Showing posts with label Zen Master Dogen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Zen Master Dogen. Show all posts

[10/3/23, 6:40:43 PM] John Tan: You and Andre are talking about philosophical concepts of permanence and impermanence.   Dogen is not talking about that.  What Dogen meant by "impermanence is buddha nature" is telling us to authenticate Buddha nature directly in the very transient phenomena -- the mountains, the trees, the sunshine, the drumbeats of footsteps, not some super awareness in wonderland.
[10/3/23, 6:41:40 PM] Soh Wei Yu: Oic..
[10/3/23, 6:43:15 PM] Soh Wei Yu: I didnt talk with andre lol
[10/3/23, 6:43:21 PM] Soh Wei Yu: Anna was talking with andre
[10/3/23, 6:44:24 PM] Soh Wei Yu: Actually what dogen said is pretty obvious imo even after initial anatta
[10/3/23, 6:44:32 PM] Soh Wei Yu: Wonder why mipham didnt emphasize that point
[10/3/23, 6:44:43 PM] Soh Wei Yu: Maybe he did with the rongzom appearances are divine
[10/3/23, 6:44:49 PM] John Tan: Different praxis

 

..........

 

p.s. some recent quotes I shared:

  • Soh Wei Yu
    Dogen does not accept an unchanging Brahman. Being a Buddhist teacher he refutes an unchanging atman-brahman:
    As my mentor Thusness/John Tan said in 2007 about Dogen, “Dogen is a great Zen master that has penetrated deeply into a very deep level of anatman.”, “Read about Dogen… he is truly a great Zen master… ...[Dogen is] one of the very few Zen Masters that truly knows.”, “Whenever we read the most basic teachings of Buddha, it is most profound. Don't ever say we understand it. Especially when it comes to Dependent Origination, which is the most profound truth in Buddhism*. Never say that we understand it or have experienced it. Even after a few years of experience in non-duality, we can't understand it. The one great Zen master that came closest to it is Dogen, that sees temporality as buddha nature, that see transients as living truth of dharma and the full manifestation of buddha nature.”
    "When you ride in a boat and watch the shore, you might assume that the shore is moving. But when you keep your eyes closely on the boat, you can see that the boat moves. Similarly, if you examine many things with a confused mind, you might suppose that your mind and nature are permanent. But when you practice intimately and return to where you are, it will be clear that there is nothing that has unchanging self.
    • ⁠Dogen"
    “Mind as mountains, rivers, and the earth is nothing other than mountains, rivers, and the earth. There are no additional waves or surf, no wind or smoke. Mind as the sun, the moon, and the stars is nothing other than the sun, the moon, and the stars.”
    • ⁠Dogen
    “For Dōgen, Buddha-nature or Busshō (佛性) is the nature of reality and all Being. In the Shōbōgenzō, Dōgen writes that “whole-being (Existence itself) is the Buddha-nature” and that even inanimate things (grass, trees, etc.) are an expression of Buddha-nature. He rejected any view that saw Buddha-nature as a permanent, substantial inner self or ground. Dōgen held that Buddha-nature was “vast emptiness”, “the world of becoming” and that “impermanence is in itself Buddha-nature”.[23] According to Dōgen: Therefore, the very impermanency of grass and tree, thicket and forest is the Buddha nature. The very impermanency of men and things, body and mind, is the Buddha nature. Nature and lands, mountains and rivers, are impermanent because they are the Buddha nature. Supreme and complete enlightenment, because it is impermanent, is the Buddha nature.[24] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dōgen#Buddha-nature
    Continued in my next post
    Dōgen - Wikipedia
    EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG
    Dōgen - Wikipedia
    Dōgen - Wikipedia

    • Reply
    • Remove Preview
    • 2d

    Soh Wei Yu
    From Bendowa, by Zen Master Dogen
    Question Ten:
    Some have said: Do not concern yourself about birth-and-death. There is a way to promptly rid yourself of birth-and-death. It is by grasping the reason for the eternal immutability of the 'mind-nature.' The gist of it is this: although once the body is born it proceeds inevitably to death, the mind-nature never perishes. Once you can realize that the mind-nature, which does not transmigrate in birth-and-death, exists in your own body, you make it your fundamental nature. Hence the body, being only a temporary form, dies here and is reborn there without end, yet the mind is immutable, unchanging throughout past, present, and future. To know this is to be free from birth-and-death. By realizing this truth, you put a final end to the transmigratory cycle in which you have been turning. When your body dies, you enter the ocean of the original nature. When you return to your origin in this ocean, you become endowed with the wondrous virtue of the Buddha-patriarchs. But even if you are able to grasp this in your present life, because your present physical existence embodies erroneous karma from prior lives, you are not the same as the sages.
    "Those who fail to grasp this truth are destined to turn forever in the cycle of birth-and-death. What is necessary, then, is simply to know without delay the meaning of the mind-nature's immutability. What can you expect to gain from idling your entire life away in purposeless sitting?"
    What do you think of this statement? Is it essentially in accord with the Way of the Buddhas and patriarchs?
    Answer 10:
    You have just expounded the view of the Senika heresy. It is certainly not the Buddha Dharma.
    According to this heresy, there is in the body a spiritual intelligence. As occasions arise this intelligence readily discriminates likes and dislikes and pros and cons, feels pain and irritation, and experiences suffering and pleasure - it is all owing to this spiritual intelligence. But when the body perishes, this spiritual intelligence separates from the body and is reborn in another place. While it seems to perish here, it has life elsewhere, and thus is immutable and imperishable. Such is the standpoint of the Senika heresy.
    But to learn this view and try to pass it off as the Buddha Dharma is more foolish than clutching a piece of broken roof tile supposing it to be a golden jewel. Nothing could compare with such a foolish, lamentable delusion. Hui-chung of the T'ang dynasty warned strongly against it. Is it not senseless to take this false view - that the mind abides and the form perishes - and equate it to the wondrous Dharma of the Buddhas; to think, while thus creating the fundamental cause of birth-and-death, that you are freed from birth-and-death? How deplorable! Just know it for a false, non-Buddhist view, and do not lend a ear to it.
    I am compelled by the nature of the matter, and more by a sense of compassion, to try to deliver you from this false view. You must know that the Buddha Dharma preaches as a matter of course that body and mind are one and the same, that the essence and the form are not two. This is understood both in India and in China, so there can be no doubt about it. Need I add that the Buddhist doctrine of immutability teaches that all things are immutable, without any differentiation between body and mind. The Buddhist teaching of mutability states that all things are mutable, without any differentiation between essence and form. In view of this, how can anyone state that the body perishes and the mind abides? It would be contrary to the true Dharma.
    Beyond this, you must also come to fully realize that birth-and-death is in and of itself nirvana. Buddhism never speaks of nirvana apart from birth-and-death. Indeed, when someone thinks that the mind, apart from the body, is immutable, not only does he mistake it for Buddha-wisdom, which is free from birth-and-death, but the very mind that makes such a discrimination is not immutable, is in fact even then turning in birth-and-death. A hopeless situation, is it not?
    You should ponder this deeply: since the Buddha Dharma has always maintained the oneness of body and mind, why, if the body is born and perishes, would the mind alone, separated from the body, not be born and die as well? If at one time body and mind were one, and at another time not one, the preaching of the Buddha would be empty and untrue. Moreover, in thinking that birth-and-death is something we should turn from, you make the mistake of rejecting the Buddha Dharma itself. You must guard against such thinking.
    Understand that what Buddhists call the Buddhist doctrine of the mind-nature, the great and universal aspect encompassing all phenomena, embraces the entire universe, without differentiating between essence and form, or concerning itself with birth or death. There is nothing - enlightenment and nirvana included - that is not the mind-nature. All dharmas, the "myriad forms dense and close" of the universe - are alike in being this one Mind. All are included without exception. All those dharmas, which serves as "gates" or entrances to the Way, are the same as one Mind. For a Buddhist to preach that there is no disparity between these dharma-gates indicates that he understands the mind-nature.
    In this one Dharma [one Mind], how could there be any differentiate between body and mind, any separation of birth-and-death and nirvana? We are all originally children of the Buddha, we should not listen to madmen who spout non-Buddhist views.
    The Heart of Dogen's Shobogenzo
    BOOKS.GOOGLE.COM.SG
    The Heart of Dogen's Shobogenzo
    The Heart of Dogen's Shobogenzo

    • Reply
    • Remove Preview
    • 2d

    Alberto Befani
    Soh Wei Yu thank you so much, this passage is so important for my understanding of Dogen! 🙏🏼




https://www.facebook.com/groups/SotoZenGlobal/posts/10160528895910692/

 

See my replies (by Soh Wei Yu):


    I don't mean to be quarrelsome here at all but I do have a concern with the bodhisattva path. The Buddha taught that enlightenment ended rebirth. The stream enterer has at the most 7 lives before parinirvana. The Buddha himself entered nirvana at the end of his life. So how can a bodhisattva who is aiming at enlightenment remain in samsara until it is empty if she gets enlightened and cuts off rebirth. Seems like a big problem.

    15 comments


  • Cynthia Wooten Wolfenbarger
    The Buddha didn't teach that.


    Into the Stream: A Study Guide on the First Stage of Awakening
    ACCESSTOINSIGHT.ORG
    Into the Stream: A Study Guide on the First Stage of Awakening
    Into the Stream: A Study Guide on the First Stage of Awakening


  • Elliot Miller
    Author
    Cynthia Wooten Wolfenbarger "The Pali Canon recognizes four levels of Awakening, the first of which is called stream entry. This gains its name from the fact that a person who has attained this level has entered the "stream" flowing inevitably to nibbana. He/she is guaranteed to achieve full awakening within seven lifetimes at most, and in the interim will not be reborn in any of the lower realms." - Thanissaro Bhikkhu


    Cynthia Wooten Wolfenbarger
    Elliot Miller this is not specifically taught in Soto Zen Buddhism, and in fact there is no belief in reincarnation that is required. We are already enlightened, we just need to realize that. And it can be a continual, iterative process. The Bodhisattva intentionally remains until all sentient beings are free. That is the intent, anyway.

    • Reply
    • 1h
    • Edited

  • Soh Wei Yu
    Cynthia Wooten Wolfenbarger Many Soto Zen Buddhists nowadays do not believe in rebirth as they are influenced by modern materialist views, however it is clear that Dogen took rebirth and karma quite literally.


  • Soh Wei Yu
    Astus shared:
    Dogen talks directly and indirectly about karma and rebirth. Some examples:
    In the Shobogenzo (tr. Nishijima-Cross, Numata edition):
    vol 1
    ch9, Keisei-sanshiki (p. 118), on the power of confession cleansing past karma
    ch10, Shoaku-makusa, the entire chapter about retribution and precepts
    ch12, Kesa-kudoku (p. 159), on the power of kesa/kashaya cleansing karma
    ch14, Sansuigyo (p. 221), different beings see in different ways
    vol 4
    ch90, Shizen-biku (p. 272), criticises Kongzi and Laozi for their ignorance of past lives
    ch84, Sanji-no-go, the whole chapter is about the karma in three times
    In the Eihei Koroku (tr. Leighton-Okumura):
    4.275 (p264); 5.383 (p340) fruit of past lives
    5.386 (p344) "If people who study Buddha Dharma have no genuine faith or true mindfulness, they will certainly dispense with and ignore [the law of] causality."
    6.437 (p392) denying karma is wrong view, zazen with wrong view is useless
    7.485 (p430); 7.517 (p460) 3 kinds of karma
    7.504 (p450) "Tathagatas never go beyond clarifying cause and effect"
    7.510 (p454) "Students of the way cannot dismiss cause and effect. If you discard cause and effect, you will ultimately deviate from practice-realization."
    7.524 (p466) rebirth of relatives by the merit of one's leaving home

  • ---------------------
     
    Shobogenzo:

    Venerable Kumaralabdha, the Nineteenth Ancestor in India, said:

    "We see both wholesome and unwholesome results in the three periods. Ordinary folks deny cause and effect when they see kind, fair-minded people suffer and die young, while violent and unjust people prosper into old age. Such ordinary folks say that neither crimes nor beneficial acts bring consequences. They do not realize that the consequences of our actions follow us for one hundred, one thousand, or ten thousand eons."
     
    We clearly know from this that Kumaralabdha does not deny cause and effect. But students today do not understand this. They do not revere or follow the ancient way. Calling themselves teachers of humans and devas, they are robbers of humans and devas—enemies of practitioners. Followers of the ancestral teaching should not instruct later generations to deny causation, because that is a crooked view, not the dharma of buddha ancestors. People fall into this crooked view because their studies are shallow.

    Nowadays, monks in China say, “Those of us who have received human bodies and encountered buddha dharma don’t remember even one or two past lives, but the wild fox on Mount Baizhang remembered as many as five hundred past lives. He did not become a fox because of past actions. Stopped at the entrance door by a golden chain [trapped by a limited view of enlightenment], he was transmigrating only in the animal realm.” Many who are regarded as great teachers talk like this, but such a view is not acceptable among buddha ancestors.

    In the realms of humans, foxes, and others, some may be born with the capacity to see past lives. Such a capacity may be the result of unwholesome action and not necessarily a seed of enlightenment. The World-Honored One has cautioned us in detail about such a point. Not to understand it reflects a lack of study. Regrettably, to know as many as one thousand or ten thousand lifetimes is not necessarily to understand buddha dharma. There are those outside the way who remember eighty thousand eons, but do not understand buddha dharma. Compared with such capacities, this fox who could recall five hundred lifetimes is not significant.

    The most serious mistake made by those who study Zen in China is to believe that a person who practices completely does not fall into cause and effect. What a pity! There have been an increasing number of those who deny cause and effect, even though they witness the Tathagata’s true dharma being transmitted from ancestor to ancestor. So, those who study the way should urgently clarify this teaching. The point of Baizhang’s words Do not ignore cause and effect is that we should not be ignorant of causation.

    Thus, the significance of practicing cause and realizing effect is clear. This is the way of buddhas and ancestors. Those who themselves have not yet clarified buddha dharma should not superficially explain it to humans and devas.

    Ancestor Nagarjuna said, “If you deny cause and effect in the worldly realm, as some people outside the way do, you negate this present life as well as future lives. If you deny cause and effect in the realm of practice, you reject the three treasures, the four noble truths, and the four fruits of shravakas.”

    Clearly know that those who deny cause and effect are outside the way, whether they are living a worldly or a renunciate life. They say that the present life is unreal and that their transient body is in this world, but that their true nature abides in enlightenment. They believe that their true nature is mind, and that mind and body are separate.

    There are also those who say that people return to the ocean of true nature when they die. Without having studied buddha dharma, they say that transmigration through birth and death ends and there are no future births after they return to the ocean of enlightenment. Those who hold this view of annihilation are outside the way. They are not buddha’s disciples even if they look like monks. They are indeed outside the buddha dharma. Because they deny cause and effect, they deny present and future lives. They deny causation because they have not studied with true teachers. Those who have studied deeply with true teachers should abandon mistaken views which deny causation. Have faith in and pay respect to the compassionate teaching of Ancestor Nagarjuna.


  • Cynthia Wooten Wolfenbarger
    Soh Wei Yu rebirth doesn't necessarily mean the same thing as reincarnation. It doesn't necessarily mean a direct one to one preservation of an individual personality or soul. Especially since Buddhism teaches no soul. Again, Zen Buddhism doesn't require you to believe anything.


  • Soh Wei Yu
    Cynthia Wooten Wolfenbarger Yes no learnt Buddhist in any of the three traditions (Theravada, Mahayana, Vajrayana) believe that a soul is reincarnated. But also, all three traditions do take rebirth and karma without soul quite literally. There is, conventionally speaking, past lives and karma. To reject these would constitute what Buddha calls "wrong view".
    It does not require a soul or agent however.
    “Empty phenomena ~ Nagarjuna
    All beings consist of causes and effects,
    In which there is no ‘sentient being’ at all.
    From phenomena which are exclusively empty,
    There arise only empty phenomena.
    All things are devoid of any ‘I’ or ‘mine’.
    Like a recitation, a candle, a mirror, a seal,
    A magnifying glass, a seed, sourness, or a sound,
    So also with the continuation of the aggregates —
    The wise should know they are not transferred.
    Nagarjuna
    The Heart of Dependent Origination, verse 4 & 5”
    Buddhaghosha:
    "Mere suffering is, not any sufferer is found
    The deeds exist, but no performer of the deeds:
    Nibbana is, but not the man that enters it,
    The path is, but no wanderer is to be seen."
    No doer of the deeds is found,
    No one who ever reaps their fruits,
    Empty phenomena roll on,
    This view alone is right and true.
    No god, no Brahma, may be called,
    The maker of this wheel of life,
    Empty phenomena roll on,
    Dependent on conditions all." Visuddhimagga XIX.


  • Soh Wei Yu
    In the ultimate sense, there do not even exist such things as
    mental states, i.e. stationary things. Feeling, perception,
    consciousness, etc., are in reality mere passing processes of feeling,
    perceiving, becoming conscious, etc., within which and outside of
    which no separate or permanent entity lies hidden.
    Thus a real understanding of the Buddha's doctrine of kamma and
    rebirth is possible only to one who has caught a glimpse of the
    egoless nature, or //anattata//, and of the conditionality, or
    //idappaccayata//, of all phenomena of existence. Therefore it is said
    in the //Visuddhimagga// (Chap. XIX):
    Everywhere, in all the realms of existence, the noble disciple
    sees only mental and corporeal phenomena kept going through the
    concatenation of causes and effects. No producer of the
    volitional act or kamma does he see apart from the kamma, no
    recipient of the kamma-result apart from the result. And he is
    well aware that wise men are using merely conventional language,
    when, with regard to a kammical act, they speak of a doer, or
    with regard to a kamma-result, they speak of the recipient of the
    result.
    No doer of the deeds is found,
    No one who ever reaps their fruits;
    Empty phenomena roll on:
    This only is the correct view.
    And while the deeds and their results
    Roll on and on, conditioned all,
    There is no first beginning found,
    Just as it is with seed and tree. ...
    No god, no Brahma, can be called
    The maker of this wheel of life:
    Empty phenomena roll on,
    Dependent on conditions all.
    In the //Milindapanha// the King asks Nagasena:
    "What is it, Venerable Sir, that will be reborn?"
    "A psycho-physical combination (//nama-rupa//), O King."
    "But how, Venerable Sir? Is it the same psycho-physical
    combination as this present one?"
    "No, O King. But the present psycho-physical combination produces
    kammically wholesome and unwholesome volitional activities, and
    through such kamma a new psycho-physical combination will be
    born."
    FUNDAMENTALS OF BUDDHISM
    ANGELFIRE.COM
    FUNDAMENTALS OF BUDDHISM
    FUNDAMENTALS OF BUDDHISM

    • Reply
    • Remove Preview
    • 45m

  • Cynthia Wooten Wolfenbarger
    Soh Wei Yu okay, so how does all of this relate to the original question about the Bodhisattva vow not making sense?


  • Soh Wei Yu
    Cynthia Wooten Wolfenbarger His question presumes that full enlightenment leads to the cessation of mindstream in parinirvana, so one cannot continue the Bodhisattva vow of helping beings after passing away from this life.
    I answered his query below.
    "In Mahayana sutras, Buddhas eventually rouse sravaka arahants from cessation to continue their path to Buddhahood, and Buddhas appear to enter parinirvana but actually continue to emanate and help suffering sentient beings as long as there is a single sentient being left in the universe. Their mindstreams do not actually cease, only delusions and afflictions cease.
    1st Bhumi [Mahayana stream entry] bodhisattvas do cut off the cause for rebirth in the lower realms and self-views like the sravaka stream entrant, and an 8th Bhumi bodhisattvas who has overcome all mental afflictions like a sravaka arahant do cut off uncontrolled cyclic rebirths, but it is not the same as the cessation of mindstream.
    It is a different understanding from Theravada which relies only on Pali canon suttas and the Sravakayana commentaries."














  • Adam Schwartz
    Who’s problem is it?


  • Dominick Fontana
    I've had the same thought. 🤔 I take, Buddha's, words to heart when he says, (roughly paraphrasing) "don't believe what I say, until, you've experienced it yourself".


  • Soh Wei Yu
    In Mahayana sutras, Buddhas eventually rouse sravaka arahants from cessation to continue their path to Buddhahood, and Buddhas appear to enter parinirvana but actually continue to emanate and help suffering sentient beings as long as there is a single sentient being left in the universe. Their mindstreams do not actually cease, only delusions and afflictions cease.
    1st Bhumi [Mahayana stream entry] bodhisattvas do cut off the cause for rebirth in the lower realms and self-views like the sravaka stream entrant, and an 8th Bhumi bodhisattvas who has overcome all mental afflictions like a sravaka arahant do cut off uncontrolled cyclic rebirths, but it is not the same as the cessation of mindstream.
    It is a different understanding from Theravada which relies only on Pali canon suttas and the Sravakayana commentaries.

  • Reply
  • 1h
  • Edited