Someone posted this but the post seems to have disappeared before I could approve. Perhaps he deleted it?
"So a nondual teacher that I've followed for a while is claiming that the idea of no-self upheld by this group, Angelo Dilullo, Adyashanti, Fetters 8-10 etc. (dropping away of all identity, no agency, no doership, no inner world, no self reflection) is not supported or taught by Buddhism whatsoever. They claim that this is a recent invention and no different from depersonalization/derealization.
In fact depersonalization is possible when one is stuck at some dark night possibly in the I AM and impersonality phase (although I have personally not gone through all these issues myself), but not possible when there is proper anatta realization.
"(commenting on some of Suzanne Segal's descriptions) If someone draws a line in the thin air and is able to plant a seed into a lay person’s inmost consciousness that “he can’t go beyond this line”, that lay person will feel that the so called ‘imaginary’ boundary is as solid as a physical wall. The way we are ‘bonded’ to dualistic view of a ‘Self’ is similar. A strong sense of Witnessing Presence without going beyond that "invisible line" is not the experience of “no-self” in Buddhism and therefore I would not call her experience an “insight” into no-self. The negative experiences she had seem more like very strong ‘self/Self’ propensities, it is a form of split, a separation. Staying in no-self is to be fully authenticated by all things and as all things. Fear arises because of this lack of authentication. She sank too deeply into the 'content'. This is the case of "dark nights" where propensities rushed into manifestations. Her attempt to reason herself out will not work. Logical reasoning cannot break that 'bond' and she just couldn't help reacting to it. One way out is to practice and develop the mental habit of "dissolving" every moment before "content" arise. The mental habit of dissolving will become a strength of it own to counter this problem. In true no-self experience, the first aspect is the cognitive mind loses its charm and is replaced with intuitive and direct experience. Only the qualities of our nature are experienced (clarity, radiance, presence and vitality), nothing about symbols, labels and content. Second, the illusionary view of a "Self' on top of manifestation is dissolved; There is complete rest in appearance. Nothing needs be done and therefore there can only be the experience of liberation as that boundary, that separation disappeared. Nothing is obstructing anything in the experience of no-self."
Lastly, I can sense deep confusion and ignorance in the teacher you spoke to. Rather than spreading and resorting to venomous and slanderous nonsense (I know that teacher is not a Buddhist and probably doesn't believe in karma, but still...), he or she should come here, reveal his/her identity and properly debate with us. I am happy to clear up all these misunderstandings. Also, I am not sure if you have read this article I wrote before about how life is like after anatta:
Why awakening is so worth it
- Like
- ReplySoh Wei YuAdminGroup expertTry this link instead, the above seems to not work:Awakening to RealityAwakening to Reality
- Reply
- Remove Preview
Soh Wei YuAdminGroup expertIf the links above do not work, click on the search button on AtR group and search "Kelvin Ng · Please comment on her difficulties at the point of making this video. Thank you."- Reply