Soh

 

Always happy to hear of breakthroughs like this (my efforts to inform people in reddit in just these two short years seems to have led to a number of genuine anatman breakthroughs so far, so I recommend everyone to spare no effort in spreading the message whenever and wherever possible, in skillful ways. Even if it does not bear fruit today, it can bear fruit in 1 or 2 years, who knows):



Fishskull3
Today
Fishskull3 1:55 PM
Hey!! We talked two years ago where you told me about your blog AtR (Awakening to Reality: https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/). I read it back then but didn’t fully appreciate the immense value of the creation that you and thusness brought forth. At that time I was sitting in this weird phase that was halfway point between One Mind and Anatta but I didn’t fully realize it, so I just brushed off your maps instead (Soh: I believe he's referring to John Tan's 7 Stages https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2007/03/thusnesss-six-stages-of-experience.html ). I kept practicing because I assumed I just needed more time to integrate and maybe I did.

It wasn’t until a few days ago when I happened to stop by your blog again and read the two stanzas (Soh: the two stanzas of anatta/no-self can be found in John Tan's article https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2009/03/on-anatta-emptiness-and-spontaneous.html ) and contemplated it where the last subtle bits of the “conceiving a background” collapsed effortlessly and I was shocked. I sat with it some more and in my trekchod practice I could tell there was still some mental construct I was subtly reifying so I kept reading a page here and there.

And then today when I was on the toilet (lmao) I read this passage by Andre:

“When looking at the apple and orange resting on the table, the presence of the apple refers to a somewhat separate instance of “luminosity”, while the orange refers to another instance, or manifestation, of “luminosity”. They are not the same luminosity or the same awareness, because there is no overarching awareness enveloping, controlling, owning or pervading the display of appearances.” (Soh: I believe this is from this article by André A. Pais https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2018/11/beyond-awareness.html 8) Beyond Awareness: reflections on identity and awareness)

I realized immediately that my issue was I was creating this mental construct of the “foreground” experience being a single unified awareness and it immediately dropped away and it was just the luminosity of appearances.

I just wanted to say thank you for absolute treasure you and everyone else have created with this blog. I greatly appreciate it.
User Avatar
xabir 8:27 PM
Thats good.. would you say both stanzas are clear experientially for you?
Are you in our atr group btw?
Fishskull3 8:35 PM
Yeah I would say both stanzas are experientially true. I would also say understanding anatta as a dharma seal and not a stage is what made it very evident on its own accord.
And no I am not, I wouldn’t mind joining though
User Avatar
xabir 8:43 PM
How is your experience now?
Do you relate with this:
Partial excerpts from https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2023/05/nice-advice-and-expression-of-anatta-in.html What is experiential insight 👍 Yin Ling: When we say experiential insight in Buddhism, It means.. A literal transformation of energetic orientation of the whole being, down to the marrow. The sound MUST literally hears themselves. No hearer. Clean. Clear. A bondage from the head here to there cut off overnight. Then gradually the rest of the 5 senses. Then one can talk about Anatta. So if for you, Does sound hear themselves? If no, not yet. You have to keep going! Inquire and meditate. You haven’t reach the basic insight requirement for the deeper insights like anatta and emptiness yet! Yin Ling: Yin Ling: “Realisation is when This insight goes down to the marrow and you don’t need even a minute amount of effort for sound to hear themselves. It is like how you live with dualistic perception now, very normal, no effort. Ppl with Anatta realisation live in Anatta effortlessly, without using thinking to orient. It’s their life. They cannot even go back to dualistic perception because that is an imputation, it js uprooted At first you might need to purposely orient with some effort. Then at one point there is no need.. further along, dreams will become Anatta too. That’s experiential realisation. There’s no realisation unless this benchmark is achieved!” ...... "Soh: what is important is that there is experiential realisation that leads to an energetic expansion outwards into all the forms, sounds, radiant universe... such that it is not that you are in here, in the body, looking outwards at the tree, listening the birds chirping from here it is just the trees are vividly swaying in and of itself, luminously without an observer the trees sees themselves the sounds hear itself there is no location from which they are experienced, no vantage point the energetic expansion outward into vivid manifestation, boundless, yet it is not an expansion from a center, there is just no center without such energetic shift it is not really the real experience of no selfxabir Snoovatar" - https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2022/12/the-difference-between-experience-of.html
The atr group is here, you are welcomed to join :) https://www.facebook.com/groups/AwakeningToReality
User Avatar
xabir 8:56 PM
Also i see you are into dzogcheb
Dzogchen
Do you have a teacher in dzogchen?
Fishskull3 8:57 PM
Yeah I do relate with that, I would say my experience now is best described as a collection of self-luminous appearances that are unsubstantiated
Yes, Lama Lena, but not in the way where we are in communication with one another
User Avatar
xabir 8:58 PM
I see. I recommend acarya malcolm smith and kyle dixon for dzogchen teachings and materials
Shared recently to someone:
Krodha who posted in your thread has realised anatman and emptiness (thusness stages 5 to 7) Shared recently with someone: “It does come. Mahayana stream entry is first bhumi as Malcolm said Also his student kyle dixon (krodha) shared his awakening: https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2014/10/advise-from-kyle_10.html This is a good read too He is the dzogchen subreddit main admin Krodha He made me a moderator too but i seldom participate Malcolm told me over dinner years ago that kyle was the first to totally understand his teachings Kyle Dixon also shared back in 2020 how Dzogchen practice led to his anatman and emptiness realizations: Also tell John yes Dzogchen practice is resting in moment of unfabricated consciousness in sense gates, with mindfulness and awareness that directly hit thought as it arises and then is not distracted by thought 👍1 Then also direct perception of vidyā The first will lead to anatta realization, the second two fold emptiness 👍1 It is now subject and object are recognized as empty But also the semdzins Can expedite insight Seeing through thought is how anatta occurred for me The Rig Pa Rang Shar says, as thought arise (shar grol) then as one gets more familiar in the practice thought arise by themselves (rang grol) and finally in realization as if they never arose in the first place (ye grol) 👍1 Non-arising of thought is what led to insight of no background for me and then whole intense realization 👍1 Time is held together by thought and substratum delusion of background knower” “Krodha who posts regularly in reddit and also posted in your thread is also very clear and has similar anatman and emptiness realisations. Kyle Dixon ( https://www.reddit.com/user/krodha/ ), who Dzogchen teacher Acarya Malcolm told me over dinner was his first student to understand his teachings, wrote: "'Self luminous' and 'self knowing' are concepts which are used to convey the absence of a subjective reference point which is mediating the manifestation of appearance. Instead of a subjective cognition or knower which is 'illuminating' objective appearances, it is realized that the sheer exertion of our cognition has always and only been the sheer exertion of appearance itself. Or rather that cognition and appearance are not valid as anything in themselves. Since both are merely fabricated qualities neither can be validated or found when sought. This is not a union of subject and object, but is the recognition that the subject and object never arose in the first place [advaya]. ", "The cognition is empty. That is what it means to recognize the nature of mind [sems nyid]. The clarity [cognition] of mind is recognized to be empty, which is sometimes parsed as the inseparability of clarity and emptiness, or nondual clarity and emptiness." - Kyle Dixon, 2014 John Tan/Thusness and I also attended Dzogchen teacher Acarya Malcolm Smith’s teachings online https://www.zangthal.com/ Also Malcolm’s writings can be found here https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2014/02/clarifications-on-dharmakaya-and-basis_16.html Krodha expressed his anatman realisation and experience here: https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2014/10/advise-from-kyle_10.html I gathered from your posts you may have a breakthrough to realise the clarity aspect (atr calls I AM), but as malcolm and kyle said that is a preliminary insight https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2020/09/the-degrees-of-rigpa.html
Fishskull3 8:59 PM
Yeah I have acarya Malcom’s self arising and self liberating translations. Both of those people seem very knowledgeable
User Avatar
xabir 9:00 PM
Their expressions are very consistent with the anatta and emptiness insights
So much so that i created a scraping program to scrape and compile all their writings into pdfs
https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2014/10/advise-from-kyle_10.html - see if you can relate to this by kyle with your newfound insight
Btw do you mind if i share what you said today into the atr blog? :)
Fishskull3 9:10 PM
Yeah I can definitely relate with what I’ve experexperienced so far. I will also say that Trekchod has become effortless and has basically been happening on its own ever since. Whereas before it was still slightly contrived
Please feel free :)
I can definitely relate with that in what I’ve experienced so far***
Soh



John Tan shared a nice picture generated by ChatGPT. It reminded me that I had a dream of people being semi transparent that inspired me two weeks before my anatta insight and mind body drop over a decade ago. John tan replied, “This is good. Be light and insubstantial when you meditate.”

“Just remember it has to be light and insubstantial without essence”


ChatGPT: “A serene and spiritual image showing a person in deep meditation. The person is sitting cross-legged, their expression calm and peaceful. Around them, a radiant light is emanating outward, resembling the transformation of a concave lens turning convex. This radiant light gradually dissolves into a spectrum of rainbow colors, symbolizing insubstantiality, lightness, weightlessness, and a lack of dimensions. The background is tranquil, enhancing the sense of peace and spiritual depth of the scene.


Here are two images that combine elements from your previous requests, featuring the tranquil background of the first image with the transparent meditator from the last image, surrounded by radiant light transforming into a spectrum of rainbow colors.”

Soh

A new post by Kyle Dixon/Krodha: https://www.reddit.com/r/Buddhism/comments/18tia6k/comment/kfe8y12/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 


krodha

·

4 days ago

Nonduality has a few iterations in buddhadharma.


The two main versions I would say are that phenomena are “nondual” because being ultimately empty, they are free from the dual extremes of existence and nonexistence. That is one of the primary definitions of emptiness, freedom from those extremes.


The Kaumudī states:

Because of the absence of inherent existence, the nondual essence of all phenomena is emptiness.


Bhāviveka describes the yogic direct perception of emptiness in his Tarkajvālā:

When that yogin dwells in the experience of nonconceptual discerning wisdom [prajñā] and experiences nonduality, at that time, ultimately, the entire reality of objects are as follows, of the same characteristics, like space, appearing in the manner of a nonappearance since their characteristics are nonexistent.


Another type of nonduality, which is arguably implied in the previous type, is the collapse of subject and object which involves the function of seeing and appearances that are seen, occurring as one single movement so-to-speak. Also with hearing, the activity of hearing is realized to be sound itself. It is not that something is being heard, the sound is precisely hearing, which is precisely consciousness. The Buddha describes this in the Kalakarama sutta, for example.

This experience is obstructed by a type of knowledge obscuration in normal sentient beings, one must actually awaken to taste, or experience this. Even if we stop conceptualizing and rest in bare awareness, there is still a cognitive bifurcation that is in place. That dualistic consciousness only subsides in awakened equipoise.


Jamgon Mipham Rinpoche:

Then, at the time of the supreme quality on the path of joining, one realizes that since the perceived does not exist, neither does the perceiver. Right after this, the truth of suchness, which is free from dualistic fixation, is directly realized. This is said to be the attainment of the first bhūmi.

Soh
Someone asked: "@Soh Wei Yu

https://youtu.be/-QRFeZngTuY

Curious what you think of this guy. He criticises pretty much all

current Buddhist schools, even most Theravada and claims they’re on

false paths. In other videos he mentions Daniel Ingram, Angelo, Delson

Armstrong and Frank Yang by name and calls them deluded. He advocates

following the early suttas and nothing else, saying we can’t deviate

from the Buddha’s words etc. He has another channel where he reads from

the suttas.

Daniel responded and wants to have an interview with him



Soh replied:

many of those who criticise daniel ingram and frank yang and angelo dont understand the anatta insight in the first place

im not sure about what insight delson has

and most teachers, even well known vipassana and theravada teachers lack the anatta insight as explained in https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2018/12/vipassana-must-go-with-luminous.html

and this is key insight to entering the noble path, ending of self view and the first three fetters, and the key insight for liberation

but i agree that arahantship is a delusional claim. it is at most stream entry

explained very nicely in https://www.reddit.com/r/streamentry/comments/igored/insight_buddhism_a_reconsideration_of_the_meaning/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf%20

and https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2020/08/insight-buddhism-reconsideration-of.html

john tan and i likes that article very much. john even added it into his AtR AI bot

as for not going against suttas, i agree one should not go against suttas

don't invent stuff

but i'm also not a sectarian theravadin that is fundamentalist about only

following suttas and disregarding anything 'mahayana' and 'vajrayana'

in fact i would say i very much appreciate the mahayana and vajrayana teachings

and follow their teachings

also, as thich nhat hanh said, the point about mahayana and nagarjuna is not to go against the suttas, in fact nagarjuna never quoted mahayana sutras. he only quoted pali canon. his aim was to correct erroneous views people developed that deviated from the suttas. -- this is in the newly published book that yin ling shared on Nagarjuna and Madhyamaka by Thich Nhat Hanh: https://www.amazon.com/Cracking-Walnut-Understanding-Dialectics-Nagarjuna/dp/1952692466/ref=sr_1_1?crid=1KL7T3NQJAXJ4&keywords=cracking+the+walnut&qid=1704538940&sprefix=crac%2Caps%2C1461&sr=8-1

likewise, kyle dixon also said before, the purpose of mahayana teachings is a corrective to the wrong views of the hinayana sects that misunderstood the teachings of buddha in the suttas

i am not a fundamentalist sutta follower but i also believe sutta, mahayana sutras, vajrayana tantras and so forth, they can all be integrated in one's understanding and there is no need to 'choose' the suttas over the other teachings

but i do not believe in reinventing teachings and terms by the buddha, on what liberation, stream entry, arahantship and so on mean

also see this writing by John Tan: https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2016/07/what-is-authentic-buddhist-teaching.html - What is an Authentic Buddhist Teaching?

 

as for first bhumi (aka Mahayana stream entry), Kyle Dixon recently shared a quote:

Jamgon Mipham Rinpoche:

Then, at the time of the supreme quality on the path of joining, one realizes that since the perceived does not exist, neither does the perceiver. Right after this, the truth of suchness, which is free from dualistic fixation, is directly realized. This is said to be the attainment of the first bhūmi.



---


Mr. C: "What I find interesting is that many of these so called fundamentalists don’t agree that nagarjuna has right view. They outright reject that he’s in line with the suttas whereas Mahayana states they’re compatible


I see people stating for example that the Buddha didn’t discuss emptiness, just that all phenomena are not-self, but not even claiming outright that there is no self


Of course I disagree with those kind of claims



Soh:


kyle dixon has quoted many suttas talking about the emptiness of all dharmas and their illusory nature


its clear to me that the pali sutta is completely consistent with mahayana emptiness, and inconsistent with the 'little atmans' of dharmas that late abhidhamma commentators introduced into the teachings


i recommend going through part 1 to 4 of all kyle dixon's compilations that i made


has many very clear writings


in fact john tan find his dharmawheel writings to be the best among all he trained the atr AI bot with


https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2023/11/a-compilation-of-some-of-kyle-dixons.html


as for those that say buddha taught not self but not no self, i already explained why that is wrong in https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2011/10/anatta-not-self-or-no-self_1.html


and kyle dixon also painstakingly explained so many times throughout reddit


because so many people are infected with this thanissaro ideology


it is a novel, but wrong idea of what buddha meant with anatman


ok one of my messages above was removed


because the facebook AI dumbly thought my anatta: not-self or no self was about porn and sexual stuff


i was saying i explained why this whole anatman is only not self but not no self wrong ideology has infected so many people online via thanissaro's novel ideology


it is also very wrong


and very misleading


in fact recently i posted another post, i dont think i should post more links here now lest facebook remove it again


but you can search on google or my blog:


Thanissaro, Consciousness without Surface, No Self vs Not-Self https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2023/12/thanissaro-consciousness-without.html


it's a post made in december 2023


many of those who claims this also happen to fall into eternalist views about awareness


it's not surprising and their practice of turning anatman into a strategy of not-self becomes a means of dissociating from phenomena in order to rest in some unperturbed awareness


no different from brahman even if they do not call it by that name


this is 180 degrees different from buddhist insights into anatman, dependent origination and emptiness in some sense


a very common tendency in the thai forest tradition - see atr article "Seven Stages and Theravada (and other Buddhist traditions)?"" https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2021/09/seven-stages-and-theravada.html


...


yes and also check out my other article "Anatta: Not-Self or No-Self?", a separate article, different from the one on thanissaro http://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2011/10/anatta-not-self-or-no-self_1.html


"Review complete


Jan 6, 2024

We restored your message

Hi Soh

We found that our technology made a mistake taking your post down.

Thank you for taking the time to request a review and helping us improve our systems. Our priority is keeping the community safe and respectful, so sometimes we have to take precautions.

You sent this in Awakening to Reality Chat

as for those that say buddha taught not self but not no self, i already explained why that is wrong in https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2011/10/anatta-not-self-or-no-self_1.html

Jan 6, 2024"


great its restored