, when your eyes open you see them; when your eyes close, do you still see them? Thus we know that conditioned appearances are like dreams and illusions.

If you do not urgently seek a teacher, you pass a lifetime in vain. Even though one innately possesses the Buddha-nature, if one does not rely on a teacher, one will ultimately not understand clearly. Those who awaken without a teacher are rare, one in ten thousand. If, by your own conditions, you meet and obtain the Sage's intent, then you do not need to visit a spiritual friend. This is knowing by birth; it transcends learning. If you have not yet awakened or understood, you must diligently and bitterly study; through the teaching, you will then obtain awakening. But if you already understand clearly (i.e., have awakened), then even without further ‘study’ you can still ‘get it’ (understand the essence of the teachings).

It is not like the lost people who cannot distinguish black from white, proclaiming false words as the Buddha's decree, slandering the Buddha and envying the Dharma. Classes like these speak dharma like rain, but it is all talk of Mara, not Buddha-speak. The teacher is King Mara; the disciples are the subjects of Mara; lost people allow him to command them, unknowingly falling into the ocean of birth and death.

However, people who do not See Nature falsely claim to be Buddhas. These sentient beings are great sinners; they deceive all sentient beings, causing them to enter the realm of Mara. If one does not See Nature, explaining the Twelve Divisions of Scriptural Teaching is all talk of Mara. They are family members of the house of Mara, not disciples of the house of Buddha. Since they do not distinguish black from white, on what basis can they avoid birth and death?

If one Sees Nature, that is Buddha; if one does not See Nature, that is a sentient being. If one departs from the nature of sentient beings and says there is a separate Buddha-nature to be obtained, where is the Buddha now? The nature of sentient beings is precisely the Buddha-nature. Outside of Nature there is no Buddha; Buddha is precisely Nature; apart from this Nature, there is no Buddha to be obtained, and outside of Buddha there is no Nature to be obtained.

Question: If one does not See Nature, but recites Buddha's name, chants sutras, gives charity, holds precepts, is diligent, and widely generates blessings and benefits, can one become a Buddha?

Answer: One cannot.

Further Question: Why can one not?

Answer: Having a slight dharma to obtain is conditioned dharma; it is cause and effect; it is receiving rewards; it is the dharma of samsara; one does not avoid birth and death, so when will one attain the Buddha Way? Becoming Buddha requires Seeing Nature. If one does not See Nature, talk of cause and effect and such things is the dharma of outsiders. If it is a Buddha, he does not practice the dharma of outsiders. Buddha is a person without karma, without cause and effect; if there is a slight dharma to be obtained, it is all slandering the Buddha; on what basis can one attain [Buddha]?

But if there is abiding or attachment to One Mind, One Agent, One Comprehending or One Seeing, the Buddha does not allow it at all. Buddha has no keeping or violating [precepts]; the Mind-nature is fundamentally empty; it is neither defiled nor pure. All dharmas have no practice and no realization, no cause and no effect. Buddha does not keep precepts, Buddha does not practice good, Buddha does not commit evil, Buddha is not diligent, Buddha is not lazy; Buddha is a person of no-creation.

But if there is an abiding and attached mind, looking at Buddha, he does not allow it. Buddha is not Buddha; do not understand it as Buddha. If you do not see this meaning, at all times and in all places, everything is not understanding the Fundamental Mind. If you do not See Nature, and at all times intend to create "thoughts of no-creation," you are a great sinner, a deluded person, falling into blank emptiness; ignorant like a drunk person, not distinguishing good from bad. If you intend to practice the dharma of no-creation, you must first See Nature, and only then rest your mental conditions.

If one does not See Nature but attains the Buddha Way, there is no such place. There are people who deny cause and effect, blazing in creating evil karma, falsely saying the original is empty and creating evil has no fault; such people fall into the hell of Uninterrupted Darkness, with no time of exit forever. If one is a wise person, one should not make such a view.

Question: Since movement and activity at all times are all Fundamental Mind, when the physical body enters impermanence, why do we not see the Fundamental Mind?

Answer: The Fundamental Mind is always appearing before you; you just do not see it yourself.

Question: Since the Mind is present, why do I not see it?

The Master said: Have you ever dreamed?

Answer: I have dreamed.

Question: When you are dreaming, is that your own self or not?

Answer: It is my own self.

Further Question: Are your speech, movement, and activity separate from you or not separate?

Answer: Not separate.

The Master said: Since it is not separate, then this body is your fundamental Dharmakāya; this Dharmakāya is your Fundamental Mind. This Mind, from beginningless vast kalpas ago, is not separate from today; it has never had birth or death. It is not born and not extinguished. It does not increase and does not decrease; it is not defiled and not pure; it is not good and not evil; it does not come and does not go. It also has no right or wrong, no characteristics of male or female, no monk or layperson, no old or young, no sage and no ordinary; also no Buddha, also no sentient being, also no practice or realization, also no cause or effect, also no physical strength, also no characteristic or shape.

It is like empty space; it cannot be grasped, it cannot be abandoned; mountains, rivers, and stone walls cannot hinder it. It appears and disappears, comes and goes, with unhindered supernatural power; it penetrates the mountain of the five aggregates and crosses the river of birth and death. No karma whatsoever can restrain this Dharmakāya.

This Mind is subtle and marvelous, difficult to see; this Mind is not the same as the Mind of Form; this Mind is what everyone desires to see. Those who move their hands and move their feet within this Luminosity are like the sands of the Ganges, yet when asked about it, they can say nothing; they are just like wooden puppets. It is entirely for one's own use, so why do you not recognize it?

The Buddha said that all sentient beings are entirely lost people; because of this they create karma and fall into the river of birth and death; wanting to exit, they sink back in, simply because they do not See Nature. If sentient beings are not lost, why is it that when asked about the matter within, not a single person understands? One moves one's own hands and feet, so why does one not recognize it? Therefore we know the words of the Sages are not mistaken; lost people cannot understand on their own. Therefore we know this is difficult to clarify; only the Buddha alone can understand this Dharma; the rest, humans, gods, and sentient beings, are entirely unclear.

If wisdom is clear, this Mind is named Dharma-nature, and also named Liberation. Life and death do not restrain it; all dharmas cannot restrain it; this is named the Great Self-Existent King Tathāgata. It is also named the Inconceivable; it is also named the Essence of the Sage; it is also named Long Life and No Death; it is also named the Great Immortal. Although the names are different, the Essence is the same one.

The various differentiations made by Sages are all not apart from Self-mind. The Mind's capacity is vast and great; its responsive functioning is inexhaustible: in response to eyes, forms are seen; in response to ears, sounds are heard; in response to the nose, scents are smelled; in response to the tongue, flavors are known; up to movement and activity—all are Self-mind. At all times, simply where the path of language is cut off, that is Self-mind.

Therefore it is said: The Tathāgata's form is inexhaustible, and wisdom is also likewise. Form being inexhaustible is Self-mind; the mind-consciousness is excellent at distinguishing everything; up to activity and functioning, all are wisdom. Mind has no shape or characteristics; wisdom is also inexhaustible. Therefore it is said: The Tathāgata's form is inexhaustible, and wisdom is also likewise.

The physical body of the four great elements is precisely affliction; the physical body has birth and destruction; the Dharmakāya is permanently abiding and has no place of abiding, because the Tathāgata's Dharmakāya is permanently unchanging. The Sutra says: Sentient beings should know, the Buddha-nature is inherently one's own. Kāśyapa just realized fundamental nature; fundamental nature is precisely Mind; Mind is precisely Nature; Nature is precisely this same Mind of all Buddhas. Former Buddhas and later Buddhas only transmitted this Mind; apart from this Mind, there is no Buddha to be obtained.

Upside-down sentient beings do not know self-mind is Buddha; they gallop outward to seek, busy all day long; reciting Buddha, bowing to Buddha—where is the Buddha? You should not make such views; simply know self-mind; outside of Mind there is utterly no other Buddha.

The Sutra says: Whatever has characteristics is all illusory. It also says: Wherever you are, there is a Buddha. Self-mind is Buddha; you should not use Buddha to bow to Buddha. However, if appearances of Buddhas and Bodhisattvas suddenly appear before you, you absolutely must not bow or pay respect. My Mind is empty and quiescent, fundamentally without such characteristics; if you grasp appearances, that is a demon; you fall entirely into deviant paths. If it is an illusion arising from the mind, you need not bow. Those who bow do not know; those who know do not bow; bowing is being seized by demons. Fearing students do not know, I therefore make this distinction.

Upon the fundamental Nature-essence of the Buddhas and Tathāgatas, there are absolutely no such characteristics; you must pay close attention. Even if there are strange states, you absolutely must not collect or seize them; also do not generate fear, do not be suspicious or confused; my Mind is inherently pure, where could there be such characteristics? Even appearances of devas, dragons, yakshas, ghosts, spirits, Indra, Brahma kings, and so forth—you also must not generate respect with your mind, nor should you fear; my Mind is inherently empty and quiescent; all appearances are delusion-views; simply do not grasp appearances. If you give rise to a Buddha-view or a Dharma-view, or appearances of Buddhas and Bodhisattvas, and generate respect, you fall into the position of sentient beings yourself.

If you wish to understand directly, simply do not grasp any characteristics and you will attain it; there are no other words. Therefore the Sutra says: Whatever has characteristics is all illusory. They all have no fixed reality; illusions have no fixed characteristic. They are impermanent dharmas; simply not grasping appearances matches the Sage's intent. Therefore the Sutra says: Separation from all characteristics is named all Buddhas.

Question: Why can one not bow to Buddhas and Bodhisattvas?

Answer: The Celestial Mara, Pāpiyān, and Asuras manifest supernatural powers; they can all make the appearances of Bodhisattvas. Various transformations are outsiders; they are totally not Buddha. Buddha is self-mind; do not bow by mistake. "Buddha" is a Western word; in this land, we say "Awakened Nature." "Awakened" is Numinous Awareness; responding to capacities and contacting things, raising the eyebrows and blinking the eyes, moving hands and moving feet—all are the nature of your own Numinous Awareness. Nature is precisely Mind, Mind is precisely Buddha, Buddha is precisely the Way, the Way is precisely Zen.

The single character for "Zen" is not fathomed by ordinary people or sages. It is also said: Seeing fundamental nature is Zen. If one does not see fundamental nature, it is not Zen. Even if one can explain a thousand sutras and ten thousand treatises, if one does not see fundamental nature, one is just an ordinary person; it is not the Buddha-dharma. The Ultimate Way is dark and deep; it cannot be understood by speech; how can canonical teachings reach it? Simply see fundamental nature; it is okay even if you do not know a single character. Seeing Nature is precisely Buddha; the Sage-body is inherently pure, without defilement or filth. All verbal explanations are the Sage initiating functioning from the Mind. The Essence of functioning is inherently empty; names and speech still cannot reach it; how can the Twelve Divisions of Scripture attain it?

The Way is fundamentally perfectly accomplished; it does not use practice and realization. The Way is not sound or form; it is subtle, marvelous, and difficult to see. Like a person drinking water knows for himself whether it is cold or warm, it cannot be told to others. Only the Tathāgata can know; the rest, humans, devas, and other classes, are all unaware and unknowing. The wisdom of ordinary people does not reach it, so they have grasping at characteristics. Not understanding that self-mind is fundamentally empty and quiescent, falsely grasping appearances and all dharmas, one immediately falls into becoming an outsider. If one knows all dharmas are born from Mind, one should not have grasping; grasping is not knowing.

If one sees fundamental nature, the Twelve Divisions of Scripture are all idle words. A thousand sutras and ten thousand treatises are just to clarify the Mind; if immediately upon words you tally and understand, of what use is the teaching? The Ultimate Principle cuts off words; teaching is verbal vocabulary; it is truly not the Way. The Way is fundamentally without words; speech is illusion.

If in the night you dream of seeing pavilions, palaces, elephants, horses, and the like, or trees, thickets, pools, and pavilions—appearances like these—you must not give rise to a single thought of delight and attachment; they are all places of reincarnation (womb-entry); you must pay close attention. At the moment of approaching the end, do not grasp appearances, and you will eliminate hindrances. If a doubtful mind glances up, immediately you are seized by demons. The Dharmakāya is inherently pure and without sensation/receiving; just because of delusion, one is unaware and unknowing, and due to this, falsely receives retribution. Therefore there is delight and attachment, and one does not obtain freedom.

Right now, if you realize the fundamental body and mind, you will not be dyed by habits. If one enters the ordinary from the sage, manifesting various mixed types, acting as a sentient being oneself, therefore the Sage is free in reverse and direct circumstances; no karma can restrain him. The Sage has achieved great awe-inspiring virtue for a long time; all species of karma are turned by the Sage; heaven and hell can do nothing to him. The spirit-consciousness of the ordinary person is dim and dark; not like the Sage, who is internally and externally thoroughly clear. If one has doubt, one does not act; if one acts, one wanders in birth and death; later facing regret, there is no place for rescue. Poverty, distress, and suffering are all born from delusional thinking; if one understands this Mind, pass it on to advise and encourage each other; simply act without acting, and you enter the Tathāgata's Knowledge and View.

For a person who has first aroused the intention (bodhicitta), spirit-consciousness is generally essentially unstable. If one frequently sees strange states in dreams, one should simply not doubt; they all arise from one's own mind, they do not come from outside. If in a dream you see brightness appearing, surpassing the sun disk, then residual habits are suddenly exhausted; this is seeing the nature of the Dharma-realm. If this matter occurs, it is the cause of achieving the Way. Only you know it yourself; it cannot be told to others.

Or if in a quiet grove, while walking, standing, sitting, or lying down, the eye sees brightness, whether large or small, do not tell people, and also do not grasp it; this is also the Luminosity of self-nature. Or if in the quiet of night, in the dark, while walking, standing, sitting, or lying down, the eye witnesses brightness differing no whit from daytime, do not be strange about it; it is all self-mind about to clarify and appear. Or if in a dream at night you see stars and moon clearly, this is also the various conditions of self-mind about to cease; also do not tell people. If dreams are confused and murky, like walking in darkness/shade, this is also one's own mind's afflictive hindrances being heavy; this too you know yourself.

If one Sees Nature, one need not read sutras or recite Buddha; wide learning and much knowledge are of no benefit; spirit-consciousness turns dull. Establishing teachings is only to mark the Mind; if one recognizes the Mind, what use is reading teachings? If one enters the sage from the ordinary, one must rest karma and nourish the spirit, passing the days according to one's lot. If there is much anger and hatred, causing Nature to turn against the Way, you cheat yourself with no benefit. The Sage appears and disappears freely within birth and death, hiding and revealing without fixity; no karma can restrain him. The Sage smashes heterodox demons; if all sentient beings simply See Nature, residual habits are suddenly extinguished. Spirit-consciousness is not dim; one must simply understand directly right now. If you want to truly understand the Way, do not grasp any dharmas; rest karma and nourish the spirit, and residual habits will also be exhausted. Naturally clear and white, it does not depend on exerting effort.

Outsiders do not understand the Buddha's intent; they exert effort the most. Violating the Sage's intent, all day long they rush about reciting Buddha and turning sutras; dimming the divine nature, they do not avoid the cycle of rebirth. Buddha is a person of leisure; what need is there to rush about widely seeking fame and profit? Of what use will it be later? But people who do not See Nature read sutras and recite Buddha, learning "diligence" for a long time; practicing the Way six times a day, sitting for long periods without lying down; widely studying and hearing much, considering this to be Buddha-dharma. Sentient beings such as this are all people who slander the Buddha-dharma.

Former Buddhas and later Buddhas only speak of Seeing Nature. All conditioned practices are impermanent. If one does not See Nature, yet falsely says "I have attained Anuttara-bodhi" (Unsurpassed Awakening), this is a great sinner. Among the Ten Great Disciples, Ananda was number one in having heard much; regarding the Buddha he had no recognition, he only learned broad hearing (erudition). The Two Vehicles and outsiders all do not recognize Buddha; knowing numbers and practicing realization, they fall into cause and effect. This is the karmic retribution of sentient beings; they do not avoid birth and death; turning far away from the Buddha's intent, they are sentient beings who slander the Buddha; killing them has no fault.

The Sutra says: Icchantikas do not generate faith; killing them has no fault. If one has faith, this person is a person of the Buddha-position. If one does not See Nature, one should not arbitrarily slander the good [who do]; confusing oneself is of no benefit. Good and evil are distinct; cause and effect are clear. Heaven and hell are right before your eyes; foolish people do not believe, and manifest falling into the hell of darkness; also unaware and unknowing; only because karma is heavy, therefore they do not believe. Like a person without eyes does not believe the Dao has light; even if you tell him he does not believe; only because he is blind, on what basis can he distinguish sunlight? Foolish people are also like this. Now manifesting falling into mixed species of livestock, born in poverty and lowliness; seeking life they cannot get it, seeking death they cannot get it. Although receiving this suffering, if you ask them directly, they say "I am happy now," not different from heaven. Thus we know that all sentient beings take the place of birth as happiness; they are also unaware and unknowing. Evil people like this—only because karmic obstructions are heavy, therefore they cannot generate faith; they have no freedom [from karma].

If one sees Self-mind is Buddha, one need not shave the beard and hair; a white-robed one [layperson] is also Buddha. If one does not See Nature, shaving the beard and hair, one is also an outsider.

Question: White-robed ones have wives and children, and lust is not removed; on what basis can they become Buddha?

Answer: I only speak of Seeing Nature, I do not speak of lust. It is only because you do not See Nature; if you just See Nature, lust is fundamentally empty and quiescent; it cuts off and removes itself naturally, and one also does not delight in or attach to it. Even if there are residual habits, they cannot cause harm. Why is this? Because Nature is fundamentally pure. Although dwelling in the physical body of the five aggregates, its Nature is fundamentally pure and cannot be defiled. The Dharmakāya fundamentally has no sensation; no hunger, no thirst, no cold, no heat, no sickness, no love, no family, no suffering, no joy, no good, no bad, no short, no long, no strong, no weak. Fundamentally there is not a single thing to be obtained. It is only because of grasping that there is this physical body; due to this there are appearances of hunger, thirst, cold, heat, sickness, and so forth.

If you do not grasp, you function with abandon. If within birth and death you obtain freedom, turning all dharmas, you are unobstructed like the supernatural powers of the Sage; there is no place you are not at peace. If the mind has doubt, you definitely will not pass through any states/environments. Not doing [evil] is best; if you do it, you do not avoid the cycle of birth and death. If one Sees Nature, a Chandala (outcaste/butcher) can also become Buddha.

Question: A Chandala creates karma by killing life; how can he become Buddha?

Answer: I only speak of Seeing Nature; I do not speak of creating karma. Even if he creates karma differently, all karma cannot restrain him. From beginningless vast kalpas ago, only because of not Seeing Nature, one falls into hell; therefore one creates karma and cycles in birth and death. From the moment of realizing fundamental nature, one ultimately does not create karma. If one does not See Nature, reciting Buddha does not avoid retribution, let alone killing life. If one Sees Nature, the doubtful mind is suddenly removed; killing life also can do nothing to him.

The Twenty-Seven Patriarchs from the Western Heaven only transmitted the Mind-seal. I have now come to this land to transmit only the Sudden Teaching of the Mahayana: Mind itself is Buddha. I do not speak of keeping precepts, diligence, or asceticism. Even entering water and fire, climbing upon sword-wheels, eating once a day, sitting long without lying down—these are all the conditioned dharmas of outsiders. If you recognize the nature of Numinous Awareness in activity and movement, you are the Mind of all Buddhas. Former Buddhas and later Buddhas only spoke of transmitting Mind; there is no other Dharma whatsoever. If you recognize this Dharma, an ordinary person who does not know a single character is also a Buddha. If you do not recognize the nature of your own Numinous Awareness, even if you smash your body into motes of dust, you will ultimately not find Buddha.

"Buddha" is also named Dharmakāya, also named Fundamental Mind. This Mind has no shape or characteristics, no cause and effect, no tendons or bones; it is like empty space; it cannot be grasped. It is not the same as material obstruction; it is not the same as outsiders. Apart from the Tathāgata alone who can understand this Mind, the rest—sentient beings and lost people—are not clear about it. This Mind is not apart from the physical body of the four great elements; if apart from this Mind, there is no ability to move. This body has no knowing, like grass, trees, tiles, and pebbles. The body is without nature; on what basis does it move?

If self-mind moves, up to language, activity, movement, seeing, hearing, sensing, and knowing—all are the moving mind moving the function. Motion is the mind moving; motion is precisely its function. Outside of moving-function there is no mind; outside of mind there is no motion. Motion is not mind; mind is not motion. Motion fundamentally has no mind; mind fundamentally has no motion. Motion is not apart from mind; mind is not apart from motion. Motion has no mind to separate from; mind has no motion to separate from; motion is mind's function; function is mind's motion. Motion is precisely mind's function; function is precisely mind's motion. Not moving, not functioning; the essence of function is fundamentally empty. Emptiness fundamentally has no motion; motion and function are the same as mind; mind fundamentally has no motion.

Therefore the Sutra says: Moving yet without anything moved; all day going and coming yet never having gone; all day seeing yet never having seen; all day laughing yet never having laughed; all day hearing yet never having heard; all day knowing yet never having known; all day happy yet never having been happy; all day walking yet never having walked; all day abiding yet never having abided.

Therefore the Sutra says: The path of language is cut off; the place of mental activity is extinguished; seeing, hearing, sensing, and knowing are fundamentally perfectly quiescent. Even anger, happiness, pain, and itch—how are they different from a wooden puppet? It is only because searching for pain and itch results in them being unobtainable. Therefore the Sutra says: Evil karma results in bitter retribution; good karma results in good retribution. Not only does anger lead to falling into hell, and happiness lead to birth in heaven. If one knows the nature of anger and happiness is empty, and simply does not grasp, one is released from karma. If one does not See Nature, lecturing on sutras definitely has no basis; speaking is also inexhaustible. I have briefly marked the deviant and the correct like this; it does not reach one or two [percent of the reality].

The Ode says:

Mind, Mind, Mind—difficult to seek; When broad, it pervades the Dharma-realm; When narrow, it does not admit a needle. I fundamentally seek Mind, not Buddha; I fully know the Three Realms are empty, without a thing. If you wish to seek Buddha, simply seek Mind; Only this Mind, this Mind is Buddha. I fundamentally seek Mind, Mind holds itself; Seeking Mind is not obtained; wait for Mind to know. Buddha-nature is not obtained from outside the Mind; When thought arises, that is precisely the time of sin arising.

The Gāthā says:

I originally came to this land, To transmit the Dharma and save lost sentient beings. One flower opens five petals; The bearing of fruit will form naturally.

End of Bloodstream Sermon of Grand Master Bodhidharma.


Translator (Soh)'s Commentary

Introduction 

The Bloodstream Sermon (Xuemai Lun) is one of the four principal texts attributed to Bodhidharma, the First Patriarch of Chan (Zen). It represents a radical, iconoclastic turn in Buddhist literature. Unlike the gradualist approaches of the scholastic traditions, this text emphasizes Jiànxìng (Seeing Nature) as the singular, indispensable requirement for Buddhahood. It ruthlessly dismantles reliance on external forms—recitation, precepts, stupa building, and scripture study—if they are divorced from the direct realization of the Mind. The text serves as a "bloodline" or lineage certificate, asserting that the transmission of the Buddha-mind is the only authentic Buddhism.

Structural and Stylistic Choices 

The translation maintains the "question and answer" format (Dialogue) which is crucial for the "direct pointing" style. I have used direct, sometimes abrupt English to mirror the forceful Chinese of the Tang/Song vernacular style used in the text. I have incorporated fluid phrasing from Red Pine where accurate (e.g., "seized by," "wooden puppet") while correcting his interpretative looseness regarding doctrinal terms.

Translation Choices - Contextual Explanations

  • Spirit-Consciousness (Shénshí): This term refers to the transmigrating consciousness in Chinese folk Buddhism and early Chan. It is the functional aspect of the mind that wanders in samsara when deluded.

  • Person of Non-action (Wúwéi Rén): The Buddha is described as a "person of wúwéi." Here, wúwéi is not just the ontological "unconditioned" but the Daoist-influenced functional style of "non-contrivance" or "effortlessness."

Contextual and Doctrinal Explanations

The Rhetoric of Ultimate Truth vs. The Reality of Karmic Ripening

The Bloodstream Sermon employs the radical rhetoric of the "Sudden Teaching." Statements such as "killing [icchantikas] has no fault" or "A Chandala (butcher) can become a Buddha" are intended to shatter dualistic grasping. However, a grave danger lies in erroneously interpreting these statements literally, or as a license for licentiousness or a denial of cause and effect (nihilism). The Buddha taught in the Neyyatha Sutta, "Monks, these two slander the Tathagata. Which two? He who explains a discourse whose meaning needs to be inferred as one whose meaning has already been fully drawn out. And he who explains a discourse whose meaning has already been fully drawn out as one whose meaning needs to be inferred. These are two who slander the Tathagata."

A note on 'killing icchantikas': Mahāyāna Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra is textually layered and intentionally uses shock / reversal rhetoric. Modern scholarship treats the Dharmakṣema “long” text as a conglomeration with strands that don’t perfectly harmonize. For example, while some statements seemingly suggest that icchantikas are hopeless beings that cannot be saved, the same scripture tradition later insists that in truth, icchantikas can be saved and will attain enlightenment in the future.

Furthermore, the same 
Mahāyāna Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra states, "Noble son, do not say that! That youth was a magical emanation (māyā) and Vajrapāṇi, the king of the yakṣas, enacted that deed in order to extirpate and terrify those who denigrate the authentic Dharma, but it is not right to kill either those who denigrate the authentic Dharma or icchantikas. You should not take life which results in the accumulation of negative karma."

Freedom from Karma: The Exclusive Domain of the Fully Awakened

Bodhidharma said in the Treatise on the Awakening of Nature, "Sentient beings create karma; karma does not create sentient beings. Creating karma in this life, receiving retribution in the next life—there is no time of escape. Only the Perfected Person [i.e. Buddha] does not create any karma within this body, therefore he does not receive retribution. The sūtra says: "Creating no karma, one naturally attains the Way."

It is a critical error to assume that a mere initial glimpse of the Nature (Jiànxìng / Kensho) grants immunity from karma. While the Nature itself is unconditioned, the practitioner who has "seen" it is not yet a fully perfected Buddha. They remain subject to the twin obscurations (afflictive and knowledge obscurations) to varying degrees, and the ripening of latent karmic tendencies.

True freedom from karma is not a property of the initial "Path" but of the final "Fruit." It belongs strictly to the fully awakened Tathāgata who has completely exhausted the Two Obscurations (afflictive emotions and cognitive traces). For the vast majority of practitioners—even those with genuine initial insights—karma remains fully operative.

As the Mahayana Sutras and Zen Masters clarify, this complete freedom is exclusive to the Buddha:

  • Lankavatara Sutra: "Karma does not attach to the Buddhas, because they have transcended all dualities. They are free from individualization and discrimination... they are beyond the triple world and are unattached to the consequences of deeds."

  • Mahaparinirvana Sutra: "The Tathagata is beyond karma, birth, and death. Though he may appear to enter samsara, he does so out of compassion and is never tainted by its bonds."

  • Avatamsaka Sutra: "The deeds of the Buddha are free from any bondage of karma... His actions are not born of desire, not subject to consequence, and yet they benefit infinite beings."

  • Zen Master Huangbo: "The Buddha is without karma. Karma belongs to the deluded mind. Enlightenment knows no karma, no rebirth."

The Inescapability of Ripening (Vipāka)

We must distinguish between creating new binding karma (which stops upon full awakening) and the ripening of old karma. The distinction between a Buddha and an ordinary being is not that the Buddha vanishes from the causal universe, but that the Buddha is free from the Three Poisons (Greed, Anger, Delusion) that drive the creation of new binding karma.

Even Shakyamuni Buddha, in his physical manifestation, experienced severe migraines due to the ripening of past karma, which persisted for the rest of his life following the Sākya clan's massacre. This demonstrates that while the Buddha's mind is liberated, the physical body remains subject to the unerring law of cause and effect. If this is so even for a Buddha, the claims that one is "untouched" while still embodied and not yet a full Buddha absolutely falls into the category of the "Nihilist View."

The Koan of Baizhang’s Wild Fox: "Not Falling" vs. "Not Obscuring"

To understand Bodhidharma's assertion that the Nature is "free from cause and effect" without falling into error, one must look to the famous Chan Koan Case 2 of the Wumenguan (The Gateless Barrier), concerning Baizhang and the Wild Fox.

In this case, an elder monk was asked, "Is an accomplished cultivator subject to cause and effect?" He answered, "They do not fall into cause and effect" (bù luò yīnguǒ). For this answer—implying that enlightenment is an exemption from cosmic law—he was reborn as a wild fox for 500 lifetimes. He was only liberated when Master Baizhang corrected him with a single turning phrase: "They do not obscure cause and effect" (bù mèi yīnguǒ).

  • "Not Falling" (Bù luò): This implies a denial of causality, a belief that the enlightened being sits outside the operation of karma. Master Dogen (in Shobogenzo: Shinjin-inga) critiques this as a "Great Wrong View" that leads to hellish states.

  • "Not Obscuring" (Bù mèi): This means the enlightened being is perfectly clear about cause and effect. They are not confused (mèi) by it. They understand that while the Mind-ground is empty, the functioning of phenomena follows precise laws.

Therefore, when the Bloodstream Sermon speaks of being "free," it refers to the the full realization and embodiment of the Ultimate Nature of Mind. It does not give permission for unawakened or partially awakened students to ignore moral discipline. As Master Dogen concludes: "To say 'one does not fall into cause and effect' is to deny cause and effect... 'Not obscuring cause and effect' is clearly deep faith in cause and effect."

“To summarize, the principle of cause and effect is quite clear, and it is totally impersonal: those who fabricate evil will fall into a lower state, whereas those who practice good will rise to a higher state, and without the slightest disparity. If cause and  effect  had  become  null  and  void,  Buddhas  would  never  have  appeared  in  the  world  and  our  Ancestral  Master  would  not  have  come  from  the  West.  In  short,  it  would  be  impossible  for  human  beings  to  encounter  a  Buddha  and  hear  the  Dharma. The fundamental principle of cause and effect was not clear to Confucius or Lao-tzu. It has only been clarified and Transmitted by Buddha after Buddha and by Ancestor after Ancestor. Because the good fortune of those who are seeking to learn  in  these  degenerate  days  of  the  Dharma  is  scant,  they  do  not  encounter  a  genuine Master or hear the authentic Dharma, and so they are not clear about cause and  effect.  If  you  deny  causality  as  a  result  of  this  error,  you  will  experience  excessive misfortune, since you would be as ignorant as an ox or a horse. Even if you  have  not  committed  any  evil  act  other  than  denying  cause  and  effect,  the  poison  of  this  view  will  immediately  be  terrible.  Therefore,  if  you  who  are  exploring the Matter through your training with a Master have put your heart that seeks  awakening  as  the  first  and  foremost  matter,  and  therefore  wish  to  repay  the  vast  benevolence  of  the  Buddhas  and  the  Ancestors,  you  should  swiftly  clarify  what causality really is.” - Zen Master Dogen Zenji (https://www.thezensite.com/ZenTeachings/Dogen_Teachings/Shobogenzo/088jinshiInga.pdf)

“Without the precepts, Zen is the work of the devil."

  — Zen Master Dogen Zenji


Refuting the "One Agent" and the "First Cause" Heresy

"But if there is abiding or attachment to One Mind, One Agent, One Comprehending or One Seeing, the Buddha does not allow it at all."

  — Bodhidharma
In this critical passage, Bodhidharma explicitly rejects the attachment to "One Mind" (一心) or "One Agent" (一能 - Yi Neng). This is a precise dismantling of the Substantialist / First Cause (第一因) view—the belief in a singular, permanent "Agent" or "Source" that generates reality.

The Meaning of "Néng" (能): Agent vs. Function 

In Buddhist philosophy, the character Néng (能) is the active half of the dualistic pair Néng-Suǒ (能所 - Subject/Object or Agent/Patient).

  • Néng: The Subject, the Agent, the "Knower," or the "Creator."

  • Suǒ: The Object, the Sphere, the "Known," or the "Created."

When Bodhidharma warns against attaching to "One Agent," he is attacking the subtle delusion of establishing a "Cosmic Subject" or "Super-Self" (like the Purusha of Sāṃkhya or the Brahman of Vedanta) that stands behind phenomena and "acts" as their ultimate Source or creator. He is saying: do not reify the functioning of Mind into a static Agent.

Modern Relevance: The "First Cause" Error (Xiao Ping Shi)

This distinction is vital for navigating modern doctrinal deviations. For instance, the contemporary teacher Xiao Ping Shi (leader of the "True Enlightenment Practitioners Association" in Taiwan) has been critiqued by teachers (such as Ven. Da Zhao) for falling into this exact "One Agent / First Cause" error.

Xiao posits that the Tathāgatagarbha (or Eighth Consciousness) is a literal, permanent entity that "creates" (能生 - Néng Sheng) the physical body and the universe. He views the True Mind as the Agent (Néng) and the universe as the Product (Suǒ). This is a classic monistic view (邪因外道 - Heterodox Cause), confusing the Buddhist Alaya (a storehouse of dependent seeds) with a Samkhya or Vedantic view of an Ultimate Source or the Pradhāna (Nature) of Sāṃkhya philosophy.

Ven. Da Zhao's Critique & Scriptural Evidence

As Ven. Da Zhao points out in his critique Heterodox Cause: Xiao Ping Shi's "God-Making Movement", this view aligns with the "Twenty Kinds of Outsiders" refuted in the Lankavatara Sutra commentaries. He cites authoritative texts to refute this "One Agent" view:

  • Abhidharma Kośa (Vol 6): "One cause producing things is impossible" (一因生法,決定無有).

  • Avatamsaka Sutra (Vol 30): "The nature of all dharmas is empty and quiescent; there is no single dharma that can create" (無有一法能造作).

Dependent Origination as Non-Arising 

Crucially, when Bodhidharma asserts that "Mind.. ...[has] no cause and effect," he is refuting the substantialist view of Inherent Production/Inherent Causation—the idea that something can arise by its own power or essence from a Self, Other, Both, or Causelessness—and not the valid relative principle of Dependent Origination itself. To understand this, we must look to the Eight Examples of Illusion (such as a mirage, a rainbow, or an echo).

True Dependent Origination reveals that phenomena are Non-Arisen (無生):

  • The Rainbow: A rainbow depends on mist, light, and an observer. Because it is thoroughly dependent on these conditions, no independent "rainbow-entity" is ever truly born. It is a vivid appearance that is simultaneously empty of essence.

  • The Drum Sound: When a drum is struck, a sound arises. But the sound is not inside the wood, the hide, or the stick. It does not "come" from anywhere. It is a dependent designation—a label applied to a confluence of conditions. Because no "sound-entity" can be found, the sound is "unborn" and "unceasing."

Bodhidharma points to this: Whatever dependently originates is empty of inherent existence. The "functioning" of the Sage is like a mirage or an echo—functioning clearly without an Agent, moving without a Mover, and arising without ever leaving the state of non-arising. Simultaneously, Bodhidharma does not deny The Causal Power of the Unreal, hence in that same text he asserts, "Good and evil are distinct; cause and effect are clear.", and "There are people who deny cause and effect, blazing in creating evil karma, falsely saying the original is empty and creating evil has no fault; such people fall into the hell of Uninterrupted Darkness, with no time of exit forever. If one is a wise person, one should not make such a view."

The Paradox of Motion and Mind — The Total Realization of Anatta

1. The Mutual Negation: Escaping the "Substantialist" Trap

This section contains the text’s most critical dialectic for realizing Anatta (No-Self). When Bodhidharma says "Motion is mind's function," a student might fall into Substantialist Non-dualism—imagining "Mind" as a giant, static background screen or a "Source" that remains untouched while emitting functions like a radio emits waves.

Bodhidharma destroys this view with a rigorous mutual negation:

"Outside of moving-function there is no mind; outside of mind there is no motion. Motion has no mind to separate from; mind has no motion to separate from."

This reveals that "Mind" and "Motion" are not two things (a Hidden Source vs. a Visible Output). They are a single, non-dual occurrence.

  • You cannot peel away the "Motion" to find a "Mind" hiding behind it.

  • You cannot set aside "Mind" and find some mechanical "Motion" existing on its own.

2. The "Weather" Analogy: Dynamic Function without a Static Agent

To realize this is to cure the "disease of nouns." Our language tricks us into believing that for every action (verb), there must be a subject (noun) to initiate it. We say "The wind blows," implying "Wind" is an entity that decides to perform the act of "blowing."

But as Zen Master Thich Nhat Hanh points out, this is a grammatical fiction:

"If there is no blowing, there is no wind... We don't need a 'rainer,' we just need the rain. Raining and the rain are the same."

Similarly, "Mind" or "Awareness" is not a static container in which things happen. As clarified in contemporary discussions (e.g., via the Awakening to Reality blog), "Mind" is merely a label for dynamic activity, just like "Weather".

  • No Lightning besides the Flash: You cannot have "lightning" sitting in the cloud waiting to perform a "flash." Lightning is the flashing.

  • No Agent behind the Flash: The flash happens. It is self-luminous. There is no "flasher" behind it.

In the same way, there is no "Knower" behind the "Knowing," and no "Mover" behind the "Moving."

3. Nagarjuna’s Logic: Refuting Both the Mover and the Movement 

Bodhidharma’s assertion that "Motion is not mind" and "Mind has no motion" echoes the rigorous analysis of Nagarjuna (in the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā, Chapter 2). By asserting "Motion is not mind," Bodhidharma prevents the materialist error of reducing awareness to mere physical mechanics (Identity); conversely, by asserting "Outside of motion there is no mind," he destroys the eternalist delusion of a hidden "ghost in the machine" or separate Self (Difference). This rigorous double-negation collapses the entire Agent-Action structure, forcing the realization of Anatta: functioning appears vividly as a dependent designation, yet neither an inherent "Mover" nor an independent "Movement" can ever be established.

To fully realize Anatta, we must see through the metaphysical structure of "Agent" and "Action."

We habitually assume an inherent Mover (Self) initiates a Movement (Activity). Nagarjuna refutes this by exposing the logical absurdities that arise if we take these as real entities:

  • The Error of the "Moving Mover" (The Doubling Fault): If we claim there is an inherently existing "Mover" who then performs the act of "moving," we commit a logical error. Why? Because to be defined as a "Mover," one must already possess motion. If this "Mover" then performs the action of moving, there would be two motions: one that makes him a "Mover" initially, and a second one that he performs. This is absurd.

  • Mutual Dependence (No Independent Basis): Since an independent "Mover" cannot be established, perhaps the "Movement" itself is real? Nagarjuna argues that "Movement" is impossible to locate: it is not found in the path already passed, nor in the path not yet passed.

    • Without a "Mover," there is no "Movement" (who is moving?).

    • Without "Movement," there is no "Mover" (how are they defined?).

  • Conclusion (Dependent Designation): Because neither the Mover nor the Movement can stand alone, they are revealed to be Dependent Designations (prajñaptir upādāya). They exist only as conceptual labels applied to a flow of conditions.

    Crucial Two Truths Distinction: This is not a nihilistic denial that "walking happens." Walking conventionally occurs. It is a denial that a Reified Self (Svabhāva) initiates the walking. The structure of "Subject performs Verb" collapses into emptiness—dynamically appearing and functioning as all actions and appearances vividly without reifications and without a ghost in the machine.

4. Mind as Self-Luminosity: The Light of Knowing

If both the Agent and the Action are empty of inherent existence, what is happening? Is it just blank darkness?

No. The text says: "Motion is precisely mind's function."

This points to the realization that Mind is the self-luminosity of all appearances.

  • The Mind is not a spotlight that shines from a subject onto an object.

  • The appearances and dynamic functions (the moving hand, the sound of the bell, the arising thought) are themselves the brilliant light of knowingness. Crucially, the brilliant light of knowingness has no existence of itself apart from self-knowing appearances.

The "knowing" is not separate from the "known." The redness of a flower is the knowing of the redness, and no other knowing can be found beside that appearance. The sensation of walking is the knowing of walking, and no other knowing can be found beside that appearance. There is not the slightest hairbreadth’s distinction between the scene and the seeing.

5. "Moving Yet Without Anything Moved"

This culminates in the Sutra quote: "All day going and coming yet never having gone."

This is the final seal of Anatta:

  • Conventionally: There is the vivid appearance of walking, speaking, and eating.

  • Ultimately: There is no "Walker" who traverses space, no "Speaker" who generates words, no "Thinker" who creates thoughts.

Because there is no fixed "Self" to travel from Point A to Point B, and because the "Mover" is empty of substance, even "Movement" itself is empty of substance. Thus, the Sage functions all day long yet "never moves." This is the total, agentless exertion of all dependent conditions—raining without a rainer, thinking without a thinker, moving without a mover.


Comparative Notes: High-Fidelity vs. Earlier Translations (e.g., Red Pine)

While Red Pine's translation is widely read for its conversational fluency, this High-Fidelity translation diverges in critical areas to restore the specific Mahāyāna technical terminology and the correct doctrinal classification of "Internal" vs. "External" practice.

Dharmakāya vs. Real Body

  • Source: Fǎshēn (法身).

  • Red Pine: "Real body."

  • This Translation: "Dharmakāya."

  • Rationale: Dharmakāya is a specific technical term referring to the Buddha's complete knowledge of emptiness. Red Pine’s choice of "Real Body" implies a substantial, inherent substrate (a "Real Self"), which risks sneaking a non-Buddhist Atman-view (Self-view) back into a text explicitly teaching No-Self or No-Mind. Translating it as "Real body" risks substantialism—implying a metaphysical essence, "True Self" or substratum that ultimately exists underlying all phenomena, in contrast to the physical body. Retaining Dharmakāya preserves the link to the Trikāya (Three Bodies) doctrine essential to the text.

Outsiders vs. Fanatics

  • Source: Wàidào (外道 - Skt. Tīrthika).

  • Red Pine: "Fanatics."

  • This Translation: "Outsiders" (or "Followers of Outer Paths").

  • Rationale: The term Wàidào specifically refers to non-Buddhist practitioners who seek the Truth outside the Mind (e.g., through austerities, worship of deities, or metaphysics). Red Pine’s choice of "Fanatics" implies that their error is one of emotional intensity or zealotry. The text’s actual critique is doctrinal: their error is external seeking, regardless of how calm or "fanatical" they are.

Numinous Awareness vs. Miraculously Aware

  • Source: Língjué (靈覺).

  • Red Pine: "Miraculously aware."

  • This Translation: "Numinous Awareness."

  • Rationale: Líng (Numinous/Spiritual) refers to the intrinsic, efficacious, and self-illuminating potency of the Mind. "Miraculous" suggests a supernatural event or magic trick. "Numinous Awareness" better captures the Chan view of the Mind’s natural, inherent capacity to know and sense without a dualistic knower.

Dharma of Outsiders vs. Nonsense

  • Source: Wàidào Fǎ (外道法 - Dharma of Outer Paths).

  • Red Pine: "All this talk about cause and effect is nonsense."

  • This Translation: "Talk of cause and effect... is the dharma of outsiders."

  • Rationale: The text reads yīnguǒ děng yǔ, shì wàidào fǎ. This does not dismiss karma as "nonsense" (a nihilistic error). Rather, it critiques the reliance on conditioned merit-making without "Seeing Nature."

    • Early Buddhist Parallel: MN 117 distinguishes "Right View with effluents" (leading to merit/rebirth) from "Noble Right View" (leading to liberation).

    • Mahāyāna Parallel: The Diamond Sūtra contrasts giving while "abiding in marks" (limited merit) with giving without attachment (immeasurable merit).

    • Bodhidharma asserts that practicing for karmic rewards without realizing the Nature keeps one "outside" the gate of liberation. Red Pine’s "nonsense" is interpretive and risks misleading the reader into thinking the law of karma itself is false; "dharma of outsiders" accurately categorizes it as a provisional approach insufficient for Buddhahood if clung to as the final goal.

Seeing Nature vs. Seeing Your Nature

  • Source: Jiànxìng (見性).

  • Red Pine: "See your nature."

  • This Translation: "See Nature" (or "Seeing Nature").

  • Rationale: The original Chinese contains no possessive pronoun. While "your nature" is acceptable in conventional parlance, in a rigorous Chan context, inserting "your" creates a subtle doctrinal hazard. It risks reifying the Nature as a personal possession, an individual soul, or a property belonging to a "Self." By stripping away the unwarranted pronoun, "Seeing Nature" (Kenshō) correctly points to the realization of the empty, non-dual nature of reality, which is neither a personal ego nor a "Universal Consciousness," but simply the vivid, ungraspable functioning of Mind that is No-Mind (empty of inherent existence), without an agent, self/Self, center or subject.

Icchantika vs. Incapable of Belief

  • Source: Yīchántí (一闡提).

  • Red Pine: "People who are incapable of belief."

  • This Translation: "Icchantika."

  • Rationale: Icchantika is a specific Mahāyāna soteriological category referring to beings whose "roots of merit" are severed. Glossing it merely as "people who can't believe" loses the weight of the scriptural reference (specifically to the Nirvana Sutra) regarding the gravity of slandering the Dharma.




Doctrinal Explanation

To understand why Bodhidharma calls the pursuit of karma "the dharma of outsiders" (wàidào fǎ), we must look at how Buddhist tradition distinguishes between practicing for merit (within Samsara) and practicing for liberation (Nirvana).

1. The Foundation: Pali Canon (MN 117)

The Buddha explicitly distinguishes two types of Right View. This provides a clear early Buddhist formulation of the distinction Chan later re-expresses.

  • Mundane Right View (Sāsava - "With Effluents"): Affirmation of giving, offerings, and the fruits of karma. This is ethically indispensable and leads to merit/heaven, but it is still "siding with merit" and results in further becoming (acquisitions).

  • Noble Right View (Anāsava - "Noble/Taintless"): The wisdom faculty that penetrates the Four Noble Truths. This is the "transcendent" factor of the path that cuts the root of suffering.

2. The Mahāyāna Parallel: "Abiding in Marks" vs. Ultimate Truth

Mahāyāna often re-expresses this distinction using the idioms of (i) conventional vs. ultimate truth and (ii) "abiding in marks" vs. non-abiding prajñā. Karma is affirmed conventionally, while ultimate insight cuts the reification of agent, action, and result.

Context"Outsider" / Mundane Approach"Seeing Nature" / Ultimate Approach
Diamond Sūtra

"Abiding in Marks"


Practicing charity while reifying a "self," "person," or "living being."


Result: Finite merit (spiritually limited).

"Non-Abiding"


Practicing without attachment to forms or reification of the giver/gift/recipient.


Result: Immeasurable merit.

Lankavatara Sūtra

Conventional Teaching


Teachings on karma and moral causality that rely on discriminative mind and words.

Self-Realization of Noble Wisdom


The yogin's direct realization (Āryajñāna) that transcends discursiveness and dualistic views.

Vimalakirti Sūtra

"Bound Practice"


Sitting in meditation while physically or mentally "abiding" in form or tranquility.

"True Sitting"


Not manifesting body and mind in the triple world, yet not relinquishing the affairs of beings.

The Bodhidharma Synthesis

When Bodhidharma says: "Talk of cause and effect... is the dharma of outsiders," he is aligning with the Diamond Sūtra's critique of "Abiding in Marks."

To practice causality with attachment to a Self/Agent seeking rewards outside is to remain "outside" the Gate of Chan and the gate of liberation.

Red Pine's Error ("Nonsense"):

By translating Wàidào Fǎ as "nonsense," Red Pine implies the conventional teaching is false. It isn't false; it is simply a "lower" rung. As MN 117 clarifies, Mundane Right View is still "Right View"—it just doesn't lead out of Samsara on its own.

Explanation: The Nature of Realization and the Necessity of Cultivation

To "See Nature" is to realize the emptiness of the Agent, the threefold structure of subject-action-object, and the emptiness and non-arising of self and phenomena (twofold emptiness). This does not mean one enters a nihilistic void where actions have no consequences. Rather, it reveals that the Three Wheels (Agent, Action, and Result) are empty of inherent existence.

Once the Agent-Agency-Action paradigm is penetrated and seen as empty and unreal, karmic bondage—the wholesome and unwholesome actions underpinned by the three afflictive poisons of desire, aggression, and delusion, serving as the fuel and conditions for the compulsion to be reborn—starts to lose its foothold.

However, even after realizing emptiness, one does not immediately overcome the cycle of birth and death in samsara. Although self and phenomena, Agent-Agency-Action are realized to be empty, unobtainable, and non-arisen, and the conceptual view that binds one to the lower realms is severed; the full cessation of samsaric rebirth requires further cultivation.

Doctrinal Note: The Beginning, Not the End

It is critical to understand that realizing the emptiness of the Three Wheels and the non-arising of dharmas marks the entry into the path, not the completion of it. In the Mahāyāna map, this realization corresponds to the First Bhūmi (The Path of Seeing).

While the imputed view of a self—namely, apprehending the self as a singular, permanent, and independent entity—is cut here, deep-seated innate emotional habits and karmic momentum remain. Authentic Chan requires progressive refinement (baoren) to move from this initial insight toward full Buddhahood.

  • First Bhūmi (Path of Seeing): Realization of Twofold Emptiness. The imputed self-view is cut, preventing rebirth in the Three Lower Realms, but innate emotional patterns and the general compulsion for samsaric rebirth persist.

  • Eighth Bhūmi & Arahantship: The exhaustion of Afflictive Obscurations (Kleśāvaraṇa). While the Eighth Bhūmi Bodhisattva and the Arahant differ in their scope of wisdom regarding phenomena, they both share the complete eradication of afflictive emotions. All traces of grasping, desire, anger, fear, pride, anxiety, and all traces of the "I Am" conceit are eradicated. It is here that the compulsion to be reborn in Samsara is finally severed. The Arahant has finished their task of liberation; the Eighth Bhūmi Bodhisattva becomes "Immovable," no longer capable of sliding back into samsaric delusion, and proceeds toward full Buddhahood.

  • Buddhahood: The exhaustion of Cognitive Obscurations (Jñeyāvaraṇa). The subtlest reifications of phenomena in terms of existence, non-existence, and duality are purified, resulting in Omniscience—a perfection of wisdom that exceeds even the realization of the Eighth Bhūmi.

(For a detailed reading on these stages, refer to the author's article: Buddhahood: The End of All Emotional/Mental Afflictions and Knowledge Obscurations)


The Twin Obscurations

In Mahāyāna Buddhism two principal obscurations (Ch. , zhàng; Skt. āvaraṇa; Tib. sgrib pa) are distinguished—afflictive obscurations (Ch. 煩惱障, fánnǎozhàng; Skt. kleśāvaraṇa; Tib. nyön mongs kyi sgrib pa) and knowledge obscurations (Ch. 所知障, suǒzhīzhàng; Skt. jñeyāvaraṇa; Tib. ye shes kyi sgrib pa)—each defined by its essence (bhāva), cause (hetu), and function (varaṇa).

Afflictive obscurations are the defiling emotions—passion (Ch. , tān; Skt. rāga), aggression (Ch. , chēn; Skt. dveṣa), delusion (Ch. , chī; Skt. moha), and the like—which arise from grasping at a self, agent or soul (Ch. 我執, wǒzhí; Skt. ātmagrāha; Tib. bdag lta bu) and block final liberation from saṃsāra.

Knowledge obscurations are the subtler veils of misperception—beginning with the classic three spheres (Ch. 三輪, sānlún) of subject, object, and action; extending to all notions of how phenomena arise, abide, and cease; to supposed inherent causes and effects; to misconceived characteristics (Ch. 取相, qǔxiàng; Skt. lakṣaṇagrāha); to dualistic divides of internality versus externality; and to extremes of existence versus nonexistence—each stemming from ascribing true, independent reality to phenomena (the “self of phenomena,” Ch. 法執, fǎzhí; Skt. dharmātmagrāha; Tib. chos lta bu) and thereby obscuring omniscience.

Although Śrāvaka (Ch. 聲聞, shēngwén) Arhat (Ch. 阿羅漢, āluóhàn) and Pratyekabuddha (Ch. 緣覺, yuánjué) practitioners likewise uproot the afflictive obscurations, entry into the eighth bhūmi (Ch. , ) marks the first stage at which a bodhisattva (Ch. 菩薩, púsà) has eliminated all kleshas—putting them on par with arhats in that respect—yet they remain subject to the knowledge obscurations until full Buddhahood (Ch. 佛果, fóguǒ).


1. The Ultimate View: "One Leap Straight into the Tathāgata-Ground"

In the rhetoric of Chan/Zen, one often encounters statements that seem to promise that this initial realization is the totality of Buddhahood. A primary source for this view is the Song of Enlightenment (《證道歌》; Zhengdao Ge) by Yongjia Xuanjue (665–713 CE).

Yongjia is traditionally regarded as a Dharma heir of the Sixth Patriarch Huineng and is famous as the "One Night Enlightened Guest" (一宿覺), having received transmission and departed after a single night. In his Song, contrasting "merit with attachment" (which leads only to temporary heavenly rewards) with the "gate of the unconditioned real suchness" (無為實相門), he famously declares:

「爭似無為實相門,一超直入如來地。」

"How can it compare to the gate of the unconditioned real suchness? One leap straight into the Tathāgata-ground."

The phrase is often cited in shorthand as Yi chao ru ru lai di (「一超入如來地」).

  • 「一超」 means "a single leap" or "one bound" (bypassing step-by-step stages).

  • 「直入」 means "straight in" or "directly enter."

  • 「如來地」 (Ru Lai Di) refers literally to the "Tathāgata-ground," a standard technical term for the stage of full Buddhahood found in texts like the Lankavatara Sutra.

This line creates the impression that the moment of awakening is a singular leap that bypasses all stages. Bodhidharma’s own Doctrine of No-Mind reinforces this absolute perspective:

"No-mind, no illumination, and also no function; No illumination and no function is precisely the Unconditioned. This is the True Dharma-realm of the Tathāgata, Not the same as Bodhisattvas or Pratyekabuddhas. The statement 'No-mind' implies the absence of a mind with delusory appearances."

When reading such texts, one might assume that the moment one awakens to the truth of No-Mind, one is immediately a fully awakened Buddha, identical to Shakyamuni.

2. The Reality: Sudden Awakening, Gradual Cultivation

However, mistaking the nature of the realization for the full exhaustion of obscurations is a grave error. While the nature of the mind is indeed the "Tathāgata-ground," the practitioner’s capacity to embody that nature is usually obscured by habit energies.

There are historically rare cases of "Instant Realizers" (cig car ba in Tibetan traditions)—those of superior capacity who attain full Buddhahood the very moment they are introduced to the nature of mind—but these are exceptionally uncommon. As Kyle Dixon notes regarding the Tibetan equivalents of these traditions:

"Chigcharwas are fully realized during direct introduction, buddhahood. If you are saying there is mere recognition [ngo shes], and then there is further 'exhaustion' over time, that would not be indicative of a chigcharwa or 'sudden realizer.'"

Dixon further quotes the master Zhigpo Dutsi, who searched for such historical figures:

"Apart from Saraha in India and Ling Repa (founder of the Drukpa lineage) in Tibet, I have not found a single sudden realizer [cig car ba] even though I have searched far and wide."

The same principle applies to Zen. Even in the earliest days of Buddhism, there were those who attained complete liberation immediately after being pointed to no-self—such as Bahiya in the Bahiya Sutta, who awakened upon hearing the instruction: "In the seen, there is just the seen, and no you in terms of that" [paraphrased]. Yet, the vast majority of the Buddha's disciples still had to traverse gradual stages (Stream Entry to Arahantship) to fully uproot the fetters.

Therefore, for most of us, even if we have a sudden awakening, it must be followed by gradual practice to clear away the "Beginningless Habit-Energies" (vasana).

3. The Methodology: The Infant and the Ice

This dynamic is best explained by the Korean Seon (Zen) Master Chinul (Puril Bojo Guksa), who championed the framework of "Sudden Awakening, Gradual Cultivation" (頓悟漸修). In his Secrets on Cultivating the Mind, he writes:

"First let us take sudden awakening. When the ordinary man is deluded, he assumes that the four great elements are his body and the false thoughts are his mind. He does not know that his own nature is the true dharma-body; he does not know that his own numinous awareness is the true Buddha. He looks for the Buddha outside his mind. While he is thus wandering aimlessly, the entrance to the road might by chance be pointed out by a wise advisor.

If in one thought he then follows back the light [of his mind to its source] and sees his own original nature, he will discover that the ground of this nature is innately free of defilement, and that he himself is originally endowed with the non-outflow wisdom-nature which is not a hair's breadth different from that of all the Buddhas. Hence it is called sudden awakening.

Next let us consider gradual cultivation. Although he has awakened to the fact that his original nature is no different from that of the Buddhas, the beginningless habit-energies are extremely difficult to remove suddenly; and so he must continue to cultivate while relying on this awakening. Through this gradual permeation, his endeavors reach completion. He constantly nurtures the sacred embryo, and after a long time he becomes a saint. Hence it is called gradual cultivation.

This process can be compared to the maturation of a child. From the day of its birth, a baby is endowed with all the sense organs just like everyone else, but its strength is not yet fully developed. It is only after many months and years that it will finally become an adult."

To further illustrate this, Chinul quotes the Great Master Guifeng Zongmi using the analogy of ice and water:

「識冰池而全水,藉陽氣而鎔消。悟凡夫而即真,資法力而修習…」

"Although we know that the frozen pond is entirely water, the sun's heat is necessary to melt it. Although we awaken to the fact that an ordinary man is Buddha, the power of Dharma is necessary to permeate our cultivation. When the pond is melted, the water flows freely and can be used for irrigation and cleaning. When falsities are extinguished, the mind will be luminous and dynamic, and then its function of penetrating brightness will manifest."

4. Synthesis: The Ultimate vs. The Relative

How do we reconcile the "One Leap" of Yongjia with the "Gradual Melting" of Zongmi? We must understand the difference between the View (the Ultimate) and the Path (the Relative).

From the perspective of the Ultimate, the various stages (Bhumis) are empty designations, for the True Nature is beyond all gradation. While the gradual path maps out ten or more stages of Bodhisattva development to address the layers of obscuration, the Chan view is that once the nature of mind is realized, the path is simply a matter of maturation.

The True Nature is like the Sun—always shining, self-perfected, and complete from the very beginning. The obscurations (emotional and cognitive) are merely drifting Clouds. Whether these clouds dissipate slowly over aeons or vanish in a single gust of wind, the Sun itself has no "levels" or "stages." It does not get brighter as the clouds part; it was simply obscured and obstructed.

Therefore, in the One Vehicle (Ekayana), there is fundamentally only one "Bhumi"—precisely that "One Leap Straight into the Tathāgata-ground" (Yi chao ru ru lai di 「一超入如來地」) mentioned earlier. It depends entirely on whether one recognizes it or not. Once this Sun—the luminous and empty nature of mind—is discovered, the only task remaining is to allow the clouds to disperse. Zen Masters emphasize post-enlightenment cultivation not to "gain" something new, but to stabilize this recognition so that the Sun is no longer obstructed or obscured in the slightest.

Yuanwu Keqin warned:

"When you reach the point where feelings are ended, views are gone... you open up to Zen realization. After that it is also necessary to develop consistency... If there is the slightest fluctuation, there is no hope of transcending the world."

The Fifth Patriarch Hongren taught:

"Even though phenomena are essentially empty, it is necessary to preserve the basic true mind with perfect clarity."

Shido Bunan advised treating the realization

"as though you were raising an infant," nurturing it until the function is equal to the Buddhas.

As Kyle Dixon concludes:

"Realization and insight are always sudden and immediate, but just as in other Buddhist systems, that knowledge is unstable and must be carefully cultivated from then on in order to eventually actualize Buddhahood."

Zen teacher Meido Moore said:

"...so it seems I agree with Krodha [Kyle Dixon]'s take.  

From a practice standpoint, though, the crucial point is contained in the words, "one should just constantly activate correct views in one’s own mind." This has nothing to do with theoretical certainty that defilements are empty and do not bind; it refers to the seamless, sustained upwelling of the unified samadhi/prajna. Departing from but then returning to this, again and again, describes the post-awakening practice to dissolve jikke*. 

If one experiences departure from this samadhi, even for a moment, the path is not completed at all. If one does not know what is actually meant by that samadhi, then even with kensho the path is still barely begun in terms of actualization."


*Jikke is a Japanese term (traces/habit-energy, vasana in Sanskrit) that describes the deep-seated behavioral and cognitive patterns that persist even after one has had a glimpse of their true nature (kenshō). The post-awakening practice serves to remove these obstructions and embody realization more fully.


5. Scriptural Authority: The Origins of "Sudden Principle, Gradual Practice"

The necessity of post-awakening cultivation is famously encapsulated in the maxim: "Sudden awakening in principle; gradual cultivation in phenomena" (Ch. 理上頓悟,事上漸修; lǐ shàng dùn wù, shì shàng jiàn xiū).

While this phrasing is widely associated with later Zen exegesis, it is not an invention of the Zen patriarchs but a direct paraphrase of the Buddha's teaching in the Śūraṅgama Sūtra (Ch. 大佛頂首楞嚴經; Dà Fódǐng Shǒuléngyán Jīng). In Volume 10 (T0945, 卷第十), the sūtra provides the canonical bedrock for this view.

(Note: While modern scholarship treats the Śūraṅgama Sūtra as an East Asian composition and its authenticity was occasionally questioned by historical figures like Dōgen, it has nevertheless functioned as a foundational, authoritative text for the vast majority of the Chan tradition.)

理則頓悟,乘悟併銷; 事非頓除,因次第盡。

(Textual Note: Variants often read 乘悟並消 or 併消)

"In principle, awakening is sudden; riding on this awakening, [delusions] simultaneously melt away. But in terms of phenomena, they are not removed suddenly; they are exhausted sequentially [through stages]."

This four-part structure provides the precise doctrinal nuance required to navigate the path:

  1. "In principle, awakening is sudden" (Ch. 理則頓悟, lǐ zé dùn wù): "Principle" (Li) here refers to the Mind-ground, Suchness, or Buddha-nature. This nature is not assembled piece by piece; recognizing it is a singular, immediate "turning" or direct insight.

  2. "Riding on this awakening, [delusions] simultaneously melt away" (Ch. 乘悟併銷, chéng wù bìng xiāo): Genuine insight collapses fundamental ignorance. In the specific context of the sūtra, this refers to the immediate loosening of the karmic "knots" of perception; the wrong view that a self exists is cut through immediately upon this realization.

  3. "But phenomena are not removed suddenly" (Ch. 事非頓除, shì fēi dùn chú): "Phenomena" (Shi) refer to the "installed base" of conditioning—habit energies (vasanas), emotional reflexes, and karmic momentum. Even though the lights have been turned on, the machinery of karma is still spinning from past momentum.

  4. "They are exhausted sequentially" (Ch. 因次第盡, yīn cì dì jìn): This doctrinal stance articulates the logic behind the later Chan emphasis on "protection and sustenance" (Ch. 保任; bǎorèn) and the "nurturing of the sacred embryo" (Ch. 長養聖胎; zhǎngyǎng shèngtāi)—the long process of stabilization that follows the initial breakthrough.

Historical Application in Zen

This scriptural authority was explicitly cited by the great Linji Chan master Dàhuì Zōnggǎo (Ch. 大慧宗杲; 1089–1163) during the Song Dynasty. In his instructions to the scholar-official Li Bing (李邴), Dàhuì quotes this specific passage to admonish that awakening must be followed by sustained practice (Ch. 悟後仍須修行; wù hòu réng xū xiūxíng), warning against the arrogance of assuming that initial insight equates to final completion.

The framework was further systematized by the Korean Seon master Chinul (Ch. 知訥; 1158–1210). In his seminal work, Excerpts from the Dharma Collection and Special Practice Record with Personal Notes (Ch. 修心訣; Xiūxīnjué), Chinul explicitly cites the Śūraṅgama Sūtra and ties it to the analysis of the earlier Huayan-Chan patriarch Guifeng Zongmi (Ch. 圭峰宗密; 780–841):

如經云:理即頓悟,乘悟並消;事非頓除,因次第盡。 故圭峰深明先悟後修之義...

"As the sūtra says: 'In principle, awakening is sudden... in terms of phenomena, they are not removed suddenly...' Therefore, Guifeng [Zongmi] deeply understood the meaning of 'First Awakening, then Cultivation'..."

Thus, the teaching of "Sudden Principle, Gradual Practice" is not a betrayal of the sudden teaching, but its necessary completion—ensuring that the sudden vision of the "Sun" is eventually matched by the total evaporation of the "Clouds."

Soh

Original Chinese: https://bookgb.bfnn.org/books/0847.htm

Note: The translator's commentary and notes (by Soh) are provided at the end of the text.


English Translation:

Attributed to the Patriarch Bodhidharma 

Preface by Disciple Tanlin

The Dharma Master was a native of the Western Regions, from the Kingdom of Southern India, the third son of a Brahmin King. His spiritual wisdom was open and clear; upon hearing [the teachings], he understood everything. His ambition lay in the Mahāyāna path, so he discarded the white [lay clothes] to follow the black [monastic robes], continuing and prospering the Sage's lineage. With a mind merged in empty quiescence, he thoroughly understood worldly affairs; possessing clarity both internally and externally, his virtue surpassed the worldly standard. Lamenting that the Orthodox Teaching in the borderlands was declining, he subsequently crossed distant mountains and seas to travel and teach in Han and Wei. Those who had extinguished the mind all took refuge in faith; those who clung to views gave rise to slander. At that time, there were only Daoyu and Huike; although these two śramaṇas were younger in years, their outstanding wills were lofty and far-reaching. Fortunately meeting the Dharma Master, they served him for several years, reverently inquiring and asking for instruction, and were blessed to receive the Master's intention. The Dharma Master, moved by their refined sincerity, instructed them in the True Path: how to pacify the mind, how to initiate practice, how to accord with things, and how to apply expedient means. This is the Mahāyāna method of pacifying the mind, ensuring no error or confusion. How to pacify the mind: Wall-Gazing. How to initiate practice: The Four Practices. How to accord with things: Guarding against ridicule and suspicion. How to apply expedient means: Discarding attachment to them. This brief preface explains the origin [of this text].

Now, regarding entering the Way, there are many paths; but essentially speaking, they do not exceed two kinds. One is Entry by Principle; the second is Entry by Practice.

Entry by Principle means: awakening to the Fundamental Truth through the Teachings; deeply trusting that all sentient beings share the same one True Nature, but it is covered by adventitious dust and delusive thoughts, and thus cannot manifest clearly. If one abandons the false to return to the true, steadfastly abiding in Wall-Gazing, there is no self and no other, ordinary beings and sages are equal and one. Firmly abiding without shifting, never again following written teachings, this is to be implicitly in accord with Principle. Without having discrimination, quiescent and Unconditioned ¹, this is named Entry by Principle.

Entry by Practice refers to the Four Practices; all other various practices are included within these. What are the four? First, the Practice of Facing Enmity; second, the Practice of According with Conditions; third, the Practice of No Seeking; fourth, the Practice of According with Dharma.

What is the Practice of Facing Enmity? It means that when a practitioner of the Way undergoes suffering, they should think to themselves: "In countless kalpas of the past, I abandoned the root to follow the branches, flowing and wandering through various existences, generating much enmity and hatred, causing infinite harm and violation." "Although I have committed no offense in the present, this is the fruit of my past bad karma ripening; it is not something that can be bestowed by heaven or men." "I accept it with a willing heart, without any grievance or complaint." The Sūtra says: "When meeting suffering, do not worry." Why is this so? Because of penetrating understanding. When this mind arises, it corresponds with Principle; embodying enmity helps advance on the Way, therefore it is called the Practice of Facing Enmity.

Second, the Practice of According with Conditions: Sentient beings have no self; they are turned entirely by conditions and karma; suffering and happiness are received together, and all arise from conditions. If one obtains excellent rewards, honor, and such things, it is induced by past causes within me; I am only receiving it now, but when the condition is exhausted, it returns to nothing—what joy is there in this? Gain and loss follow conditions, but the mind has no increase or decrease; if one is unmoved by the wind of joy, implicitly according with the Way, it is therefore called the Practice of According with Conditions.

Third, the Practice of No Seeking: People of the world are perpetually lost, craving and attaching everywhere; this is named seeking. The wise awaken to the truth, and Principle is contrary to the mundane; they pacify the mind in non-action ¹, and while the physical form follows the turning of fate, [they know] the ten thousand existences are all empty, with nothing to desire or enjoy. Merit and Darkness ² always follow each other; living long in the Three Realms is like living in a burning house. Having a body is all suffering; who can attain peace? Thoroughly understanding this, one therefore abandons all existences, stopping thought and having no seeking. The Sūtra says: "To have seeking is all suffering; to have no seeking is immediate joy." Determining and knowing that no seeking is truly the practice of the Way, it is therefore called the Practice of No Seeking.

Fourth, the Practice of According with Dharma: The Principle of intrinsic purity is named Dharma. By this Principle, all characteristics are empty, without defilement and without attachment, without this and without that. The Sūtra says: "In the Dharma there are no sentient beings, because it is free from the defilement of sentient beings; in the Dharma there is no self, because it is free from the defilement of self." If the wise can believe and understand this Principle, they should practice in accordance with the Dharma. The Dharma Essence has no stinginess; regarding body, life, and wealth, one practices dāna [giving] without sparing. The mind has no reluctance; liberated in the three emptinesses, relying on nothing and attached to nothing, acting only to remove defilement. Acting to transform sentient beings without grasping at characteristics. This is self-practice, and it can also benefit others; it can also adorn the path of bodhi. Since dāna is like this, the other five [pāramitās] are also like this. To eliminate delusive thoughts, one practices the Six Perfections, yet there is nothing practiced; this is the Practice of According with Dharma.

The End of the Contemplation on the Four Practices by Grand Master Bodhidharma

Appendix: Stele Eulogy for Grand Master Bodhidharma [By] Xiao Yan, Emperor Wu of Liang Sitting on the Precious Sun on the peak of Mount Laṅkā. Amidst it, a golden figure draped in coarse cloth. His form is like the great earth, his Essence like the void. The mind holds vaiḍūrya, color like snow. Neither polished nor ground, eternally pure and bright. Parting clouds and rolling up mist, the mind is explicitly penetrating. Using the Pundarika flower to adorn the body. Following conditions and touching things, always joyous. Neither existing nor non-existing, neither going nor coming. Much learning and eloquence cannot explain it. Real indeed! Empty indeed! Apart from birth and existence. The great and the small, all conditions are cut off. In a kṣaṇa [instant], ascending to the mind of marvelous awakening. Leaping scales in the ocean of wisdom, rising above the former sages. By Principle, the Dharma water should flow eternally. How could one expect a temporary passage, only to return to temporary thirst? Within the dragon's pearl, the mind-lamp falls. The white-hair [ūrnā] wisdom blade is chipped at the edge. The path of life suddenly ends, the wisdom eye closes. The Zen river halts its flow, the Dharma beam breaks. No going, no coming, no right, no wrong. This and that, form and Essence, the mind is shattered. Abiding here, departing here, all return to quiescence. Within quiescence, how could there ever be sobbing? Using this holding of hands to transmit the lamp. Birth and death, going and coming, are like a lightning flash. If one can have a sincere mind without doubt. The kalpa fire burns the lamp, yet it is not extinguished. The Dharma of the One Truth is fully available here. If not awakened to the path of delusion, here it is exhausted.



Translator's Commentary

Introduction This text, the Two Entries and Four Practices (Erru Sixing Lun), is the document most reliably attributed to the historical Bodhidharma. It captures the seminal transition of Buddhism in China from a scholarly, exegetical tradition to the direct, experiential practice that would become Chan (Zen). The preface by Tanlin provides crucial biographical details, noting Bodhidharma's South Indian origins and his emphasis on "Wall-Gazing" (bìguān).

Translation Choices for Key Terminology

  • Wall-Gazing (壁观 - Bìguān): I have retained the literal "Wall-Gazing." While some scholars interpret this metaphorically as "mind like a wall" (steep and stable), the literal translation preserves the iconic imagery associated with Bodhidharma sitting in the cave at Shaolin.

  • Principle (理 - Lǐ): In this text, is the counterpart to Shì (phenomena/practice). It refers to the absolute truth or the fundamental nature of reality. I have strictly used "Principle" to avoid the Western metaphysical baggage of "Noumenon" or the rationalist implication of "Reason."

  • Essence (体 - Tǐ): I have translated as "Essence" rather than "Substance" to adhere to Buddhist emptiness ontology, where the "body" of reality is not a physical substance but a nature of emptiness.

  • Unconditioned / Non-action (无为 - Wúwéi): The translation distinguishes between the ontological and praxiological dimensions of this term. Where the text speaks of the Wall-Gazing mind as "quiescent and Unconditioned" (jìrán wúwéi), it refers to a state free from karmic formation. Later, where it instructs one to "pacify the mind in non-action" (ānxīn wúwéi), it refers to the functional attitude of the practitioner—acting without contrived effort.

  • Characteristics (相 - Xiàng): In the section on "According with Dharma," Xiàng refers to the specific defining marks or signs of conceptualized entities. I have used "characteristics" to align with the lakṣaṇa (defining mark) terminology, emphasizing that the Dharma is empty of such definable boundaries.

Contextual and Doctrinal Explanations The text is structured around the "Two Entries": Principle (direct intuitive alignment with truth) and Practice (gradual cultivation through conduct). The "Entry by Principle" contains the famous instruction to "steadfastly abide" (níng zhù) in Wall-Gazing. This suggests a practice of stable, unwavering concentration that cuts through subject-object duality ("no self and no other"). The "Four Practices" are essentially a re-framing of daily life and suffering. They provide a cognitive framework for the practitioner to transmute adversity (Practice 1), success (Practice 2), and craving (Practice 3) into the path, culminating in the "Practice of According with Dharma" (Practice 4), which is the practice of emptiness itself—acting without the concept of an agent, action, or receiver (the Three Emptinesses).

Emperor Wu's Eulogy The eulogy is highly poetic and filled with paradoxes common to the Prajñāpāramitā literature ("Neither existing nor non-existing"). It reflects the profound respect the Emperor held for Bodhidharma, despite the legendary (and likely apocryphal) encounter where Bodhidharma allegedly told the Emperor he had "no merit." The verses here suggest a deep appreciation of the "One Truth" and the "Mind-lamp."