Must Reads ↑ Top
Soh

Something I've been thinking about lately, any feedback given will be appreciated.
Lately I've just been flowing through each day completely absorbed in everything I'm doing, and then during slower moments I will contemplate or meditate on the insights that I was pointed to thanks to Soh Wei Yu and these are some of the things I've been thinking about:
Without lungs, vocal chords, and mouth, there is no "speech". No vocal chords means no voice, no mouth means no enunciation, and no lungs means no air that can carry the vocal chords' vibration that flows through the shapes of the mouth that shift the sound into different patterns.
No speech means no communication through sound. No communication through sound, and there is only silence with movement such as pointing - at least as far as we know in human experience.
No concepts, no communication. If there is not a connection of a pattern of sound made while there is a pointing toward an "object" to direct attention, then there is no concept or information gathered that that sound is another means to direct attention toward that thing.
No communication in general means no way to attempt to direct or get one's attention. If there's no way to direct attention, there's no way to grow, learn, adapt, survive, and all other things.
No molecules structured by a specific amount and set of atoms to create air... no air aha
No air, then there's nothing to carry sound, and also no life, really.
Listening to the sound of birds tweeting among each other, clearly there's some sort of communication that can't be understood. Drop the concepts of "birds" and "tweeting", and there's only sounds, forms, shapes, and colors.
When there's only sounds, forms, shapes, and colors, it's all just direct experience, Presence moving and shifting in various dimensions. One stream, ultimately.
You see two people talking but one looks confused while the other speaks. Only when the speaking person points at a direction, and simultaneously a sound pattern is spoken by the person, the one who is confused makes a motion with their head that seems to be universally understood as "Yes".
Another scenario; you see two people talking in a cafe and after a certain stream of sound patterns from one person, the other produces a "smile". Stream of sound patterns appear to flow from the smiling person, quickly, loudly, but there's an energy or atmosphere that is "light", "soft", "warm".
Another scenario; you see two people talking in the middle of a street, and you notice one person contorts there face in a certain way that makes them look "angry" after a stream of sound patterns from the other. This "angry" person becomes loud as well, but there's an energy of "heaviness", "harshness". Now streams of sound patterns burst from the two simultaneously, both faces contorted.
Drop the concepts of "people", "speech", "anger", "smiling", etc., and now there's only forms, shapes, colors, sounds, energy, and movement alone. Everything interdependent on each other, the entire universe these moments and the moments are spontaneous. You don't know the "meaning" of the sounds, you don't know the "labels" of the "forms", there's some sort of communication and some sort of reaction.
Concepts are like code but ultimately there is no need to obsess over them. It all occurs effortlessly, if there were no concepts in mind and only Presence while these interactions were occurring then it would simply be movement with no concept of concepts stored in these "forms" and influencing the movement or behaviors of them.
It's "empty".
Sound patterns triggering previously learned connections between a sound and a sense-phenomenon and now there is ability to communicate insights, knowledge, and ideas. Those connections build new connections, they're much like Lego blocks. It's all spontaneous, and it's the entire universe "doing" it.
Behaviors and movements still having certain reactions, it shows that just because it is "empty" does not mean that there aren't outcomes or consequences.
Going back to those three scenarios, you see that the interaction between two people with a language barrier ends up leading to the confused one learning a new word, which is helpful for their growth.
You see the interaction at the cafe, and there is a softness in the atmosphere that shows compassion, love, friendship - preservation.
You see the interaction of the two people on the street, and there is a harshness of the behaviors that lead to hatred, violence - destruction.
Simplified, there's "growth", "preservation", "destruction". The universe shifts in so many different ways without any specific destination or end in mind. It's all spontaneous but there are patterns you can see. Each pattern is straightforward in where it "goes".
When there is an entanglement between the senses and concepts, the pattern is confusion. Impermanence does not imply inconsistency. Setting concepts aside, if you could see a "person" walking in the world behaving in certain ways that would be deemed "successful" in the eyes of the world, but then that same person when alone appears to cry and behave in a way that implies hopelessness and imprisonment and lack of passion in their work or success, then there is clearly suffering and pain.
When the senses and concepts are entangled, the "sense of self" becomes "real". The more they unknot, the more that "sense of self" is softened or dissolved.
Everything is alive but there's no "entity".
The "universe" is not an "entity", it is a network of behavior, functions, information, communication. Damn vivid. Equalizing itself, liberating itself, enlightening itself, growing itself, preserving itself, spoiling itself, destroying itself, all based on how things fall in place.
These thoughts aren't mine, these words aren't mine, these behaviors aren't mine, this body isn't mine, nothing is "mine"; ultimately speaking there is no "me" that possesses anything.
This doesn't encourage irresponsibility or apathy, however. When taken in a specific fashion, it's seen that there is more openness. The concepts work like Lego blocks automatically, next thing you know something "clicks", then there is motivation and drive to behave a certain way. No agent who is doing the behaving.
There are moments where I'll walk back home from work and notice that everything is just happening effortlessly. Like it's not necessarily "real" that I am "an individual" in the way I've been taught deeply, but that it's all a dance of sorts that included the being raised to believe "I am an individual" separate from everything and everyone, and that that is "real", and then that this same dance has shifted its appearance that includes this post right here of the understanding on why that isn't "true".
That all there is in Presence even is a recreation of empty luminosity in the form of "memory" that implies "my past" leading up to this point. That even that's a part of the "dance".
I'm not a subject experiencing reality through an object, there is only "experiencing" which includes a stream of conceptualization that starts with "I am" to imply identity. It's just a sound pattern recreated in thought to point out a collection of memories.
And there's still absorption in each moment.

4 Comments

Soh Wei Yu
Admin
The maha sort of absorption is important. Not only a state of no mind but when it matures it is like maha. Every activity is the universe-activity.
2009:
(7:41 PM) Thusness: the oceanic feeling is important
(7:41 PM) Thusness: it is the 'maha', great, magnificent experience.
(7:42 PM) Thusness: It is the experience of oneness.
(7:42 PM) Thusness: In fact, stage 6 when stabilized give u that experience always...from moment to moment.
(7:42 PM) Thusness: crystal clarity as Oneness.
(7:43 PM) Thusness: As what i have told Star...
(7:43 PM) Thusness: the universe eats an apple.
(7:43 PM) AEN: oic..
(7:43 PM) Thusness: Every sensation becomes sacred. Maha! Great and Magnificent!
(7:45 PM) AEN: icic..
(7:46 PM) AEN: oceanic as an expansive and spacious feeling?
(7:47 PM) Thusness: nope
(7:47 PM) Thusness: as an Oneness feeling.
(7:47 PM) AEN: oic..
(7:47 PM) Thusness: as just that moment of action.
(7:47 PM) Thusness: as a dissolving into just that action.
(7:48 PM) Thusness: normally it is thought to be an absorption stage.
(7:48 PM) Thusness: That resulted due to concentration.
(7:48 PM) AEN: icic..
(7:49 PM) AEN: last time when i meditate i got a sense of expansive and spaciousness... and felt like thoughts, feelings and perceptions are just like ripples on an ocean
(7:49 PM) Thusness: But it is an every moment matter from the perfection of insight point of view.
(7:49 PM) AEN: oic..
(7:49 PM) Thusness: that is no good.
(7:50 PM) Thusness: when there is an 'I AM', u will have that feeling.
(7:50 PM) AEN: icic..
(7:50 PM) Thusness: when u know ur nature is empty-luminosity, u will see all is as 'ME'
(7:51 PM) Thusness: the "I AM" is not more 'ME' than a passing thought.
(7:51 PM) Thusness: than a passing sound. 😛
(7:51 PM) Thusness: than a moment of vibration caused by the MRT.
(7:51 PM) AEN: oic..
(7:52 PM) Thusness: than a moment of sensation when the feet touches the ground.
(7:52 PM) Thusness: This comes from stability of knowing our DO and non-dual nature.
(7:52 PM) AEN: icic..
(7:54 PM) Thusness: Phroggy is quite good.
(7:55 PM) Thusness: unfortunately he involves in too much speculations.
(7:55 PM) AEN: icic..
(7:55 PM) Thusness: sometimes we must know when to stop. 😛
(7:55 PM) Thusness: and let direct experience take over.
(7:56 PM) Thusness: and when to arise and let conceptuality takes over. 😛
(7:56 PM) Thusness: lol
...
(4:40 PM) Thusness: It is a form of samadhi, the experience of maha.
(4:40 PM) AEN: isit nonduality?
(4:41 PM) Thusness: When division and impersonality are dissolved, it is non-dual.
(4:41 PM) Thusness: Oneness is always experienced.
(4:42 PM) Thusness: and this oneness when experienced and understood correct will provide insight into our anatta nature.
(4:42 PM) Thusness: when wrongly understood, it mislead us into the belief of a common ground and source.
(4:43 PM) Thusness: Which leads to the difference between the idea of 'wave and ocean' and indra-net.
(4:43 PM) Thusness: difference
(4:44 PM) AEN: oic..
(4:44 PM) AEN: but u said one can experience non personality and yet not non dual?
(4:44 PM) Thusness: not anatta
(4:44 PM) Thusness: impersonality but not anatta or non-dual insight.
(4:44 PM) AEN: icic..
(4:46 PM) Thusness: even when the experience of impersonality matures, it does not necessarily lead to the insight of anatta. That Awareness is a verb or a process.
(4:46 PM) Thusness: There is just One Chanting.
(4:46 PM) Thusness: There is just One breathing, one breath.
(4:46 PM) Thusness: into one action...
(4:47 PM) AEN: oic..
(4:48 PM) Thusness: This maha or samadhi like experience appears to be a stage and when wrongly understood mislead one to conclude that we have a common ground. Because of the 'Oneness' experience.
(4:49 PM) Thusness: Being non-dual and impersonal and with the strength of the dualistic tendency, it is almost natural to draw such a conclusion.
(4:49 PM) AEN: icic..
(4:51 PM) Thusness: But when insight arises, it is seen that non-dual experiences are found in the most common and mundane activities.
(4:51 PM) Thusness: Like carry water and chop wood.
(4:51 PM) Thusness: Yet in chop wood and carry water, there is the experience of Oneness.
(4:51 PM) AEN: oic..
(4:51 PM) Thusness: And this is expressed in Zen.
(4:52 PM) Thusness: That in our most ordinary activities, non-dual is experienced.
(4:52 PM) AEN: ?????:
?????????,
????????,
????,
??:?????
(4:52 PM) AEN: the ???? is like u said one action?
(4:52 PM) Thusness: yes
(4:52 PM) Thusness: This is an important aspect of self-liberation too.
(4:53 PM) Thusness: or at least my third phase of spontaneous arising. 😛
(4:53 PM) Thusness: I think i wrote in ur awakeningtoreality blog i did mentioned about it last time.
(4:53 PM) AEN: oic.. when
(4:54 PM) Thusness: It is the experience as if the universe is doing the work.
(4:54 PM) Thusness: This experience must be clear and obvious in what i call the phase of spontaneous arising.
(4:55 PM) Thusness: one must first have the insight of anatta and emptiness first.
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
[9/2/16, 10:53:43 PM] Soh Wei Yu: Interesting
[9/2/16, 11:09:09 PM] Soh Wei Yu: But u said he cldnt express the actualization?
[9/2/16, 11:09:47 PM] Soh Wei Yu: The actualization is like the wisdom of compassion?
[9/2/16, 11:12:20 PM] John Tan: We can call it whatever ... Doesn't matter...but to express it with life and blood, as living experience...
[9/2/16, 11:13:51 PM] John Tan: The way of feeling with ones entire body mind, without self as total engagement...what is it like?
[9/2/16, 11:14:04 PM] John Tan: What is living fully like?
[9/2/16, 11:15:15 PM] John Tan: If anatta hasn't opened ones heart, then we will hv wasted the insight of anatta.
[9/2/16, 11:15:17 PM] Soh Wei Yu: It's like full absorption until self is totally forgotten without a trace.. Whether in seeing hearing or in action
[9/2/16, 11:15:55 PM] John Tan: U r still within the entry and exit
[9/2/16, 11:16:10 PM] John Tan: The 6 entries and exits
[9/2/16, 11:19:30 PM] John Tan: U must allow urself to live in the actual realization of anatta in engagement ... U r not engaging, still thinking, still immerse in insights and who has realized this or that, who is at what state over the years...u must fully live without self, fully actualize ur insights in engagement...
[9/2/16, 11:21:24 PM] John Tan: Then ur heart can b truly open...with wisdom of selflessness
[9/2/16, 11:21:47 PM] Soh Wei Yu: Oic..
[9/2/16, 11:22:10 PM] John Tan: Otherwise practice yoga
[9/2/16, 11:23:31 PM] John Tan: Clear the obscurations of the body like how the 7 phases of insights clear away all those mental constructs
[9/2/16, 11:23:57 PM] John Tan: To complement ur insights
[9/2/16, 11:25:15 PM] John Tan: When hearing sound without self in anatta, what is it like?
[9/2/16, 11:33:48 PM] Soh Wei Yu: There is just the living sound which is crystal clear, there is no distance but rather ones whole life is the sound and other senses interwoven seamlessly and arising spontaneously
[9/2/16, 11:49:44 PM] John Tan: How u feel?
[9/2/16, 11:55:55 PM] John Tan: Not "the insight of anatta is not enough..." But anatta cannot stay as an merely an insight but actualized
[10/2/16, 12:01:58 AM] Soh Wei Yu: Oic..
[10/2/16, 12:02:51 AM] Soh Wei Yu: It's liberating. Like any sense of self and heaviness is released and instead there is absorption into the details and textures of the experience without any sense of a self or background
[10/2/16, 12:03:36 AM] John Tan: Liberating...what else?
[10/2/16, 12:03:55 AM] Soh Wei Yu: Clear, vivid, alive
[10/2/16, 12:04:08 AM] John Tan: What else?
Soh Wei Yu
Admin
[16/5/18, 11:32:57 PM] John Tan: If u put in all ur your heart into washing plates and toilets for few years, u might hv matured ur experiential insight of total exertion, non-action and strong samadhi.
[17/5/18, 12:15:53 AM] Soh Wei Yu: Oic..
[17/5/18, 1:56:59 PM] Soh Wei Yu: Ken wilber Say during his early years he was dish washer and into Zen and it helped his practice
[17/5/18, 1:57:06 PM] Soh Wei Yu: And had satori or nondual awakening then
[17/5/18, 1:57:20 PM] Soh Wei Yu: He say dish washing is very Zen job lol
[17/5/18, 1:57:35 PM] Soh Wei Yu: Maybe because doesn’t require much thinking. Programming requires a lot of thinking lol
[17/5/18, 1:57:40 PM] John Tan: Depends
[17/5/18, 1:59:28 PM] John Tan: Becomes more important after realization and given to those realized
[17/5/18, 2:02:37 PM] Soh Wei Yu: Oic..
[17/5/18, 8:58:01 PM] Soh Wei Yu: My Friend working in Accenture always OT to 4am, 5am almost like daily and work on weekends and hasn’t been sleeping well for half a year. Still got discipline to go exercise, Swimming, gym, etc. I told him he is my inspiration. I OT a bit tired already hahahah
[17/5/18, 9:43:36 PM] John Tan: Lol yeah that is more imp
[17/5/18, 9:47:04 PM] Soh Wei Yu: Discipline?
[17/5/18, 9:49:54 PM] John Tan: Yes and persistency
Being-Time by Shinshu Roberts
AWAKENINGTOREALITY.COM
Being-Time by Shinshu Roberts
Being-Time by Shinshu Roberts
    • Reply
    • Remove Preview
    • 12m








  • Soh

     

     

    Session Start: Saturday, January 31, 2009

     

    (10:04 PM) AEN:              hi wat u tink about this article: http://www.easwaran.org/page/32

    (4:00 AM) AEN:              http://www.realization.org/page/namedoc0/serv_joa/joa_10.htm

    (4:09 AM) AEN: next page, the author spoke of the problem of resting in background http://www.realization.org/page/namedoc0/serv_joa/joa_11.htm

    his story is v interesting i read from the first page until here :P

    (4:10 AM) AEN: its his journal of awakening

    (4:15 AM) AEN: in that page he also talk about letting go of control

    (4:19 AM) AEN:              http://www.realization.org/page/namedoc0/serv_joa/joa_12.htm -- he talked about transcending duality totally here

     

    Session Start: Sunday, February 01, 2009

     

    (10:55 AM) Thusness:    The experience is there but the clarity in terms of insight of our nature is still not there yet.  When one has not matured the experience of anatta, emptiness, it is difficult to see the real causes and conditions of non-dual experience and 'effortlessness' of this experience.

    (10:56 AM) AEN:             oic..

    (10:58 AM) Thusness:    the url u send me yesterday about science and buddhism i think is quite good.  But direct experience is more important

    (10:58 AM) AEN:             icic..

    (10:58 AM) Thusness:    what is the url again?

    (10:58 AM) AEN:             http://www.easwaran.org/page/32

    (10:59 AM) Thusness:    But the experience the author is moving from "I AMness" into seeing the non-dual aspect of this "I AMness"

    (11:00 AM) AEN:             the science one?

    (11:00 AM) Thusness:    The 'center' is still very much there.  It is intertwined into his experience of non-duality.

    nope in the realization.org

    (11:00 AM) AEN:             oic..

    (11:01 AM) Thusness:    The glimpse of transparency is there but there is no permanent lucidity.

    (11:01 AM) AEN:             he said "I'd like to mention something about the sense of "continuity" or oneness. I had a "dorje" like, lightning in a dark night, kind of insight about a month after I transitioned to a background Awakening with Arjuna last April, leading me to see the "continuity" or "no difference" between, consciousness, attention, space and objects. What I am talking about now is different, however. That previous flash occurred within the context

    (11:01 AM) Thusness:    I do not know how is his progress now, but at the time of writing, it is still not really there.

    (11:01 AM) AEN:             of a background realization, and the sense of "being in the background" remained. It was as if the insight was analogous to taking a core sample of the ocean floor from a boat - the insight was the cable, which extended out into the ocean floor, but "I" remained in the boat. Even though the insight led to a similar recognition, is far different when, in the full realization, you "are" the

    objects, not separate from them by any background cave. In the previous case, the locus of my self-nature remained in the background, whereas now, that locus of self-nature, heart, whatever, is interspersed in objects. So basically what I am saying here is that similar insights from the position of background and foreground may

    lead one to the conclusion that these are identical realizations, but my own experience has shown them to be very different, based on the metaphors of "fission" (background realization, the culmination of the sifting

    out, neti-neti process) and "fusion" (the marriage of one's self-nature, consciousness, with objects). But try to tell that to an Advaitic realizer!!

    (11:02 AM) Thusness:    Yes i read that.

    (11:02 AM) AEN:             icic..

    (11:03 AM) Thusness:    means he is very clear about this experience of witness and phenomena but is not clear that witness is really the phenomena.

    means he is clear about "I AMness" as the background is not it.

    (11:03 AM) AEN:             oic..

    (11:03 AM) Thusness:    problem lies in the not realising what is the tendency.

    (11:04 AM) AEN:             icic..

    (11:04 AM) Thusness:    and the experience of anatta.

    (11:06 AM) Thusness:    Actually after another 10 years of experiences, given his sincerity, his experiences should already be fairly mature.

    The 'center' is the result of karma.

    (11:06 AM) Thusness:    requires DO to break this entirely.

    (11:07 AM) AEN:             oic..

    he wrote that in 1995

    (11:08 AM) AEN:             heres another writing by him http://www.heartspace.org/writings/essays/2001/HeartSpaceOSKA.html .... but his website not updated since 2001. he is now into dzogchen and mahamudra

    (11:09 AM) Thusness:    If he is into Mahamudra, then he is safe and there. :)

    (11:10 AM) AEN:             ic.. yeah.. in more recent years since 1996 he started to learn from a number of tibetan masters

    (11:10 AM) Thusness:    This is a good illustration that one even without understanding will come out those techniques similar to what that is described in Dzogchen and Mahamudra.

    (11:11 AM) Thusness:    Then when he meets Mahamudra or Dzogchen, immediately he recognized the profundity of these teachings.

    He will progress very fast from there.

    (11:11 AM) AEN:             icic..

    (11:12 AM) Thusness:    What he urgently need is to have correct view to integrate the base of all his experiences.

    (11:12 AM) Thusness:    and truly understand emptiness to correctly transform his experience into empty luminosity.

    (11:12 AM) AEN:             but those who learn from mahamudra and dzogchen not necessarily will integrate the view rite... like ken wilber also learnt under a few dzogchen masters

    (11:13 AM) AEN:             and even got his experience authenticated by at least one of them

    (11:13 AM) Thusness:    But emptiness must be stressed as DO to him.

    (11:13 AM) AEN:             oic

    (11:14 AM) Thusness:    because of his experience, he might skewed his understanding towards Advaita sort of understanding therefore for him, DO must be emphasized instead of simply talk about the unfindable, ungraspable, insubstantiality.

    (11:14 AM) AEN:             icic..

    (11:15 AM) AEN:             he talk about non locality also http://www.heartspace.org/misc/IndraNet.html

    (11:16 AM) Thusness:    haha...that website by him ah?

    (11:16 AM) AEN:             yea

    (11:16 AM) Thusness:    then he is there liao lah

    (11:16 AM) AEN:             oic

    (11:17 AM) Thusness:    read point 2 and 3

    :P

    (11:18 AM) AEN:             ok..

    what about it

    (11:20 AM) Thusness:    means he clearly knows the difference.

    (11:20 AM) AEN:             the difference of what?

    (11:26 AM) Thusness:    Advaita and Vedanta

    (11:27 AM) AEN:             u mean advaita and buddhism?

    (11:27 AM) Thusness:    yeah

    (11:28 AM) AEN:             icic..

    (11:29 AM) Thusness:    However as at that date, his spiritual journals are so so only. :P

    (11:29 AM) AEN:             oic..

    (11:39 AM) Thusness:    I have told u the 3 important phase of enlightenment, what are those?

    (11:40 AM) AEN:             u mean the mirror analogy one?

    (11:40 AM) Thusness:    no, from very beginning i already told u.

    (11:41 AM) Thusness:    even b4 jonls i think.

    (11:41 AM) AEN:             non duality, then emptiness, then spontaneous arising

    ?

    (11:41 AM) Thusness:    yes

    (11:41 AM) AEN:             or abiding presence

    icic

    (11:41 AM) Thusness:    I told u not to talk about spontaneous arising because it will be misunderstood.

    (11:41 AM) AEN:             oic

    (11:42 AM) Thusness:    there is no need to tell how much u know and what is being experienced unless time is right then communication will be meaningful.

    (11:42 AM) Thusness:    u cannot tell someone that absolutely nothing needs to be done and all is always and already is.

    (11:43 AM) Thusness:    I din not write it down in the six stages although i told u about it.

    (11:43 AM) Thusness:    so what are the conditions to see whether a person is ready?

    (11:43 AM) AEN:             non dual and emptiness?

    (11:44 AM) Thusness:    actually i told u is anatta.

    (11:44 AM) AEN:             oic

    (11:44 AM) Thusness:    so when u see a person is still in "I AMness", do u talk about spontaneous arising?

    (11:45 AM) AEN:             no

    (11:45 AM) Thusness:    why?

    (11:45 AM) AEN:             bcos it will be misunderstood rite

    (11:45 AM) Thusness:    in what sense?

    (11:45 AM) AEN:             more like things automatically entering and leaving awareness but awareness just remain

    ?

    (11:46 AM) Thusness:    because this experience occurs in every phase.

    (11:46 AM) AEN:             oic..

    (11:46 AM) Thusness:    therefore everyone will think that he gets it.

    (11:47 AM) Thusness:    even now, all things are spontaneously perfected, does it mean that u get it?

    (11:47 AM) AEN:             no

    (11:47 AM) Thusness:    all ignorance and wisdom are spontaneously manifested even now.

    (11:47 AM) AEN:             oic..

    (11:48 AM) Thusness:    so what does spontaneous arising mean?

    (11:48 AM) Thusness:    and why it is at the last of the insight?

    (11:49 AM) AEN:             spontaneous arising is everything manifesting on its own accord due to conditions?

    (11:49 AM) Thusness:    no

    (11:50 AM) Thusness:    why only after the direct experience and maturing of anatta and emptiness insight?

    (11:51 AM) AEN:             not sure

    (11:52 AM) Thusness:    because it is referring to anatta and emptiness are always spontaneously manifested

    (11:52 AM) Thusness:    whatever arises are always non-dual luminosity and emptiness

    (11:53 AM) AEN:             oic..

    (11:53 AM) Thusness:    a practitioner will at the last phase come to this.

    (11:54 AM) Thusness:    because during the journey of practice, he will always want to grasp or sustain these 2 experiences.

    (11:54 AM) Thusness:    but if we do not have direct and mature insight of anatta and emptiness, how are we to know?

    for anatta and emptiness are always manifesting yet we do not see.

    (11:55 AM) Thusness:    Therefore the first step is thorough seeing

    if u do not know anatta and how is it like, how are u to know?

    (11:55 AM) AEN:             oic..

    (11:55 AM) Thusness:    if u do not know emptiness and there is no direct experience of emptiness, how do u know?

    (11:56 AM) AEN:             so actually spontaneous arising is just the complete and thorough insight of anatta and emptiness rite?

    (11:56 AM) AEN:             oic

    (11:56 AM) Thusness:    nope

    (11:57 AM) Thusness:    yet when emptiness and non-dual luminosity is sufficiently clear, a practitioner can still be 'concentrative' and efforting.

    u will realise that later in ur practice.

    (11:57 AM) AEN:             icic..

    (11:57 AM) Thusness:    until u really know what is stage 6.

    (11:58 AM) Thusness:    and that is what i told u about article i said is good.

    (11:58 AM) Thusness:    stage 6 is the true experience of what is being described.

    (11:58 AM) AEN:             oic..

    (11:59 AM) Thusness:    so what is most important in the article?

    (11:59 AM) AEN:             dependent origination?

    (11:59 AM) Thusness:    what is it like in actual experience?

    (11:59 AM) AEN:             non-local, interdependent..?

    (12:00 PM) Thusness:    what does anatta (non-dual luminosity) and emptiness lead one to?

    no lah

    what is said in the article?

    (12:01 PM) AEN:              empty of a self? everything reflects everything else? i dunno :P

    (12:01 PM) Thusness:    because u do have real experience, u cannot understand the essence.

    (12:01 PM) AEN:              oic..

    phil is stage 6 now rite

    (12:02 PM) Thusness:    that is why u r unable to see and missed out the importance of it.

    (12:02 PM) AEN:              oic

    (12:02 PM) Thusness:    i mean that vedanta and buddhism comparison article lah

    (12:02 PM) Thusness:    dunno what rinpoche

    (12:02 PM) AEN:              orhh

    hahaha

    (12:03 PM) Thusness:    like the post i wrote to jonls, many will not understand

    but ppl like tony parsons will. :)

    and hopefully jonls knows what i meant.

    (12:03 PM) AEN:              oic..

    (12:04 PM) Thusness:    so what is most important in that article?

    (12:04 PM)         Thusness is now Online

    (12:07 PM) Thusness:    i do not want u to have knowledge regarding who is right or wrong and all those comments and challenges made to other religions and traditions.

    I never want u to get into that.

    (12:08 PM) AEN:              finding back the link :P

    icic..

    (12:08 PM) Thusness:    i am only interested in opening up ur wisdom of what is the truth of Awareness and directly point to it.

    (12:09 PM) AEN:              oic..

    (12:10 PM) AEN:              the article talks about the unfindability of all phenomena as the ultimate truth?

    (12:10 PM) Thusness:    read stage 6.

    and my comments

    all the points are inside but it is difficult to see.

    (12:11 PM) AEN:              oic..

    (12:11 PM) AEN:              ya he talked about advaita seeing phenomena as illusion but brahman as ultimately real

    so its like escaping maya and seeking the mirror?

    but buddhism is in seeing the nature of all phenomena... as empty

    (12:11 PM) AEN:              no ultimate brahman apart from phenomena? its just realising the true nature of all phenomena

    (12:12 PM) Thusness:    nope

    read again

    (12:13 PM) Thusness:    because we do not know, we walk the wrong path, practice the wrong way and have the wrong understanding.

    (12:13 PM) AEN:              oic..

    (12:14 PM) AEN:              the maya is our buddha nature?

    (12:15 PM) Thusness:    what does that mean?

    (12:15 PM) AEN:              there is no escape from maya and no background reality to seek? its a matter of realising the nature of maya

    (12:15 PM) Thusness:    so what does that mean?

    (12:16 PM) AEN:              no efforting, spontaneous perfection?

    everything is already empty and non dual

    (12:16 PM) Thusness:    no no

    i did not talk about spontaneous arising

    (12:17 PM) AEN:              icic..

    (12:18 PM) AEN:              i dunnu :P

    (12:19 PM) Thusness:    This is because u r seeing from the angle of what is being taught and not what is being actually experienced.

    therefore there is no true seeing.

    (12:20 PM) AEN:              oic..

    (12:20 PM) Thusness:    what u see is DO, emptiness and non-dual, ur mind is therefore trapped.

    (12:20 PM) Thusness:    This is how our mind is trapped and prevents the seeing.

    (12:20 PM) AEN:              icic..

    (12:20 PM) Thusness:    when we are trapped in non-dual, we can't see emptiness.

    (12:21 PM) Thusness:    even it is clearly mentioned, it can't be seen.

    (12:21 PM) AEN:              oic..

    (12:22 PM) AEN:              so what does that mean? :P

    (12:23 PM) Thusness:    reality is like an illusion.

    but not an illusion.

    it is like a dream

    but not a dream.

    (12:24 PM) Thusness:    Everything is a magical display.

    And everything is mind. :)

    (12:24 PM) AEN:              icic..

    (12:24 PM) Thusness:    What does that mean?

    (12:25 PM) Thusness:    The mind is always wrongly understood.

    from "I AM" to non-dual experience.

    (12:25 PM) Thusness:    We cannot understand the truth of this mind therefore we can't see mind.

    (12:26 PM) Thusness:    just like u can't see the essence of the article.

    (12:26 PM) AEN:              oic..

    (12:26 PM) Thusness:    we have a pre-conception.

    Everything is mind.

    (12:26 PM) Thusness:    And Everything is like a magical display

    that is why i said there is no mirror, there is only reflection.

    the key is to know the nature of mind.

    (12:27 PM) Thusness:    to see that everything is reflection, transience

    (12:28 PM) Thusness:    Everything is Mind is what that must be derived from anatta and emptiness.

    (12:28 PM) Thusness:    but we do not know what "everything" is and what mind is.

    (12:28 PM) Thusness:    therefore we cannot 'see' and cannot experience.

    we cannot see the essence of it.

    (12:29 PM) Thusness:    so anatta and emptiness are taught.

    (12:29 PM) AEN:              icic..

    (12:29 PM) Thusness:    what is Everything?

    it is like magical display, like an illusion.

    but it is not an illusion.

    (12:29 PM) Thusness:    like a dream but not a dream which many misunderstood.

    (12:31 PM) Thusness:    therefore when we experience sounds, thoughts, see colors, forms, dimension and shapes...all is empty

    like an illusion.

    like dreams

    like the 'redness' of a flower

    (12:31 PM) Thusness:    like the 'selfness'

    like the 'hereness'

    like the 'nowness'

    yet empty, nothing real

    (12:32 PM) Thusness:    if u can't totally see that pristineness, that non-dual, that luminosity

    (12:32 PM) Thusness:    and see only emptiness, u r mistaken

    (12:33 PM) Thusness:    the 'redness', the 'nowness', the 'hardness', the coldness, all are as luminous, as clear, as vivid

    we must fully experience it

    (12:34 PM) Thusness:    yet they are not real, nothing concrete, no solidity, nothing substantial, nothing graspable, no findable

    empty

    (12:34 PM) Thusness:    thus non-dual luminosity and emptiness

    (12:35 PM) Thusness:    we see this union, in all transience

    passing phenomena

    in emotions

    (12:35 PM) Thusness:    in feelings

    in thoughts

    in sounds

    in sight,

    in color

    in dimension

    in shapes

    in taste

    (12:35 PM) Thusness:    in hardness, coldness

    in sweetness

    in sky

    in the sound of chirping bird

    all experience are like that

    (12:36 PM) Thusness:    empty yet luminous

    then we realise that it is the same as mind

    it is mind

    (12:36 PM) Thusness:    if we din see these 2 nature of mind thoroughly

    we can't see

    (12:36 PM) Thusness:    we distant

    we seek

    we find

    because of its emptiness nature, the manifold, we cannot know what mind is

    (12:37 PM) Thusness:    therefore the ground is taught, the view is taught

    (12:37 PM) Thusness:    empty yet non-dual luminosity

    so that u can see and experience directly that the transience are mind

    (12:38 PM) Thusness:    yet there is no self nature

    get it?

    (12:38 PM) AEN:              think so

    (12:38 PM) Thusness:    then u experience what is one taste

    (12:38 PM) AEN:              oic..

    (12:38 PM) Thusness:    Because we do not know what mind is, we cannot experience mind.

    we do not know

    that is why insight is important

    (12:39 PM) Thusness:    however if u do not know what is non-dual luminosity and emptiness, how is a practitioner going to experience mind everywhere

    and know that whatever arises is mind?

    (12:40 PM) Thusness:    therefore first anatta (non-dual luminosity), then emptiness, then spontaneous arising

    (12:40 PM) AEN:              icic..

    (12:41 PM) Thusness:    do u understand what i mean?

    (12:41 PM) AEN:              ya i tink so

    (12:42 PM) Thusness:    read the article

    (12:44 PM) AEN:              ok