This blog is about spiritual awakening, maps and stages, the blinding effects of our strong momentum/conditioning (karmic propensities), view, realization, experience, etc. If you're new here, I recommend going through the 'Must Reads' articles (see sidebar). For discussions you are welcome to join the Awakening to Reality Facebook group
Someone said:"pursuit of merit is the Buddhist way to develop a wise sense of self"
Soh replied:
I would say it should be the other way round. Truly practicing without sense of self gives rise to the highest merit.
13m
Reply
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
Top Contributor
Sariputra: What is the worldly, and what is the supramundane perfection of giving?
Subhuti: The worldly perfection of giving consists in this: The Bodhisattva gives liberally to all those who ask, all the while thinking in terms of real things [that are unchanging and substantial]. It occurs to him: "I [who is unchanging and substantial give, that one [who is unchanging and substantial] receives, this is the gift [that is unchanging and substantial]. I renounce all my possessions without stint. I act as one who knows the Buddha. I practice the perfection of giving. I, having made this gift into the common property of all beings, dedicate it to supreme enlightenment, and that without apprehending anything [that is unchanging and substantial]. By means of this gift, and its fruits may all beings in this very life be at ease, and may they one day enter Nirvana!" Tied by three ties he gives a gift. Which three? A perception of self, a perception of others, a perception of the gift.
The supramundane perfection of giving, on the other hand, consists in the threefold purity. What is the threefold purity? Here a Bodhisattva gives a gift, and he does not apprehend a self [who is unchanging and substantial, nor a recipient [who is unchanging and substantial], nor a gift [that is unchanging and substantial]; also no reward of his giving [that is unchanging and substantial]. He surrenders that gift to all beings, but he apprehends neither beings nor self [who are unchanging and substantial]. He dedicates that gift to supreme enlightenment, but he does not apprehend any enlightenment [due t non-attachment to it, thus truly attaining it]. This is called the supramundane perfection of giving.
Pañcavimsatisahasrika, 263-64
Buddhist Texts Through The Ages
Translated & Edited By Edward Conze, I.B. Horner, David Snellgrove & Arthur Waley
There is also mundane generosity (laukikadāna) and supramundane generosity (lokottaradāna), the generosity approved of by the āryas (āryavarṇitadāna) and the generosity disapproved of by the āryas (āryāvarṇitadāna), the generosity of the buddhas and bodhisattvas (buddhabodhisattvadāna) and the generosity of the śrāvakas (śrāvakadāna).
1) What is mundane generosity (laukikadāna)? Mundane generosity is the generosity of ordinary people (pṛthagjanadāna) and also the generosity used by the āryas with an impure mind (sāsravacitta). Some say that [only] the generosity of worldly people constitutes mundane generosity, whereas the generosity of the āryas, even though carried out with impure mind, is supramundane because their fetters (saṃyojana) are cut (chinna). Why? Because these āryas have obtained the concentration of non-thought (apraṇihitasamādhi).[1]
Furthermore, mundane generosity is impure (aviśuddha), whereas supramundane generosity is pure (viśuddha).[2] There are two kinds of fetters (saṃyojana): i) those that depend on craving (tṛṣṇāpekṣa); ii) those that depend on wrong views (dṛṣṭyapekṣa).[3] When these two kinds of fetters are present, the generosity is mundane; when they are absent, the generosity is supramundane.
When the three obstacles (āvaraṇa)[4] fetter the mind, the generosity is mundane. Why? Dharmas, resulting from causes and conditions (hetupratyaya) are truly without substantial self (anātmaka); nevertheless, we say: “I am giving and someone is receiving”; this is what is called mundane generosity. Besides, [the notion] of self (ātman) has no precise attribution (aniyatasthāna): sometimes it is the self that is taken as ātman and not as other; sometimes it is other that is taken as ātman and not as self.[5] As a result of this imprecision, there is no true ātman. Moreover, the thing given (deyadravya) exists solely as a result of the complex of causes and conditions (hetupratyayasāmagrī) and all the dharmas are in themselves nonexistent (anupalabdha). They are like a cloth (paṭa) that results from a collection of causes and conditions but which ceases to exist as soon as one pulls out the silken thread or threads of which it is composed. In the same way the dharmas have as sole characteristic the absence of own-characteristic [142b] (animittalakṣaṇa); they are eternally empty of self nature (svabhāvalakṣaṇa). But people have hallucinations (abhiprāya) and take them to be existent. This mistake (viparyāsa) and this error characterize the mundane generosity. – But when the mind is free of the three obstacles (āvaraṇa), the characteristic of dharmas (lakṣaṇadharma) is truly cognized and the mind is free of error (viparyāsa): then generosity is supramundane.
2) Supramundane generosity is the generosity approved of by the āryas (āryavarṇitadāna); mundane generosity is the generosity disapproved of by the āryas (āryāvarṇitadāna).
Moreover, pure (viśuddha) generosity free of stains (vimala) and conforming to the true nature (bhūtalakṣaṇa) of dharmas is the generosity approved of by the āryas; the impure (aviśuddha) generosity, mixed with fetters (saṃyojana), errors (viparyāsa) and obstinacy (cittasaṅga) is the generosity disapproved of by the āryas.
Finally, the generosity associated with the knowledge of the true nature (bhūtalakṣaṇaprajñā) is the generosity approved of by the āryas; in the contrary case, it is disapproved of by the āryas.
3) When one gives without seeking [the welfare] of beings or without wanting to know the true nature (bhūtalakṣaṇa) of dharmas, but only for the purpose of escaping from birth (jāti), old age (jarā), sickness (vyādhi) and death (maraṇa), this is the generosity of the śrāvakas. When one gives for all beings or again in order to know the true nature of dharmas, this is the generosity of the Buddhas or bodhisattvas.
When one is incapable of fulfilling (paripūrṇa) all the qualities (guṇa) [required for true generosity] but one is seeking to obtain a small portion of them, this is generosity of the śrāvakas. When one wishes to fulfill all the qualities, this is generosity of the Buddhas or bodhisattvas.
When one gives out of fear of old age, sickness and death, this is generosity of the śrāvakas; when one gives to acquire buddhahood, to convert beings and without fear of old age, sickness and death, this is generosity of the Buddhas or bodhisattvas.[6] At this point, the story of the P’ou sa pen cheng king (Bodhisattvajātakasūtra) should be told.
Good video that John Tan shared with me. The video points out progression from I AMness to Anatta and discusses psychedelics. John Tan however cautioned, “To me, any meddling with the mind is dangerous.”
——-
Shared to psychonaut subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Psychonaut/comments/1amtgru/madness_or_nirvana_the_psychedelics_paradox/
Posted by
u/xabir
4 minutes ago
Madness Or Nirvana? The Psychedelics Paradox
Here's a good video that my mentor John Tan found online and shared with me. The video points out progression of spiritual realizations from I AMness to Anatta (realization of no-self) and discusses psychedelics and how it usually contrasts with a permanent awakening. Psychedelics tend to lead to an awakening of the I AMness realization and peak experiences of ego-death, however there are further realizations along the spiritual journey.
Youtube video "Madness Or Nirvana? The Psychedelics Paradox": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PBEgGMc-72o
As for the stages of spiritual awakening, my mentor has also written about them:
(p.s. I'm someone who is very much into spirituality, Buddhism, and has also dabbled with psychedelics when I was younger. I have gone through rather similar stages as my mentor in my journey as the 7 stages link with some minor differences (e.g. I didn't go through stage 3))
0 Comments
Share
Save
——-
Update: John Tan said his other videos are good. “ This asangoham guy narrator emphasized a lot on anatta and emptiness of self, non-doership and interconnected-ness in 3 separate videos. The other 2 are:
Nietzsche + Zen.
The joy of being a spiritual loser: being no one, going no where.. Go watch”
———
[3/4/24, 12:32:24 AM] John Tan: I really like the last part of the psychedelic video about madness or enlightenment. Illustrated very well on the anatta part of luminous appearances.
[3/4/24, 12:33:20 AM] John Tan: Thinking of how to edit it as the beginning part is misleading and "anatta" is defined wrongly.
[3/4/24, 12:33:34 AM] Soh Wei Yu: Ic..
[3/4/24, 12:36:45 AM] John Tan: And in between part of the anatta, he illustrated "no here and there is no there", good to interject "dependent designation". That "here" and "there" are merely conventional.
However it cannot be understood at the mental or mind level alone like what I said in the "weight of thoughts" post in my fb.
[3/4/24, 12:38:39 AM] John Tan: And when he talk about boundlessness, he should also bring out effortlessness and non-doership.
[3/4/24, 12:43:03 AM] Soh Wei Yu: you're talking about the psychedelic video?
[3/4/24, 12:48:08 AM] John Tan: Yes
[3/4/24, 12:48:16 AM] Soh Wei Yu: i see
[3/4/24, 12:54:47 AM] John Tan: Lucky I din do any editing for the 7 phases of insights...lol
[3/4/24, 12:55:50 AM] John Tan: If not will waste tremendous time for nothing...now advancement of technologies can help to shorten lots of works and time
[3/4/24, 12:56:00 AM] Soh Wei Yu: lol ya true
[3/4/24, 12:56:13 AM] Soh Wei Yu: i was thinking later gpt5 gpt6 come out, whole atr blog will be organised nicely
[3/4/24, 12:56:17 AM] John Tan: Can include picture and video in future...lol
[3/4/24, 12:56:18 AM] Soh Wei Yu: and all books instantly translated to 30 languages
[3/4/24, 12:56:19 AM] Soh Wei Yu: lol
[3/4/24, 12:57:26 AM] John Tan: Probably after edited version first before doing the translation
[3/4/24, 12:57:36 AM] Soh Wei Yu: i see
[3/4/24, 12:57:43 AM] Soh Wei Yu: yeah.. hope you can edit
[3/4/24, 12:58:36 AM] John Tan: I prefer some video like the psychedelic video, very ATR the last part. I like it a lot.
[3/4/24, 12:58:51 AM] John Tan: Can illustrate better
ChatGPT: Here is the image that captures the essence of a profound spiritual
journey, illustrating the diverse paths converging towards the
realization of anatman or no-self, with figures representing
contemporary and historical teachers from different traditions.
Someone said: "This has been my realization as well. I have been having a hard time finding many who espouse emptiness teachings. Obviously Buddha, but the only major practitioner I can find any info on or videos by is Greg Goode. "
Soh replied:
That's because you've been reading Advaitin authors so far, in which case the I AM and one mind realization features prominently.
I can list many, many contemporary (and many more who are dead) teachers and masters and practitioners who have realised anatta. I even wrote that there's 60 who realised anatta through the AtR blog. I'm not kidding, and I'm not making this figure up, I actually have all the names on a notepad. But it goes to show that anatta realisation is actually quite attainable with the right pointers and guidance and practice.
But as for teachers who realised anatta, here's a list of contemporary teachers who realised anatman:
Zen teacher Venerable Jinmyo Renge Sensei who offers long distance training program https://wwzc.org/long-distance-training-program and her teacher Ven. Anzan Hoshin roshi also clearly realised anatman and is another teacher I recommend. Why do I recommend these two in particular (Malcolm and Jinmyo)? Because they offer online teachings. Of course there are many other teachers who realised anatman, you just have to search around, but they may or may not offer teachings online (they may be stationed at a local dharma center or monastery, for example).
Another dharma teacher who underwent similar journey from Vedanta realization (confirmed to be deep and profound by his Vedanta teachers and asked to teach) before going into Buddhist realization is Archaya Mahayogi Shridhar Rana Rinpoche, you can read about his bio and articles here: https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/search/label/Acharya%20Mahayogi%20Shridhar%20Rana%20Rinpoche
He gives highly recommended teachings and materials for Dogen studies: “ Today he is recognized for his unique perspective on the life and teachings of Dogen Zenji derived from his experience as both practitioner and translator, and as a teacher in both Japanese and Western practice communities. He gives frequent lectures on the Shobogenzo and other foundational texts. His translations and commentaries includeDogen's Extensive Record (Wisdom Publications, 2004) and The Wholehearted Way (Tuttle Publishing, 1997),Realizing Genjokoan,Living By Vow,Mountains and Waters Sutra, andSquabbling Squashes. His lectures have appeared in Buddhadharma: The Practitioner's Quarterly, Dharma Eye, and Buddhism Now.
He continues to lead sesshins (intensive meditation retreats) and genzo-e (Shobogenzo study) retreats at Sanshin-ji (Sanshin Zen Community) and at various other centers in the US and around the world. Shohaku Okumura's bio on Sanshin Zen Community.
Now, at this point you're probably thinking, ok you listed many teachers, but how come I've still never heard of any of them before?
Well how about Adyashanti? You must have heard of him right? Adyashanti realised anatta and total exertion only in recent years. All his books in earlier years were into I AM and one mind only. I have posted some of his recent articles https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/search/label/Adyashanti
How about A H Almaas? Have you heard of him? He also only realised anatta and total exertion only in recent years. All his books in earlier years were into I AM and one mind only. I highly recommend watching this video by him: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hqUcX_D8H8
There's also this teacher Richard from the Actual Freedom Trust, he is not Buddhist but his experience and progression is quite similar to I AM then into anatta and total exertion, however his insights has not expanded into twofold emptiness. https://www.actualfreedom.com.au/richard/articles/abriefpersonalhistory.htm
And these are just the contemporary ones, and only some of them off the top of my mind. There are plenty more I have not listed. And if you want me to list the olden/dead masters, it will be too many to list.
In addition to the various paths and teachers discussed in the
context of spiritual mentorship and guidance, the significance of
finding an awakened teacher cannot be overstated. As I, Soh, shared with
someone recently, the teachings of the first Zen Patriarch Bodhidharma
offer profound insights into this matter.
Bodhidharma, esteemed
as the first patriarch of Chan/Zen, marking him as a foundational and
transformative figure in the lineage and teachings of this tradition,
emphasizes the crucial role of a teacher in the journey towards
enlightenment. In his teachings, he states, "To find a Buddha, you have
to see your nature. Whoever sees his nature is a Buddha. If you don’t
see your nature, being mindful of Buddhas, reciting sutras, making
offerings, and keeping precepts are not equal to it. Being mindful of
Buddhas results in good karma, reciting sutras results in a good
intelligence; keeping precepts results in a good rebirth in heavens, and
making offerings results in future blessings — but no buddha. If you
don’t understand by yourself, you’ll have to find a teacher to know the
root of births and deaths. But unless he sees his nature, such a person
isn’t a good teacher. Even if he can recite the twelve groups of
scriptures he can’t escape the Wheel of Births and Deaths. He suffers in
the three realms without hope of release. Long ago, the monk Good Star
was able to recite the twelve groups of scriptures. But he didn’t escape
the Wheel, because he didn’t see his nature. If this was the case with
Good Star, then people nowadays who recite a few sutras or shastras and
think it’s the Dharma are fools. Unless you see your own Heart, reciting
so much prose is useless.
To find a Buddha have to see your
nature directly. Your nature is the Buddha. And the Buddha is the person
who’s free: free of plans, free of cares. If you don’t see your nature
and run outwards to seek for external objects, you’ll never find a
buddha. The truth is there’s nothing to find. But to reach such an
understanding you need a good teacher and you need to struggle to make
yourself understand. Life and death are important. Don’t suffer them in
vain.
There’s no advantage in deceiving yourself. Even if you
have mountains of jewels and as many servants as there are grains of
sand along the Ganges, you see them when your eyes are open. But what
about when your eyes are shut? You should realize then that everything
you see is like a dream or illusion. If you don’t find a teacher soon,
you’ll live this life in vain. It’s true, you have the buddha-nature.
But without the help of a teacher you’ll never know it. Only one person
in a million becomes enlightened without a teacher’s help. If, though,
by the conjunction of conditions, someone understands what the Buddha
meant, that person doesn’t need a teacher. Such a person has a natural
awareness superior to anything taught. But unless you’re so blessed,
study hard, and by means of instruction you’ll understand.
People
who don’t understand and think they can do so without study are no
different from those deluded souls who can’t tell white from black.”
Falsely proclaiming the Buddha-Dharma, such persons in fact blaspheme
the Buddha and subvert the Dharma. They preach as if they were bringing
rain. But theirs is the preaching of devils not of Buddhas. Their
teacher is the King of Devils and their disciples are the Devil’s
minions. Deluded people who follow such instruction unwittingly sink
deeper in the Sea of Birth and Death.
Unless they see their
nature, how can people call themselves Buddhas they’re liars who deceive
others into entering the realm of devils. Unless they see their nature,
their preaching of the Twelvefold Canon is nothing but the preaching of
devils. Their allegiance is to Mara, not to the Buddha. Unable to
distinguish white from black, how can they escape birth and death?
Whoever
sees his nature is a Buddha; whoever doesn’t is a mortal. But if you
can find your buddha-nature apart from your mortal nature, where is it?
Our mortal nature is our Buddha nature. Beyond this nature there’s no
Buddha. The Buddha is our nature. There’s no Buddha besides this nature.
And there’s no nature besides the Buddha."
Also, Jigme Phuntsok Rinpoche said:
"If
you wish to eradicate your afflictions, you must follow your teacher
and study for a long time. Otherwise, studying for only a few days will
not have any significant effect ... Some people today are not willing to
study or reflect on the Dharma, but they are enthusiastic about
meditation. They believe meditating all day with their eyes shut is the
ultimate practice. I do not think much of this. Although there are
people of the highest caliber who attain enlightenment without study or
reflection, are you of such caliber? Therefore, you cannot live in a
cave or another completely isolated place when you first start to
practice. Instead, you should be with a qualified Dharma teacher and
earnestly receive the Buddhadharma; it is best if you are always engaged
in study, reflection, and practice. Of course, I am not asking you to
study and reflect for a lifetime without ever practicing. But to spend
an entire life in blind meditation without any study or reflection is
also the wrong path!"
----
Zen teacher Ven Jinmyo Renge Sensei: "Sometimes students really can't
understand why they can't just sit at home, by themselves, without
instruction. After all, the Buddha did that. Bodhidharma did that. May I
point out that you are not the Buddha and you are not Bodhidharma.
You're also not Einstein and you're not going to come up with anything
like the theory of relativity – not without countless years of
instruction and study and probably not even then. You're not Bach and so
it is highly unlikely that you will write music like his, not without
countless years of instruction and study. Sorry if this is the first
time anyone's pointed this out, but things are not all equal, they're
not all fair, we do not all have the same starting point and you are as
you are, not as someone else is. Or was. Start from where you are and be
willing to learn from others.
You might not like what I just said, but do you understand why I said it?
I
once asked the Roshi about Teachers – if two people who had nothing in
common Woke Up and became Teachers, would they somehow come to agree
with each other about everything? He said "No, but they would understand
why the other was saying or doing what he or she was saying or doing.""
- https://wwzc.org/book/export/html/1017
----
Soh replied to someone, "In one of your sub posts you said most gurus are abusive. I disagree, I think most gurus are not abusive, but some indeed are. However, it is the duty of all students to choose their guru wisely and carefully. You should not blindly follow any gurus but examine them first, have some criterias to select. For example, Dzogchen texts gives a list of criterias to select a guru.
Kyle Dixon (krodha) shared on Reddit before:
"In theRig pa rang shar tantra,chapter 9, the attributes of a qualified teacher are listed:
The master of the intimate instructions that possesses the vajra meaning has a positive attitude, is skillful in teaching, has obtained the empowerments, applies the meaning of Secret Mantra, understands all the inner and outer activities, is inseparable from the meditation deity, remains undistracted in samadhi, is knowledgable in the secret tantras of Secret Mantra, possesses the meaning of the intimate instructions of the Great Perfection, engages in all outer and inner sadhanas, [18b] never leaves the meaning of the view, gives up outer, inner, and secret activities, is endowed with qualities like a precious jewel, and enjoys an inexhaustible treasury. With the cord of compassion unsevered and the stream of affection uninterrupted, the master and disciple are thus connected.
A “master” to avoid is described as follows:
A master lacking a connection with a lineage of scholars, who is self-important, stupid, literal-minded, who does not understand the meaning of Secret Mantra, has harsh words for others, is boastful, has entered false paths, has not seen the mandala of the empowerment, disregards samaya, [18/a] is unable to answer questions, has little learning, and great pride — such an unexamined master is a māra for the disciple. He is not a master who can teach Secret Mantra and is unable to teach the Great Perfection, Ati. Do not associate with such a person.
Jigme Lingpa comments on the above excerpt regarding the unqualified teacher:
As it says, do not get involved with such a demonic master.
Longchenpa, in his own response to the above excerpt from the rig pa rang shar (regarding the unqualified teacher), states:
Accordingly, I advise you to avoid them.
The kun byed rgyal po tantra states:
The inauthentic master teaches scripture like a monkey, his false path beset with concepts.
And regarding the qualified teacher it goes on to say:
The master who displays the truth is a precious treasury worth an inestimable price.
Jigme Lingpa continues:
This tantra [rig pa rang shar] also speaks of six characteristics:
[i] having put all samsaric phenomena behind him, [ii] having few desires and being content, [iii] being skilled in practice and having had experiences, [iv] being learned in the meanings of the tantras and having striven to accomplish them, [v] being learned in the meaning of the view and being completely capable with it, and [vi] having great compassion and being happy in renunciation.
One with the complete set of these qualities is said to be necessary. If, on the other hand, he is merely an effigy of whom it is said This one is a wonderful source of miracles, This one holds an unsurpassable rank, and This one is a sacred object of worship and harmony with worldly people, then he is not [a genuine teacher].
More from Jamgon Köngtrul:
Avoid a master whose traits are discordant with those of a true teacher; But since a fully qualified master is rare, follow the one who is replete with good qualities.
A teacher whose traits are discordant with the characteristics of the [true] master stands outside of the Buddhist doctrine and connot be taken as a spiritual teacher. Consequently, even though the teacher may be very famous, active, etc., the discriminating student should be aware [of these shortcomings] and detach him or herself [from the teacher]. This should be done even if a teacher-student relationship has already been formed. If one has not yet formed such a relationship, one should avoid doing so, right from the beginning. Sakya Pandita states:
Detach yourself from the spiritual teacher Who does not conform to the Buddha's teaching.
We should learn how to recognize [bad teachers] from the many descriptions given in the scriptures and then shun them. For example, the Condensed Tantra [of the wheel of Time] states:
Proud, subject to uncontrollable anger, defiant of pledges, guilty of misappropriation, ignorant [of the doctrine], willfully deceptive of students, having failed to enter the state of supreme bliss, uninitiated, a slave to wealth and enjoyments, careless, rude in speech, and obsessed with sexual desire: wise students who wish full awakening should shun such a teacher as they would hell.
Because we are living in a [degenerate] age, we very rarely meet a teacher endowed with all of the necessary qualifications. Since we may never meet such a teacher, we should accept a master who has many good qualities and very few weaknesses. [Pundarika's] Ultimate Familiarization states:
In this age of conflict, spiritual masters will exhibit both faults and virtues; not one is absolutely irreproachable. Therefore, examine well even those who excel in virtue before beginning to study with them."
I recently sent the following message to someone regarding manifestation:
Some time ago, I wrote about my experiences with manifestation:
Soh Wei Yu:
My experience with manifestation relates to praying to Green Tara and concerns some personal life situations from my past which I prefer not to discuss. I haven't tried other manifestation methods (including New Age ones like 'The Secret').
However, suffice it to say, I had some miraculous encounters where I felt Green Tara's presence (though not visually) and received mental communication from her. She informed me that my wish would be "granted" that day. Indeed, after many months of waiting, it was fulfilled that very day. Months prior, Tara had also communicated that my wish would come true and advised me not to worry but to “focus on helping others.” Without that specific communication, I would have had no indication of when it would happen. During that encounter, there was also a strange, pleasant smell when I felt 'her Presence'. The last time that happened was in 2012 when I did the Garab Dorje guru yoga for the first time after receiving Chögyal Namkhai Norbu's transmission. My bunkmates also smelled that pleasant fragrance. (Incidentally, burning incense was forbidden in the army barracks, so the origin of the scent was inexplicable).
[Update, 2024: I just met Sim Pern Chong, and he told me that in 2012, he too smelled an otherworldly fragrance the first time he practiced the Garab Dorje guru yoga after the transmission he attended with me from Chögyal Namkhai Norbu. An amazing synchronicity. He also related other miraculous encounters he experienced during mantra recitations.]
While this might sound superstitious, this event convinced me of the truth behind the promise found in this sutra:
Those who want children will come to have them,
Those who seek wealth will come to have that,
Each and every wish will be fulfilled,And obstacles, entirely vanquished, will be no more. (Emphasis by Soh)
(Update: 1 I should also mention that I knew I had a close connection with Tara since 2012. When Dzogchen teacher Chögyal Namkhai Norbu was holding a 5-day Dzogchen teaching retreat in Singapore, I had a dream the day before he gave the Tara empowerment. I didn't know he was giving the Tara empowerment the next day, but the night before, I had a very peculiar dream where many dakinis were singing the Green Tara mantra in a unique tune I hadn't heard before. I woke up right after the dream. It left a strong impression, and I felt I must have had some kind of connection with Tara.)
(The following section appears to be from a comment thread)
Aditya Prasad: Soh Wei Yu, Was it just the Green Tara prayer (Om Tare Tuttare Ture Soha) you were reciting? I've been drawn to that one lately for some reason.
Soh Wei Yu: Aditya Prasad, I recited the Green Tara mantra (Om Tare Tuttare Ture Soha) a lot over many months, but I think on that specific day, I was reciting the Praise to Tārā with Twenty-One Verses of Homage.
I also wrote previously:
I've had a strong affinity with Guan Yin since a young age. I started going to my mom's dharma center at the age of 13, and since then, I have also received teachings from other teachers. In more recent years, I started chanting the Da Bei Zhou (Great Compassion Dharani) and the Tara mantra daily.
Guan Yin has told me to be compassionate in my visions. Also, the last time I saw her in a dream, I entered a blissful samadhi state. Guan Yin pointed me to rest in my true nature, and then I experienced instant samadhi and an intense presence and blissfulness of my true nature while asleep.
Tara also appeared to me previously, telling me my wishes would come true six months later and on the day before it happened (otherwise I wouldn't have known). She told me to focus on helping others. When she appeared, there was a fragrance from another world, even though I was not burning any incense in my air-conditioned room.
Also, this thread on the importance of cultivating merits is absolutely crucial for any successful 'manifestation': On the Importance of Merits
That said, manifestation is not the main point of dharma practice for me; liberation and awakening are far more vital and important on my path.
The concerns of this life are not so important in the long run. You may or may not believe in past lives, but many people in my community, and practitioners/yogis starting from the Buddha, can and do recall past lives. Therefore, liberation concerns not just the well-being of this life (and certainly not only its material aspects), but liberation from the cycle of rebirth in samsara.
In the 'importance of merits' link above, I mentioned why merits are also important, both in spiritual life and for worldly success. My mentor, who [info redacted], attributes his success to cultivating merit.
In short, from the perspective of Buddhism, particularly Mahayana Buddhism, the main purpose of dharma practice and awakening is to achieve freedom from all suffering and the cycle of rebirth (samsara), attain omniscience, and develop the capacity to tirelessly help all sentient beings attain the same liberation and awakening, without turning away from samsara.
I feel particularly connected with Avalokitesvara (Guan Yin) and Green Tara. In my visions and encounters with them, they told me to be compassionate and to focus on helping others.
I recently told John Tan:
“Just now I was searching for my AirPod casing for quite some time, like half an hour. I searched here and there and couldn't find it. Then I prayed to a bodhisattva. I suddenly heard an inner voice confidently tell me something like, ‘Why are you searching everywhere when it’s with you right there all along?’ Then I tried to search my pockets again, for what felt like the hundredth time, but couldn't find it. Then, about half an hour later, the AirPod casing fell out from inside my jeans – I suspect it had fallen down into my pants earlier when I was in the toilet 🤣
I hear inner voices like that sometimes that I believe are from bodhisattvas when I pray sincerely.
I patted my jeans when I heard that voice but somehow didn't find it then.”
John Tan replied, “U must be something wrong, why bother bodhisattva for such a matter?”
He added, “That said, over the years, I have come to realize and believe despite my overly logical and pragmatic mind 🤣 that such "phenomena" are not uncommon in practice, it is hard to sweep all under the carpet in the name of "science" and "coincidence".”
I (Soh) responded, “I see... yes... especially since my encounter with Tara and the otherworldly fragrance when she ‘came’. And previously, when I received the Dzogchen transmission from ChNN (Chogyal Namkhai Norbu) and practiced the guru yoga of Garab Dorje for the first time, I also experienced that otherworldly fragrance. It’s hard to deny and attribute it purely to coincidence. My mother also knows that otherworldly fragrance well; I think she experienced it when chanting the Da Bei Zhou in the past.”
Further Accounts of Tara's Blessings
Besides my own experiences, countless others have had miraculous encounters with Tara. For example:
Also recently, someone on Reddit shared this experience (Link):
I did Tara practice religiously for many many months and finally one night in a dream she revealed herself to me. She came with a retinue of dozen of monks and they gave me spiritual teachings in a dream for what seemed like a long time. They told me that tenderness was one of the highest spiritual qualities. I was also visited by Yeshe Tsogyal after a retreat where we had been doing Yeshe Tsogyal prayers. She briefly put my mind into samadhi as she merged her mind with mine, and I felt the most unfathomable bliss, peace, joy, and love I had ever felt. Then she told me: "on the path to enlightenment, there will always be obstacles, but suffering is optional"
The Vajrayana View of Deities
However, it should be emphasized that Tara practice, within the Vajrayana framework, goes beyond merely praying to an external being. It is important to keep this perspective in mind and receive appropriate instructions from a qualified Vajrayana master.
Dzogchen teacher Acarya Malcolm Smith:
Tara, as a deity, is just a name for our own state. As ChNN puts it, "Tara is the state of Dzogchen."
...
When we practice deity yoga, we are realizing our own state, not the state of some other being, buddha or not.
…
There is also the fact that in kriya tantra people practice by addressing the deity as external, like Tāra, for example, for common siddhis; a kind of practice that is enjoyed by brahmins, which also depends heavily on ritual purity and so on. So, because Vajrayāna is a path of skillful means, it employs people's theistic tendencies. But this vanishes in carya tantra, where the deity is understood as a symbol of the nature of the mind and one visualizes oneself as the deity. By the time we get to HYT, this is all completely abandoned, since now we are to understand, at the time of the result, that all phenomena we experience—aggregates, sense bases, and sense elements—are the display of our own gnosis.
…
But generally, if you want mundane siddhis, then you need to practice some creation stage practice, like Tara, Kilaya, Amitayus, etc. depending on one needs.
Krodha / Kyle Dixon:
You are the deity in Vajrayāna.
…
Green Tara is a powerful practice, has benefited me greatly in times of need.
...
Let’s put it this way: they’re as real as you and I are, which ultimately isn’t real at all, but we can still ride a bike, go to the store, help someone else, etc.
...
As for Buddha nature, Buddha nature can replace God for the meantime, as long as it is understood that buddhanature is your own, personal potentiality to become a Buddha. Buddha nature or tathāgatagarbha, has many of the same qualities as the qualities the Christian God is said to have, but it is something within you.
You start with Buddha nature as like a seed inside you, and then you cultivate it and at the time of buddhahood, everything will be buddha nature, so to speak.
There are many beings, buddhas, ārya-bodhisattvas, dharmapālas, lōkapālas, etc., we can pray to for help and guidance. You can also pray to your own buddhanature, and set your intention on your own awakening so you can help to benefit and liberate all sentient beings.
Mahamudra teacher Thrangu Rinpoche:
The practice of deity meditation consists fundamentally of three elements: clear appearance of the deity’s form, stable pride or confidence, that you are the deity, and recollection of purity by recalling the deeper meaning of the various aspects of the deity. It is difficult to cultivate clear appearance and the recollection of purity in post- meditation. Therefore, the principal post-meditation practice is to maintain the stable confidence that we are actually the deity. We try to maintain the confidence that the true nature of our body, speech, and mind is the body, speech, and mind of the deity being practiced. The commentaries on deity meditation commonly state, “In post-meditation, never part from the confidence of believing you are the deity.”
SEEING OURSELVES AS THE DEITY
In practicing we are trying to ameliorate the traces of our previous wrongdoing, especially our obscurations, which consist of the cognitive obscuration and the afflictive (or emotional) obscuration. Because of the presence of these obscurations, we experience the world in an incorrect and deluded way; our experience of what we call samsara consists of deluded projections.
What we are trying to do in our practice is to transcend these deluded projections and experience the pure reality, or pure appearances, that lie behind them. It is not sufficient simply to tell ourselves, "I know that what I am experiencing is adulterated by delusion," and then to stay with these deluded projections. As long as you continue to invest energy in them they will continue, even though you recognize them, at least theoretically, to be invalid. We have to reject, to cast aside, our involvement with delusion and actually consciously attend to and cultivate attention to pure appearance. By doing so you can gradually transcend and abandon delusion.
It is for this purpose that we make use of iconography, or, in other words, deities. In the Vajrayana the deity is something very different from what we normally mean by that term. Normally when we say "deity," we imagine some kind of external protector or higher power, something superior to us, outside of us, that can somehow lift us up out of where we are and bring us to where we want to be. Therefore, concurrent with our conventional idea of deity is the assumption of our own inferiority to deities.
In comparison to the deity, we consider ourselves as an inferior, benighted being that has to be held up by something outside ourselves. But the Vajrayana notion of deity is not like that, for in the Vajrayana, practitioners visualize themselves as the deities with which they are working.
This body that you now consider to be so impure and afflicted is an extension of the nature of your mind. Therefore, in practice you consider this apparently impure body to be the body of your yidam, the deity upon whom you are meditating. Since buddha nature is the most fundamental essence of your mind, and since your body is the projection of that mind, your body is pure in nature. You acknowledge that fact in practice by imagining your body to be pure, not only in essence, but in appearance.
Through cultivating this method, eventually the actual appearance or experience of your body comes to arise in purity. The creation stage is necessary in order to work with the deluded projections in this way.
~Khenchen Thrangu Rinpoche
Update:
I shared this with my admins days ago:
"I see. I think doing some deity practice or simple ones like the 21 praises to Tara may help ward off negative influences.
I always have the feeling that Buddhas and Bodhisattvas are helping me and have had many miraculous encounters (in a waking state, not psychedelic-induced), including experiencing pleasant smells from other realms and receiving telepathic messages.
Just the other day, I had difficulty finding a cockroach that was hiding in my home. It hid from me for hours. Then, after chanting the 21 Praises, I asked Tara to please let the cockroach come out because the helper was coming to clean my place the next day, and she would definitely kill it. As soon as I finished that thought, the cockroach ran out towards me. I was able to gently catch it with a wet tissue and release it outside. I felt some compassion for the cockroach when I saw it.
Later, rereading the 21 Praises, I was reminded that it mentions warding off things like pestilence, negative entities, and so on."
Straightforward Presence
-
I was meditating in my big stuffy purple chair in front of my altar the
other day and i noticed an index card on the table next to me. An … Continue
readin...
At The Drop of This Leaf
-
Well hello there.
It's been quite a few years, I guess. I've come back to this blog time and
again but never really found much to talk about. It seems that...
Buddha alone together with Buddha
-
*Buddha alone together with Buddha*
According to Dogen reality is actualized by ‘Buddha alone together with
Buddha’ (*Yui Butsu Yo Butsu*). Huike, the se...
-
Dharmatā is adorned with vidyā, vidyā is adorned with pristine
consciousness [*ye shes*], pristine consciousness is adorned with
compassion,* also compas...
Words Point To Flow
-
I’ve recently got some emails and blog comments with concerns about the
language I use – how I talk so much about a ‘me’, and how I seemingly
imply a ‘pers...
虛
-
I transmit the Zen Dharma of Absolute Tathata (Suchness). Striking away
all words & concepts, penetrating right to the Heart of Emptiness. Pointing
out ...
Gewahrsein und Gewahrtes
-
Die meisten Leute wissen nicht, was Gewahrsein ist. Dabei ist es sehr
einfach: Gewahrsein ist das, was weiß oder sich gewahr ist, dass gerade ein
Vogel zwi...
A new dawn: the end of co-dependency
-
I dream that everyone would just step back for a few moments and simply
stop investing (read: wasting) time and energy into others and thus start
dealing w...
The Ultimate Nature of Phenomena
-
*Bdcrtgb Rcnrcrrdfvnb*
It is not existent - even the Victorious Ones do not see it.
It is not nonexistent - it is the basis of all samsara and nirvana.
This...
Four Ways of Letting Go
-
--------------------------------------
Technorati: Buddhism Buddha Buddhist Dharma Compassion Wisdom Religion
Meditation Zen Philosophy Spirituality Insp...