Soh

Below is a structured synopsis of the “ATR Meeting 28 October 2020” document, following the requested format. Times are approximate since the transcript begins after the first 17 minutes.

INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT
• The meeting occurs on October 28, 2020, with multiple attendees (e.g., Kenneth, William Lam, John Tan, Soh, Sim Pern Chong, Jui Horne, Angelo, Pam, Nafis, etc).
• The first 17 minutes (not included in the transcript) deal with general conversation about the ongoing pandemic, its impact on businesses, and related personal updates.
• At around the 17-minute mark, the conversation shifts toward spiritual topics when Kenneth asks John Tan about the start of his spiritual awakening.

SEGMENTED TIMELINE

00:00–17:00 | (Omitted from Transcript) – Pandemic and Business Context
• General discussion of the pandemic’s effects on business and daily life.
• Setting the stage for a more personal and philosophical discussion that begins after minute 17.


17:00–30:00 | Early Spiritual Experiences and the “I AM” Stage
• John Tan describes his spiritual journey beginning around age 15, emphasizing the direct experience of consciousness referred to as “I AM” or Presence.
• He explains how conceptual thinking can obscure direct experience, and how, at first, one may experience a dualistic sense of being a subject separate from an object.
• The conversation touches on Buddhism and Hinduism, noting that both traditions use methods (such as koans or self-inquiry) to spark a direct realization of consciousness.
• John Tan highlights that early realization of Presence or “I AM” often feels nonconceptual, powerful, and liberating, yet may still retain dualistic notions of a background self.

30:00–45:00 | From “I AM” to Anatta
• John Tan recounts that years later (in 1997) he realized Anatta (no-self), wherein the notion of a separate subject dissolves completely.
• Discussion of dualistic versus nondual experiences: one can have a taste of Presence (the “I AM”) while still feeling a separate self in daily life. Anatta, by contrast, removes that background sense of a subject.
• William Lam asks about the cause of self. John Tan explains it as “reification”—turning a conceptual construct into a seemingly solid, separate “I.”
• The group references classical Buddhist ideas, noting that seeing through the self leads to direct, immediate experience of sound, sight, or sensation without a “someone” behind them.

45:00–60:00 | Reification, Madhyamaka, and Further Insights
• John Tan introduces the concept of “reification” more formally, relating it to Madhyamaka teachings (Nagarjuna’s philosophy): the sense of self, objects, and inherent existence are conceptual constructs.
• Comparison of different Tibetan Buddhist schools: Gelugpa (associated with Tsongkhapa) emphasizing “no inherent existence,” versus traditions (e.g., Mipham, Gorampa) that speak in terms of “freedom from extremes” and challenge any conceptual imputation.
• Kenneth and John discuss how language shapes experience (“the lightning flashes” implies a subject ‘lightning’ and an action ‘flashes,’ when in direct experience they are not two).
• John Tan notes the importance of continuing deconstruction: once self is seen through, one can also question the solidity of objects and physicality.

60:00–75:00 | Total Exertion and Maintaining Conventional Realities
• John Tan describes “total exertion”—an insight in which one feels intimately connected to all appearances in a seamless, vibrant way, yet diversity remains.
• This differs from collapsing everything into a single oneness; instead, phenomena remain distinct but without a separate sense of self or inherent existence.
• The group observes that one can retain ordinary designations (cup, table, etc.) while seeing through inherent existence, leading to a feeling of interconnection across time and space.
• William Lam asks how these insights arise: John Tan suggests a combination of meditative practice, study, and especially sincere questioning of one’s assumptions.

75:00–90:00 | Experience vs. Insight; Practice Methods
• John Tan distinguishes between a fleeting experience (e.g., a brief taste of spaciousness) and stable insight (seeing directly that there never was a self).
• Discussion covers the “I AM” phase versus a stable realization of anatta, plus how conceptual deconstruction in daily life supports direct, nondual experience.
• Participants mention that after anatta, one can feel continuous clarity without needing to meditate long hours, unlike the earlier “I AM” stage when one constantly tries to recapture Presence.

90:00–End | Taoism, Chinese Philosophy, and Parallel Practices
• The conversation explores Taoist ideas such as Wu Wei (actionless action) and the transformation of Qi, relating them to non-agency (no separate self acting).
• John Tan discusses the I Ching, Yin-Yang, and Five Elements, illustrating the deep Chinese emphasis on ceaseless transformation over static essence.
• He notes later Taoist incorporation of “inner light” teachings, possibly influenced by Buddhist concepts of primordial consciousness.
• Personal anecdotes arise about teachers, masters, and experiences that show parallels in Taoist and Buddhist approaches.

TOA PAYOH MEETING ENDING

OVERCOMING ATTACHMENT AND CONCEPTUAL DECONSTRUCTION

  • John Tan elaborates on overcoming attachment and the nature of attributes and objects.
  • He discusses how attributes like color are not inherent in objects but are dependent on consciousness and the whole exertion of consciousness​​.
  • Emphasizes the gradual process of deconstructing concepts such as cause and effect and attributes over years, leading to a deeper understanding of dependent origination​​ and emptiness.


KEY THEMES AND INSIGHTS

  1. Progression of Spiritual Realization
    – From the “I AM” or Presence phase (direct sense of being) to the eventual insight of Anatta (no-self).
    – Distinguishing between temporary experiences and abiding insights that transform one’s sense of self and world.

  2. Reification and Conceptual Constructs
    – How language and thought solidify fleeting phenomena into fixed entities, including the notion of a personal “I.”
    – Madhyamaka teachings on emptiness, comparing Tsongkhapa’s “no inherent existence” with other schools that emphasize the dissolution of all conceptual imputation.

  3. Total Exertion
    – A nondual sense of intimate connection with all phenomena (including past and future) while preserving the diversity of appearances.
    – Demonstrates that the dissolution of inherent existence does not erase or collapse conventional distinctions.

  4. Taoist Parallels
    – Wu Wei (non-agency) resonates with no-self and effortless action in Buddhism.
    – Emphasis on Qi, continuous transformation, and alignment with natural patterns.
    – Later Taoist works incorporate “inner light” teachings with possible Buddhist influence.

  5. Practice Approaches
    – Emphasis on sincere questioning, deconstruction of assumptions, and mindfulness or Vipashyana.
    – Importance of matching intellectual inquiry with direct experiential practice to move from fleeting glimpses to stable realization.

CONCLUSION

• The meeting closes on the topic of integrating these insights—Anatta, total exertion, Taoist philosophy—into everyday life.
• John Tan’s repeated guidance is to keep investigating one’s direct experience and be “very sincere, very objective” in seeing how concepts shape perception.
• While experiences like “I AM” or a glimpse of spacious awareness can be profound, the deeper transformation occurs through consistent insight into no-self, emptiness, and the effortless interrelatedness of all phenomena.

This synopsis captures the main flow of the discussion, from background and personal spiritual history to detailed analysis of concepts such as anatta, reification, and Taoist parallels. It highlights how the group explores these teachings in a lively, conversational manner, grounding philosophical points in lived experience.

-----


For those who prefer to listen in Audio, I recommend PC/phone read to text:

For iPhone Users

Download the PDF files:

  1. Open Safari on your iPhone.
  2. Go to the provided box.com link with the zip file of PDFs.
  3. Tap the zip file to download, then tap again to extract the contents in the Files app.

Add PDF files to the Books app:

  1. Open the Files app.
  2. Find the folder with the extracted PDFs.
  3. Select the PDFs, then tap "Share."
  4. Choose "Copy to Books" to add them to your Books library.

Listen to PDFs using Spoken Content:

  1. Go to Settings > Accessibility > Spoken Content.
  2. Enable "Speak Screen" and "Speech Controller."
  3. Open a PDF in the Books app.
  4. Tap the speech controller icon (a small floating button).
  5. Tap the play button on the speech controller to start reading the PDF aloud.

For Android Users

Download the PDF files:

  1. Use Chrome to visit the box.com link.
  2. Tap the zip file to download, then extract its contents using a file manager app.

Add PDF files to a PDF reader app:

  1. Open the file manager.
  2. Locate and open a PDF file with your preferred PDF reader app.

Use text-to-speech features:

  1. Download a text-to-speech app like Voice Aloud Reader or explore the latest options on Google Play Store.
  2. Open the app, grant permissions, and choose a PDF file to listen to.
  3. Alternatively, use the built-in text-to-speech feature in Accessibility settings:
    • Go to Settings > Accessibility > Text-to-Speech Output.
    • Configure the settings and enable text-to-speech for PDF reading.

For Windows Users

Listen to PDFs using Microsoft Edge or Adobe Acrobat Reader:

  1. Open Microsoft Edge or Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  2. Open the PDF file.
  3. In Edge, click the book with speaker icon; in Acrobat Reader, find the read-aloud option in the View menu.
  4. Select "Read Aloud" and use the controls to manage playback.
  5. Adjust reading speed and voice in "Voice options."
  6. Stop the reading with the "X" button in the control bar.

Note: The "Read Aloud" feature is optimized for text-based PDFs and might not work as expected with PDFs composed of scanned images.


Soh

 [20/5/24, 11:34:02 PM] John Tan: Understanding the orientation of continual practice, the attitude of devotion to what is real, gets us closer to the mystery of the relationship between practice and realization. When we first learn to practice, we usually have an experience of ourselves practicing. As we come to more thoroughly understand the nature of the self and of reality, our sense of self transforms until, at some point, we realize that when one is practicing, when one is meditating, when one is inquiring, when one is chanting, it is not one particular individual that is practicing, it is the totality of all that there is that is practicing. The more continual our practice and the more unflagging our orientation toward reality, the more our understanding of who or what practices can shift from an identified self to the totality of reality.

[20/5/24, 11:34:33 PM] John Tan: From diamond approach, I like this one.

[20/5/24, 11:35:59 PM] Soh Wei Yu: from Runaway Realisation.. that book by him i want to read but haven't had time. its about anatta and total exertion

[20/5/24, 11:36:01 PM] John Tan: Without core (essencelessness) and totality presenting itself is one understanding.

[20/5/24, 11:36:24 PM] John Tan: Yes

[20/5/24, 11:37:25 PM] Soh Wei Yu: https://www.amazon.com/Runaway-Realization-Living-Ceaseless-Discovery-ebook/dp/B00OYFPKK2/ref=sr_1_1?crid=G95HQNP1W4BR&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.l-tL5eKFWZ16hX8XWreMDaFtqxU4pJ9OxQILOyoY3LwQVHQPsTKa6KQeoOn8vH70yBgUB5VcE0BaQsG0r9aUtNC6lfepU3hwWr-a56zm_wXv_8lA_b7DK57QD7gNSzM9IKMzvY_CSCp54z4DRS8QV8k7_IG0O2g69MMM3VEba58CM2sNxb8zJ7Xqt0mxDRnnpfcbVIIxRH-TF6MA3S9qYb97YJIhoJlmWPCNNm3qigY.p3TPBdtYle_6UW4lnef9LGKWKjEtPvA7yEH--_8lLCY&dib_tag=se&keywords=runaway+realization&qid=1716219400&sprefix=runaway+realiz%2Caps%2C387&sr=8-1 


- his first book after anatta... also this one https://www.amazon.com/Alchemy-Freedom-Philosophers-Secrets-Existence/dp/1611804469/?_encoding=UTF8&pd_rd_w=Gvbs2&content-id=amzn1.sym.cf86ec3a-68a6-43e9-8115-04171136930a&pf_rd_p=cf86ec3a-68a6-43e9-8115-04171136930a&pf_rd_r=137-7634696-2758744&pd_rd_wg=nlkgv&pd_rd_r=e5b815bb-b6da-4644-b9d2-7ad11517f91f&ref_=aufs_ap_sc_dsk

[20/5/24, 11:39:11 PM] John Tan: So we cannot understand one without the other.  U must deeply understand these 2 and taste effortlessness and natural spontaneity from these 2 understanding conceptually first.


Soh

John Tan wrote for someone on AtR group:


"Conditions" means those factors in the 12-links.  


"DO" (Soh: Dependent Origination) does not arise out of ignorance, "things" arise out of ignorance and are therefore non-arisen -- dependent origination is non-origination.


Therefore DO is an enlightened view, sentient beings do not see DO, they see truly existent things being produced and destroyed (essential causality). So DO is taught because sentient beings in confusion (ignorance) mistake reified conventions as "things" being produced and destroyed.  


Both prasangika and svatantrika do not deny conventionalities, because denial implies rejecting the functional validities of these conventionalities.  Like how "money" is created out of paper, failing to see the validities of the functional aspects of "money" is nihilistic.


Prasangika and svatantrika differ only in terms of the philosophical approaches in debates with opponents holding varying degrees of inherent views, not in terms of ultimate realizations.  According to both Mipham and Gorampa, the result of ultimate realization for both prasangika and svatantrika are the same and to Gorampa,  prasangika is not a higher view than the svatantrika.

Soh

Wrote in Reddit: 


IMO Just Sitting (nothing but sitting) is like actualizing anatman. In seeing just the seen, in hearing just sound, in sitting just sit (shikantaza = just sitting).

"Shikantaza is to practice or actualize emptiness." - Shunryu Suzuki https://www.lionsroar.com/letters-from-emptiness/

"The zazen I speak of is not meditation practice. It is simply the dharma gate of joyful ease, the practice realization of totally culminated enlightenment." - Dogen

"SHIKANTAZA IS MEDITATION IN its simplest form. There are only three elements: body, mind, and breath. No gimmicks. Nothing to hold on to. Not even the breath. Breath is still present, of course, but we're not fixed on it. Earlier in this book I talked about tranquility (shamatha in Sanskrit) and awareness (vipashyana in Sanskrit). In shikantaza, these two are not separate. The mind settles, but not on a particular point. In shikantaza, Awareness is objectless and subjectless—there's no "you" who does shikantaza. It's as if concentration has been filed down to a single point—yet, at the same time, has expanded outward and is taking in everything: sights, sounds, feelings, sensations, thoughts, movements. And this Awareness is sizeless and timeless. In shikantaza we discover that there is no clear distinc-tion between self and other. Are you breathing? Or are you being breathed? You need not answer. There is no essential difference. Awareness is general and without location. It's been this way all along, but only now is it clear and obvious."

  • Zen teacher Steve Hagen, "Meditation Now or Never"

"Buddha said in the Agama Sutras (Soh: Referring to Bahiya Sutta): "In the seen is just the seen, in the heard is just the heard." Our six senses are naturally free and unobstructed. So, in sitting meditation, just sit like that, letting the six senses function naturally and freely. Don't interfere with them, not even non-interfering interference. In essence, there isn’t an "I" watching or listening there. Thus, zazen is about allowing all phenomena to prove there's no you, not about you proving there's no you. The key is here; don't get it wrong. When you try to prove there's no you, an "I" is already there proving it. Is that forgetting the self? No!

So, how do all phenomena prove there's no you? What exactly are these phenomena?

The seen forms, heard sounds, smelled scents, tasted flavors, felt sensations of cold and heat, the arising and passing thoughts. All these phenomena are constantly telling you, there's no me! There's no me!"

"The six senses are truly just present, operating naturally within the true and unobstructed reality. This is the so-called natural, unobstructed functioning of the six senses. It's so natural, a matter of course. Only in the genuine practice of zazen, at that very moment, do you realize our mind is incredibly vast, its applications infinite. The six senses function naturally: eyes seeing forms, ears hearing sounds, nose smelling scents, tongue tasting flavors, body feeling touches, mind perceiving phenomena. All actions and movements are the Dharma Body. The six senses are unimpeded, free from attachment or aversion, equally interacting with arising and ceasing conditions, naturally liberated. Siddhartha Gautama Buddha himself said, if you can genuinely let all phenomena prove there's no you, sitting zazen honestly in this way, just the time it takes for an ant to crawl from your nose to your forehead is more beneficial than sitting for ten, a hundred years with an 'I'. If you seek the Dharma with yourself for a hundred billion years, it's impossible, forever impossible. Because there's an "I" wanting to become a Buddha!"Shikantaza," this method, is the authentic practice of zazen. Sitting in that moment is performing the Buddha's dignified conduct, Buddha's actions. The moment without delusion is Buddha's dignified conduct, hence this is called the method of great ease."

"I' is not right, 'no I' is not right, but meditation is happening! What thing is meditating? What is meditating? How do you resolve this? Some more enlightened Zen masters, like Zemu Xingdao, sometimes say 'meditation is meditating' for the sake of instruction, for convenience in teaching. Because he is experienced, whatever he says is right. Or in English, 'the universe is universing', the universe is sitting the universe, the universe is the universe. Some people, upon hearing this, might be even more baffled."

Soh

 


I recommend this monastery's retreats in Taipei (outskirts of Taipei in a forested area, close to the foot of Yangmingshan volcano) for those who can understand Chinese. I visited and attended in Taipei earlier this year. It's rare to have realized teachers able to guide you one on one (usually they have too many students and are very busy) and without needing to pay a huge sum of money.
You can check their schedule from their website: http://www.changrove.org/
Ven Guo Ru is one of Ch'an Master Sheng Yen's twelve successors.
[22/3/24, 9:20:04 AM] Soh Wei Yu: Btw he is the first among sheng yen list of 12 successors:
[21/3/24, 2:08:02 PM] Soh Wei Yu: https://youtu.be/f8y0QKXZGHs?si=o26rUnamdVvBwCgC
[21/3/24, 2:08:20 PM] Soh Wei Yu: First thirty minutes talk about anatta, emptiness, hinayana vs mahayana vs brahman
[22/3/24, 8:04:55 AM] John Tan: 👍
[22/3/24, 8:09:47 AM] John Tan: 👍
[22/3/24, 8:30:46 AM] John Tan: Yes quite good.
[24/3/24, 12:02:51 AM] Soh Wei Yu: Ven guo ru retreat quite good.. for him zen is revealing the marvellous true mind and practice with that in everyday life not just meditation. The teachings emphasize emptiness of all phenomena but also about revealing marvellous mind. The method is meditation is sort of methodless method of actualizing the true mind every moment but he says it’s important we do 早晚课 (like daily meditation and chanting), he say the methodless method is most difficult
He also teach can hua tou like “what is this?” The meditation is sitting insterspersed with standing meditation and they have walking and even running meditation.. they have many other movements and stretching and exercises also
He got one disciple i think a nun who is like his successor and probably had some realisation also thats guiding there.. she would like shout self enquiry questions from time to time. Like someone sleepy she would shout “在昏沉的是谁?” (Who is being sleepy?) what is the self nature 自性 of sleepiness? 能走路的是谁? (Who is it that was able to walk?) and something like 能觉察 (that which is able to be aware of) movement of legs 的清明心是什么 (what is that Clear Mind)? etc. she shouts with some fierceness lol ‎<This message was edited>
[24/3/24, 12:02:56 AM] Soh Wei Yu: Reminds me of my self enquiry days lol
[24/3/24, 12:03:58 AM] Soh Wei Yu: Ven guo ru did initial talk and concluding talk and q n a. Everything is very methodical even their eating and lunch.. got a lot of things and behaviour to follow and must be mindful every moment. And silence is observed ‎<This message was edited>
[24/3/24, 12:04:12 AM] Soh Wei Yu: And we all spent an hour sweeping floor and trimming weeds lol
[24/3/24, 12:05:44 AM] Soh Wei Yu: I think they have a lot of movement and exercises unlike those skewed to sitting like goenka.. i feel healthier and less prone to energy imbalance
He say next week he will give a talk on zen sickness
[24/3/24, 12:07:59 AM] Soh Wei Yu: Theres more than 30+, some of his students went china now to visit hui neng temple so usually might have more. Also got one white guy there.. i heard he attained kensho. His chinese was not so good, interesting he was able to benefit that way
[24/3/24, 12:26:05 AM] Soh Wei Yu: Marvellous mind he calls 妙净明心
[24/3/24, 12:33:00 AM] John Tan: Very good👍
[24/3/24, 12:34:24 AM] John Tan: Yes very good.
[24/3/24, 9:03:44 AM] John Tan: 明心还需见空性,明空性也需证妙心。(Soh: [after] apprehending Mind, one must still realise Emptiness, after understanding Empty nature, one still needs to realize marvellous Mind)    
[24/3/24, 9:56:46 AM] John Tan: Also natural state can also be approached from mature knowledge of effortlessness and non-doership nature of luminous clarity side or from thorough knowledge of the conventional which is freedom from all extremes and elaborations (emptiness).
[24/3/24, 6:25:31 PM] John Tan: How much u pay?
[24/3/24, 6:25:55 PM] John Tan: And u don't go everywhere talking about ur blog🤦
[24/3/24, 6:26:32 PM] Soh Wei Yu: Lol
[24/3/24, 6:27:22 PM] Soh Wei Yu: I think the recommended donation is like 500twd a day and its like up to you. I just gave 2000twd a day to support them more
[24/3/24, 6:27:46 PM] Soh Wei Yu: 500twd is like 21sgd
[24/3/24, 6:29:17 PM] Soh Wei Yu: Theres a lot of monks and nuns at the temple.. maybe like 10 ‎<This message was edited>
[24/3/24, 6:29:25 PM] Soh Wei Yu: And not so many students as far as i can tell
[24/3/24, 6:32:10 PM] John Tan: 10 is not a lot but 10 with clarity of insights is good.
Soh

Cao Khánh wrote in AtR group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/AwakeningToReality/posts/25438496085765148/?__cft__[0]=AZW8JbPtGcnaNGO5rlSsT7lSKjoP9SU8e64eeY5Tx1k-TG8TLtnZS7Vys97Q5j1jFZegi24q7zx4S6uQmAYC0sSA4JgzGBehl8vCTMdqk_ypil0DyLw1Ax78HyfIw7xHsHPNdfE13EO3iiwlICPkEnR-F5f0LRjxNKoFvpfRPD6d7HqXUBCRVf7L5mOSc-2E7Yep49B9PZ2jt0ORZVCI2Q2uafSM7NB_hMzyaGE8GAks-A&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-R]-R


Top contributor

  · 

6 hours ago

  · 

Recommending Lama Joe Evans (Jigme Rangdrol) for Practitioners Interested in Dzogchen

I believe there are many people here already knows about Lama Joe or have been actively learning from him. And I have talked to Soh about him and Soh thinks it's okay for me to share this here.

So if you're interested in Dzogchen teaching, I would recommend Lama Joe for the following reasons:

Malcolm Smith, a Dzogchen teacher endorsed by AtR, said: "Joe Evans is my student and I vouch for him 100%".

I've attended the Spring Retreat with Lama Joe and his Rangdrol Foundation sangha, and can attest that he is very attentive and takes his teaching responsibilities very whole-heartedly, while also being very chillaxing about it.

Lama Joe says if you're genuinely interested in Dzogchen then that is good enough to start learning and practicing Dzogchen.

He holds his teaching online and accepts dana, so location limitation and monetary limitation is not the problem

He has a very active Discord sangha for ongoing correspondence as well.

He is hosting another retreat coming this summer so you can have a chance to receive Direct Introduction if you haven't had one already.

There is surely more things to appreciate about Lama Joe, so I invite other members who have received his teachings to share their perspectives

If you want to check out Lama Joe Evans, here's a few links that I've found helpful:

The Rangdrol Foundation website: https://www.rangdrolfoundation.org/

Interview about his experience with his different teachers (Chögyal Namkhai Norbu, Khenchen Namdrol Rinpoche, Acarya Malcolm Smith, and Dungse Rigdzin Dorje Rinpoche) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOShiRbfHDI





YOUTUBE.COM

Praxis Behind The Obscure: Dzogchen w/ Jigme Rangdröl

In this episode, Joe Evans also known as Jigme Rangdröl joins the podcast to discuss his Buddhist journey, how to find a qualified teacher, and stories of ex...

Cao Khánh

Author


Top contributor

Some nice writings from Lama Joe

"gzhi (ground/basis) and zhi (peace)

The point of rushen and semdzin is really to bring distracting proliferations to a point of exhaustion so that you can observe the empty clarity of your mind, which is the nature of mind. In that moment of unfabricated consciousness you recognize your nature. If there’s no recognition of the presence you have slipped into dullness. If you’re grasping and labeling the experience you have slipped back into proliferation. The two diversion’s are fairly recognizable so in practice they are actually allies because they indicate when we have returned to distraction. Once you are familiar with rigpa then your thoughts are not a problem because you are now able to skillfully apply the three modes of liberation.

gzhi (ground/basis) and zhi (peace)

Chogyal Namhkai Norbu was very adamant about this particular pitfall as well. People mistakenly claim that a blank state of quiescence is the dharmakaya. One has to understand that such a state is not the great perfection and merely leads to the formless realm at best but likely rebirth as an animal since it is marked by dullness.

gzhi (ground/basis) and zhi (peace)

Sure, the main point is that rigpa is your rigpa, it is the naturally perfected cognizant aspect of the basis; which is in your body. It’s not outside, everyone has their own mind stream and thus their own rigpa.

gzhi (ground/basis) and zhi (peace)

Right, the nature of the individual, the basis."

Soh has commented his other writings to point that Lama Joe's view is "definitely not substantialist"

6h

Reply

Edited

Soh Wei Yu

Admin


All-star contributor

Cao Khánh its from his other posts that i knew his views are not substantialist, not these particular ones

6h

Reply

Edited

Cao Khánh

Author


Top contributor

Soh Wei Yu can you share them here as well? I'll correct the previous comment

6h

Reply

Edited

Soh Wei Yu

Admin


All-star contributor

Cao Khánh hmm i forgot, quite a number actually, i recommend people go through the whole pdf i posted if they are interested

6h

Reply

Edited

Cao Khánh

Author


Top contributor

damn 202 pages!!! nice one

6h

Reply





Soh Wei Yu

Admin


All-star contributor

Here is a compilation of his writings from reddit: https://files.awakeningtoreality.com/A%2520Compilation%2520of%2520(Reddit)%2520Joe%2520Evans.pdf.pdf

A%20Compilation%20of%20(Reddit)%20Joe%20Evans.pdf.pdf | Powered by Box

APP.BOX.COM

A%20Compilation%20of%20(Reddit)%20Joe%20Evans.pdf.pdf | Powered by Box

A%20Compilation%20of%20(Reddit)%20Joe%20Evans.pdf.pdf | Powered by Box

6h

Reply

Remove Preview