- Reply
- 14h
- Edited
- Reply
- 13h
- Edited
- Reply
- 13h
- Reply
- 13h
- Reply
- 12h
- Edited
- Reply
- 11h
- Edited
- Reply
- 11h
- Reply
- 11h
- Edited
- Reply
- 11h
- Edited
- Reply
- 11h
- Edited
- Reply
- 11h
13 Comments
Stian Gudmundsen Høiland
This sounds rather confused to me. What do you find powerful, Yin?
Yin Ling
For me the “mere perception” is powerful. …
See more
William Lim
Yin Ling so "perception" here means designation?
William Lim
"Perception never really arises, or come into being, it never remains, and therefore it never ceases to be."
I thought perception arises due to causes and conditions?
Yin Ling
William Lim yap ur right. I would say arise due to conditions. Cause make it complicated.
Like
If u need 1000000 conditions to arise one “thing”, and if one of the
condition is not there the “thing” won’t manifest, can u say that
“thing” actually exist?
If it exist Where’s u wanna find that thing, in one of the 10000000 conditions? 

Then can u say that “thing” arise?
Like
u need sun, u need an eye, eye consciousness, rain
dust plus so many other conditions for a rainbow to appear.. so where
is the rainbow actually? U can point to it? Which condition has the
rainbow?


So Can u say the rainbow “arise”? Or remain ? Or cease ?
So if u see everything is like such rainbow, it is non-arising.
Never was there. Just an appearance due to coming together of a bunch of conditions
Idk if I’m confusing u?
William Lim
Yin Ling I think I get it.
Every
"thing" is a result of conditions, so there isn't really a "thing", not
one with inherent existence anyway. The "thing" is just a result of
conditions, and there is no "thingness" inside the thing.
If there isn't a "thing", then there isn't a thing to arise or cease.
Like that is it?
William Lim
I think sometimes I just cannot reconcile the words being used.
Conditions come together to arise or cease "things" mah.…
See more
William Lim
Yin Ling, great emoticon visual aid!
Yin Ling
William Lim I understand what u mean.
I contemplated this v long actually don’t understand why ppl say non arising
It v hard for me to explain but one day I was playing with some images in my mind creating an image of a tent
with the 4 sticks holding each other up.. then suddenly I understnd the
“slanted sticks” are not really there existing. I can see “slanted
sticks” in the exact arrangement of a tent because of 3 other sticks. If
there is no 3 other sticks there’s no “slanted stick” in that exact
way. Same with other sticks.

So
I took that understanding to everything else. Like a cup. There is no
cup. I only see a cup appearing because of so many conditions. There is
no “cup” as such. Not even there. My mind put it together so I have a
perception.
Hahahah I am going to confused u now
until now I still cannot explain how I come to this insight

William Lim
Yin Ling, appreciate that you keep trying to explain the unexplainable... What u describe feels very "total exertion" to me 

Yin Ling
William Lim
hahaha very hard actually need ask John tan he can explain better . But
usually if one keep investigating somehow the understanding will come..
that’s my xp la.