From “I AM” to non-duality, no-self, emptiness and spontaneous perfection
About this library
This blog is about spiritual awakening, maps and stages, the blinding effects of our strong momentum/conditioning (karmic propensities), view, realization, experience, etc. If you are new, begin with the Must Reads.
Look outward at the appearing objects, And like the water in a mirage, They are more delusive than delusion. Unreal like dreams and illusions, They resemble reflected moon and rainbows.
Look inward at your own mind. It seems quite exciting, when not examined. But when examined, there is nothing to it. Appearing without being, it is nothing but empty. It cannot be identified saying, "that's it!" But is evanescent and elusive like mist.
Look at whatever may appear In any of the ten directions. No matter how it may appear, The thing in itself, its very nature, Is the sky-like nature of mind, Beyond the projection and dissolution of thought and concept.
Laurel for me, yanny for others, “roses” are red for me, “roses” are black for dogs.
Whatever arises is "empty".
Zen Master Dogen:
In
general, then, the way of seeing mountains and waters differs according
to the type of being [that sees them]. In seeing water, there are
beings who see it as a jeweled necklace. This does not mean, however,
that they see a jeweled necklace as
water. How, then, do we see what they consider water? Their jeweled
necklace is what we see as water. Some see water as miraculous flowers,
though it does not follow that they use flowers as water. Hungry ghosts
see water as raging flames or as pus and blood. Dragons and fish see it
as a palace or a tower, or as the seven treasures or the mani gem.
[Others] see it as woods and walls, or as the dharma nature of
immaculate liberation, or as the true human body, or as the physical
form and mental nature. Humans see these as water. And these [different
ways of seeing] are the conditions under which [water] is killed or
given life.
Given that what different types of
beings see is different, we should have some doubts about this. Is it
that there are various ways of seeing one object? Or is it that we have
mistaken various images for one object? At the peak of our concentrated
effort on this, we should concentrate still more. Therefore, our
practice and verification, our pursuit of the way, must also be not
merely of one or two kinds, and the ultimate realm must also have a
thousand types and ten thousand kinds. (Bielefeldt Trans.)